Search Results

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5060 Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Smartphone Review: Pixel Perfect : The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL A Good All-Rounder SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro (€700+)  Entry Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Quick Summary The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL stands out with its sleek, premium design, continuing Google's tradition of minimalist aesthetics and excellent build quality. It features a 6.80" LTPO OLED, promising vibrant colours and a smooth 120Hz adaptive refresh rate for a top-tier viewing experience. Additionally, its durable build, complete with IP68 water and dust resistance, ensures that it's both stylish and practical for everyday use. Despite its size, the phone should feel comfortable in hand, making it an excellent choice for those who prefer larger smartphones. Performance-wise, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is powered by the latest version of Google's Tensor G4, ensuring fast, efficient multitasking and AI-driven enhancements. This chipset will provide high-speed processing for daily tasks and enable advanced features like real-time language translation, on-device voice commands, and computational photography. Paired with up to 12GB of RAM and 5G support, the phone will be future-proofed for years of fast and reliable performance. Being known for its camera capabilities, this smartphone has three cameras on the back: a 50MP OIS primary (1x-2x), a 48MP ultrawide, and a 48MP 5x telephoto. Multi-zone LDAF assists all three cameras. The primary camera can capture 8K video, a feature not available on the Pixel 9. The selfie camera has also been upgraded to a 42MP camera with autofocus capabilities. Google's AI enhancements like Night Sight and Super Res Zoom will push mobile photography to new heights. Coupled with solid battery life, fast charging, and seamless integration with the latest Android version, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL will appeal to users looking for a premium, AI-driven smartphone experience. Pros Cons Great battery life of 2 days of use with fast charging Storage only starts from 128GB Launched with Android 14 Adequate camera performance still could be improved Upgraded Selfie Camera Seven years of OS, security and Pixel Drop updates   ViserMark Labels for the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL : Battery Life: The phone's total usage time is 49 hours, which equals two days and 1 hour. The phone has a good battery life, especially for users who use their phone moderately or heavily throughout the day. Battery Charging: The Pixel 9 Pro XL charges in 1 hour and 44 minutes, which means it offers a fast charging experience and allows users to recharge the phone quickly. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The phone scored 44/100 for battery performance and achieved a high battery efficiency rating. This indicates that the phone manages power well, optimising energy use to extend battery life. Additionally, the 3.3 kWh/annum energy consumption is energy-efficient for day-to-day operations. Specification Overview  - Released Date: August 2024 Body: 162.8 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm , weight 221g. Corning® Gorilla® Glass Victus® 2 cover Display : 6.8 inches, LTPO OLED, 120Hz with HDR10+ and 1344 x 2992 resolution. IP68 Dust and Water-resistant with fingerprint-resistant coating. Operating System : Android 14. Chipset :   Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) , Octa-core processor Memory : 128GB 16GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM Connectivity :  5G, Wi-Fi 6, eSIM, Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Stereo Speakers: Yes. Camera : Set-up - Main: 50MP (wide), Telephoto: 48 MP, Ultra wide angle: 48 MP with dual pixel PDAF, Multi-zone LDAF, OIS . Video 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps Front Camera:  42 MP and Video 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps. Battery : 5060mAh, 45W wired. Also, with 23W wireless (w/ Pixel Stand), 12W wireless (w/Qi-compatible charger), as well as reverse wireless. Colour : Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL achieved a battery performance score of 44/100 in ViserMark testing, indicating decent but not exceptional battery life compared to other flagship smartphones. This score reflects real-world battery efficiency, where the smartphone balances power consumption with performance throughout various tasks. Compared to similar Flagship smartphones, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL outperforms its predecessor, the Google Pixel 8 Pro , which scored 41/100, demonstrating improved battery management and longevity. However, it still falls behind the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , which achieved a higher 49/100 score. This suggests that while the Pixel 9 Pro XL is competitive with enhanced battery features, rival phones like Samsung's flagships may offer slightly better battery optimisation, especially for heavy smartphone users. Overall, the Pixel 9 Pro XL is a solid option for users seeking good performance and battery efficiency but may not offer quite the battery life compared to other high-end smartphones. 2. Battery Life In the ViserMark's battery life testing, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL performed exceptionally well providing continuous use for 2 days or 49 hours. This places it as a top performer in the flagship smartphone tier, ensuring users can depend on the phone for extended periods without frequent recharging. When compared to other flagship smartphones, the Pixel 9 Pro XL matches the battery life of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , both delivering two days of use. This represents a significant improvement over the Google Pixel 8 Pro, which only offers 1.5 days of battery life. The average battery life in the Flagship/Pro Tier category is approximately 1.58 days, making the Pixel 9 Pro XL stand out. Regarding battery life translated to hours, the Pixel 9 Pro XL exceeds 49 hours, closely matched by the Galaxy S24 Ultra at 52 hours. The Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly surpasses the Google Pixel 8 Pro, which provides only 38 hours of usage. Overall, the  Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  offers excellent endurance, making it one of the best choices for users who prioritise long-lasting battery life in a premium smartphone. 3.   Battery Consumption The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Google Pixel 8 Pro were compared in terms of battery performance, examining their power usage during various daily activities. The analysis, conducted using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , highlighted power consumption during social media usage, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing tasks. Social Media & Communication: The power efficiency for social media use is significantly improved in the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL compared to the Pixel 8 Pro . This indicates better optimisation for apps that involve continuous background activity, scrolling, and media consumption, making the newer device more suitable for users who spend extended periods on social media. Additionally, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes less battery for outgoing calls and multimedia messaging (MMS), showing its enhanced power management for communication-based tasks. Media & Entertainment: One area of significant improvement is in media playback, especially for YouTube and general media player usage. The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes notably less power than the Pixel 8 Pro, providing better battery performance for users who often stream videos or listen to music. This enhancement is important for users who want entertainment, as the newer smartphone allows for longer playback times without needing a recharge. Productivity: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL performs more efficiently during web browsing and email tasks than its predecessor. This improvement in power management means that users relying heavily on their smartphones for work-related tasks, such as checking emails or conducting research online, will experience longer battery life between charges. Additionally, it offers marginally better battery efficiency for tasks like file transfers, reducing the power drain when moving large amounts of data. Camera & Messaging: When using the camera, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 's power consumption is notably lower than the Pixel 8 Pro, demonstrating significant improvements in photography-related power management. This is a key advantage for users who frequently use their smartphones for photography. In SMS messaging, both devices show similar power consumption, but the Pixel 9 Pro XL's slight efficiency gain means longer battery life for everyday tasks. In conclusion, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has significantly improved battery management for various daily tasks compared to the Pixel 8 Pro . Users will especially appreciate the improved efficiency in social media usage, media playback, and productivity tasks, resulting in longer battery life and fewer interruptions for charging. These enhancements in the newer smartphone showcase Google's commitment to providing better power management for both leisure and work-related activities, making the Pixel 9 Pro XL a more dependable choice for all-day use. The detailed battery performance comparison between the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra highlights how leading brands' flagship devices manage power during a range of everyday tasks. Social Media & Communication: Both smartphones show comparable performance in terms of battery consumption for social media, with the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra consuming similar amounts of power. For outgoing calls, however, the Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes less energy than the S24 Ultra, making it a slightly more efficient choice for voice communication. Multimedia & Entertainment: The   Google Pixel 9 Pro XL shows superior efficiency in media playback, including watching YouTube videos and listening to music on the media player. It consumes less battery for gaming, suggesting better efficiency and optimisation for resource-intensive activities. Gamers will benefit from the Pixel 9 Pro XL's ability to conserve power during long gaming sessions. Productivity Tasks: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra performs better in email and consumes less power than the Pixel 9 Pro XL, which may make it a more efficient choice for productivity-focused users. It also exhibits slightly lower energy consumption for web browsing, offering better battery performance for users who spend more time browsing the internet on their phones. Camera & Messaging: In camera usage, the   Google Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes significantly more power than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, which suggests that the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is more efficient in photography and video capture. For tasks like SMS, both devices perform similarly, with minor differences in power consumption. For users, the choice between these two smartphones ultimately comes down to personal usage patterns. The key takeaway is that both brands offer competitive phones, and understanding these battery performance differences can significantly impact a user’s daily experience with their smartphone. The detailed battery performance comparison between the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , Google Pixel 8 Pro, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the average battery consumption for flagship smartphones (indicated by various colours) reveals how each device manages power during daily tasks. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: When it comes to social media usage, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (blue) is the most efficient in terms of battery consumption compared to the Google Pixel 8 Pro (light blue), the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (orange), and the average flagship consumption (green). This makes the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL the best option for users who spend significant time on social media. Additionally, the Pixel 9 Pro XL continues to outperform the other phones for outgoing calls, showcasing Google's improvement in optimising battery life for communication tasks. Gaming & Multimedia: Regarding gaming, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL stands out for its efficiency, using less power compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Pixel 8 Pro. This indicates that it is well-optimised for intense gaming, making it a solid choice for gamers. Also, for multimedia consumption, especially for tasks like watching YouTube and using media players, the Pixel 9 Pro XL uses significantly less power, making it the top choice for users who frequently stream videos or consume media on their devices. The Pixel 8 Pr o is less efficient in these tasks, using more battery power than the Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Galaxy S24 Ultra. Productivity & Web Usage: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, with its superior efficiency in email usage, stands out against the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , which is still competitive but uses slightly more power. However, both the Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Galaxy S24 Ultra perform similarly in web browsing, a crucial aspect for users heavily reliant on internet usage. This similarity in performance reassures users about the capabilities of both devices. The Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Galaxy S24 Ultra are competitive leaders in battery efficiency for productivity-related tasks, with the average flagship performance falling between the two. Camera Usage & Messaging: In terms of camera usage, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has the best battery efficiency. It uses less power than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Pixel 8 Pro, making it the ideal choice for users who frequently use their smartphones for photography or videography. As for SMS messaging, all smartphones are relatively similar, with minor differences in power consumption. This means that basic messaging tasks are efficiently handled across all flagship devices. The average flagship consumption (green) serves as a key benchmark to evaluate the overall efficiency of these leading smartphones. Both the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra perform above the average in many tasks, showcasing their competitiveness in the flagship category. Overall, the Pixel 8 Pro shows room for improvement compared to its successor but remains competitive in key areas. Users should choose based on their daily usage needs, with the Pixel 9 Pro XL excelling in entertainment and browsing, and the Galaxy S24 Ultra performing best in gaming and productivity. 4.   Battery Efficiency ViserMark tested the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and awarded it a 1-leaf rating for battery efficiency, indicating relatively low efficiency compared to a potential maximum of 5 leaves. This rating reflects the device's energy conservation during regular use. In the efficiency comparison chart, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  performed similarly to the Flagship/Pro Tier category average, providing 1 hour of efficient usage. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra topped the comparison with higher efficiency, lasting 1.5 hours, while the Google Pixel 8 Pro lagged, managing only 0.5 hours of efficient use. These results suggest that while the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL offers decent battery efficiency for most tasks, it could improve its energy conservation, especially compared to competitors like the Galaxy S24 Ultra. For users, this means that although the Pixel 9 Pro XL offers good battery life, it may consume energy faster during heavy or continuous usage, affecting overall efficiency. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The ViserMark label indicates that the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL uses 3.3 kWh of energy annually. This number represents the amount of energy the device uses over a year. A lower value means better energy efficiency, potentially resulting in lower electricity costs for the user. Compared to other flagship smartphones, the Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes more energy than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , which has an annual consumption of 3.1 kWh, making it more energy-efficient. However, it outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro , which has an annual consumption of 4.3 kWh, indicating that the Pixel 9 Pro XL is a more energy-efficient upgrade. The average for the general Flagship/Pro Tier category is around 3.8 kWh, showing that this smartphone is more efficient than most of its competitors in the Flagship smartphone range. For users interested in saving on energy costs or concerned about their environmental impact, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL offers a good balance between performance and energy efficiency. ViserMark VERDICT The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - what's it like to use? The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL offers a well-rounded experience that excels in daily efficiency, particularly in social media, playback, and web browsing. For users who spend hours scrolling through apps, streaming videos, or browsing the internet, the Pixel 9 Pro XL stands out with impressive battery optimization. Thanks to its balanced power consumption, it easily lasts a full day of mixed usage, allowing users to seamlessly transition from entertainment to productivity without worrying about constant recharging. When compared to its competitors such as the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , the Pixel 9 Pro XL stands out for its superior media performance while also being competitive in other important areas. While the Galaxy S24 Ultra is more efficient for tasks like photography and professional use such as email, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL excels in handling social apps, video playback, and gaming performance, making it a great choice for users who prioritize these features. The Pixel 9 Pro XL is not just a smartphone; it is a reliable, everyday companion that provides a seamless, long-lasting experience, making it an appealing option for users seeking a phone that balances productivity and entertainment. Pros Cons Extended battery life without frequent charging. Gaming Efficiency: compared to competitors, it is less efficient for extended gaming sessions. Outstanding Media Performance: Excels in media playback, offering superior battery efficiency for activities like streaming videos and listening to music. Productivity Tasks: Tasks like file transfers and professional use (e.g., email) consume more power. Features a 6.8-inch bright display with 120Hz refresh rate, with fast charging Not the Best for Heavy Professional Use: Although competitive, it falls slightly behind. Efficient Social Media Usage: For users who spend a lot of time scrolling through apps Balanced Power Consumption: Offers a seamless experience for both entertainment and productivity, Who should buy the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL? Introducing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, perfect for various user profiles: Media Enthusiasts & Social Media Users : This phone is great for people who enjoy streaming videos, listening to music, and using social media platforms. Its impressive battery optimisation ensures long-lasting performance for content consumption and social interaction. Researching & Web Browsing Fans : Ideal for users who spend a lot of time browsing the web. The Pixel 9 Pro XL offers efficient battery management for internet surfing, ensuring longer use without frequent recharging. Balanced Everyday Users: Best suited for those looking for a well-rounded smartphone experience. The Pixel 9 Pro XL balances entertainment, social media, and casual productivity, making it a reliable, all-purpose smartphone. CONCLUSION While the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL may not be the most efficient choice for heavy gaming or professional productivity tasks, it is a great everyday companion for users who prioritise entertainment, social interaction, and casual work. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background Google  is a multinational American technology company specialising in Internet-related services and products. It was founded in September 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin while they were PhD students at Stanford University in California . The company has its headquarters in Mountain View, California . Google’s mission statement is "to organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful" . The company offers various  products and services ,  including search engines, online advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware . Google is one of the most widely known and used search engines on the internet today . Google has a range of smartphones called Pixel phones. The company has released several models of Pixel phones over the years ,  including the Pixel 6A, Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro, Pixel Fold and the Google Pixel 7a . The latest models  are the Google Pixel 8, Pixel 8 Pro and Google Pixel 8a. The phones run on the Android operating system and are known for their high-quality cameras . Written by Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 HMD Pulse Pro Smartphone Review: Pulse of Performance: The HMD Pulse Pro Balances Power and Longevity SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Entry (€0-€199)  Entry Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Available Soon Quick Summary The HMD Pulse Pro, announced in April 2024, is an Android smartphone with strong performance and exceptional battery life. It is an attractive option for users seeking efficiency and affordability. One of the standout features of the Pulse Pro is its 6.65-inch IPS LCD display, with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate and a 720x1612 pixels resolution. The display provides an immersive viewing experience, ideal for media consumption and daily use, with a screen-to-body ratio of approximately 86.8%. The device is powered by the Unisoc T606 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU and a Mali-G57 MP1 GPU, ensuring reliable and consistent performance across various tasks. It comes with 128GB of internal storage and offers three RAM options: 4GB, 6GB, or 8GB, catering to different user needs. The dual rear camera setup features a 50 MP wide lens with autofocus, a 2 MP depth sensor and a front-facing 50 MP camera for high-quality selfies. The phone's 5000 mAh battery is another standout feature, offering an impressive 55 hours of battery life according to ViserMark testing. This battery supports 20W wired charging, allowing quick recharges in 2 hours and 18 minutes. The HMD Pulse Pro also comes with a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, NFC, and a USB Type-C 2.0 port for enhanced practicality and security. Available in Black Ocean, Glacier Green, and Twilight Purple colour options, the device combines style with a comprehensive feature set, ensuring that users are well-equipped for their daily tasks. The Pulse Pro offers great value for money, particularly considering its robust battery life and comprehensive feature set. Overall, the HMD Pulse Pro is an excellent choice for users looking for a budget-friendly smartphone with long battery life, a solid camera system, and reliable performance for everyday tasks. Pros Cons Great battery life of 2 days of use Reasonable performance for an Entry Tier smartphone Good value Adequate camera performance Software and security updates guaranteed Long charging time   ViserMark Labels for the HMD Pulse Pro The HMD Pulse Pro impresses with its battery performance, as confirmed by recent ViserMark testing. The smartphone boasts a battery life of 2 days (55 hours), which positions it as a reliable option for users seeking longevity in their smartphone use. This endurance is paired with a charging time of 2 hours and 18 minutes, ensuring the phone can be quickly powered up when needed. Despite its impressive battery life, the HMD Pulse Pro received a Battery Performance score of 48/100, indicating that while the battery lasts long, there might be areas where efficiency could be improved. Moreover, the Pulse Pro's energy efficiency is highlighted by a Battery Efficiency rating of 1.5 out of 5 leaves, reflecting a moderate balance between power consumption and battery size. The device's Annual Energy Consumption is calculated at 2.9 kWh per annum, which is standard for smartphones in its category. Overall, these results suggest that the HMD Pulse Pro is well-suited for users prioritising battery life. Specification Overview  - Released Date: April 2024 Body: 163.2 x 75 x 8.6 mm , weight 196g. Corning Gorilla Glass Victus Display : 6.65 inches, IPS LCD, 90Hz with 720 x 1612 resolution. Dust and splash-resistant. Nano-SIM Operating System : Android 14 Chipset :   Unisoc T606 (12 nm) , Octa-core processor Memory : 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM . microSDXC Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n / ac, Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes Camera : Set-up - Main: 50MP (wide) 2 MP (depth) with LED flash, HDR. Video1080p@30fps Front Camera:  50 MP and Video Battery : 5000mAh, 20 W wired Colour : Black Ocean, Glacier Green, Twilight Purple Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the HMD Pulse Pro Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover the Battery Test Results Learn more about the HMD Pulse Pro   Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the HMD Pulse Pro  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the HMD Pulse Pro  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The HMD Pulse Pro stands out as the leader in battery performance among its competitors in the Entry Tier smartphone segment, scoring 48 out of 100. This positions it ahead of similar models like the Xiaomi A2 and Motorola Moto G34 , which scored 44 and 43 respectively. Despite the small margin, this slight edge in battery performance could translate into noticeable benefits for users, such as longer usage time between charges and more efficient power management, making the Pulse Pro an appealing choice for those who prioritise battery life. However, the narrow gap between these smartphones highlights a consistent focus on reliable battery life across the Entry Tier (€0-€199) market. The close scores suggest that while the HMD Pulse Pro leads, competitors like the Xiaomi A2 and Motorola Moto G34 are also strong contenders, offering similar battery performance. This consistency emphasises the importance of battery life in this segment, where consumers often seek the best value. Nonetheless, the HMD Pulse Pro's position at the top suggests it is better suited for users looking for that extra bit of endurance from their smartphone. 2. Battery Life The HMD Pulse Pro stands out in the Entry Tier smartphone segment, leading the pack with its superior battery life. It offers an impressive 2 days of continuous use or 55 hours if translated into hours on a single charge, outlasting competitors like the Motorola Moto G34 and Xiaomi A2 , which offer around 53 and 54 hours, respectively. This extended battery life makes the Pulse Pro an attractive choice for users who prioritise endurance and want a device that can comfortably last more than two days without recharging. However, the consistency of 2 days of use in battery life between the HMD Pulse Pro and its rivals highlights the strength of the Entry Tier segment in delivering reliable battery life. All phones compared exceed 50 hours of use and approach or surpass 2 days of battery life, indicating that manufacturers are successfully meeting the demands of budget-conscious consumers who value longevity. While the Pulse Pro holds a slight edge, the strong performance of its competitors means that users may also consider other factors, such as design or camera quality, alongside battery life, when making their purchasing decisions. 3.   Battery Consumption The  HMD Pulse Pro  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. The battery performance comparison between the HMD Pulse Pro and the Motorola Moto G34 uncovers intriguing differences in power consumption across various tasks. Notably, the HMD Pulse Pro consumes more power than the Moto G34 during outgoing calls. This higher current draw suggests that the Pulse Pro may be utilising more powerful hardware or processing capabilities, potentially delivering better performance but at the cost of battery efficiency. This insight is crucial for users who value performance but also need to manage their phone's battery life. Another significant insight from the data is the substantial power draw of the   Motorola Moto G34 during camera usage. It exhibits a higher current consumption compared to the HMD Pulse Pro, indicating that it may be supporting more advanced camera features or better image processing. This could be a boon for users who prioritise photography, as they could enjoy enhanced camera functionality, even if it means sacrificing some battery life. This understanding of the trade-off between camera features and battery life is valuable for users who are photography enthusiasts. Interestingly, the web browsing and media playback activities show less discrepancy between the two smartphones, with both phones exhibiting similar power consumption levels. This implies that the HMD Pulse Pro and the Moto G34 are well-optimised for these tasks, offering users a balanced experience without excessively draining the battery. The analysis suggests that the HMD Pulse Pro is more performance-oriented, which might appeal to users who value advanced features and are willing to trade off some battery efficiency for better overall performance. Conversely, the Motorola Moto G34 offers more conservative power management, making it a better option for users who prioritise battery longevity and efficiency in their day-to-day activities. This comparison highlights the importance of considering performance and battery life based on user needs and usage patterns. The battery performance comparison between the HMD Pulse Pro and the Xiaomi A2 reveals several interesting trends that highlight differences in how these two smartphones manage power consumption across various tasks. One of the most notable observations is that the HMD Pulse Pro consumes more power than the Xiaomi A2 in nearly all usage scenarios. This trend suggests that the Pulse Pro may be utilising more powerful hardware or processing more intensive tasks, leading to higher current consumption across the board. For instance, during social media usage and outgoing calls, the HMD Pulse Pro  exhibits significantly higher current consumption than the Xiaomi A2 . This could imply that the Pulse Pro is handling these tasks more aggressively, possibly due to higher processing demands or less efficient power management. In contrast, the Xiaomi A2's more restrained power consumption could potentially lead to better battery longevity, empowering users who heavily engage in these activities. Interestingly, the power consumption difference between the two devices in gaming and media playback is less pronounced, though the HMD Pulse Pro still consumes slightly more power. This suggests that both devices are well-optimised for these power-intensive activities. Still, the higher consumption of Pulse Pro might be tied to better performance or higher-quality graphics processing. Overall, the data suggests that while the HMD Pulse Pro may offer stronger performance or more advanced features, it comes at the cost of increased power consumption. For users who prioritise efficiency and longer battery life, particularly during everyday tasks like social media, calling, and video playback, the Xiaomi A2 might be the better choice. Conversely, users who value higher performance and don't mind sacrificing some battery efficiency for it may find the HMD Pulse Pro more appealing. This analysis underscores the importance of respecting individual user needs and preferences when balancing performance with power management. The in-depth battery performance comparison among the HMD Pulse Pro, Motorola Moto G34 , and Xiaomi A2 , and their performance against the entry-tier segment average, uncovers several intriguing insights into how these smartphones manage power across a range of everyday tasks. Firstly, the HMD Pulse Pro consistently exhibits higher power consumption across most activities when compared to its competitors, particularly in tasks like social media usage, camera operation, and web browsing. This higher power draw suggests that the Pulse Pro may be leveraging more powerful hardware or delivering a higher level of performance, which could be advantageous for users who prioritise speed and responsiveness in their phone, even if it means a quicker battery drain. This insight helps readers understand the trade-offs involved in their purchase decision. Another interesting observation is that while the Pulse Pro generally uses more power, the Xiaomi A2 demonstrates more efficient power usage in several key areas, including gaming, media playback, and outgoing calls. This efficiency could make the Xiaomi A2 a more attractive option for users who prioritise battery longevity, especially when extended usage is crucial. The Motorola Moto G34 falls somewhere in between, generally offering more balanced power consumption that aligns closely with the entry-tier average, making it a solid all-around performer. Finally, the average battery consumption for the Entry Tier segment, represented by the green bars, provides a valuable benchmark, showing that all three devices are relatively close in performance to the segment norms. However, the HMD Pulse Pro’s divergence from the average in high-consumption tasks highlights its focus on performance, possibly catering to users who demand more from their smartphones in terms of power and capabilities. In summary, the HMD Pulse Pro stands out for its performance-driven approach, which may appeal to users who need a device that can easily handle intensive tasks, even if it comes at the cost of higher power consumption. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi A2 offers a more battery-efficient alternative suitable for users who value long battery life over peak performance. The Motorola Moto G34 provides a balanced option, making it a reliable choice for those looking to compromise power and efficiency in the entry-tier market. 4.   Battery Efficiency The battery efficiency comparison chart for the HMD Pulse Pro and its competitors reveals several key insights into how well these smartphones manage power relative to their battery capacities. This suggests that the HMD Pulse Pro has a long battery life and uses its power effectively, making it a strong choice for users who need reliable performance over extended periods without significant energy waste. Interestingly, there is no gap in efficiency between the Pulse Pro and other mobile phones like the Motorola Moto G34 and Xiaomi A2 . While all close in efficiency, these mobile phones do not match the Pulse Pro's capability to stretch every bit of power out of its battery. This slight advantage might make the Pulse Pro more appealing to users who are particularly sensitive to battery performance, especially in scenarios where efficient power usage can translate into longer daily usability. The above chart highlights that while the HMD Pulse Pro excels in battery life and efficiency, its competitors remain relatively close in performance. This reinforces Pulse Pro's position as a leader in its segment, particularly for users who demand longevity and efficient power management from their smartphones. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The annual energy consumption comparison chart for the HMD Pulse Pro and its competitors reveals insightful trends regarding the efficiency and overall energy usage of these entry-tier smartphones. The HMD Pulse Pro, with the lowest annual energy consumption at 2.9 kWh per year, is the most energy-efficient phone among the compared models. This efficiency is a significant advantage for users who are conscious of their device's environmental impact, as it helps reduce their carbon footprint while still enjoying the benefits of a smartphone. In contrast, the other smartphones in the comparison, including the Motorola Moto G34 and Xiaomi A2 , consume slightly more energy annually, at 3.1 and 3.0 kWh, respectively. The Entry Tier average, at 3.2 kWh, further highlights the HMD Pulse Pro's superior efficiency. This suggests that while all these mobile phones are designed to be energy-efficient, the Pulse Pro's optimised power management gives it a tangible edge, potentially making it more appealing to environmentally conscious consumers or those looking for cost savings over the long term. Overall, the HMD Pulse Pro excels in battery life and energy efficiency, consuming less power annually compared to its peers. This efficiency and its strong battery performance reinforce the Pulse Pro's position as a leading choice in the entry-tier market, especially for users who prioritise sustainability and cost-effective energy use. ViserMark VERDICT The HMD Pulse Pro - what's it like to use? The H MD Pulse Pro offers a mixed experience that caters to performance enthusiasts and users who prioritise battery efficiency, making it a versatile option within the Entry Tier smartphone market. One of the most significant aspects of using the HMD Pulse Pro is its battery performance. With an extended battery life of 2 days or 55 hours and energy-efficient consumption, it's designed to last through demanding use without frequent recharging. However, it's important to note that the Pulse Pro consumes more power across various tasks than its competitors. This might appeal to users looking for solid performance, even if it comes at the cost of higher power usage. The phone shows a higher current draw for everyday activities like social media, calling, and web browsing, which could impact battery life depending on usage patterns. Also, the HMD Pulse Pro excels in handling intensive tasks, such as gaming and camera operations, thanks to its powerful hardware. However, this power comes at a cost-a potential decrease in battery life during heavy use. This trade-off is something users should consider based on their daily needs and usage patterns. Beyond performance, the HMD Pulse Pro maintains a user-friendly design with features like a 6.65-inch IPS LCD display and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. These elements contribute to a comfortable and secure user experience, while the availability of multiple colour options adds a touch of personalization. The device also supports practical features like NFC and USB Type-C, which enhance its usability in everyday scenarios. Overall, the HMD Pulse Pro is a strong choice for users who value both performance and battery life. It's particularly well-suited for those who prioritise power and efficiency in equal measure, and who are willing to accept a bit of extra power consumption for a responsive, capable smartphone experience. Pros Cons Extended battery life without frequent charging. Tends to consume more power across various tasks compared to competitors, potentially impacting battery life during heavy use Handles intensive tasks like gaming and camera usage efficiency. The display resolution is 720x1612 pixels, which might be lower than what some users expect from a modern smartphone. Features a 6.65-inch IPS LCD display with 90Hz refresh rate It lacks any groundbreaking or standout feature that would significantly set it apart from other entry-tier smartphones. Energy efficient making it more cost-effective and environmentally friendly. Performance comes at the cost of increased power usage, which may not suit users who prioritize battery longevity over performance. Priced competitively. For users who engage in lighter smartphone activities, the extra power and performance capabilities might be unnecessary, Who should buy the HMD Pulse Pro? Here are the types of users who might find the HMD Pulse Pro  particularly beneficial: Performance Seekers on a Budget: The Pulse Pro is ideal for users who want strong performance in tasks like gaming and photography without spending a fortune. It delivers high power and responsiveness at an affordable price. Battery-Conscious Users: Perfect for those needing a smartphone with a long battery life, lasting over two days on a single charge, while still capable of handling everyday tasks efficiently. Practical Everyday Users: This is a great choice for individuals looking for a well-rounded, reliable device for daily use. It offers essential features like NFC, a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, and energy-efficient operation. CONCLUSION In summary, the HMD Pulse Pro is best suited for users who seek a balance of performance, battery life, and affordability, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of smartphone users. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background HMD Globa l, commonly known as HMD, is a Finnish mobile phone manufacturer that was founded in 2016. The company's mission is to revive the iconic Nokia brand, combining its renowned durability and reliability with modern Android technology. This unique approach has led to the creation of devices that offer solid performance, longevity, and affordability, making HMD a standout in the industry. HMD Global quickly gained attention for its commitment to producing smartphones that adhere to a clean, stock Android experience, free from bloatware and unnecessary modifications. This approach has ensured smoother performance and timely updates and appealed to consumers who prefer a more streamlined and user-friendly interface. With a strategic focus on the mid-range and entry-level segments, HMD Global has distinguished itself by offering quality devices at competitive prices. The company's strong emphasis on battery life, durability, and software reliability has carved out a unique niche in the market, appealing to both nostalgic Nokia fans and new users seeking dependable, no-nonsense smartphones. HMD’s products are now available in over 100 countries, and the company has developed a reputation for supporting its devices with regular software updates and security patches, further enhancing the longevity and value of its offerings. HMD continues to grow its presence in the global smartphone market through strategic partnerships and a focus on user trust. Written by Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and the latest test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000   Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Review: Power Meets Performance in Your Pocket Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Mid Tier Ranking #4 Video Review Watch Now! What you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G   smartphone. Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is a smartphone that offers excellent value for money and has several improvements over its predecessor, the R edmi Note 12 . It has a minimalist design and a flat, lightweight build. A MediaTek Dimensity 6080 SoC powers the phone and comes in variants with 6GB, 8GB, and 12GB of RAM, coupled with 128GB or 256GB of storage. It has a 6.67-inch Super AMOLED display with Full HD+ resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate, providing a great viewing experience even in bright sunlight. For photography, it has a 108MP primary camera, an 8MP ultra-wide camera, and a 2MP macro camera. The 108MP camera performs well in daylight, offering balanced contrast and saturation, while the 8MP ultra-wide camera maintains similar quality. The phone's 16MP front camera captures sharp images in daylight but has issues with accurate skin detection. In terms of performance, this smartphone can handle most apps smoothly, even moderately graphically intense games. It has 5G support and offers decent network speeds. The   Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has a 5,000mAh battery, providing over 1.5 days of usage on a single charge. It also supports 33W fast charging, which enables it to reach nearly full charge in just over an hour. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is a well-balanced smartphone with a good display, reliable performance, and long battery life, making it a solid choice for anyone looking for these features.  Specification Overview - Released Date: January 2024 Body : 161.1 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm or 6.39 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches. Weight 174.5g. Display : 6.67" FHD+ AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak), 1080 x 2400 resolution, 20:9 ratio, 395ppi. Protection : Corning® Gorilla® Glass 5 . IP54 dust/water rated. Operating System : Android 13, MIUI 14 Chipset : MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) Memory : 8GB RAM, 256GB RAM Connectivity : 5G; Hybrid Dual SIM; Wi-Fi 5; BT 5.3; NFC; Infrared port; 3.5mm jack Rear Camera : 108MP+8MP+2MP triple camera. 1080p@30fps Front Camera : 16MP Video:  Front camera: 1080p@30fps, Rear camera : 1080p@30fps Battery : 5000 mAh, 33W wired Colours : Graphite Black, Artic White, Ocean Teal Others: NFC: Yes. AI Face Lock: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes.   3.5 mm headphone jack. Side Fingerprint Sensor, GPS: L1, A-GPS supplementary positioning, electronic compass. Good Points ​Not So Good Points Full retail package, including a charger and case No stereo speakers IP54-rated with Gorilla® Glass 5 for protection and enhanced durability Battery life of 1.5 days of use could be improved Good overall functionality and performance Video capture only to 1080p Fast and efficient charging solution Strong performance from the main and selfie cameras ​ Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G and comparative smartphones. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review   is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G's  battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumption   Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels Battery Performance What is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Performance Score? In our comprehensive testing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 43 out of 100 . The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G scored 43 out of 100 on the ViserMark battery performance test. This score incorporates the efficiency and endurance of the smartphone's battery in a real-world context. Understanding how this score positions the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G in the Mid Tier (€200-€499) is essential. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G competes closely with smartphones like the Nothing Phone 1 and the OPPO A78 , which scored 42/100. The overall score is calculated based on battery size, day of use, and charging. This similarity in score indicates that all three phones have comparable battery performance levels, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G benefits from fast charging, giving a marginal edge. When we look in closer detail into the battery performance, the efficiency and management are slightly disappointing, but they are still well-suited for users with average smartphone usage patterns. The chart below displays three smartphones' ViserMark battery performance scores for a clearer comparison. Also of Interest : Have you missed this smartphone review? Behind the Battery Life: A Deep Dive into the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser . Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels.   Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Performing Smartphone   Battery Life How long will the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G battery last? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  test results indicate a battery life of 1.5 days, or 39 hours , on a single charge. In assessing the battery life of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , which boasts a 5000mAh battery, the smartphone delivers 1.5 days of use or approximately 39 hours on a full charge. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? Compared to similar smartphones like the Nothing Phone 1 (2 days/53 hours) and the OPPO A78 (2 days/49 hours), the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G falls slightly short. This difference can be decisive for users whose primary concern is the longest between charges. The chart below shows all three comparable smartphones. NEW BATTERY CONSUMPTION  Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the device's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. In this analysis, we compare the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G' s energy consumption with the industry's average mid-tier level across a range of everyday activities to see how it performs in terms of milliampere hours (mAh). Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by SmartViser . Reviewing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's battery consumption reveals several key insights. For those who use social media frequently, this smartphone is quite power-hungry, consuming approximately 969 mAh, which is higher than the average mid-tier smartphone's consumption of 515.40 mAh. If you tweet, like, and scroll a lot, you may need to charge your phone more often than usual. For gamers, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has excellent gaming performance but consumes more battery power than the average mid-tier phone, using 758 mAh compared to 542.37 mAh. If you are a gamer, you might want to carry a charger when you're playing to ensure your phone doesn't run out of battery. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has an average battery life of 39 hours, shorter than the Mid Tier average of 48 hours. While it is a robust device, it may not be the most efficient regarding battery life. Users who value the Xiaomi experience may find that this trade-off is worth it and embrace the phone's features, but they may need to keep an eye on their battery levels and be prepared to recharge more frequently. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G vs Nothing Phone 1 Smartphone Comparison This comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and Nothing Phone 1 examines how these two smartphones consume battery power during typical daily activities. The chart below visually represents the strengths and weaknesses of each smartphone. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by  SmartViser . When using social media, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G consumes almost twice the battery of Nothing Phone 1 . It uses 969 mAh, while Nothing Phone 1 only uses 452.33 mAh. Choosing between these two phones can make a difference for social media enthusiasts. Also, when making phone calls, this smartphone uses 785 mAh, whereas Nothing Phone 1 consumes only 464.22 mAh. The Nothing Phone 1 might be the better option. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G consumes 758 mAh for gaming, while Nothing Phone 1 only uses 376.97 mAh. If you're a gamer, you might find Xiaomi's low battery notifications interrupting your play sessions more often than the Nothing Phone 1 . Nothing Phone 1 's battery life lasts longer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G. It lasts 49 hours, while the Xiaomi smartphone only lasts 39 hours. This suggests that Nothing Phone 1 manages its resources more efficiently. In summary, Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is more power-hungry than Nothing Phone 1 . The choice between these two phones may depend on how much battery life you need to get through your day. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G vs OPPO A78 Smartphone Comparison Users often look beyond basic specifications to understand how smartphones perform in everyday scenarios. This comparison is with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G . The OPPO A78  focuses on battery consumption. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by  SmartViser . Social media enthusiasts will be pleased to know that the OPPO A78 is the clear winner here, with a much more conservative consumption of 442.95 mAh than Xiaomi's 969 mAh. Also, if you're a frequent caller, the OPPO A78 is the better choice here . However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G does ensure clear and stable connectivity, reflecting Xiaomi's commitment to maintaining communication quality. Regarding battery life, the OPPO A78 performs better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , lasting an average of 53 hours compared to Xiaomi's 39 hours. This makes the OPPO A78 a great choice for gaming enthusiasts due to its low power consumption of 528.79 mAh. However, high-quality images and videos may require more power, and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G delivers excellent performance where it matters. In conclusion, the OPPO A78 does show lower consumption when it comes to battery life. Its more conservative battery consumption across various daily activities makes it a clear winner compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G . Yet, Xiaomi offers a powerfully engaging user experience that justifies its energetic approach to battery usage. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Overall Smartphone Comparison We compare the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G battery consumption, the Nothing Phone 1 , and the OPPO A78  during various common activities, contrasting their battery consumption with the average for Flagship/Pro-tier smartphones. This comparison chart below aims to offer a clear understanding of which smartphone would be the best fit for your lifestyle and usage habits.   Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by  SmartViser . Bringing an enthusiastic approach to battery consumption, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has a robust feature set and performance capabilities. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G uses a significant 969 mAh, much higher than the Nothing Phone 1 's 452.33 mAh, OPPO A78 's 442.95 mAh, and the mid-tier average of 515.40 mAh when using social media. Yet gamers will appreciate Xiaomi's 758 mAh consumption, showcasing the ability to handle more graphically intensive games smoothly, making it a solid choice for mobile gaming enthusiasts. With an average battery life of 39 hours, the Xiaomi supports a full day of extensive use, demonstrating its capacity to handle a heavy-duty lifestyle. While the Nothing Phone 1 and OPPO A78 show lower consumption and the mid-tier average stands at 48 hours, the Xiaomi offers a powerfully engaging user experience catering to the active smartphone user who values performance even if it means a bit more fast charging. In summary, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has capabilities and delivers a user experience due to its higher battery consumption. All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser . Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels.   Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Smartphones for Battery Life Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G? The battery efficiency for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G was 1 leaf out of 5 . The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's battery efficiency is critical to its overall performance, especially when considering its 1 leaf out of 5 rating in this area. This rating offers insight into how well the device manages its 5000mAh battery in practical use. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The 1 leaf out of 5 rating indicates room for improvement in battery management. This score reflects how the smartphone utilises its battery capacity regarding hardware and software configurations. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's battery efficiency, as indicated by its 1 leaf out of 5 rating, suggests it's less efficient in power management compared to some of its close competitors. This aspect is significant for users prioritising energy efficiency and prolonged battery life. Potential buyers should weigh this factor alongside their usage habits and the phone's other features to determine if the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G meets their needs. Also of Interest : Apple iPhone 14 Plus - Bigger and Even Better on Battery Performance Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G use? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has a moderate energy consumption of 4.2 kWh annually. The annual energy consumption of a smartphone, like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , is a metric for understanding its long-term energy efficiency and environmental impact. This smartphone records an annual energy consumption of 4.2, which is higher in the context of other similiar smartphones regarding usage and sustainability. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G compare to Mid Tier The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's 4.2 annual energy consumption rating is relatively high compared to the Nothing Phone 1 and the OPPO A78 , which showcased lower annual energy consumption ratings at 3.0. This difference highlights a more efficient use of power in these smartphones, possibly due to better optimisation between hardware and software or more energy-efficient components being used. The chart below shows the annual energy consumption of three comparable smartphones. Fo r users, especially those who are environmentally conscious or faced with high electricity costs, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's higher annual energy consumption could be a concern. It indicates a need for more frequent charging, which could translate to higher electricity usage over time. Potential buyers must consider how this factor aligns with long-term usage and sustainability goals. Also of Interest:   Smartphone Ranking Table.     VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G offers a solid experience for those prioritising performance and features over battery longevity. The phone provides a smooth and responsive experience, especially in social media browsing, gaming, and multimedia. It has decent camera performance and captures high-quality images and videos, although it consumes more battery. The smartphone handles everyday tasks easily, but this comes at the cost of higher power consumption, meaning you may charge it more often than other phones. What's in the box? Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Smartphone USB-C charging and data transfer cable rated as 3A or up to 25W 33W power adapter Dark grey protective case Should I buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G? As for whether you should buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G, it depends on your priorities. If you're looking for a smartphone that delivers strong performance and has a range of features for a comprehensive smartphone experience, and you don't mind charging it more frequently, then the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is a great choice. However, suppose battery life is a major concern for you, and you prefer a phone that can last longer between charges. In that case, you might explore other options like the Nothing Phone 1 or the OPPO A78 , which offer better battery efficiency. The decision ultimately hinges on what you value more in your daily smartphone use.   Extra Insights Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G support 5G? Yes, it does Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G have dual-SIM capabilities? Yes, it does Q: What storage and RAM variants are available for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G? 8GB RAM + 256GB Storage, 12GB RAM + 256GB Storage Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G have stereo speakers? No, it does not. It has a single, bottom-firing speaker, which is different from the other models in the Redmi Note 13 series. Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G have a microSD card slot? No, it does not Q: Is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G VoLTE enabled? Yes, it is. Even if the device supports VoLTE users need to have this enabled in their SIMs to work and some networks may not have VoLTE services enabled. Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G support wireless charging? No, it does not Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G have a headphone jack? Yes, it does VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Xiaomi   was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes in high quality. Technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. It is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint worldwide to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China, and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil.   Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing!   If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer  looking to improve your smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn . Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000   Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Review: A Perfect Balance of Style and Performance Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Mid Tier Ranking #5 Video Review Watch Now! What you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G   smartphone. Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is a smartphone that is sure to impress even the most discerning of smartphone users. With its sleek design, high-end features, and powerful performance, this phone stands out in the Mid Tier (€200-€499) smartphone market. One of the key features of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is its curved Gorilla Glass Victus, which provides both style and protection. It is also IP68-protected, making it water and dust-resistant. The 6.67-inch AMOLED screen is another impressive feature of this device, with a high resolution and HDR10+ and Dolby Vision support that delivers stunning visuals. Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset, with fast storage and RAM, this smartphone runs on MIUI 14 on Android 13, providing a smooth and customisable user experience. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G also comes with a 108MP primary camera, among the best in its class. It also has a 16 MP ultra-wide camera, a 5 MP macro camera, and a 2 MP depth sensor to produce stunning photos and videos. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G   offers a balance of style, performance and battery life. Its standout feature is its rapid charging time, which benefits users on the go. It is an ideal choice for tech enthusiasts who are always looking for the latest and greatest technology and those looking for a reliable and powerful smartphone. This smartphone is undoubtedly worth considering. Good Points Not So Good Points Elegant IP68-rated design with curved Gorilla Glass. Battery life of 1.5 days of use could be improved. High-resolution, colour-accurate OLED display. Camera processing needs refinement. Ultra-fast charging capabilities High-quality photo and video output. Quality stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support. Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer .   VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G and comparative smartphones. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review   is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G's  battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumption   Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels Battery Performance What is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Performance Score? In our comprehensive testing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 44 out of 100. With a substantial battery capacity of 5000mAh, this smartphone earns a performance score of 44, which reflects its ability to handle power-intensive tasks efficiently. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? Within the Mid Tier smartphone market, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G , Samsung Galaxy A54 , and Realme Narzo 50 are strong contenders. All three smartphones come equipped with a 5000mAh battery, the industry standard for Mid Tier smartphones, offering a good balance between size and phone usage longevity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G follows with a score of 44, and the Samsung Galaxy A54 trails slightly at 42. These scores suggest that while all three perform well, the Realme Narzo 50 leads in power optimisation. Also of Interest : Have you missed this smartphone review? Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Review: Power Meets Performance in Your Pocket Battery Life How long will the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G battery last? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G  test results indicate a battery life of 1.5 days, or 36 hours , on a single charge. Users can expect about 1.5 days or 36 hours of use on a single charge, which aligns with the Mid Tier average. This duration is adequate for most users, allowing a full day and a half without recharging. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The Realme Narzo 50 also takes the lead, offering 2 days (45 hours) of use, which is beneficial for users who are frequently on the go or away from power sources. However, the Xiaomi and Samsung Galaxy A54 smartphones offer 1.5 days of use, but the Samsung stretches to 39 hours, three more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 's 36 hours. NEW BATTERY CONSUMPTION  Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G  manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. We compare the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G' s energy consumption with the industry's average Mid Tier (€200-€499) smartphone across a range of everyday activities to see how it performs in milliampere hours (mAh). Based on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G battery consumption in different daily tasks, the smartphone tends to consume more power than the average Mid Tier smartphone across activities that generally demand more from the hardware, like gaming, camera use, and social media. This could indicate that its hardware is optimised for performance, which may appeal to users who want a more responsive experience. Additionally, the higher power consumption during media playback and social media tasks might indicate that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G has a more power-intensive screen, which can impact battery life. The higher consumption during calls and data transfers suggests that the modem or antenna design could be more powerful or less efficient than the average. However, for less intensive tasks like email, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G manages power similarly to other Mid Tier smartphones. In conclusion, the battery usage results reflect that the software optimisation as the MIUI may not be as finely tuned for power efficiency as some other UIs on Android, leading to higher overall battery usage. Despite the higher usage in many areas, the phone's charging time is significantly lower than the average thanks to its fast charging capability, which can offset the higher power consumption for some users. Overall, the comparison demonstrates the importance of understanding individual usage patterns when choosing a smartphone. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is an excellent choice for users who demand top performance and have access to regular charging. For those with more average use cases or longer times between charges, other smartphones with better battery efficiency may be worth considering. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G competes well with the Mid Tier average, offering a commendable balance of performance and battery life. Its standout feature is its rapid charging time, which benefits users on the go. However, its battery efficiency and annual energy consumption are areas where it does not perform as well as the average, which could be a consideration for power users or those concerned about electricity usage. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A54 Smartphone Comparison Analysing the comparison of the smartphones, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G consumes more power than the Samsung Galaxy A54 during most activities. It has a higher battery drain during calls, gaming sessions, data transfer tasks, video streaming, and media playback. At the same time, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is more power-efficient in MMS, camera, text messaging, and web browsing. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G may be a better choice for users who are prioritising performance over battery life. The Samsung Galaxy A54 may be a better choice for those who want longer battery life. Factors contributing to the differences in battery performance between the two smartphones are display technology, processor efficiency, software optimisation, peripheral hardware, connectivity, usage patterns, and charging technologies. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is potentially aimed at users who prioritise performance and advanced features, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 may cater to those who need efficient battery usage. Prospective buyers must choose a smartphone that aligns with their needs and usage habits. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G vs Realme Narzo 50 Smartphone Comparison The comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G and the Realme Narzo 50 regarding battery performance across various tasks indicates that the Realme Narzo 50 is generally more efficient in power management for most everyday tasks. The test results suggest that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G has a higher battery consumption during gaming, video streaming, and web browsing, which may indicate a more powerful processor or higher-spec display. On the other hand, the Realme Narzo 50 has lower battery usage in several categories, which suggests that it has more aggressive power management strategies or software optimisations. The Realme Narzo 50's higher power consumption when using the camera implies that it utilises more advanced imaging processes or higher-resolution sensors. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 's MIUI offers a richer UI with more background services running. The higher power consumption for tasks that require internet connectivity could indicate less efficient background synchronisation or higher power usage using communication features. Finally, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G has many customisation options that can impact battery life if not managed correctly. At the same time, the Realme Narzo 50 might have a more conservative approach to default settings to extend battery life. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . Xiaomi's higher power usage across various tasks may reflect its performance, catering to users who prefer speed and responsiveness. The comparison showcases that software optimisation, hardware efficiency, and balancing features against power draw are critical factors defining a smartphone's battery life. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Overall Smartphone Comparison This analysis compares the battery performance of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G , Samsung Galaxy A54 , and Realme Narzo 50 smartphones with the average usage of mid-tier phones. It shows that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G uses more power across most tasks, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 is more balanced and efficient. The Realme Narzo 5 is efficient in many categories, especially gaming and calls, but its camera usage is unexpectedly high. Based on the findings, users should choose Xiaomi for fast charging and performance, Samsung for balanced usage, and Realme for the best mix of efficiency and performance, provided they can manage the higher battery drain from camera use. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . Several additional insights emerge: Charging Technologies The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G  quick rapid charging may encourage usage patterns that involve frequent, rapid top-ups, offsetting its higher power consumption in various tasks. Energy Management Features : The Samsung Galaxy A54 may have energy-saving features such as adaptive power saving and a more conservative approach to background processes and network usage, which helps it maintain lower consumption rates closer to the Mid Tier average. User Preferences and Priorities : While the Realme Narzo 50 generally consumes less power in most tasks, its significantly higher camera usage indicates that users interested in mobile photography should be prepared for more frequent charging. However, its efficiency in other areas could balance this higher consumption for some users. Battery Life : Smartphones run with higher battery usage and may experience faster battery wear. Users who keep their phones longer may want to consider phones like the Samsung Galaxy A54 , which aligns closer to the Mid Tier average in energy consumption, possibly contributing to better long-term battery health. Device Optimisation : Manufacturers often release software updates that can improve battery life. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 's higher consumption could be refined with future updates, enhancing its efficiency. In conclusion, while test results provide a starting point, the real-world experience will be the ultimate test of battery performance. Users should consider their specific needs, whether performance, longevity or a balance of both when deciding between these smartphones. Each phone offers distinct advantages; the best choice depends on the user's priorities. All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser . Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels.   Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Smartphones for Battery Life Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G? The battery efficiency for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G was 0.5 leaf out of 5 . How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The Samsung Galaxy A54 and Realme Narzo 50 share the top spot in battery efficiency with a score of 1 leaf out of 5, indicating the maximum possible usage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G , with a score of 0.50, might be less efficient in its power consumption and lead to more frequent charges over time. Also of Interest : Samsung Galaxy S23 FE - Premium Features and Affordability Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G use? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G has a moderate energy consumption of  4.5 kWh annually. Although the annual energy consumption is 4.5kWh and slightly higher than the Mid Tier average, the difference is not massive. It does indicate that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G may cost slightly more to charge over a year and have a marginally higher environmental impact in terms of energy use. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G compare to Mid Tier? Annual energy consumption follows the efficiency trend, with the Realme Narzo 50 being the most energy-efficient at 3.6kWh, followed by the Samsung Galaxy A54 at 4.2kWh and the  Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G  at 4.5kWh. Users looking to minimise their energy footprint would appreciate Realme's efficiency. Also of Interest:   Smartphone Ranking Table.   VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G offers a premium design and advanced functionality, providing users with a highly satisfying experience. Let's take a closer look.  Ergonomic and Premium Design : The curved Gorilla Glass Victus body adds to the phone's aesthetic appeal and provides a comfortable and secure grip. However, the curved design may make the phone slippery, so it is recommended that you use the provided case for better handling. Visual Treat:  The 6.67-inch AMOLED display delivers great visuals, high resolution and 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision support. Whether streaming content, gaming, or browsing, the display offers vivid colours, deep blacks, and excellent clarity. Quick Performance:  The Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset and fast UFS3.1 storage ensure smooth and responsive performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G should handle tasks efficiently for demanding games or multitasking. Software Experience:  Running MIUI 14 on Android 13, the user interface will likely be user-friendly and customisable, providing a seamless and intuitive experience. The enhanced haptics add to the interaction, making the phone feel more responsive. Multimedia and Gaming:  The stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support enhance the audio experience, making it enjoyable for music, movies, and games. The powerful GPU ensures a good gaming experience, especially for a Mid Tier (€200-€499) smartphone . Photography and Videography:  With its versatile camera setup, including a 200MP primary sensor, users can expect high-quality photos and videos. The 4K video recording capability  with electronic stabilisation, makes it suitable for capturing detailed and stable footage. Battery and Charging:  While the battery life may be average, the 120W fast charging capability is a significant advantage, offering rapid recharging and minimising downtime. The  Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G  offers users luxury, performance, and convenience. It suits many users, from tech enthusiasts to everyday consumers looking for a reliable and powerful smartphone.  It's worth considering if you're in the market for a new smartphone. What's in the box? Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Smartphone 6A-rated USB-A-to-C cable 120W power adapter Dark grey protective case Should I buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G? Reasons to Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G: The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is an attractive choice for its outstanding 6.67-inch AMOLED display, boasting HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, perfect for those who want vibrant and sharp visuals. Performance-wise, it's a powerhouse with the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset, ensuring smooth handling of gaming and multitasking. The 120W fast charging is a significant boost, offering quick battery top-ups, ideal for busy lifestyles. Photography enthusiasts will appreciate the versatile and high-quality shots from its 200MP primary camera. The smartphone's premium design with curved Gorilla Glass Victus and IP68 dust and water resistance add to its luxurious feel. Moreover, its competitive pricing makes it an excellent value for anyone seeking high-end smartphone features without the steep flagship cost. Reasons to Reconsider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G: However, there are aspects to consider before purchasing. The average battery life might be a limiting factor for busy users or those who spend long hours away from charging points. Additionally, the camera's processing could be better, which might deter photography enthusiasts seeking the utmost image quality. The MIUI interface, while customisable, comes with its share of bloatware and ads that may appeal to only some. Lastly, the sleek and curved design, though visually appealing, makes the phone prone to slipping, potentially requiring a protective case that could mask its elegant design. In summary, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is a strong contender in the Mid Tier market, offering a balance of performance, design, and features. It's a suitable choice for users looking for a feature-rich phone at a reasonable price. However, consider other options if battery life or camera quality is important. As always, aligning the smartphone's features with your needs and preferences is key to making the right decision. Extra Insights Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G support 5G? Yes, it does Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G have dual-SIM capabilities? Yes, it does Q: What storage and RAM variants are available for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G? 8 GB RAM + 256 GB storage and 12 GB RAM + 512 GB storage Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G have stereo speakers? Yes, it does Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G have a microSD card slot? No, it does not Q: Is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G VoLTE enabled? Yes, it is. Even if the device supports VoLTE users need to have this enabled in their SIMs to work and some networks may not have VoLTE services enabled. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes in high quality. Technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. It is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint worldwide to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China, and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil.  Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer  looking to improve your smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn . Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Xiaomi Redmi 13C Review: Power-Packed Performance Meets Exceptional Value Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199)  Ranking # 2 Video Review What you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi 13C stands out as a strong contender for the title "Best Budget Smartphone of 2024," especially when considering its performance and price point compared to other smartphones in the Entry Tier ( €0-€199 ). However, whether it is the best can depend on various factors, including user preferences and specific needs. Key Points of the Xiaomi Redmi 13C Price : Typically, Xiaomi’s Redmi series is known for offering high value for a relatively low cost, appealing to budget-conscious users looking for reliable performance at an affordable price. Specifications : The Xiaomi Redmi 13C features a good balance between performance and power efficiency. It is equipped with a processor that can handle daily tasks smoothly without draining the battery too quickly. Camera Quality : For its price range, Xiaomi offers decent camera capabilities that can compete with more expensive phones. However, it may not lead the market in innovation or high-end features. Battery Life : One of the most crucial aspects, particularly for budget phones. Xiaomi often prioritises battery endurance, making the Xiaomi Redmi 13C a great choice for long-lasting performance, with 2.5 days of use confirmed through ViserMark tests. User Experience : With MIUI, Xiaomi’s custom Android skin, users get a range of features customised for the Xiaomi Redmi 13C smartphone, which can enhance usability but may come with a learning curve for those new to MIUI. Are you looking for a smartphone that combines affordability, reliable functionality, and impressive battery life? Look no further than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C . This powerful smartphone offers everything you need to stay connected on the go without breaking the bank. With its sleek design and innovative features, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C is the perfect choice for anyone looking for a high-quality smartphone that won't let them down. Specification Overview - Released Date: November 2023 Body : 168 x 78 x 8.1 mm or 6.61 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches. Weight 192g. Display : 6.74 inches, with 720 x 1600 pixels resolution Protection : Corning® Gorilla® Glass Operating System : Android 13, MIUI 14 Chipset : Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85, Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Memory : 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM Connectivity : Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band. Dual SIM; NFC - Yes, Stereo speakers - Yes, 3.5 Headjack: Yes Rear Camera : Wide (main): 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF, 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro), LED flash, HDR Front Camera : 8 MP, f/2.0, HDR Video:  Front camera: 1080p@30fps , Rear camera :  1080p@30fps Battery : 5000 mAh, 18W wired Colours : Midnight Black, Navy Blue, Glacier White, Clover Green Good Points Not So Good Points Good design and budget-friendly Lacking camera performance Excellent Battery life of 2.5 days of use Limited video recording functionality Good storage capacity Slow charging MicroSD Slot Charger included   Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer .   VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Xiaomi Redmi 13C  and comparative smartphones. Xiaomi Redmi 13C ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review   is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Xiaomi Redmi 13C's  battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumption Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels 1. Battery Performance What is the Xiaomi Redmi 13C Performance Score? In our comprehensive testing, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of  52 out of 100. How does the Xiaomi Redmi 13C compare to Entry Tier smartphones? The Xiaomi Redmi 13C  has the highest performance score, 52, within the smartphone Entry Tier tested in 2024. It indicates better overall battery management and performance efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A2 (44) and Xiaomi Redmi 12C (42). This suggests that the Xiaomi Redmi 13C is more advanced with battery management, giving end users better battery-related performance. Also of Interest : Have you missed this smartphone review? Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Review: A Perfect Balance of Style and Performance All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser . Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels.   Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Performing Smartphone   2. Battery Life How long will the Xiaomi Redmi 13C battery last? The Xiaomi Redmi 13C  test results indicate a battery life of 2.5 days, or 57 hours , on a single charge. How does the Xiaomi Redmi 13C compare to Entry Tier smartphones? The Xiaomi Redmi 13C can last 2.5 days per charge under typical usage, translating into about 57 hours. It is significantly higher compared to the 2.0 days/54 hours for the Xiaomi Redmi A2 and 1.5 days/39 hours for the processor, the Xiaomi Redmi 12C. This highlights that newer phones like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C have better power management even when the battery capacity remains the same across the smartphones. All comparative smartphones have a substantial 5000 mAh battery, which is common in budget smartphones today. This capacity is typically enough to ensure that the phone can last through at least a day of moderate to heavy use. The chart above shows that the Xiaomi smartphone range is a compelling option for users who prioritise battery endurance. All three mobile phones have an impressive two days of use. This balance of features, along with its cost-effectiveness, can make the Xiaomi range very competitive against other smartphone brands and an excellent choice for budget-conscious users. 3.  NEW  Battery Consumption  Xiaomi Redmi 13C battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The Xiaomi Redmin 13C  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Xiaomi Redmin 13C  manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. The test results comparing the Xiaomi Redmi 13C with the average Entry Tier smartphone provide a detailed look at how the Xiaomi Redmi 13C performs in battery consumption across various everyday activities. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . Here are some insightful observations from the test results: With an average battery life of 52 hours, the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  significantly outperforms the average for Entry Tier smartphones, which is 46 hours. This suggests it has better battery longevity optimisation despite similar or more intensive usage patterns. This smartphone consumes more battery power than entry-level smartphones when using social media. However, it excels at handling intensive background processes or less efficient app handling, indicating its superior performance. For mobile gamers, the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  is a game-changer. It consumes less battery during gaming and excels at handling gaming tasks with unmatched efficiency. Its superior optimisation for video streaming tasks when using YouTube further enhances the gaming experience, instilling confidence in potential buyers about its performance. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C's camera is an area where it consumes significantly less battery than Entry Tier smartphones during photo and video capture, suggesting that its camera software or hardware has been optimised for power efficiency. When it comes to web browsing and email, the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  is reliable. It consumes less battery power during these tasks, underscoring its efficiency in handling internet-based tasks. This versatility reassures potential buyers about its performance and makes it a compelling option for those who rely heavily on these functions. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C demonstrates an impressive balance between battery life and consumption efficiency across everyday smartphone tasks, often outperforming the average Entry Tier smartphones. Its strengths in handling calls, gaming, camera usage, and multimedia functions more efficiently make it a compelling option for users requiring a phone capable of sustaining longer periods of use without frequent charging. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Xiaomi Redmi A2 Smartphone Comparison The comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi 13C and the Xiaomi Redmi A2 across various battery consumption metrics offers valuable insights into their efficiency and performance in everyday use. Here’s a chart detailing how each smartphone tested in battery usage for everyday smartphone activities: Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . In the comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi A2 and  Xiaomi Redmi 13C , it was found that the Xiaomi Redmi A2 consumes less power during social media interactions and MMS usage than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This is due to the Redmi A2's optimised background processes and lower display power usage.  However, in terms of gaming and data transfer consumption, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C's components, such as the processor and GPU, are robust but less efficient, leading to a higher power draw during intensive tasks. The  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  is also optimised for camera operations and YouTube streaming, making it more efficient and impressive than the Redmi A2. When managing email and web browsing battery consumption, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C uses considerably less power than the Redmi A2, extending the phone's overall usable time.  As the latest smartphone in the Xiaomi series, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C is an excellent choice for end users requiring an extended battery life, especially those frequently using power-intensive tasks. Despite its high power consumption in certain areas, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C ensures a smooth performance and is versatile, handling a wide range of functions seamlessly. In summary, this smartphone is a compelling option for users who need robust performance across various applications and can appreciate its extended battery life. Its power management, while allowing for higher consumption in some areas, contributes to a longer-lasting user experience, making the Xiaomi Redmi 13C a superior choice in the Entry Tier smartphone market compared to the Xiaomi Redmi A2. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Xiaomi Redmi 12C Smartphone Comparison The comparative analysis of battery consumption between the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  and Xiaomi Redmi 12C reveals significant differences in power management and efficiency.  The  Xiaomi  Redmi 13C  showcases superior battery longevity with an average battery day of life total l ing 52 hours compared to the Redmi 12C's  42 hours. This suggests that the 13C has enhanced battery optimisation across various functionalities. Let's examine the test results to see if the older version has been superseded in battery performance and everyday activities. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . The Xiaomi Redmi 13C outperforms the Xiaomi Redmi 12C in terms of consuming significantly less battery power when it comes to social media and communication. These differences suggest that the Xiaomi Redmi 13C's newer, less power-intensive hardware could be the reason for its superior performance. This smartphone is ideal for gaming and media consumption as it uses less for gaming, less for YouTube, and less for media player usage than the Xiaomi Redmi12C. This efficiency is an excellent advantage for entertainment enthusiasts, who can use their phones longer without frequent recharges. Even in camera usage, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C consumes less power than the Redmi 12C. This advantage boosts confidence in photo and video enthusiasts about the smartphone's capabilities, whether due to more efficient image processing or better hardware integration. For productivity tasks such as email and web browsing, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C again shows lower power consumption, which benefits users who heavily use their phone for work and personal management without a quick battery drain. A consistent observation across all tasks is that the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  maintains lower battery consumption than the Xiaomi Redmi 12C, suggesting superior power management technology. This consistency will likely make it a more versatile choice for a broader range of users, particularly those who enjoy multimedia content, gaming, and social media. It will benefit from upgrading to or choosing the Xiaomi Redmi 13C due to its better handling of battery drain. In summary,  the Xiaomi Redmi 13C is a more energy-efficient and performance-oriented smartphone in the budget smartphone market, aligning well with the needs of power users and multimedia enthusiasts. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi 13C Smartphone Comparison Finally, we can compare the battery consumption of three Xiaomi smartphones - the Redmi 13C, the Redmi A2, and the Redmi 12C - against the average battery consumption of Entry Tier smartphones in a detailed manner.  Analysing the test results reveals the performance between these phones and clarifies their efficiency in everyday activities.  The  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  has the highest average battery life, at 52 hours, exceeding the Redmi A2 by 8 hours, the Redmi 12C by 10 hours, and the Entry Tier average by 6 hours. This suggests that the Xiaomi Redmi 13C offers the best battery optimisation among compared smartphones. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . Battery consumption rates of Xiaomi Redmi smartphones were compared across different everyday activities. The results showed that while using social media apps, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C and Redmi 12C smartphones consume more battery than the Redmi A2 and the average. This could mean these phones have less efficient background management or more intensive app processing. Regarding gaming, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 outperforms the Xiaomi Redmi 13C and Redmi12C smartphones with remarkable efficiency, consuming significantly less battery power. This suggests that the Redmi A2 has hardware or software optimisations that enhance the gaming experience by reducing power usage during graphically intensive tasks. Regarding camera usage, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C is more efficient than the Redmi 12C and the Entry Tier average, which could be attributed to better sensor management or optimised image processing. For users who frequently use their smartphone for video content, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C is the most efficient phone tested, with the lowest consumption during video streaming and well suited for power users who engage in a variety of activities ranging from social media to photography and need extended battery life without frequent recharges. Users prioritising gaming and multimedia consumption might find the Xiaomi Redmi A2 more appealing due to its superior efficiency in these areas. It potentially offers longer play times and video streaming on a single charge. While the Xiaomi Redmi 12C appears less efficient, it may still appeal to budget-conscious users looking for a functional smartphone that aligns closely with Entry Tier performance and power consumption. In conclusion, the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  stands out as a comprehensive leader in overall battery life compared to smartphones. This makes it an excellent choice for those requiring a reliable and efficient smartphone to handle diverse and power-intensive tasks. However, the Redmi A2 offers unique gaming and video streaming advantages. These features might appeal to gamers and video enthusiasts . Understanding these differences can guide users in making more informed choices based on their usage patterns and battery life expectations. 4. Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Xiaomi Redmi 13C? The battery efficiency for the Xiaomi Redmi 13C was 1.5 leaf out of 5. How does the Xiaomi Redmin 13C compare to Entry Tier smartphones? All smartphones share the same battery capacity (5000 mAh), but efficiency and consumption vary. The Redmi 13C  and Redmi A2  have identical efficiency ratings of 1.5 leaves out of 5, much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 12C's 1 leaf, which indicates less effective use of the stored power. Also of Interest : Samsung Galaxy S23 FE - Premium Features and Affordability 5. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Xiaomi Redmi 13C use? The Xiaomi Redmi 13C has an annual energy consumption of  2.9 kWh annually. How does the Xiaomi Redmi 13C compare to Entry Tier smartphones? Regarding annual energy consumption, the Redmi 12C  uses a much higher annual energy of 3.3 kWh compared to 3.0 kWh for the Redmi A2 and 2.9 kWh for the Xiaomi Redmi 13C . VERDICT: What is it like to Use? Typically, the Xiaomi Redmi series phones have robust build quality and a modern and sturdy design. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C is no exception, with a plastic back and frame that keeps the smartphone lightweight yet durable enough for daily use. The  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  smartphone is powered by a MediaTek MT6769Z Helio G85 processor that can smoothly handle everyday activities like browsing, social media, and standard apps. For gaming, it should handle casual games well, but more demanding games may have specific limitations. It offers ample RAM and storage for multitasking and storage for average users needing space for photos, videos, and applications. Users can expect a display that balances quality and efficiency. It features a 6.74-inch screen with a resolution of 720 x 1600 pixels , providing a comfortable viewing experience for media consumption and web browsing. Although the Xiaomi Redmi 13C may not compete with higher-tiered smartphones, it should offer a solid camera experience suitable for casual photography. With a battery capacity of around 5000 mAh, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C offers an impressive battery life of 2 days on a single charge under regular use. Its efficient power management helps provide a longer battery life compared to other Entry Tier smartphones. It also runs on MIUI, Xiaomi's custom Android skin, and offers a user-friendly interface with various customisation options and additional apps and tools that may improve productivity. What's in the box? Xiaomi Redmi 13C Smartphone USB-A-to-C cable and wall charger SIM Ejector Tool User Manual Should I buy the Xiaomi Redmi 13C? The Xiaomi Redmi 13C is a compelling purchase option based on its long battery life, efficient power management, and balanced application performance. It is especially suited for users looking for a phone that combines affordability with reliable functionality, extended battery life, and a user-friendly experience. Whether you prioritise media consumption, need a dependable smartphone for daily tasks, or require a phone with a long battery life, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C is a strong contender for the title "Best Budget Smartphone of 2024" and a reasonable choice that meets a wide range of needs without compromising quality or performance. Extra Insights Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi 13C support 5G? Yes, it does Q: Does the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C have dual-SIM capabilities? Yes, it does Q: What storage and RAM variants are available for the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C? 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM,  128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM Q: Does the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  have stereo speakers? Yes, it does Q: Does the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  have a microSD card slot? Yes, it does Q: Is the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C VoLTE enabled? Yes, it is. Even if the device supports VoLTE users need to have this enabled in their SIMs to work and some networks may not have VoLTE services enabled. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes in high quality. Technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. It is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint worldwide to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China, and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil.  Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing!   If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer  looking to improve your smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn . Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Xiaomi Redmi A3 Smartphone Review: This Smartphone Shines as a Budget-Friendly Powerhouse Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199)  Ranking # 5 Video Review What you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi A3 Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi A3 is not just a budget smartphone; it's a smart investment that ensures you get the most out of your money without compromising essential features. Here's a detailed breakdown: Key Features: Display and Design : The Redmi A3 features a 6.71-inch HD+ display with DC dimming for better eye protection. It has good colour reproduction and brightness for its price point. The design is straightforward, with a slim flat frame, making it easy to hold. . plastic back and a waterdrop notch at the front. Processor and Performance : It is equipped with a MediaTek Helio G36 processor, suitable for basic tasks such as browsing, social media, and light gaming. Also, it offers a 90Hz refresh rate, bringing a smoother user experience. Camera Setup : The device includes a dual-camera setup on the rear, typically comprising a 13MP primary sensor and a 2MP depth sensor, which performs adequately in well-lit conditions. Battery Life : One of the standout features is its 5000mAh battery, which can comfortably last a full day on a single charge under moderate usage. Software : It runs on MIUI, Xiaomi's custom Android skin, which includes various features and customization options but comes with pre-installed apps and advertisements. Considerations: Performance Limitations : The MediaTek Helio G36 processor is unsuitable for heavy multitasking or high-end gaming. Users might experience lag and slow down during intensive tasks. Camera Performance in Low Light : The camera's performance is subpar in low-light conditions, which is common in this budget segment. Bloatware and Ads : MIUI might appeal to some, mainly because it contains bloatware and ads that can affect the user experience. Conclusion: The Xiaomi Redmi A3 stands out in the budget segment for its robust battery life and solid performance. It is an excellent choice for budget-conscious users or those who need a reliable secondary phone. While it may not boast the highest specifications, its affordability and overall functionality make it a competitive option in its price range. Specification Overview - Released Date: February 2024 Body : 168.3 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm or 6.63 x 3.0 x 0.33 inches. Weight 193g. Display : 6.71 inches, with 720 x 1650 pixels  resolution Protection : Corning® Gorilla® Glass 3 Operating System : Android 14, MIUI Chipset : Mediatek Helio G36, Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) Memory : 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM Connectivity : Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band.  Dual SIM; Stereo speakers - Yes, 3.5 Headjack: Yes Rear Camera : Wide (main): 8MP, f/2.0, 0.08 MP (auxiliary lens), LED flash, HDR Front Camera : 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) Video:  Front camera: 1080p@30fps, Rear camera : 1080p@30fps Battery : 5000 mAh, 10W wired Colour: Midnight Black, Forest Green (Olive Green), Star Blue (Lake Blue) Good Points Not So Good Points Stylish design and budget-friendly Lacking performance 6.71-inch HD+ IPS LCD screen with 90Hz Refresh Rate Limited camera functionality Android 14 Go Edition with MIUI with 3 years of security patch updates Slow charging Gorilla Glass 3 protection and s peakers located at the top Charger 3.5mm headphone jack included   Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer .   VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Xiaomi Redmi A3  and comparative smartphones. Xiaomi Redmi A3 ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review   is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Xiaomi Redmi A3's  battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumption Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels 1. Battery Performance What is the Xiaomi Redmi A3 Performance Score? In our comprehensive testing, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of  39 out of 100. How does the Xiaomi Redmi A3 compare to Entry Tier smartphones? The Xiaomi Redmi A3 shows a solid mix of capabilities and limitations. Its large battery capacity and relatively efficient energy use are significant pluses for anyone looking for a budget-friendly smartphone that doesn't require daily charging. The Xiaomi Redmi series exhibits a clear upward trend in battery performance scores, reflecting ongoing improvements in power management with each new smartphone.  The Redmi A2, launched in March 2023, marked a significant milestone with its score of 44 out of 100. This score set a solid baseline for battery performance in Xiaomi’s Entry Tier smartphones and laid a strong foundation for the subsequent smartphones. The Redmi 13C, introduced in November 2023, further elevated the benchmark with a score of 52 out of 100, demonstrating substantial advancements in battery efficiency and phone optimisation. However, the latest model, the  Xiaomi Redmi A3 , released in February 2024, deviated from this upward trend with a lower battery performance score of 39 out of 100. This deviation could indicate a shift in design focus, possibly towards cost reduction, different feature prioritisations, or variations in battery capacity and technology that are not directly correlated with higher efficiency scores. Typically, users expect newer smartphones to outperform older ones, especially regarding battery life and efficiency. Xiaomi might be positioning the Xiaomi Redmi A3 differently within its product lineup, possibly focusing on enhancing other aspects such as camera capabilities and display technology that appeal to a different market segment. The score progression, from the Redmi A2 to the Redmi 13C, highlights Xiaomi’s commitment to enhancing the battery capabilities of its smartphones. However, the apparent decline with the  Xiaomi Redmi A3  invites a closer examination of the balance between battery performance and other smartphone features. This observation underscores the importance of considering the overall user experience and the potential trade-offs in design decisions. Also of Interest : Have you missed this smartphone review? Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Review: Power Meets Performance in Your Pocket All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser . Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels.   Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Performing Smartphone   2. Battery Life How long will the Xiaomi Redmi A3 battery last? The Xiaomi Redmi A3  test results indicate a battery life of 1.5 days, or 44 hours , on a single charge. How does the Xiaomi Redmi A3 compare to Entry Tier smartphones? The Xiaomi Redmi A3's large capacity of 5000mAh suggests potential for long-lasting battery life. However, the actual usage time may not fully align with user expectations for two days, as indicated by the 1.5 days of use per charge. All three smartphones shown in the chart, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 , Redmi A2, and Redmi 13C, feature a 5000 mAh battery, which is standard across the Entry Tier and offers a solid baseline for battery life. Despite the same battery capacity, performance varies across phones, suggesting differences in hardware optimisation or software efficiency. The test results reveal a fluctuation in battery life scores that might also reflect changes in the underlying battery management technologies, integration of new software features that impact battery consumption, or even trade-offs for improving other hardware specifications. Xiaomi ensures consistent improvements in critical areas like battery life to maintain competitive advantage and consumer trust. For potential buyers, it’s crucial to evaluate smartphones based on comprehensive reviews and personal usage needs. The unexpectedly lower battery life score of the recently released Xiaomin Redmi A3 suggests a complex balance between cost, performance, and market differentiation. To conclude, a lower battery life score does not necessarily reflect the overall quality or value of the smartphone. 3.  NEW  Battery Consumption Xiaomi Redmi A3 battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The  Xiaomi Redmin A3  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the  Xiaomi Redmin A3  manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. The test results comparing the  Xiaomi Redmi A3  with the average entry-tier smartphone provide a detailed look at its battery consumption performance across various everyday activities. Taking a closer look at the test results, the Xiaomi Redmi A3's battery consumption across various activities compared with the average for entry-tier smartphones indicates varying degrees of efficiency and power management. This analysis reveals how the Xiaomi Redmi A3 benchmarks against typical usage patterns in the Entry Tier.  Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . The  Xiaomi Redmi A3's  slightly higher power consumption than the average presents potential inefficiencies in energy usage during high-engagement activities like browsing social media platforms. These insights can influence potential buyers, particularly those who value energy efficiency, with a deeper understanding of the Xiaomi Redmi A3's performance.  During gaming sessions, the  Xiaomi Redmi A3  demonstrates a significant increase in power consumption, indicating potential processing or graphics handling inefficiencies. This category also exhibits higher consumption in the Xiaomi Redmi A3, suggesting possible inefficiencies in data transmission or network handling. Both functions consume more power on the Xiaomi Redmi A3 than the average, with higher camera usage implying less sensor or processing efficiency optimisation. Compared to other Entry Tier smartphones, the  Xiaomi Redmi Redmi A3  consumes more energy across almost all activities. This could be less sophisticated power management or older technology that does not optimise battery use as effectively as other smartphones in the Entry Tier. This benchmark allows potential buyers to compare the Xiaomi Redmi A3's energy efficiency against other alternatives.  Interestingly, this smartphone excels in handling MMS, which could indicate optimisation specific to certain types of data processing or less energy-intensive software integration for messaging. This reassures potential buyers that the Xiaomi Redmi A3 is efficient in certain areas, even if it may not be the best choice for gaming enthusiasts. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi A3 vs Xiaomi Redmi A2 Smartphone Comparison The comparison of battery consumption between the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the Xiaomi Redmi A2 highlights significant differences in energy efficiency between these two smartphones across daily smartphone activities. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . The  Xiaomi Redmi A3  does consume more power than the Redmi A2 during social media activities involving heavy data and screen usage. It also shows higher power consumption for outgoing calls and MMS, suggesting less efficient handling of essential communication functions. The Xiaomi Redmi A3 consumes more power for gaming than the Redmi A2, indicating a heavier processing load or less optimisation for gaming graphics and processing. Its higher consumption during file transfers suggests potential inefficiencies in data handling or network connectivity. This smartphone uses more power for the camera but slightly less for YouTube, indicating differences in how video streaming and camera operations are optimised. The  Xiaomi Redmi A3  draws more power across email, media player, and SMS functions, except for slightly lower consumption during YouTube viewing. Interestingly, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 is more efficient in web browsing than the A2. The power consumption differences between the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Redmi A2,  particularly in gaming , social media, and camera use, could significantly affect the user experience, especially for heavy users in these activities. However, the Redmi A3's power efficiency in web browsing might appeal to frequent internet surfers who value extended browsing time. The analysis demonstrates that the Xiaomi Redmi A3 consumes more battery power across most activities than the Redmi A2, indicating general battery efficiency. Potential buyers must consider these aspects, especially if their typical smartphone usage involves heavy activities like gaming and social media. The Redmi A2 offers better battery management for such activities, potentially providing a longer-lasting user experience per charge. This comparison underscores the significance of battery efficiency as a critical factor when choosing between different smartphones within the same brand or price range, empowering potential buyers to make informed decisions based on their usage patterns and priorities. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi A3 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C Smartphone Comparison Let's continue to analyse the battery consumption data for the Xiaomi Redmi A3 compared with the Xiaomi Redmi 13C across various daily smartphone activities. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . The  Xiaomi Redmi A3  and Redmi 13C are compared for battery consumption for various activities. Both smartphones show high consumption in social media usage, but the Xiaomi Redmi A3 is slightly higher, indicating a marginal difference in energy efficiency. For outgoing calls and MMS, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 consumes more power for calls but less for MMS, suggesting variations in communication efficiency. While the Xiaomi Redmi A3 may have a slight edge in MMS efficiency, it's important to note that the Redmi 13C still maintains a solid overall performance. One area where the two smartphones significantly differ is gaming. The  Xiaomi Redmi A3  consumes more power during gaming sessions. This indicates better optimisation with newer processing technology, in the Redmi 13C resulting in a smoother gaming experience for users. The Xiaomi Redmi A3 displayed higher power consumption during file transfer, suggesting less efficient data transmission management. Also, the Redmi 3C proved to be more energy-efficient in camera use and YouTube streaming, which is crucial for users who prioritise multimedia functionality. The Redmi 13C stands out with its significantly lower power consumption across email, media player, and SMS functions, suggesting superior optimisation for these everyday tasks. This consistent efficiency in daily use scenarios is a testament to the Redmi 13C's reliable performance and battery life. Also, web browsing is notably more efficient on the Redmi 13C which might appeal to users who engage in long internet sessions. This comparison illustrates that the Xiaomi Redmi 13C generally offers better battery efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 across various standard smartphone activities. The Redmi 13C's superior performance in efficiently managing battery consumption is particularly evident in multimedia uses, web browsing, and essential communications. For users prioritising long battery life and efficient power usage, the Redmi 13C would be a more suitable choice. The Xiaomi Redmi A3 , while adequate, shows areas where improvements could enhance user experience, especially for those engaging in high-consumption activities. This analysis underscores the importance of considering how battery life aligns with personal usage patterns when choosing between smartphones. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi A3 Smartphone Comparison The analysis of battery consumption across the Xiaomi Redmi A3 , the Redmi A2, and the Redmi 13C smartphones reveals distinct patterns in how each phone manages power across common smartphone activities. This comparison also includes average consumption data for the Entry Tier providing a broader context for evaluating each smartphone's performance. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser . Detailed Observations: Social Media and Video Streaming: It's important to note that the Xiaomi Redmi A3 consumes more power than the Redmi A2 and slightly more than the Redmi 13C and the Entry Tier average during high-engagement activities such as social media and YouTube streaming. This observation highlights Xiaomi Redmi A3's limitations and inefficient energy use in these scenarios. Communication: The Xiaomi Redmi A3 consumes more power during voice calls and MMS than the Redmi A2, but it outperforms the Redmi 13C in MMS usage. This variability in communication efficiency across smartphones provides a comprehensive understanding of the Xiaomi Redmi A3's communication performance. Entertainment and Utility: For tasks like gaming, and file transfers, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 consumes more energy than the Redmi A2 and the Redmi 13C. On the other hand, the Redmi 13C shows a closer alignment to the Entry Tier average, suggesting better optimisation from a recently released smartphone. Furthermore, the Xiaomi RedmiA3's power usage for the camera, media player, and email is consistently higher than its counterparts, indicating potentially lower overall battery efficiency. Web Browsing: Interestingly, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 shows comparable or slightly better efficiency in web browsing compared to the Redmi13C, indicating some optimisation for lighter, less intensive tasks. What does this mean for Users? Users who frequently engage in gaming, video streaming, and social media would benefit from choosing the Redmi 13C over the Xiaomi Redmi A3 due to its superior battery management and lower power consumption. If as a user your phone use is balanced between calls, light web browsing, or media consumption, the Redmi A2 is a reliable choice. Its performance and battery life strike a balance, reassurance that it can adapt to your moderate usage needs. While the Xiaomi Redmi A3 may consume more power across many activities, it still appeals to budget-conscious users. If you prioritise other features over battery efficiency, this smartphone is designed with your needs in mind, ensuring you get the most value for your money. 4. Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Xiaomi Redmi A3? The battery efficiency for the Xiaomi Redmi 13C was 1.0 leaf out of 5. How does the Xiaomi Redmin A3 compare to Entry Tier smartphones?  An efficiency score of 1 out of 5 suggests that the smartphone manages its power effectively drawn from the battery when considering its hardware and software integration. The efficiency rating, while average, does not highlight any significant advancements in power management that differentiate the Xiaomi Redmi 13 from competitors. The battery efficiency scores among the Xiaomi models indicate a notable progression, with one surprising exception - the  Xiaomi Redmi A3 . Despite being the most recent release, this smartphone registers the lowest efficiency score, a stark contrast to the Redmi A2 and the Redmi 13C, which score higher at 1.5 out of 5. This unexpected decrease in efficiency in the latest phone series could raise concerns about technological advancements or design decisions that may have compromised energy management. The improved scores in the Redmi A2 and especially the Redmi 13C are a testament to Xiaomi's commitment to quality. These scores suggest that Xiaomi has successfully integrated more effective power management technologies in these smartphones, enhancing user experience and contributing to the longevity of the phones.   Also of Interest : Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Review: Unveiling an Affordable and Feature-Rich Smartphone 5. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Xiaomi Redmi A3 use? The  Xiaomi Redmi A3 has an annual energy consumption of  3.7 kWh annually. How does the Xiaomi Redmi A3 compare to Entry Tier smartphones? The Xiaomi Redmi A3 is energy-efficient, with an annual energy consumption of only 3.7 kWh. This low consumption level is beneficial for reducing electricity costs and from an environmental perspective. Despite the low energy consumption, the overall energy efficiency could be misleading if this smartphone requires multiple charges within a short period, especially for power users. Annual energy consumption is trending downward from the Xiaomi Redmi A3 's 3.7 kWh to the Redmi 13C's 2.9 kWh, with the Redmi A2 at an intermediate level of 3.0 kWh. This progression reflects an overall improvement in how efficiently these smartphones utilise power, translating into lower operational costs and a smaller environmental footprint. The decrease in energy consumption especially in the latest release, the Redmi 13C, aligns with broader environmental sustainability goals. Lower energy requirements mean reduced carbon emissions associated with power production, positioning the Redmi A2 and Redmi 13C as more eco-friendly for environmentally conscious users. VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Xiaomi Redmi A3 strikes a great balance between cost and performance. It's not just an affordable smartphone, but one that delivers essential functions without significant compromises, making it an excellent value for budget-conscious users.  Well-suited for the Entry Tier, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 is perfect for first-time smartphone users or as a secondary, budget-friendly phone. It offers reliable performance for everyday tasks, satisfactory photo quality, and excellent battery life. Its display and build quality are decent for its price point. This smartphone is a strong contender for users looking for an affordable smartphone that covers all the basics. What's in the box? Xiaomi Redmi A3 Smartphone USB-A-to-C cable 10W charger A SIM ejector tool User manuals Should I buy the Xiaomi Redmi A3? As an Entry Tier smartphone, the  Xiaomi Redmi A3  is priced competitively, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users. It has an acceptable battery life and basic functionality for calling, texting, and light app usage. Other smartphones offer better satisfaction for users with higher performance needs, particularly in areas like gaming and photography. If you value battery life and a user-friendly experience at an affordable price, the  Xiaomi Redmi A3  is a commendable choice. However, exploring alternatives within the Xiaomi smartphone series or other brands might be more suitable for intensive use.  Extra Insights Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi A3 support 5G? Yes, it does Q: Does the  Xiaomi Redmi A3 have dual-SIM capabilities? Yes, it does Q: What storage and RAM variants are available for the  Xiaomi Redmi A3? 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM Q: Does the  Xiaomi Redmi 13C  have stereo speakers? Yes, it does Q: Does the  Xiaomi Redmi A3 have a microSD card slot? Yes, it does Q: Is the  Xiaomi Redmi A3 VoLTE enabled? Yes, it is. Even if the device supports VoLTE users need to have this enabled in their SIMs to work and some networks may not have VoLTE services enabled. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes in high quality. Technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. It is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint worldwide to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China, and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil.  Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn . Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

Are you looking for a smartphone that provides excellent value without compromising features? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series could be the perfect choice for you. This new lineup promises impressive performance, vibrant displays, and long battery life, all at an affordable price. Whether a casual user or a tech enthusiast, the Redmi Note 13 Series is designed to meet your unique needs. Find out which smartphone suits you best and enjoy the power and versatility of Xiaomi's latest offerings. Comprehensive Battery Insights: Why Choose the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series In a highly competitive smartphone market in 2024, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series stands out with its exceptional battery performance. This series is designed to provide long-lasting power, ensuring your smartphone keeps up with your daily activities. Whether you're a heavy user or someone who values reliability, the Redmi Note 13 Series offers impressive battery life, fast charging capabilities, and energy-efficient hardware. Introduction to Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series Battery Performance Analysis This analysis focuses on the battery performance of each smartphone, highlighting their impressive battery life and efficiency. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G leads with exceptional battery life, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro , the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ , and Redmi Note 13 5G smartphones also demonstrate strong performance. These insights showcase Xiaomi's dedication to optimising battery life and providing reliable smartphones that meet user needs. Graphs have been prepared to illustrate the battery performance of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series, focusing on five key metrics: battery life, charging time, annual energy consumption, and power efficiency. These insights are based on rigorous testing by SmartViser, with ViserMark Labels serving as an authoritative guide on battery performance. Let's begin our analysis of the test results by looking at the first key metric: Battery Performance (Graph 1) Shown in Graph 1 is a comprehensive view of how each Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series smartphone scores in terms of battery performance compared to the Mid Tier (€200-€499) average. The Mid Tier average battery performance score is 45 out of 100. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G scores slightly below the average at 44, the Note 13 Pro 5G at 42, and the Note 13 5G at 43. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G outperforms the other smartphones and the Mid Tier average, scoring 48. This score reflects various factors, including battery life charging time, and energy efficiency, providing a holistic view of battery performance for potential users seeking a reliable and long-lasting smartphone. Battery Life (Graph 2 & 3) Now, we take a more detailed look at how long each smartphone in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series can last on a single charge under typical usage conditions. This is crucial for users who need a phone that can reliably last through their daily routines without frequent recharges. Graph 2 shows the average battery life in days for each smartphone, compared to the Mid Tier average of 1.82 days. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, Note 13 Pro 5G, and Note 13 5G each achieve an average battery life of 1.5 days. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G impressively exceeds this with a battery life of 2 days, outperforming both its series counterparts and the Mid Tier average. This superior performance makes it a standout choice for users prioritising battery longevity in their smartphone selection. The next metric provides a more granular analysis of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 battery performance. It provides a detailed view of how long each smartphone can sustain continuous use, giving a clearer picture of day-to-day usability. In Graph 3, the Mid Tier average battery life is 46 hours. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G achieve an average of 36 hours, while the Note 13 5G lasts slightly longer at 39 hours. Remarkably, the Note 13 4G surpasses all with 51 hours of use, significantly outperforming the Mid Tier average and others. This extended battery life in hours highlights the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G as an excellent option for users needing prolonged usage without frequent charging, making it ideal for heavy daily use and long-duration activities. Battery Charging Times (Graph 4) Exploring the fourth key metric, charging times is essential for understanding how quickly each Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series can be recharged. Fast charging is a crucial feature for users who need their smartphones ready for use quickly. This metric is particularly significant given Xiaomi's unique selling proposition (USP) is its fast charging capability. In Graph 4 , the mid-tier average charging time is 1.42 hours. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G impressively charges the fastest, taking only 32 minutes. The Xiaomi Note 13 Pro 5G follows with a charging time of 53 minutes. The Note 13 5G and Note 13 4G have longer charging times of 1.23 and 1.13 hours, respectively, but still fall below the Mid Tier average. These results highlight the exceptional fast-charging capabilities of Note 13 Pro+ 5G and Note 13 Pro 5G, making them ideal for users who prioritise minimal downtime and need their phones ready to go quickly. Xiaomi's emphasis on fast charging sets these phones apart, ensuring users can rely on their phones to recharge rapidly and efficiently. Battery Efficiency (Graph 5) Next, let's examine the fifth key metric, battery efficiency which provides insight into how effectively each Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series smartphone utilises its battery power. Battery efficiency is crucial for users who want their phones to last longer and operate more sustainably over time In Graph 5 , we can see that the mid-tier average power efficiency score is 1.06 leaves. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G and Note 13 Pro 5G have a score of 0.5 leaves, indicating slightly lower efficiency in their power usage to the average. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G and Note 13 4G, with their higher score of 1 leaf, show commendable performance, closely aligning with the Mid Tier average and reassuring users about their power usage. Annual Energy Consumption (Graph 6) Look at the sixth key metric, Annual Energy Consumption. This metric measures the energy consumed by each phone in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series over a year. It is essential for environmentally conscious users as it provides insight into the device's energy efficiency and potential environmental impact. In Graph 6 , the Mid Tier's average annual energy consumption is 3.62 kWh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G and Note 13 Pro 5G consume the most energy, with values of 4.5 and 4.6 kWh, respectively. The Note 13 5G has a slightly lower consumption at 4.2 kWh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G excels with the lowest annual energy consumption of 3.2 kWh, significantly below the Mid Tier average. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G's low energy consumption offers significant environmental benefits, making it an ideal choice for users prioritising sustainability. Despite its impressive battery life and efficient power usage, it maintains a lower energy footprint over the year, perfectly aligning with eco-conscious values. For users looking to minimise their energy usage without sacrificing performance, the Note 13 4G offers a compelling and responsible solution. Advanced Battery Analysis: Discovering the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series Using SmartViser's viSer  with VWS Analytics Studio's advanced analytical capabilities, we've thoroughly examined the battery consumption patterns of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series. This analysis highlights the battery performance of each phone in the series and if you go to our website, you can learn more about how we test smartphones . The graph shown below provides a comprehensive view of the battery consumption patterns of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series, featuring the Pro+, Pro, 5G, and 4G smartphones, in comparison to the average Mid Tier smartphone. It specifically highlights the current consumption in daily user activities such as social media, gaming, and web browsing. This detailed comparison helps you understand the efficiency and performance of each phone in scenarios that match your usage, showcasing Xiaomi's advancements in battery optimisation and energy efficiency. Be the first to know about new reviews, updates, news and events. Detailed Battery Consumption Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is an excellent option for individuals seeking a dependable and affordable smartphone. It features a 5000mAh battery with a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 48/100, delivering up to 51 hours of battery life. The charging time for this smartphone is just 1 hour and 13 minutes. It is perfect for casual tasks such as social media, web browsing, media consumption, and light gaming, making it especially suitable for casual users, students, and anyone needed a dependable phone. Battery Life for Daily Use: In daily usage scenarios, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G stands out with its exceptional battery life, making it perfect for extended use without frequent recharges. Compared to the 5G models, it is more efficient in tasks, like SMS, email, and media playback, offering longer usage times. While it lacks the speed of 5G connectivity, its overall performance and energy efficiency make it a strong contender for users prioritising longevity and simplicity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is designed to enhance connectivity and speed for faster internet access. It comes with a 5000mAh battery, achieving a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 43/100 and providing up to 39 hours of use. It can be fully charged in 1 hour and 23 minutes. This phone is well-suited for social media, video streaming, and multitasking with 5G speeds, making it an ideal choice for frequent travellers and multitaskers. Battery Life for Daily Use: The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G effectively balances power efficiency and performance, offering reliable battery life with the added advantage of 5G speeds. It is particularly effective for tasks such as web browsing and social media. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G falls slightly behind the 4G phone in terms of total battery life, it offers a significant improvement for users who need faster internet for activities like downloading and uploading. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a mid-range powerhouse designed for users who demand more. It features a slightly larger 5100mAh battery, a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 42/100, and offers up to 36 hours of use. Charging takes only 53 minutes. This smartphone excels in gaming, video streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking, making it perfect for power users and gamers needing robust performance. Battery Life for Daily Use: The Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is tailored for heavy-duty tasks, providing enhanced battery capacity for extended gaming and media consumption. While its battery performance score is slightly lower than the 4G model, it compensates with superior performance in demanding applications. Compared to the base 5G phone, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G offers better support for multitasking and power-intensive activities, making it a solid choice for power users. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G The flagship smartphone, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, offers top-tier features and performance. With a 5000mAh battery, it achieves a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 44/100 and provides up to 36 hours of use, with an impressive charging time of just 32 minutes. This phone is ideal for high-end gaming, professional use, content creation, and multitasking. It suits tech enthusiasts and professionals requiring top-tier performance and features. Battery Life for Daily Use: The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G stands out with its balanced battery performance and quick charging time. It is the most efficient smartphone regarding power usage, making it ideal for professional and high-demand applications. While its battery life is the same as the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G phone, its superior energy efficiency and quicker charging provide an edge for users needing reliable, fast power charging. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is well-suited for intensive tasks such as high-end gaming and professional content creation, offering a good experience in the Redmi Note 13 series. Technological Advancements in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series incorporates cutting-edge technological advancements to enhance the user experience. Here are the key highlights: Battery Optimisation:  Enhanced power management algorithms ensure prolonged battery life. For example, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G optimises power usage during heavy multitasking, maintaining efficiency and performance. 5G Connectivity:  Improved network speeds in 5G smartphones significantly enhance streaming and online gaming experiences, making the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G ideal for high-speed internet users who demand seamless connectivity. Fast Charging Technology:  Advanced solutions reduce charging time, with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G recharging in just 32 minutes, ensuring minimal downtime and maximum usage. Energy Efficiency:  Enhanced hardware and software designs lower energy consumption, highlighted by the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4G’s industry-leading power efficiency of 3.2 kWh/year, making it an environmentally friendly choice. Enhanced Performance:  Upgraded processors and RAM in Pro models support demanding applications and multitasking, ensuring smooth and responsive performance even under heavy use. AI Integration:  Advanced AI features to improve battery usage, enhance camera functionality, and provide more innovative user interactions. AI-driven battery management learns user habits to extend usage time by optimising background processes. Display Technology:  Advanced display technologies, including OLED panels and adaptive refresh rates up to 120Hz, ensure vibrant visuals and smooth interactions while conserving battery life, providing an immersive viewing experience. Software Innovations:  Xiaomi’s MIUI offers a seamless, customisable user experience with features like Quick Ball (implemented as a system service in MIUI) for more straightforward navigation and enhanced security measures to protect user data, ensuring a secure and user-friendly interface. All these advancements make the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series compelling for users seeking reliable, high-performance smartphones tailored to diverse needs. Summary The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series boasts impressive battery performance, advanced technology, and user-focused features. Each phone in the series offers unique strengths, from the Redmi Note 13 4G battery life to the high-performance Pro+ 5G. Whether you prioritise battery life, speed, or advanced features, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series has a smartphone to meet your needs, making it a versatile and reliable choice for many users. Written By: Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at Smart V iser . She plays a crucial role in developing communication and marketing strategies for the company. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn .   Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . Also, we link to relevant and other trusted affiliate partners like Xiaomi FR. If a ViserMark user clicks an affiliate link and purchases a smartphone from any of these affiliate sites within a set amount of time, ViserMark receives a small commission. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4000 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Smartphone Review: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is Familiar - But Still Improves SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro (€700+)  Flagship/Pro Tier Ranking # 5 Video Review It will be available shortly. Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  leads the way in foldable smartphones, continuing Samsung's innovative approach with its flip design. This smartphone merges cutting-edge hinge technology with an excellent display. The latest Snapdragon processor powers this stylish phone and offers exceptional performance that sets it apart from conventional smartphones. Pros Cons Improved folding design with bright screen and AI functionality Looks familiar, with a few improvements at a higher price Increased battery life with 1.5 days of use The cover screen lacks functionality Good 50MP camera with auto zoom feature 25W wired charging IP68 dust and water resistant 7-year support for software and security updates   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 The top interesting observations and highlights are based on the ViserMark labels and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 performance. A battery performance score of 44 out of 100, suggests that the phone performs adequately but leaves room for improvement. It indicates that the phone offers a balance between battery life and performance but may not be as strong in intensive use cases or heavy multitasking when compared to higher-scoring competitors. While the battery life of 1.5 days or 38 hours is competitive, the charging time of 1 hour and 34 minutes might be less impressive than some fast-charging smartphones. This could suggest that users prioritising long battery life might appreciate the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 , but those who need quick top-ups throughout the day may find the charging speed lacking. The ViserMark labels for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 reveal a smartphone that balances innovation with decent battery life and efficiency. While its charging time and battery performance score suggest room for improvement, the overall energy consumption and moderate efficiency rating make it a reasonable choice for environmentally conscious users. The insights suggest a well-rounded phone that caters to users who value modern design and adequate performance without the highest demand for intensive use. Specification Overview  - Released Date: July 2024 Body: 165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm (unfolded) 85.1 x71.9 x9 mm (folded), weight 187g. Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 with aluminium frame. It supports multiple eSIMs, but only one physical SIM. Display : Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.7-inch screen, 120Hz refresh rate with 1080 x 2640 resolution and HDR10+. IP48 dust/water rating. The folded cover is super AMOLED, 3.4 inches, and has 720 x 748 resolution. Operating System : Android 14, One UI 6.1.1. Chipset :   Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) , Adreno 750 processor Memory : 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM . No expandable storage Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n / ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct. Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. Camera : Main: 50MP (wide) 12 MP (ultrawide) dual pixel PDAF, OIS , HDR, . Video: 4K@30/60fps Front Camera:  10MP (wide) and Video 4K@30/60fps Battery : 4000mAh, 25W Wired, 15W wireless and 4 . 5W reverse wireless . A Vapour Chamber has been added that dissipates heat quickly. Colour : Blue, Yellow, Mint, Silver Shadow. Online Exclusive: Crafted Black, White and Peach Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Test Results Learn more about the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6    performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance Here's the Battery Performance score for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6. Based on the test results, let's look at the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  battery performance compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Google Pixel 8 , as well as the Flagship/Pro Tier average. Both Samsung devices have 4000mAh battery capacity and the Google Pixel 8 has a slightly larger battery of 4575mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 has the best battery performance among Flagship/Pro Tier smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Google Pixel 8 closely following. All three phones outperform the average score for the Flagship/Pro tier, indicating their superior battery management. This comparison highlights the competitive nature of the Flagship/Pro Tier smartphone market, where even slight differences in performance can influence user choice. While battery performance is a crucial strength for the Galaxy Z Flip6, other factors such as design, features, and brand loyalty will also have significant roles in the final purchasing decision. 2. Battery Life Let's see the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  test results. Based on the provided battery life ViserMark test results for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and its competitors within the Flagship/Pro (€700+) category, here are the highlights. The evaluated smartphones, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 , Samsung Galaxy S24 , and Google Pixel 8 , achieve approximately 1.5 days of battery life. The average for Flagship/Pro tier phones is slightly higher at 1.56 days. This consistency in battery life indicates that even though there are differences in hours, the day-to-day experience is similar across these smartphones. Despite slight variance in hourly performance, these smartphones generally provide users with reliable battery life over a day of typical use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 offers 38 hours of battery life, which places it between the Google Pixel 8 (36 hours) and the Flagship/Pro tier average (40 hours). The Samsung Galaxy S24 has the lowest battery life at 34 hours. This suggests that the Galaxy Z Flip6 is optimised for better battery longevity compared to the other phones, making it a suitable choice for users who need longer battery life for day-to-day activities without frequent recharging. The battery life comparison for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 reveals that it performs competitively within the Flagship/Pro tier, offering 38 hours or 1.5 days of use. This positions it favourably against the Google Pixel 8 and Samsung Galaxy S24 while being slightly below the tier average. The insights indicate that Samsung’s foldable design does not compromise battery performance, making the Z Flip6 an attractive option for users who value both innovation and battery longevity. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. Based on the provided Battery Consumption test results, where the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is represented in dark blue and the Samsung Galaxy S24 in light blue, here are the detailed observations. Across most daily activities, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 generally shows lower (less negative) values compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 (light blue). This indicates that the Galaxy Z Flip6 consumes less battery power and is more efficient in these categories. The battery consumption for social media usage is higher on the Galaxy Z Flip6 compared to the Galaxy S24, also for outgoing calls, the Galaxy Z Flip6 shows higher battery consumption. Users who frequently send MMS messages might experience quicker battery drain on the Samsung Galaxy S24, making the Z Flip6 more efficient for these activities. Similarly, gamers will find the Z Flip6 more efficient, as it will require less frequent charging. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S24 is a more efficient choice for multimedia enthusiasts who spend considerable time on these applications, as it will require less frequent charging. Similarly for productivity tasks like email and SMS the Samsung Galaxy S24 generally shows better battery efficiency compared to the Z Flip6. The battery consumption analysis reveals that the Samsung Galaxy S24 is generally more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 across various activities. This makes the Galaxy S24 a better choice for users prioritising battery performance, including social media users and gamers. However, the Z Flip6 shows better efficiency in gaming and is ideal for photographers. The insights highlight the Samsung Galaxy S24’s strengths in battery efficiency, ensuring it can meet the demands of various user segments effectively. Let's compare the battery consumption of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  and the Google Pixel 8 using the provided test results. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 shows lower battery consumption for activities such as gaming, multimedia (YouTube and Media Player), and productivity tasks (email, SMS, web browsing). This suggests that the Z Flip6 is a more efficient choice for users who spend considerable time on these applications, offering longer usage times without frequent charging. However, the analysis reveals that the Pixel 8 is more efficient for outgoing calls and social media usage, with significantly lower battery consumption compared to the Z Flip6. This makes the Google Pixel 8 a better option for users who are heavy on social media platforms and a better choice for users who make frequent calls and need longer battery life in this area. The battery consumption analysis reveals that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is generally more efficient than the Google Pixel 8 across various activities. This makes it a better choice for users prioritising battery performance and highlights the Z Flip6’s strengths in battery efficiency, ensuring it can meet the demands of various users effectively, while the Pixel 8 remains a strong contender for social media enthusiasts. Finally, these test results compare the battery consumption of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 (dark blue), Samsung Galaxy S24 (light blue), and Google Pixel 8 (orange) across various daily activities, with the average Flagship/Pro Tier (green) included as a benchmark. The analysis of battery consumption shows that the Samsung Galaxy S24 has consistently superior battery efficiency compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and Google Pixel 8 in most daily activities. The S24 performs exceptionally well in social media usage, outgoing calls, file transfer, camera usage, YouTube, media player, SMS, email, and web browsing. This makes the S24 a practical choice for users who prioritize battery life, providing extended usage between charges. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 shows notable battery efficiency in gaming and MMS, but lags in activities. The Google Pixel 8 performs better in social media usage compared to the Z Flip6, but has higher battery consumption in gaming, camera usage, and multimedia activities. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy S24 is the most efficient smartphone in this comparison, making it the top recommendation for users seeking optimal battery performance across a wide range of daily activities. The Samsung Galaxy S24 generally demonstrates better battery efficiency across most daily activities than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and Google Pixel 8 , making it the best choice for users who prioritise battery life across various activities. 4.   Battery Efficiency Taking into account the battery efficiency comparison for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and its competitors in the Flagship/Pro (€700+) category, here are the key observations. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 has a higher battery efficiency, which means it consumes less power compared to the other two smartphones for the same amount of use. This could lead to a lower overall environmental impact, making it an appealing choice for environmentally conscious users. It aligns with global trends towards sustainability, where energy-efficient mobile phones play an increasingly important role in reducing carbon footprints. With a significant advantage over its competitors in the Flagship/Pro tier, the battery efficiency comparison underscores the standout performance of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 . With a 1.5 hours per unit rating, it offers enhanced efficiency, making it ideal for heavy users and those prioritising sustainability. The consistent efficiency among other Flagship phones further highlights that the Galaxy Z Flip6 is a high-performing smartphone and an environmentally conscious choice, catering to a wide range of user needs and preferences. The focus on battery efficiency positions it as a compelling option. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption Based on the annual energy consumption test results for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and its competitors within the Flagship/Pro (€700+) category, here are the highlights. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 has the lowest annual energy consumption among smartphones compared, consuming 3.4 kWh per year. This makes the Z Flip6 the most energy-efficient option in its category. Users who are environmentally conscious or looking to reduce their electricity bills may find this phone particularly attractive. This low energy consumption underlines Samsung's commitment to optimising power usage in their foldable devices. The annual energy consumption comparison highlights the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 as the most energy-efficient. This efficiency surpasses the Samsung Galaxy S24 and the Google Pixel 8 , the latter consuming the most energy at 4.1 kWh. The Z Flip6’s superior energy management not only appeals to environmentally conscious users but also provides practical benefits for heavy users by potentially reducing the frequency of charges. These insights reinforce its position as a strong contender in the Flagship/Pro Tier smartphone market, combining innovative design with impressive energy efficiency. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 - what's it like to use? The innovative foldable design of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 offers a unique and engaging user experience. When unfolded, it combines the convenience of a compact form factor with the functionality of a full-size smartphone. Its impressive battery efficiency and relatively low annual energy consumption make it not just a stylish choice, but a practical and value-for-money option for many users. The main display, with its vibrant colours and smooth performance, is sure to excite and engage you. The compact size, when folded, makes it incredibly easy to carry and store, catering to users who want portability. The phone's exceptional energy efficiency not only contributes to a longer battery life but also ensures that users can rely on it throughout the day with fewer charges, adding to its convenience. Pros Cons Innovative Design : The foldable screen offers a unique and practical form factor. Durability Concerns : Foldable designs can be perceived as less durable than traditional smartphones. Superior Battery Efficiency : Consumes only 3.4 kWh annually, the lowest among its peers. Learning Curve : New users may need time to adapt to the foldable form factor and its features. Long Battery Life : Efficient power management reduces the need for frequent charging. Price : As a flagship device, it comes with a premium price tag, which may be a barrier for some consumers. Environmental Impact : Lower energy consumption contributes to a reduced environmental footprint. Portability : Compact when folded, making it easy to carry and store. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6? Appeal to Tech Enthusiasts and Early Adopters: The innovative foldable design provides a unique and cutting-edge experience, making it an ideal choice for those who love exploring the latest technology and being among the first to try new gadgets. Attract Environmentally Conscious Users: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 stands out with its lowest annual energy consumption among competitors, making it the perfect choice for environmentally conscious users who prioritise sustainability and want to reduce their environmental footprint. For Heavy Users and Professionals: The efficient power management and superior battery efficiency ensure long battery life, making it ideal for professionals, gamers, and anyone who relies heavily on their smartphone throughout the day. Catering to Style-Conscious Consumers and Frequent Travellers: When folded, the sleek, modern design and compact size make the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 highly portable and stylish. It is perfect for those who value aesthetics and need a powerful yet easily portable device for on-the-go use. CONCLUSION The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is a remarkable smartphone designed to appeal to a wide range of users. Its unique foldable design, efficient power management, and modern aesthetics make it an appealing choice for those seeking innovation and practicality in their next smartphone. Whether you are a professional in need of reliable battery life, a traveller looking for a portable device, or someone who values sustainability, the Galaxy Z Flip6 offers compelling features that are worth considering. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

Google continues to push the boundaries of innovation, as demonstrated at the ninth annual Made by Google event in 2024. This year's showcase was a testament to the company’s unyielding commitment to embedding AI deeply into the fabric of everyday life. From the unveiling of the latest Pixel smartphones to the introduction of advanced wearable technology, Google is not just keeping pace with the digital age; it's defining it. With the integration of the Gemini AI across multiple devices and an array of new features in the Android ecosystem, Google is making a bold statement: AI is no longer a futuristic concept but a present-day reality that can enhance productivity, creativity, and personal expression. This article delves into the key announcements from the event, exploring how Google’s latest offerings, including the Pixel 9 series, Pixel Watch 3, and Pixel Buds Pro 2, are set to redefine user experiences. Gemini: The Heart of Google's AI Ambitions At the core of Google's 2024 innovations is Gemini , the company’s latest AI model that is set to revolutionise how users interact with their devices. Gemini is not merely an upgrade to existing AI systems; it represents a paradigm shift in how AI can be seamlessly integrated into daily life. The deep integration of Gemini into Android OS means that this AI is now accessible to billions of users worldwide, offering a more natural, context-aware interaction with technology. Gemini Live , one of the flagship features, introduces a conversational AI experience that feels remarkably human. Unlike traditional digital assistants that rely on scripted responses, Gemini Live can understand context, follow complex threads of conversation, and even manage multi-step tasks. Whether you’re brainstorming a project, seeking detailed information, or managing everyday tasks, Gemini Live promises to be a versatile companion. It can seamlessly switch between contexts, allowing users to interrupt or revisit conversations as needed, making it a truly dynamic tool in the modern user’s arsenal. Google has also ensured that Gemini prioritises user privacy and security. By keeping data processing on the device for many tasks, Gemini minimises the need for external data transfers, thus reducing the risk of breaches. This on-device processing is powered by the new Tensor G4 chip , which is designed to handle the demands of advanced AI models like Gemini with efficiency and speed. For the most sensitive tasks, Gemini ensures that your data never leaves your phone, offering a layer of security that is increasingly crucial in today’s digital world. The Pixel 9 Series: A Leap in Mobile Innovation Google’s Pixel series has long been synonymous with cutting-edge technology, and the 2024 lineup continues this tradition with the introduction of the Pixel 9 , Pixel 9 Pro , Pixel 9 Pro XL , and Pixel 9 Pro Fold . These devices are not just about incremental upgrades; they represent a significant leap in both hardware and software capabilities, powered by the Tensor G4 chip. Design and Display : The Pixel 9 series introduces a refined design that not only enhances aesthetics but also improves functionality. The new models feature the sleek Super Actua displays, which are the brightest and most vibrant screens Google has produced. With sizes ranging from 6.3 inches on the Pixel 9 Pro to 6.8 inches on the Pixel 9 Pro XL, these devices cater to a wide range of preferences. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Google’s latest foldable, offers the largest inner display ever seen on a mobile device, providing an immersive experience for multitasking and media consumption. Camera Innovations : Photography has always been a standout feature of Pixel phones, and the Pixel 9 series takes this to the next level. Both the Pixel 9 Pro and Pro XL are equipped with a triple rear camera system that includes a 48MP telephoto lens with enhanced autofocus capabilities, ensuring sharper images even in challenging light conditions. The front camera, now upgraded to 42MP, offers improved low-light performance and a wider field of view, making it perfect for group selfies and video calls. For users who prefer a more compact device, the Pixel 9  delivers the same powerful main and ultra-wide cameras as its Pro counterparts. The ultrawide lens captures significantly more light, ensuring crystal-clear images and stunning macro shots. Google has also introduced a completely revamped HDR+ imaging pipeline, which enhances the realism of photos by optimising exposure, tone mapping, and contrast to better capture textures, shadows, and skin tones. AI-Driven Photography Features Google’s investment in AI is most evident in the photography features of the Pixel 9 series . These features are designed not just to capture moments but to enhance and perfect them, ensuring that users get the best possible outcome with minimal effort. Super Res Zoom Video : This feature leverages AI to allow users to zoom up to 20x while recording videos, even in low-light conditions. The advanced machine learning algorithms combine data from multiple frames to create richly detailed videos, making it ideal for capturing events from a distance. Add Me : This innovative tool ensures that no one is left out of group photos. By using augmented reality and AI, the Pixel can guide users through taking multiple shots, which it then seamlessly merges, ensuring that everyone is included in the final image without the need for a third-party photographer. Magic Editor with Reimagine : The Magic Editor has been a hallmark of Pixel photography for a few years now, and with the addition of Reimagine, it’s become even more powerful. Users can now simply describe the changes they want to see in a photo, and the AI will make it happen. Whether it’s altering the sky, adding elements to the background, or refining the composition, the Magic Editor makes it all possible with just a few taps. Night Sight in Panorama : This feature extends Google’s renowned Night Sight capabilities to panorama mode, allowing users to capture stunning low-light landscapes. The AI optimises each segment of the panorama, ensuring consistent quality across the entire image. Pixel Watch 3: A Health Companion with a Lifesaving Feature Wearable technology has taken a significant step forward with the introduction of the Pixel Watch 3 . This smartwatch is not just about fitness tracking and notifications; it’s about saving lives. The Pixel Watch 3 introduces Loss of Pulse Detection , a groundbreaking feature that can detect when the wearer’s heart has stopped beating. In such critical situations, the watch can automatically alert emergency services, potentially making the difference between life and death. The Pixel Watch 3 is designed for both health enthusiasts and those seeking advanced safety features. It offers the most accurate heart rate tracking for running to date, thanks to new advanced motion sensing and machine learning algorithms. After a run, the watch provides a comprehensive analysis of the user’s form, including metrics like cadence, stride length, and ground contact time, helping users improve their performance over time. Google has also introduced new features like Daily Readiness , Cardio Load , and Target Load , which offer personalised insights into recovery and training. These tools help users maintain a balanced approach to fitness, ensuring they are not overtraining and are adequately prepared for their next workout. The integration with Fitbit Premium  further enhances the Pixel Watch 3’s capabilities, offering tailored workout recommendations based on the user’s previous activities and current recovery status. With these features, the Pixel Watch 3 is positioned not just as a fitness tracker but as a comprehensive health and wellness companion. Pixel Buds Pro 2: The AI-Enhanced Audio Experience Rounding out the hardware announcements, Google introduced the Pixel Buds Pro 2 , which are designed to deliver an unparalleled audio experience. These earbuds are powered by the new Tensor A1 chip , which brings a host of improvements, including twice the noise cancellation of the previous generation. The Pixel Buds Pro 2 are also more compact and comfortable, featuring a design that is 24% lighter and 27% smaller than their predecessors. Despite their smaller size, the earbuds do not compromise on performance. The Tensor A1 chip enables ultra-low latency audio processing, ensuring that the sound quality remains top-notch even as the environment around the user changes. These earbuds are also deeply integrated with Gemini, making them a powerful tool for hands-free AI interaction. Users can access Gemini without needing to take out their phone, enabling them to get directions, manage appointments, or even engage in conversations on the go. This hands-free capability is particularly useful for those who are constantly on the move and need to stay connected without the hassle of pulling out their device. Android 15 Android 15, the latest iteration of Google’s mobile operating system, was a significant highlight of the Made by Google 2024 event. Set to be released later in 2024, Android 15 promises to bring a host of new features designed to enhance user experience, security, and device integration. While many of these features were introduced during the event, the full rollout is expected to begin towards the end of the year, following Google’s typical pattern of updates. The rollout of Android 15 will likely start with Google’s own Pixel devices, in line with the company's usual update strategy. This initial release is anticipated to coincide with the availability of Google’s newest hardware, such as the Pixel 9 series. Following this, the update will gradually become available on other Android devices over subsequent months, with timing varying based on the device and region. Users are advised to keep an eye on official announcements from Google for precise rollout dates. Android 15 is packed with features that focus on bolstering privacy, enhancing security, and deepening AI integration across devices: Private Space : One of the standout features of Android 15 is Private Space, which allows users to create a secure, separate area on their devices for sensitive apps. This digital safe ensures that personal information, such as health or banking data, remains protected from prying eyes, offering an extra layer of security for apps that require it. Theft Detection Lock : In a bid to enhance device security, Android 15 introduces Theft Detection Lock, an AI-powered feature that detects suspicious activity—such as someone forcibly taking your phone—and automatically locks the device to prevent unauthorised access. This feature is a significant step forward in protecting user data in the event of theft. AI-Powered Enhancements : Android 15 integrates AI more deeply into the operating system, providing AI-powered recommendations in Google TV and enhanced real-time fraud protection through Google Play Protect. These AI-driven features not only make entertainment more intuitive but also provide robust protection against malicious apps and phishing attempts. Augmented Reality in Google Maps : The update also includes improvements to AR in Google Maps, expanding the immersive content available to users and making navigation more interactive and informative. Expanded Ecosystem Integration : Android 15 broadens its ecosystem by introducing more apps and entertainment options in vehicles with Google built-in. This includes the ability to cast content directly from your phone to your car’s display, enhancing the in-car entertainment experience. Conclusion: AI at the Centre of Google's Vision The 2024 Made by Google event underscored Google's deepening commitment to AI integration across its product lineup. While the event introduced new hardware like the Pixel 9 series and Pixel Watch 3, the focus was clearly on how AI, particularly through the Gemini platform, is becoming central to Google's ecosystem. These innovations, such as the Pixel 9's advanced computational photography and Android 15’s security enhancements, highlight Google's efforts to make technology more intuitive and secure. However, alongside these advancements, there are rising concerns about privacy and data security, which Google must address as it continues to push the boundaries of AI. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

Battery performance is often a critical factor when evaluating smartphones that can significantly impact user satisfaction. Traditionally, Flagship/Pro (€700 +) smartphones are expected to outshine Mid Tier (€200-€499)  ones due to their premium pricing and advanced technology. However, data from ViserMark’s battery performance labels and battery consumption test results reveal surprising insights that challenge this conventional wisdom, particularly in everyday tasks. Battery Life: Flagship vs. Mid Tier Smartphones On average, Mid Tier smartphones demonstrate impressive battery life, often outperforming Flagship phones. For instance, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G delivers a remarkable 2.5 days of use or 61 hours of battery life, according to ViserMark labels. In contrast, Flagship/Pro smartphones like the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Google Pixel 8 Pro offer around 1.5 days of use, between 34 to 38 hours of use despite their cutting-edge features and higher price tags. This discrepancy can be attributed mainly to the power consumption patterns during everyday tasks. Flagship/Pro smartphones typically consume more power due to their advanced processors, higher-resolution screens, and additional features. For example, during social media usage, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra shows significantly higher power consumption, drawing around -803 mAh, compared to the Samsung Galaxy A15 from the Mid Tier, which consumes -785 mAh. While the difference may seem small, it accumulates over the day, leading to a shorter overall battery life for Flagship/Pro mobile phones. However, when it comes to media playback, mid-tier models often show more efficient energy use. For example, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Mid Tier) consumes -364.01 mAh, which is less than the -528.34 mAh consumed by the Flagship/Pro Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra . This suggests that Mid Tier smartphones can offer better energy management during specific tasks like media playback, extending battery life without sacrificing too much in terms of functionality. Efficiency in Everyday Tasks The ViserMark test results also highlight how Mid Tier smartphones maintain energy efficiency across various everyday tasks. For instance, during web browsing, the Motorola Moto G34 consumes -373 mAh, significantly more than the Samsung Galaxy S24 at -266 mAh. This efficiency extends to other activities like emailing and media playback, where Mid Tier phones like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G consistently show lower power consumption, allowing for longer uninterrupted use throughout the day. Another example is camera usage. The Google Pixel 8 Pro , a Flagship/Pro device, consumes -784.95 mAh, whereas the Realme Narzo 50 , a Mid Tier phone, uses around -699.91 mAh for the same task. This suggests that while Flagship/Pro phones offer superior camera features, Mid Tier phones strike a better balance between functionality and power consumption, offering a more sustainable user experience. Consumer Implications and Insights For consumers, these insights suggest that Mid Tier smartphones offer a compelling balance between performance and battery life, often rivalling, and sometimes exceeding, Flagship/Pro models in terms of energy efficiency. This is particularly relevant for users who prioritise longevity over premium features, such as those who use their phones heavily for basic tasks like social media, web browsing, and communication. Also, Mid Tier phone's energy efficiency translates to lower annual energy consumption, making these mobile phones more cost-effective in the long run and environmentally friendly. For instance, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G consumes less annual energy than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra , highlighting the practical advantages of choosing a Mid Tier device. Conclusion: Flagship vs. Mid Tier Smartphones In conclusion, while Flagship/Pro smartphones continue to lead in innovation and high-end performance, Mid Tier phones have proven formidable contenders regarding battery life and efficiency. For consumers, opting for a Mid Tier smartphone could offer better value, especially if battery longevity and energy efficiency are top priorities. This analysis underscores the importance of looking beyond brand prestige and price tags to find a smartphone that truly meets the requirements in everyday use. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry.

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Samsung Galaxy Fold6 Smartphone Review: Unfolding Excellence: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 – Innovation Meets Versatility SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro (€700+)  Flagship/Pro Ranking #9 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Available Soon Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 marks a new chapter in foldable smartphone technology, blending cutting-edge innovation with refined usability. This smartphone is designed for users who demand versatility, offering a seamless transition between a compact smartphone and a tablet-like experience. With its durable hinge mechanism, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 provides confidence in its daily use. At the same time, the improved main and cover displays ensure a top-tier viewing experience, whether you're watching videos, gaming, or multitasking. This smartphone has a 6.3-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X with a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate. It provides smooth scrolling and vibrant visuals for gaming or streaming content and is just as functional when the device is folded. It is powered by the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor and delivers exceptional performance across all applications. In addition to its robust performance, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 includes a versatile triple-camera setup a 50MP main sensor, a 12MP ultra-wide lens, and a 10MP telephoto lens, ensuring high-quality photos and videos in various conditions. The device supports 5G connectivity, wireless charging, and IP48 water resistance, including protection against solids, adding to its appeal as a premium smartphone. With its cutting-edge features, the mobile phone continues to push the boundaries of what a foldable smartphone can offer, making it a compelling choice for users who want both innovation and practicality in their mobile experience. Pros Cons Great display and quality speakers No major improvements in camera functionality Powerful and feature-rich with S Pen support Reasonable 1.5 days of Use battery life Galaxy AI A larger and wider cover screen Reliable camera set-up Longer charging time IP48 rating dust and water resistance improved to include protection against solids   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy Fold6 When it comes to battery performance, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 has been extensively tested and has received a ViserMark Battery Life rating of 1.5 days of usage or translated into 43 hours. While the overall battery performance scored 44 out of 100, it charges efficiently with a ViserMark Battery Charging Time of 1 hour and 32 minutes. The device also demonstrates a reasonable annual energy consumption of 3.3 kWh/Annum and earns a Battery Efficiency rating with 1 out of 5 leaves. These ViserMark labels suggest that the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 balances performance and power efficiency. Specification Overview  - Released Date: July 2024 Body: Unfolded : 153.5 x 32.6 mm x5.6 mm. Folded: 153.5 x 68.1 mm x 12.1 mm Weight 239g. Folded Glass front with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Unfolded with plastic front. Display : Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ with 1856 x 2160 resolution. Cover Display: 6.3 inches Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz with 968 x 2376 resolution. IP48 water rating. Operating System : Android 14, One UI 6.1.1 Chipset :   Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 , Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) with GPU Adreno 750 (1 GHz) Memory : 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n / ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct. Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. Camera : Triple set-up - Main: 50MP (wide) 10 MP (telephoto) and 12 MP (ultrawide) with LED flash, HDR, and panorama. Video 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/120/240fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10+ Front Camera:  4 MP (wide). HDR and Video 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS Battery : 4400mAh, 25W wired, 15W wireless and 4. 5W reverse wireless Colour : Silver Shadow, Pink, Navy, Crafted Black, and White Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Samsung Galaxy Fold6 Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Test Results Learn more about the Samsung Galaxy Fold6   Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy Fold6  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance  The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 has a Battery Performance Score of 44 out of 100. This score reflects its efficiency in balancing battery life, charging speed, and power consumption. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6's battery performance can be evaluated by comparing it with other Flagship/Pro devices. Here's an overview of its battery performance score. Compared to the Xiaomi 13 which has a score of 43, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and Galaxy Z Flip5 have the same scores of 44 and slightly outperform the Xiaomi 13, indicating that it offers better battery performance in everyday usage scenarios. The Flagship/Pro Tier average with a score of 40, ranks lower, suggesting that the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is more optimised for battery performance despite its complex foldable design. 2. Battery Life The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 offers a battery life of 1.5 days of use, which is consistent with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6, indicating a well-balanced power management strategy across Samsung's foldable devices. However, compared to the Xiaomi 13 , which delivers an impressive two days of battery life, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 falls slightly behind. The Flagship/Pro Tier average slightly outperforms both Samsung smartphones by a small margin, achieving 1.56 days of use. It suggests that while the Z Fold6 is efficient, it might not be the top performer in battery life compared to other smartphones in this category. In terms of hours, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 provides 43 hours of usage, surpassing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6's 38 hours. This slight edge highlights the Z Fold 6's superior battery optimisation, possibly due to its larger battery capacity and more efficient power distribution. Nevertheless, the Xiaomi 13 again takes the lead with 50 hours of use, making it the most enduring mobile phone in this comparison. The Flagship/Pro Tier average, while offering more hours than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 , still lags behind the Galaxy Z Fold6 with 40 hours of battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 demonstrates solid battery life performance, balancing longevity and practical usability. It outperforms the Galaxy Z Flip6 in this Samsung series, in terms of hours of use, but it still needs to reach the levels of the Xiaomi 13 , which is the clear leader in both days and hours of battery life. Its consistent battery life showcases its reliability for users who need a durable, foldable smartphone. However, those prioritising maximum endurance might consider alternatives like the Xiaomi 13 as an alternative. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Samsung Galaxy Fold6  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. The battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 shows interesting differences in various usage scenarios. Analysing the test results reveals how each device manages power during different activities, providing valuable insights for users who prioritise battery efficiency for specific everyday activities. Across most activities, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 exhibits higher current consumption (mA) compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 . This trend is expected due to the Galaxy Z Fold6's more extensive display system, which demands more power, especially when the device is fully unfolded. This is particularly evident in tasks like gaming and file transfers, where the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 consumes significantly more power, reflecting its demand for greater processing power and display. Camera usage also follows this trend, with the Galaxy Z Fold6 consuming slightly more power, likely due to the need to render images on a larger display. These findings suggest that the Galaxy Z Flip6 is more optimised for everyday communication, making it a more power-efficient choice for users who frequently engage in these activities. When it comes to media consumption, both smartphones exhibit similar battery consumption patterns, although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 still consumes slightly more power. This suggests that while it offers a more immersive media experience due to its larger display, it does so at the expense of higher battery usage. Overall, the Galaxy Z Flip6 is more efficient for users who prioritise battery life in everyday tasks and communication, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6  caters to those who value a larger screen and are willing to accept higher power consumption for a more versatile and expansive display experience. The comparison between the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and the Xiaomi 13 reveals notable differences in how each phone manages battery consumption across various activities. Overall, the Galaxy Z Fold6 exhibits higher power consumption in some activities due to its larger display and more demanding hardware. The performance differences are particularly evident in file transfers and camera usage. The Galaxy Z Fold6's larger screen and multitasking capabilities demand more power, leading to higher battery consumption. On the other hand, the Xiaomi 13 demonstrates better power efficiency, especially in communication and social media tasks. It consistently consumes less power during outgoing calls, MMS and media, optimising it for everyday use. The Xiaomi 13 outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 regarding battery conservation during YouTube and media player usage, likely due to its smaller, less power-hungry display. Users who value a large, versatile screen and don’t mind a higher battery drain might prefer the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 . In contrast, those who prioritise battery efficiency for daily tasks might find the Xiaomi 13 a better fit. The battery consumption analysis of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6  in comparison with the Xiaomi 13  and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 - using the Flagship/Pro Tier average as a benchmark- reveals critical insights into each smartphone's power management capabilities. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 does not consistently consume the most battery energy in all activities. While it does show higher power consumption in some tasks, such as file transfers and social media, it is not the most power-hungry in gaming and camera usage. In fact, the Xiaomi 13 shows higher battery consumption during these particular tasks, indicating that the GalaxyZ Fold6 is more efficient in these areas. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 continues to strike a balance between the Galaxy Z Fold6 and Xiaomi 13 but with a closer performance to the Flagship/Pro Tier benchmark. Its power consumption is more moderate, particularly in gaming and camera usage, where it consumes less power than the Xiaomi 13 but more than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 . This balance makes the Galaxy Z Flip6 a practical choice for users who want foldable features with relatively efficient battery usage. 4.   Battery Efficiency The 1 leaf rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 means that while it offers solid battery life and performance, it may not be the most energy-efficient option. This could be a trade-off for users who prioritise the foldable design and more significant screen display, which naturally demand more power. With a Battery Efficiency rating of 1 leaf, which places it on par with the Xiaomi 13 and the Flagship/Pro Tier average, indicates that while the Galaxy Z Fold6 is efficient, it does not stand out in energy efficiency compared to high-end smartphones. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 achieves a higher efficiency rating of 1.5 leaves, suggesting that despite its smaller battery, it is more efficient in managing power consumption. This could be due to optimised software, a smaller display, and lower power demands. While the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 offers a competitive battery efficiency in line with other flagship smartphones, it does not exceed expectations in this area. Its efficiency rating reflects the challenges of powering a large, foldable display, making it a suitable choice for users who prioritise screen size and versatility over maximum energy efficiency. However, for those looking for the most efficient mobile phone in Samsung's foldable lineup, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 may be a better option. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The annual energy consumption of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 , measured in kilowatt-hours (kWh), provides an important insight into its overall energy efficiency. Lower energy consumption indicates a more efficient device, which can be crucial for users mindful of both environmental impact and long-term energy costs. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 uses 3.3 kWh of energy annually, making it slightly more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6, which uses 3.4 kWh annually. Despite the Galaxy Z Fold6's larger and more complex dual-display setup, it remains competitive in energy efficiency. The Xiaomi 13 is the most energy-efficient mobile phone in this comparison, with an annual energy consumption of 2.9 kWh. This lower consumption rate reflects Xiaomi's effective optimisation strategies, allowing it to lead in energy efficiency among the devices compared. With its impressive energy efficiency, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 strikes a good balance in energy consumption. Despite its demanding hardware features, it maintains a lower annual rate. However, for those who prioritise the lowest possible energy consumption, the Xiaomi 13 shines. It's not just a suitable choice, it's a confident choice for users who value sustainability in their tech. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy Fold6 - what's it like to use? The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 offers a unique and versatile user experience that differentiates it from traditional smartphones. Its foldable design transforms the device from a compact phone into a tablet-sized screen, giving users an expansive display for multitasking, media consumption, and productivity. This flexibility makes it particularly appealing for users who need a phone that can adapt to different scenarios, from browsing the web and watching videos to managing multiple apps simultaneously. However, the large, foldable screen and advanced hardware have trade-offs, particularly in battery consumption. While the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 performs efficiently in gaming and camera usage tasks, it tends to consume more power during activities like file transfers and social media. This means that users who frequently engage in these tasks may notice faster battery depletion than other devices. Despite the challenges, this smartphone delivers a premium, high-tech experience. The device's seamless transition between a standard smartphone and a larger display mode is a standout feature, offering a level of versatility that is unparalleled in the market. For users who value the latest technology and a flexible, large display, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is a compelling option that enhances productivity and entertainment in a way that few other smartphones can match. Pros Cons Versatile foldable design between a compact phone and a tablet-sized display. Higher battery consumption in file transfers and social media Demonstrates better battery efficiency during gaming and camera usage making it a strong performer. Heavy and bulky design Premium user experience with a large, high-quality display and seamless transitions. The premium features and innovative design come at a high cost, Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6? The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is ideal for users who want innovation, versatility, and a premium smartphone experience. Tech Enthusiasts and Early Adopters: This smartphone is perfect for those who crave the latest in smartphone innovation. Its foldable design and advanced features offer a unique experience beyond traditional smartphones, appealing to users who enjoy exploring cutting-edge technology. Productivity-Focused Professionals and Multitaskers: Ideal for users who need a versatile phone for managing multiple tasks, the Z Fold6’s large, tablet-like display supports efficient multitasking, making it a strong choice for professionals and creatives who require a portable yet powerful tool for work and creative projects. Media Enthusiasts and Flexibility Seekers: If you consume a lot of media or value a mobile phone that can adapt to various situations, the Z Fold6 offers an immersive experience with its expansive screen. It is perfect for gaming, watching videos, or reading. Its ability to switch between a compact phone and a larger display provides unparalleled flexibility. CONCLUSION Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is best suited for users who want to stay at the forefront of smartphone innovation and need a smartphone that can serve multiple purposes in one sleek, foldable package. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and the latest test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Sony Xperia 10 V 5G Smartphone Review: The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G - An Impressive Experience SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid (€200-€499)  Entry Tier Ranking #9 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Quick Summary The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G offers exceptional picture and sound quality, catering perfectly to multimedia enthusiasts. Despite its budget-friendly price, it provides an impressive experience for watching movies and listening to music. The combination of a brighter, more colour-accurate OLED display and stereo speakers enhances the overall viewing and listening experience, making it suitable for social media enthusiasts, casual gamers, and media consumers who value high-quality visuals and sound. In addition to its multimedia strengths, the Xperia 10 V 5G provides efficient battery usage for specific tasks, ensuring longer usage times for social media browsing, gaming, and web surfing. Although it faces challenges such as longer charging times and higher annual energy consumption compared to its peers, its sleek design, robust build, and overall performance make it a versatile choice for various user needs. Whether you're seeking a reliable daily driver or a device that excels in specific areas, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G offers a balanced mix of performance and practicality. Explore our detailed review to see how this smartphone can meet your unique needs and preferences. Pros Cons Bright 6.1-inch screen with 21:9 aspect display 60Hz refresh rate High-resolution audio with a 3.5mm headphone jack Reasonable 1 day of Use battery life Quality design and easy to hold Average performance for the price range Good camera set-up Longer charging time IP68 dust and water resistant   ViserMark Labels for the Sony Xperia 10 V5G Based on the ViserMark test results provided for the Sony Xperia V 5G , here’s a detailed breakdown of the battery performance translated into ViserMark Labels. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G provides a respectable battery performance with a strong battery life, making it a reliable option for users who need a phone that can last throughout the day and beyond. However, its longer charging time is a consideration for those who prefer quick top-ups. What's truly impressive is its overall battery efficiency and energy consumption, aligning with its status as a budget-friendly device for multimedia consumption. Specification Overview  - Released Date: May 2023 Body: 155 x 68 x 8.3 mm, weight 159g. Corning Gorilla Glass Victus Display : FHD+ OLED 6.1-inch screen, 60Hz refresh rate with 2520 x 1080 resolution. IP65/IP68 dust/water rating. Nano-SIM and eSIM or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) Operating System : Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 Chipset :   Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm), Octa-core processor Memory : 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM. microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n / ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct. Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes with Hi-Res audio Camera : Triple set-up - Main: 48MP (wide) 8 MP (telephoto) and 8 MP (ultrawide) with LED flash, HDR, and panorama. Video1080p@30fps Front Camera:  8 MP (wide). HDR and Video 1080p@30fps Battery : 5000mAh, Wired, fast charging. Xperia Adaptive Charging, Battery Care and STAMINA Mode Colour : Sage Green, Lavender, White and Black Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G   Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Test Results Learn more about the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance Here's the Battery Performance score for the Sony Xperia V 5G. Based on the test results, let's look at the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G battery performance compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G and Samsung Galaxy A15 , as well as the Mid Tier average. All three devices have 5000mAh battery capacity. The battery performance of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G reflects its strengths and areas where it lags behind its competitors. With a battery performance score of 28 out of 100, it falls significantly below the Mid Tier average of 44, as well as its competitors, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  and the Samsung Galaxy A15 , which score 43 and 49, respectively. The overall battery performance is hindered by a significantly longer charging time of 3 hours and 19 minutes, which is considerably more than the 1.5-hour charging times of its peers. Additionally, the Xperia 10 V 5G has the highest annual energy consumption at 4.9 kWh, indicating less efficiency over the long term. 2. Battery Life Let's see the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G test results. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G has a mixed battery life performance, providing 1 day or 33 hours under typical usage conditions, suitable for moderate daily use. However, this falls short compared to competitors like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  and Samsung Galaxy A15 , which offer longer battery ratings of 1.5 and 2 days, respectively. One of the standout features of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is its efficient battery consumption for specific daily activities. It performs well in social media usage, gaming, and web browsing, consuming less battery power than its competitors. This efficiency allows users to enjoy extended usage for these tasks without frequent recharges. While the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G excels in specific tasks and offers decent battery life for moderate use, its longer charging times and higher energy consumption may be drawbacks for users seeking more comprehensive battery life. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. The chart below shows the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G battery consumption compared to the Samsung Galaxy A15 . For social media enthusiasts, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G offers superior battery efficiency, consuming significantly less power than the Samsung Galaxy A15. This means more scrolling and fewer interruptions to recharge. Similarly,  it uses much less battery power for outgoing calls and sending multimedia messages, making it ideal for users constantly on the phone. Like all the Xperia series, the Sony Xperia 10 V is no exception for camera performance. Like its predecessor, Sony offers exceptional camera performance at the price, with a 48MP primary sensor replacing the 12MP from its predecessor, although the telephoto and ultrawide lenses remain at 8MP. Despite this, the Samsung Galaxy A15 excels in battery efficiency for camera use and will let you take more photos on a single charge. Gamers will appreciate the Xperia 10 V 5G’s lower battery consumption during gaming sessions, meaning longer playtimes and less downtime. Lower consumption rates for YouTube and media playback make the Sony Xperia 10 V ideal for streaming music and movies. The screen is a Full HD+ 6-inch display with a 21:9 aspect ratio, which means the display is taller than the screen on your current smartphone. Turning the phone to landscape mode provides an optimally sized display for watching videos, viewing photos, or playing games. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  emerges as the more battery-efficient option across most daily activities. Also, it supports 5G for faster mobile data speeds, so users can enjoy longer browsing sessions and file transfers. making it an excellent choice for users looking for a well-rounded device with superior battery efficiency across various tasks. Let's compare the battery consumption of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G using the provided test results. From the chart above, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is significantly more efficient, consuming much less battery for social media usage compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G . This means longer usage on social platforms before needing to recharge. Also, it shows better efficiency with outgoing calls and MMS. As mentioned earlier, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G demonstrates superior battery efficiency during gaming, allowing for longer gaming sessions. It also enables longer listening and viewing times during media playback. Interestingly, both the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 have nearly identical battery consumption when streaming YouTube videos, making either one a good choice for video streaming. It's worth noting that the Sony Xperia 10 V has significantly improved speaker performance. Sony has added a stereo speaker set-up similar to its higher-priced phones, making it a worthwhile upgrade. Based on the battery consumption data for various daily activities, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  generally demonstrates better battery efficiency compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G . Although both smartphones show similar battery consumption for camera usage, the Xiaomi device has higher battery consumption across various tasks, which may lead to more frequent recharges. A well-rounded performance with superior battery management is delivered by the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G making it an attractive option for smartphone users. With key findings from the battery performance analysis, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G, and Samsung Galaxy A15 all feature a 5000 mAh battery, slightly above the mid-tier average of 4930 mAh. Despite this, the battery performance scores vary significantly, with the Xperia 10 V 5G scoring 28/100, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G at 43/100, and the Samsung Galaxy A15 leading with 49/100. The mid-tier average score is 44/100, highlighting that both the Xiaomi and Samsung devices perform closer to or above the average, whereas the Sony phone lags. For specific daily activities, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G generally demonstrates better battery efficiency. It consumes the least battery for social media, outgoing calls, MMS, gaming, file transfer, YouTube, media player, SMS, email and web browsing. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G shows the highest consumption across most activities, notably social media and gaming while the Samsung Galaxy A15 shows balanced consumption but is slightly more efficient for camera use. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is known for its efficiency in specific tasks, making it a good choice for users who prioritise daily activities with lower battery consumption. However, its long charging time and low power efficiency affect its overall battery performance. On the other hand, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G offers a better balance of battery life and charging speed, but at the cost of higher consumption for daily activities. The Samsung Galaxy A15 is the best overall performer, providing the longest battery life, efficient power usage, and quick charging. It is ideal for users in need of a reliable and long-lasting device. For those seeking efficiency in daily tasks, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is a noteworthy option. 4.   Battery Efficiency In the highly competitive Mid Tier smartphone market, battery efficiency is a critical factor. When comparing battery performance for the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , the Samsung Galaxy A15 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , significant differences are revealed in efficiency and power management. Here are the test results for the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G. The efficiency score indicates how effectively a smartphone uses its battery. A higher score represents better efficiency. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  demonstrates notable efficiency in specific tasks but suffers from a lower overall battery efficiency score, longer charging times, and higher annual energy consumption. This makes it less attractive for users seeking overall battery efficiency. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  offers a balanced performance with better efficiency than the Sony device but still falls short of the mid-tier average. It compensates with a faster charging time, making it a decent choice for users who prioritise quick recharges. The Samsung Galaxy A15  is the most efficient device, offering superior battery life, faster charging, and the lowest annual energy consumption. This makes it the best choice for smartphone users who demand both performance and efficiency. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption Annual energy consumption is an important metric for understanding the long-term efficiency and cost-effectiveness of a smartphone. This comparison evaluates the annual energy consumption of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G against the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , Samsung Galaxy A15 , and the mid-tier average. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G has the highest annual energy consumption at 4.9 kWh. This indicates that over a year, the device requires more energy to operate compared to the other two smartphones. This higher consumption can be attributed to its lower battery efficiency and longer charging times. Users of the Xperia 10 V 5G may incur higher electricity costs and a greater environmental impact over the device's lifespan. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , while more efficient than the Sony device, still consumes more energy annually than the Mid Tier average. Its balanced performance and faster charging are offset by higher energy demands, suggesting room for optimisation in battery usage. The Samsung Galaxy A15  excels with the lowest annual energy consumption among the compared devices. This makes it the most efficient choice for users concerned with long-term energy costs and environmental impact. Its superior battery management and quick charging capabilities contribute to its outstanding performance in this metric. ViserMark VERDICT The Sony Xperia V 5G - what's it like to use? The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G delivers a mixed experience, heavily influenced by its battery performance and efficiency. On one hand, it excels in specific daily activities such as social media, gaming, and web browsing, consuming significantly less battery than its competitors. This efficiency allows users to enjoy prolonged usage in these areas without frequent recharges, making it suitable for those who prioritise these activities. However, the device's overall battery performance score is relatively low and it has a notably longer charging time. This could be a drawback for users who need quick top-ups throughout the day, causing inconvenience during heavy usage periods. Additionally, the annual energy consumption of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is the highest, indicating less efficiency over the long term. Despite its lower battery efficiency and higher energy consumption, its performance in specific tasks and reliable battery life make it a competent daily driver for routine activities. The design and build quality of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G, combined with its water and dust resistance, add to its appeal, providing a durable and functional smartphone experience. However, users may need to weigh these benefits against the longer charging times and higher energy costs. Pros Cons Superior battery efficiency in social media, gaming and web browsing. Low battery performance score (28/100) compared to competitors. Water and dust resistance (IP65/68), offering greater protection. Significantly longer charging time (3 hours and 19 minutes), which may be inconvenient for users needing quick top-ups. Low battery consumption for media player and YouTube, ideal for media consumption. Highest annual energy consumption (4.9 kWh), leading to higher long-term energy costs. Efficient battery usage for SMS and email, supporting extensive communication. Higher battery consumption for camera activities compared to competitors, making it less efficient for photography, despite upgrades Lightweight and compact design, making it easy to carry and handle. Shorter overall battery life (1 day, 33 hours), requiring more frequent recharges compared to competitors Who should buy the Sony Xperia V 5G? Here are the types of users who might find the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G particularly beneficial: Social Media Enthusiasts For users who spend a significant amount of time on social media platforms, the Xperia 10 V 5G’s battery efficiency in this area is a key advantage. It consumes less battery power for social media use compared to its competitors, allowing for extended browsing and interaction without frequent recharges. Enhanced display and screen quality provide a better viewing experience, with improvements in brightness and colour accuracy. Gamers Casual gamers will appreciate the Xperia 10 V 5G’s efficient battery usage during gaming sessions. With a lower battery consumption rate for gaming, users can enjoy longer playtimes before needing to recharge. The improved screen quality ensures a more immersive gaming experience with better visuals and stereo speakers enhance the gaming experience with clear and rich sound. Media Consumers The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is ideal for users who frequently watch videos and listen to music. Its low battery consumption for media playback and YouTube makes it a suitable choice for media consumption, and the upgraded display quality enhances the viewing experience with sharper and more vibrant visuals, while the stereo speakers provide a superior audio experience, making media consumption more enjoyable. CONCLUSION The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is an attractive option for users who prioritise specific features over general improvements. Its sleek and lightweight design makes it easy to handle and carry around. The device is also notable for its water and dust resistance, which enhances its durability for everyday use. In addition, the inclusion of stereo speakers provides a high-quality audio experience, enhancing the enjoyment of multimedia content. While the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G may not excel in every aspect, it combines practical features with efficient performance, making it a versatile choice for a range of user needs. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background The Sony Group Corporation  was founded in May 1946, and its Headquarters is in Tokyo, Japan. The Sony Group consists of the following segments: Game & Network Services, Music, Pictures, Entertainment Technology & Services (Mobile Communications/Imaging Products & Solutions/Home Entertainment & Sound), Imaging & Sensing Solutions, Financial Services, and All Other businesses. While Sony smartphones may not have as prominent a market presence as some other brands, they are known for their unique features, sleek designs, and emphasis on audio-visual technologies. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and the latest test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more