Search Results

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5160 Xiaomi Redmi 14C: Smart Budget, Solid Basics SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199) Entry  Tier Ranking # 8 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi 14C is an affordable smartphone that punches above its weight, delivering a smooth 120Hz display, dependable battery life, and a premium-feel design at a fraction of the price. While it doesn’t aim for high-end power or advanced camera systems, it provides a surprisingly well-rounded user experience for those seeking value and reliability. The 6.88-inch Dot Drop IPS LCD screen stretches nearly edge to edge, offering vibrant colours and ample brightness for everyday use. With an HD+ resolution of 1640×720 and a 120Hz refresh rate, the display is impressively fluid for a phone in this price bracket, ideal for casual browsing, video streaming, and social media. TÜV Rheinland certifications for low blue light and flicker-free dimming make it a comfortable choice for prolonged use. Though sharpness doesn’t match Full HD panels, the smoothness of the refresh rate makes up for it. Under the bonnet is the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, an octa-core chipset designed for essential daily tasks. The two Cortex-A75 performance cores and six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores run at up to 2.0 GHz, supported by a Mali-G52 MC2 GPU for basic gaming and video. It’s not built for heavy multitasking or demanding 3D titles, but performs adequately in real-world usage such as messaging, light gaming, and media playback. Memory configurations range from 4GB to 8GB of LPDDR4X RAM, with up to 256GB of expandable eMMC 5.1 storage, ensuring plenty of space for apps, media and documents. The 50MP main rear camera captures bright, detailed photos in daylight, with HDR and portrait modes adding versatility. The secondary lens is more decorative than functional, primarily aiding depth perception. The 13MP front camera is a welcome upgrade in this category, producing decent selfies with built-in beautification and a soft light ring for better low-light results. Video capture is limited to 1080p at 30fps on both cameras – sufficient for everyday social content. Despite its large 5,160mAh battery, the Redmi 14C falls short of expectations in real-world usage. In our testing, it delivered up to 39 hours of moderate use — slightly below average for entry-level smartphones. This makes battery life one of its more underwhelming aspects. On the upside, it supports 18W fast charging via USB-C, though no charger is included in the box. Using a compatible adapter, a full charge from 20 to 100% takes just over two hours. Design-wise, the Redmi 14C stands out from the crowd. It features a sturdy plastic frame, a flat-edged profile, and a stylish circular camera housing reminiscent of flagship models. Depending on the colour, the back panel may be made of either textured polycarbonate or glass-like material, offering a touch of elegance rarely seen at this price. Colour options include Midnight Black, Starry Blue, Sage Green, and Dreamy Purple, all adding personality without sacrificing durability. Out of the box, the Redmi 14C runs on Xiaomi’s HyperOS, based on Android 14. The interface is clean and responsive, offering features such as Reading Mode, Game Turbo, and memory extension (up to 16GB virtual RAM). Xiaomi promises two years of major Android updates and four years of security patches, which is generous for a budget phone. In terms of connectivity, the Redmi 14C supports dual SIM 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC (varies by market), and even FM radio via the 3.5mm headphone jack. There’s also a side-mounted fingerprint scanner and AI face unlock for quick and secure access. Pros Cons 120Hz refresh rate – Rare in this price range, provides smoother scrolling and UI animations Only HD+ resolution – 720p on a large screen results in less sharpness Large 6.88" display – Great for video watching and web browsing Basic performance – MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra is modest and not suitable for heavy apps or multitasking Long battery life – 5,160 mAh easily lasts over a full day of moderate use Slow storage – eMMC 5.1 is outdated compared to UFS storage Expandable storage – microSD slot supports up to 1TB Limited low-light camera performance – Night shots can be noisy and lack detail Modern software – Ships with Android 14 and Xiaomi’s new HyperOS No water or dust resistance rating – Use with care in wet conditions Fingerprint sensor and AI face unlock – Fast and convenient security features Mono speaker – Lacks stereo sound, audio is thin and unrefined Lightweight, modern design – Looks more premium than its price suggests Heavier than some rivals – Up to 211g depending on colour Headphone jack + FM radio – Still useful for many users Ads and bloatware – HyperOS includes pre-installed apps and some promotional content Dual SIM + dedicated microSD slot – No need to sacrifice a SIM for more storage Good value for money – Low price with solid specs for everyday tasks   ViserMark Labels for the Xiaomi Redmi 14C Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Xiaomi Redmi 14C : Battery Life: The Xiaomi Redmi 14C delivers 39 hours of total usage, equating to just over 1.5 days under light to moderate use. While this may seem reasonable on paper, it's below average for the entry-tier segment, where several competitors exceed the 50-hour mark. Users expecting multi-day endurance may find themselves reaching for the charger more often than anticipated. Battery Charging: Xiaomi advertises 18W fast charging for the Redmi 14C, though no charger is included in the box. In our real-world tests, the device charged from 0% to 100% in 2 hours and 14 minutes using a compatible adapter. This puts it behind some budget rivals, especially those offering higher-wattage chargers out of the box. Battery Performance & Efficiency: In battery performance scoring, the Redmi 14C receives 38/100, reflecting basic efficiency but limited endurance under consistent use. The phone’s annual energy consumption is estimated at 4.3 kWh, keeping it within an acceptable range for low-end 4G devices, though it lacks the energy optimisation seen in more power-efficient competitors. Specification Overview  - Released Date: September 2024 Body & Build: Dimensions: 171.88 x 77.8 x 8.22 mm Weight: 204g (Midnight Black, Starry Blue), 207g (Sage Green) Materials: Plastic frame with a glossy or textured glass-like rear finish (varies by colour) Durability: No official IP rating for water or dust resistance Design: Concentric pattern on select colourways enhances grip and aesthetic appeal Display: Type: 6.88-inch Dot Drop IPS LCD Resolution: 1640 x 720 pixels (HD+), 260 ppi Refresh Rate: Up to 120Hz for smooth system navigation and UI animations Touch Sampling Rate: Up to 240Hz for improved responsiveness Brightness: 450 nits (typical), 600 nits (High Brightness Mode) Contrast Ratio: 1500:1 Colour Depth: 8-bit, 16.7 million colours Colour Gamut: 70% NTSC Eye Comfort & Certifications: TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light (software solution) TÜV Rheinland Flicker Free DC Dimming Reading Mode Screen-to-Body Ratio: 89.7% Operating System: Software: Xiaomi HyperOS (based on Android 14) Software Support: Up to 2 major Android updates and 3 years of security patches Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra (12nm) CPU: Octa-core (2x Cortex-A75 @ 2.0GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz) GPU: Mali-G52 MC2 Memory & Storage: RAM Options: 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Internal Storage: 128GB / 256GB eMMC 5.1 Expandable Storage: Yes, via microSD card (up to 1TB) Memory Extension: Virtual RAM expansion up to 16GB (on 8GB RAM model) Connectivity & Features: Speaker:  Mono bottom-firing Audio Jack:  3.5mm headphone jack Bluetooth:  5.4 (supports AAC / SBC / LDAC) Wi-Fi:  Dual-band Wi-Fi 5 (2.4GHz / 5GHz) NFC:  Yes (market dependent) FM Radio:  Yes (requires wired headphones) USB:  USB Type-C Capacity:  5,160mAh (typical) Charging:  18W fast charging supported (USB-C) Charger in Box:  No adapter included; recommended to use a PD-supported 18W charger Battery Life (tested):  Up to 39 hours of mixed use Charging Time (tested):  ~2 hours from 20% to 100% Navigation:  GPS, Glonass, Galileo, Beidou Camera System: Rear Cameras: Primary: 50MP wide, f/1.8 aperture, 5P lens Secondary: Auxiliary sensor for depth effects Features: HDR, Night Mode, Portrait Mode, 50MP high-res mode, Time-lapse Video Recording: 1080p @ 30fps 720p @ 30fps Front Camera: Resolution: 13MP, f/2.0 Features: Soft-light ring, HDR, Night Mode, Portrait Mode, Time-lapse Video Recording: 1080p @ 30fps 720p @ 30fps Colours Available: Midnight Black, Starry Blue, and Sage Green Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Xiaomi Redmi 14C through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance In ViserMark’s independent testing, the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  received a battery performance score of 38/100, placing it below the entry-tier average (43.5/100) and behind competitors like the Redmi 13C (52/100) and Motorola Moto G34 (43/100). This reflects limited battery efficiency, particularly under consistent usage. Despite housing a 5,160mAh battery, the Redmi 14C achieves around 39 hours of active usage, which, while serviceable, is lower than many devices in the same segment. Real-world endurance may cover a full day of moderate use, but power users may find themselves recharging more frequently than expected. This combination of moderate endurance and below-average battery optimisation makes the Redmi 14C a reasonable choice for basic users. However, those prioritising long-lasting performance may find more efficient alternatives within the same price bracket. 2. Battery Life The Xiaomi Redmi 14C  delivered 39 hours of continuous usage, equating to just over 1.5 days of moderate real-world use. While this allows the device to comfortably get through a full day, it underperforms compared to other entry-level competitors, particularly its predecessor, the Redmi 13C . Despite housing a slightly larger 5,160mAh battery than the Redmi 13C (5,000mAh), the 14C falls behind in endurance. This is largely due to limited power optimisation and the less efficient MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra chipset, which fails to fully capitalise on the increased capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 14C provides a basic battery experience, suitable for casual users and light app usage. However, for those prioritising long-lasting standby or heavy multitasking, more efficient alternatives are available within the same price segment. 3.   Battery Consumption According to SmartViser’s viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  generally consumes more power than the Motorola Moto G34 across most everyday tasks. The Redmi 14C shows notably higher current consumption during social media, gaming, YouTube, email, media playback, and web browsing, which contributes to its lower battery efficiency overall. However, the Motorola Moto G34 draws more power during camera usage, making it slightly less efficient in photography-related tasks. This could be due to differences in image processing or sensor behaviour between the two devices. In most use cases—especially in social media, outgoing call and gaming—the Redmi 14C shows less control over energy use, consuming well over 600mA in several categories. This aligns with its lower ViserMark battery score (38/100) and its relatively high annual energy consumption of 4.3 kWh, both indicating sub-par optimisation in comparison to its competitors. If camera use is a key priority, the Redmi 14C might offer a slight advantage in energy draw. However, for users seeking a more balanced and efficient performance across all tasks, the Moto G34  remains the stronger choice in the entry-tier market. The battery performance comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  and Redmi 13C  highlights notable differences in power consumption across a variety of everyday tasks, giving a clear picture of where the newer model may lag in efficiency. From social media browsing, outgoing calls, and gaming, to YouTube streaming, downloads/uploads, camera usage, and web browsing, the Redmi 14C registers noticeably higher current draw in every category. This uniform increase in consumption may stem from enhancements in system features, such as the smoother 120Hz refresh rate, more demanding HyperOS software, and upgraded internal components. While these upgrades contribute to a better user experience in terms of display fluidity and interface responsiveness, they also lead to reduced battery efficiency when compared directly with the Redmi 13C . Despite having a similarly sized battery, the Redmi 13C proves more power-efficient, managing background tasks and foreground usage with less energy consumption across the board. The Xiaomi Redmi 14C  demonstrates consistently higher power consumption across all tested activities when compared to the Redmi 13C , Motorola Moto G34 , and the Entry Tier average. This broad analysis highlights key differences in battery performance depending on the task, offering a clearer picture of the device’s energy profile. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: The Redmi 14C  consumes significantly more power than all other devices when browsing social media and making outgoing calls. This places it as the least efficient device in communication-heavy use, with the Redmi 13C  and Motorola Moto G34  outperforming it substantially. Gaming & Multimedia: In gaming, the Redmi 14C  shows the highest current draw, likely due to its 120Hz refresh rate and less efficient processing. For YouTube playback and media consumption, the Redmi 14C again trails the competition, drawing more current than the average entry-tier device. Productivity & Web Browsing: The Redmi 14C records higher consumption during email and web browsing, showing less optimisation in typical productivity scenarios. The Redmi 13C and Moto G34  remain more efficient in these use cases, with the Entry Tier average being better than the 14C. Camera & Media Playback: Camera usage also reveals increased power drain, although the Moto G34 surpasses it in energy use here, making it the only task where the Redmi 14C isn’t the most power-hungry. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency testing, the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  received a 0.5-leaf rating, placing it significantly below the entry-tier average of 1.28 leaves. This result highlights the device’s limited power optimisation, especially when compared to similarly priced alternatives like the Redmi 13C  and Motorola Moto G34 , both of which scored 1.5 leaves. Despite its large 5,160mAh battery, the Redmi 14C fails to make efficient use of its capacity. The MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra chipset, while functional for basic tasks, contributes to higher power drain, especially during multitasking and extended screen-on time. While the Redmi 14C may offer acceptable endurance for casual users, its below-average efficiency means that power users or heavy streamers may find themselves reaching for a charger sooner than expected. For users prioritising battery longevity and energy-conscious design, more optimised entry-level phones are available within the same price segment. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The Xiaomi Redmi 14C  has an estimated annual energy consumption of 4.3 kWh, making it one of the least efficient devices in its class in terms of power usage. This figure is significantly higher than the entry-tier average of 3.33 kWh, and well above both the Redmi 13C (2.9 kWh) and Motorola Moto G34 (3.1 kWh). The high energy draw reflects the Redmi 14C ’s limited battery optimisation, with its MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra chipset and basic power management strategy contributing to its increased power demands. Users can expect shorter runtimes compared to other budget phones, especially under moderate to heavy daily usage. While not necessarily a deal-breaker at this price point, the Redmi 14C ’s energy efficiency lags behind direct competitors, suggesting that Xiaomi has prioritised affordability and display features over extended battery longevity or green performance. Who Should Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 14C? Introducing the Xiaomi Redmi 14C , perfect for various user profiles: Everyday Users on a Budget: If you're looking for a smartphone that covers all the essentials without breaking the bank, the Redmi 14C delivers great value. With a low price and options for up to 8GB RAM with memory extension, it handles tasks like WhatsApp, web browsing, and YouTube comfortably. It’s a smart pick for students, first-time smartphone users, or anyone needing a reliable secondary phone. Media Consumers Who Want a Big Display: Thanks to its 6.88-inch LCD display with a 120Hz refresh rate, the Redmi 14C is well-suited for watching videos, scrolling social media, or reading articles. While it only offers HD+ resolution, the large screen and TÜV-certified eye comfort features provide a pleasant experience during long viewing sessions. If you want a big screen at a low price, this is it. Users Who Prioritise Storage Flexibility: The Redmi 14C supports expandable storage up to 1TB via microSD, making it ideal for those who like to keep lots of photos, videos, or offline media. Whether you choose the 128GB or 256GB variant, the extra slot is a huge bonus, especially for users who often run out of space on entry-level phones. ViserMark VERDICT The Xiaomi Redmi 14C - what's it like to use? The Xiaomi Redmi 14C  is an entry-level smartphone that focuses on delivering a balanced experience for everyday users. It doesn’t aim to impress with high-end specs but rather with dependable performance, a large display, and a practical feature set at an affordable price. Powered by the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra and up to 8GB of RAM (with memory extension), it handles basic tasks like social media, messaging, video streaming, and casual gaming without much trouble. Paired with eMMC 5.1 storage, app opening speeds are decent but not particularly fast — something to keep in mind for multitaskers. The 6.88-inch Dot Drop LCD display is one of the standout features of the device. It supports a 120Hz refresh rate and a 240Hz touch sampling rate, which contribute to a smoother scrolling and navigation experience. While the resolution is only HD+ (1640 x 720), it’s still fine for casual viewing, especially at this price point. The peak brightness of 600 nits (HBM) is adequate indoors and usable outdoors in most conditions, though direct sunlight may pose challenges. Eye comfort features like TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light certification and Reading Mode enhance long-term usability. In terms of design, the Redmi 14C manages to look more premium than expected. Its glass-like back panel and textured finish (depending on the colour variant) give it a clean and stylish look. However, it's on the heavier side at over 200g, which is noticeable during extended use. The phone lacks an official IP rating, so it's not built for rough environments — though the plastic frame provides a decent grip and drop resistance. The phone’s 50MP rear camera is capable of delivering decent photos in good lighting, with vibrant colours and acceptable dynamic range. The 13MP selfie camera performs well for video calls and basic selfies. However, both cameras struggle in low light, and there’s no image stabilisation, so photo and video clarity can drop significantly in challenging conditions. With a 5,160mAh battery, the Redmi 14C is built to last through the day — but in real-world usage, it lasts around 39 hours, slightly below the entry-tier average. It supports 18W fast charging, but does not ship with a charger, so you’ll need to use a compatible USB-C adapter. Charging from 20% to full takes just over two hours, which is standard for this segment. On the software side, the device runs Xiaomi’s new HyperOS based on Android 14, offering an updated UI and features like Reading Mode, Game Turbo, and customisation options. However, bloatware and ads are still present out of the box. Fortunately, many pre-installed apps can be uninstalled, and recommendations can be disabled in settings. The Redmi 14C includes a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, 3.5mm headphone jack, FM radio, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC (in select markets), and dual SIM with microSD support — making it a feature-rich phone for the price. Overall, the Redmi 14C  doesn’t promise a flagship experience — and it doesn’t need to. It delivers a large screen, solid battery life, and a reliable performance for the basics. It’s not the fastest or most efficient device, but it gets the job done for users who want a practical phone without unnecessary extras. If you're on a budget, need a phone for daily tasks, and appreciate a large display, the Redmi 14C  is a dependable everyday companion. Just don’t expect miracles when it comes to gaming, photography, or long-term software longevity. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, with a vision to deliver high-quality technology at accessible prices. Committed to a user-centric approach, Xiaomi quickly gained traction in the mobile internet space. By 2014, the company had sold over 61 million smartphones and expanded into key markets including Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil. Headquartered in Beijing, China, Xiaomi continues its global expansion with offices across the Asia-Pacific region, India, and Brazil, positioning itself as a rising global tech brand. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 HMD Pulse Pro Smartphone Review: Pulse of Performance: The HMD Pulse Pro Balances Power and Longevity SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Entry (€0-€199)  Entry Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Available Soon Quick Summary The HMD Pulse Pro, announced in April 2024, is an Android smartphone with strong performance and exceptional battery life. It is an attractive option for users seeking efficiency and affordability. One of the standout features of the Pulse Pro is its 6.65-inch IPS LCD display, with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate and a 720x1612 pixels resolution. The display provides an immersive viewing experience, ideal for media consumption and daily use, with a screen-to-body ratio of approximately 86.8%. The device is powered by the Unisoc T606 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU and a Mali-G57 MP1 GPU, ensuring reliable and consistent performance across various tasks. It comes with 128GB of internal storage and offers three RAM options: 4GB, 6GB, or 8GB, catering to different user needs. The dual rear camera setup features a 50 MP wide lens with autofocus, a 2 MP depth sensor and a front-facing 50 MP camera for high-quality selfies. The phone's 5000 mAh battery is another standout feature, offering an impressive 55 hours of battery life according to ViserMark testing. This battery supports 20W wired charging, allowing quick recharges in 2 hours and 18 minutes. The HMD Pulse Pro also comes with a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, NFC, and a USB Type-C 2.0 port for enhanced practicality and security. Available in Black Ocean, Glacier Green, and Twilight Purple colour options, the device combines style with a comprehensive feature set, ensuring that users are well-equipped for their daily tasks. The Pulse Pro offers great value for money, particularly considering its robust battery life and comprehensive feature set. Overall, the HMD Pulse Pro is an excellent choice for users looking for a budget-friendly smartphone with long battery life, a solid camera system, and reliable performance for everyday tasks. Pros Cons Great battery life of 2 days of use Reasonable performance for an Entry Tier smartphone Good value Adequate camera performance Software and security updates guaranteed Long charging time   ViserMark Labels for the HMD Pulse Pro The HMD Pulse Pro impresses with its battery performance, as confirmed by recent ViserMark testing. The smartphone boasts a battery life of 2 days (55 hours), which positions it as a reliable option for users seeking longevity in their smartphone use. This endurance is paired with a charging time of 2 hours and 18 minutes, ensuring the phone can be quickly powered up when needed. Despite its impressive battery life, the HMD Pulse Pro received a Battery Performance score of 48/100, indicating that while the battery lasts long, there might be areas where efficiency could be improved. Moreover, the Pulse Pro's energy efficiency is highlighted by a Battery Efficiency rating of 1.5 out of 5 leaves, reflecting a moderate balance between power consumption and battery size. The device's Annual Energy Consumption is calculated at 2.9 kWh per annum, which is standard for smartphones in its category. Overall, these results suggest that the HMD Pulse Pro is well-suited for users prioritising battery life. Specification Overview  - Released Date: April 2024 Body: 163.2 x 75 x 8.6 mm , weight 196g. Corning Gorilla Glass Victus Display : 6.65 inches, IPS LCD, 90Hz with 720 x 1612 resolution. Dust and splash-resistant. Nano-SIM Operating System : Android 14 Chipset :   Unisoc T606 (12 nm) , Octa-core processor Memory : 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM . microSDXC Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n / ac, Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes Camera : Set-up - Main: 50MP (wide) 2 MP (depth) with LED flash, HDR. Video1080p@30fps Front Camera:  50 MP and Video Battery : 5000mAh, 20 W wired Colour : Black Ocean, Glacier Green, Twilight Purple Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the HMD Pulse Pro Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover the Battery Test Results Learn more about the HMD Pulse Pro   Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the HMD Pulse Pro  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the HMD Pulse Pro  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The HMD Pulse Pro stands out as the leader in battery performance among its competitors in the Entry Tier smartphone segment, scoring 48 out of 100. This positions it ahead of similar models like the Xiaomi A2 and Motorola Moto G34 , which scored 44 and 43 respectively. Despite the small margin, this slight edge in battery performance could translate into noticeable benefits for users, such as longer usage time between charges and more efficient power management, making the Pulse Pro an appealing choice for those who prioritise battery life. However, the narrow gap between these smartphones highlights a consistent focus on reliable battery life across the Entry Tier (€0-€199) market. The close scores suggest that while the HMD Pulse Pro leads, competitors like the Xiaomi A2 and Motorola Moto G34 are also strong contenders, offering similar battery performance. This consistency emphasises the importance of battery life in this segment, where consumers often seek the best value. Nonetheless, the HMD Pulse Pro's position at the top suggests it is better suited for users looking for that extra bit of endurance from their smartphone. 2. Battery Life The HMD Pulse Pro stands out in the Entry Tier smartphone segment, leading the pack with its superior battery life. It offers an impressive 2 days of continuous use or 55 hours if translated into hours on a single charge, outlasting competitors like the Motorola Moto G34 and Xiaomi A2 , which offer around 53 and 54 hours, respectively. This extended battery life makes the Pulse Pro an attractive choice for users who prioritise endurance and want a device that can comfortably last more than two days without recharging. However, the consistency of 2 days of use in battery life between the HMD Pulse Pro and its rivals highlights the strength of the Entry Tier segment in delivering reliable battery life. All phones compared exceed 50 hours of use and approach or surpass 2 days of battery life, indicating that manufacturers are successfully meeting the demands of budget-conscious consumers who value longevity. While the Pulse Pro holds a slight edge, the strong performance of its competitors means that users may also consider other factors, such as design or camera quality, alongside battery life, when making their purchasing decisions. 3.   Battery Consumption The  HMD Pulse Pro  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. The battery performance comparison between the HMD Pulse Pro and the Motorola Moto G34 uncovers intriguing differences in power consumption across various tasks. Notably, the HMD Pulse Pro consumes more power than the Moto G34 during outgoing calls. This higher current draw suggests that the Pulse Pro may be utilising more powerful hardware or processing capabilities, potentially delivering better performance but at the cost of battery efficiency. This insight is crucial for users who value performance but also need to manage their phone's battery life. Another significant insight from the data is the substantial power draw of the   Motorola Moto G34 during camera usage. It exhibits a higher current consumption compared to the HMD Pulse Pro, indicating that it may be supporting more advanced camera features or better image processing. This could be a boon for users who prioritise photography, as they could enjoy enhanced camera functionality, even if it means sacrificing some battery life. This understanding of the trade-off between camera features and battery life is valuable for users who are photography enthusiasts. Interestingly, the web browsing and media playback activities show less discrepancy between the two smartphones, with both phones exhibiting similar power consumption levels. This implies that the HMD Pulse Pro and the Moto G34 are well-optimised for these tasks, offering users a balanced experience without excessively draining the battery. The analysis suggests that the HMD Pulse Pro is more performance-oriented, which might appeal to users who value advanced features and are willing to trade off some battery efficiency for better overall performance. Conversely, the Motorola Moto G34 offers more conservative power management, making it a better option for users who prioritise battery longevity and efficiency in their day-to-day activities. This comparison highlights the importance of considering performance and battery life based on user needs and usage patterns. The battery performance comparison between the HMD Pulse Pro and the Xiaomi A2 reveals several interesting trends that highlight differences in how these two smartphones manage power consumption across various tasks. One of the most notable observations is that the HMD Pulse Pro consumes more power than the Xiaomi A2 in nearly all usage scenarios. This trend suggests that the Pulse Pro may be utilising more powerful hardware or processing more intensive tasks, leading to higher current consumption across the board. For instance, during social media usage and outgoing calls, the HMD Pulse Pro  exhibits significantly higher current consumption than the Xiaomi A2 . This could imply that the Pulse Pro is handling these tasks more aggressively, possibly due to higher processing demands or less efficient power management. In contrast, the Xiaomi A2's more restrained power consumption could potentially lead to better battery longevity, empowering users who heavily engage in these activities. Interestingly, the power consumption difference between the two devices in gaming and media playback is less pronounced, though the HMD Pulse Pro still consumes slightly more power. This suggests that both devices are well-optimised for these power-intensive activities. Still, the higher consumption of Pulse Pro might be tied to better performance or higher-quality graphics processing. Overall, the data suggests that while the HMD Pulse Pro may offer stronger performance or more advanced features, it comes at the cost of increased power consumption. For users who prioritise efficiency and longer battery life, particularly during everyday tasks like social media, calling, and video playback, the Xiaomi A2 might be the better choice. Conversely, users who value higher performance and don't mind sacrificing some battery efficiency for it may find the HMD Pulse Pro more appealing. This analysis underscores the importance of respecting individual user needs and preferences when balancing performance with power management. The in-depth battery performance comparison among the HMD Pulse Pro, Motorola Moto G34 , and Xiaomi A2 , and their performance against the entry-tier segment average, uncovers several intriguing insights into how these smartphones manage power across a range of everyday tasks. Firstly, the HMD Pulse Pro consistently exhibits higher power consumption across most activities when compared to its competitors, particularly in tasks like social media usage, camera operation, and web browsing. This higher power draw suggests that the Pulse Pro may be leveraging more powerful hardware or delivering a higher level of performance, which could be advantageous for users who prioritise speed and responsiveness in their phone, even if it means a quicker battery drain. This insight helps readers understand the trade-offs involved in their purchase decision. Another interesting observation is that while the Pulse Pro generally uses more power, the Xiaomi A2 demonstrates more efficient power usage in several key areas, including gaming, media playback, and outgoing calls. This efficiency could make the Xiaomi A2 a more attractive option for users who prioritise battery longevity, especially when extended usage is crucial. The Motorola Moto G34 falls somewhere in between, generally offering more balanced power consumption that aligns closely with the entry-tier average, making it a solid all-around performer. Finally, the average battery consumption for the Entry Tier segment, represented by the green bars, provides a valuable benchmark, showing that all three devices are relatively close in performance to the segment norms. However, the HMD Pulse Pro’s divergence from the average in high-consumption tasks highlights its focus on performance, possibly catering to users who demand more from their smartphones in terms of power and capabilities. In summary, the HMD Pulse Pro stands out for its performance-driven approach, which may appeal to users who need a device that can easily handle intensive tasks, even if it comes at the cost of higher power consumption. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi A2 offers a more battery-efficient alternative suitable for users who value long battery life over peak performance. The Motorola Moto G34 provides a balanced option, making it a reliable choice for those looking to compromise power and efficiency in the entry-tier market. 4.   Battery Efficiency The battery efficiency comparison chart for the HMD Pulse Pro and its competitors reveals several key insights into how well these smartphones manage power relative to their battery capacities. This suggests that the HMD Pulse Pro has a long battery life and uses its power effectively, making it a strong choice for users who need reliable performance over extended periods without significant energy waste. Interestingly, there is no gap in efficiency between the Pulse Pro and other mobile phones like the Motorola Moto G34 and Xiaomi A2 . While all close in efficiency, these mobile phones do not match the Pulse Pro's capability to stretch every bit of power out of its battery. This slight advantage might make the Pulse Pro more appealing to users who are particularly sensitive to battery performance, especially in scenarios where efficient power usage can translate into longer daily usability. The above chart highlights that while the HMD Pulse Pro excels in battery life and efficiency, its competitors remain relatively close in performance. This reinforces Pulse Pro's position as a leader in its segment, particularly for users who demand longevity and efficient power management from their smartphones. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The annual energy consumption comparison chart for the HMD Pulse Pro and its competitors reveals insightful trends regarding the efficiency and overall energy usage of these entry-tier smartphones. The HMD Pulse Pro, with the lowest annual energy consumption at 2.9 kWh per year, is the most energy-efficient phone among the compared models. This efficiency is a significant advantage for users who are conscious of their device's environmental impact, as it helps reduce their carbon footprint while still enjoying the benefits of a smartphone. In contrast, the other smartphones in the comparison, including the Motorola Moto G34 and Xiaomi A2 , consume slightly more energy annually, at 3.1 and 3.0 kWh, respectively. The Entry Tier average, at 3.2 kWh, further highlights the HMD Pulse Pro's superior efficiency. This suggests that while all these mobile phones are designed to be energy-efficient, the Pulse Pro's optimised power management gives it a tangible edge, potentially making it more appealing to environmentally conscious consumers or those looking for cost savings over the long term. Overall, the HMD Pulse Pro excels in battery life and energy efficiency, consuming less power annually compared to its peers. This efficiency and its strong battery performance reinforce the Pulse Pro's position as a leading choice in the entry-tier market, especially for users who prioritise sustainability and cost-effective energy use. ViserMark VERDICT The HMD Pulse Pro - what's it like to use? The H MD Pulse Pro offers a mixed experience that caters to performance enthusiasts and users who prioritise battery efficiency, making it a versatile option within the Entry Tier smartphone market. One of the most significant aspects of using the HMD Pulse Pro is its battery performance. With an extended battery life of 2 days or 55 hours and energy-efficient consumption, it's designed to last through demanding use without frequent recharging. However, it's important to note that the Pulse Pro consumes more power across various tasks than its competitors. This might appeal to users looking for solid performance, even if it comes at the cost of higher power usage. The phone shows a higher current draw for everyday activities like social media, calling, and web browsing, which could impact battery life depending on usage patterns. Also, the HMD Pulse Pro excels in handling intensive tasks, such as gaming and camera operations, thanks to its powerful hardware. However, this power comes at a cost-a potential decrease in battery life during heavy use. This trade-off is something users should consider based on their daily needs and usage patterns. Beyond performance, the HMD Pulse Pro maintains a user-friendly design with features like a 6.65-inch IPS LCD display and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. These elements contribute to a comfortable and secure user experience, while the availability of multiple colour options adds a touch of personalization. The device also supports practical features like NFC and USB Type-C, which enhance its usability in everyday scenarios. Overall, the HMD Pulse Pro is a strong choice for users who value both performance and battery life. It's particularly well-suited for those who prioritise power and efficiency in equal measure, and who are willing to accept a bit of extra power consumption for a responsive, capable smartphone experience. Pros Cons Extended battery life without frequent charging. Tends to consume more power across various tasks compared to competitors, potentially impacting battery life during heavy use Handles intensive tasks like gaming and camera usage efficiency. The display resolution is 720x1612 pixels, which might be lower than what some users expect from a modern smartphone. Features a 6.65-inch IPS LCD display with 90Hz refresh rate It lacks any groundbreaking or standout feature that would significantly set it apart from other entry-tier smartphones. Energy efficient making it more cost-effective and environmentally friendly. Performance comes at the cost of increased power usage, which may not suit users who prioritize battery longevity over performance. Priced competitively. For users who engage in lighter smartphone activities, the extra power and performance capabilities might be unnecessary, Who should buy the HMD Pulse Pro? Here are the types of users who might find the HMD Pulse Pro  particularly beneficial: Performance Seekers on a Budget: The Pulse Pro is ideal for users who want strong performance in tasks like gaming and photography without spending a fortune. It delivers high power and responsiveness at an affordable price. Battery-Conscious Users: Perfect for those needing a smartphone with a long battery life, lasting over two days on a single charge, while still capable of handling everyday tasks efficiently. Practical Everyday Users: This is a great choice for individuals looking for a well-rounded, reliable device for daily use. It offers essential features like NFC, a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, and energy-efficient operation. CONCLUSION In summary, the HMD Pulse Pro is best suited for users who seek a balance of performance, battery life, and affordability, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of smartphone users. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background HMD Globa l, commonly known as HMD, is a Finnish mobile phone manufacturer that was founded in 2016. The company's mission is to revive the iconic Nokia brand, combining its renowned durability and reliability with modern Android technology. This unique approach has led to the creation of devices that offer solid performance, longevity, and affordability, making HMD a standout in the industry. HMD Global quickly gained attention for its commitment to producing smartphones that adhere to a clean, stock Android experience, free from bloatware and unnecessary modifications. This approach has ensured smoother performance and timely updates and appealed to consumers who prefer a more streamlined and user-friendly interface. With a strategic focus on the mid-range and entry-level segments, HMD Global has distinguished itself by offering quality devices at competitive prices. The company's strong emphasis on battery life, durability, and software reliability has carved out a unique niche in the market, appealing to both nostalgic Nokia fans and new users seeking dependable, no-nonsense smartphones. HMD’s products are now available in over 100 countries, and the company has developed a reputation for supporting its devices with regular software updates and security patches, further enhancing the longevity and value of its offerings. HMD continues to grow its presence in the global smartphone market through strategic partnerships and a focus on user trust. Written by Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and the latest test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5060 Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Smartphone Review: Pixel Perfect : The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL A Good All-Rounder SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro (€700+)  Entry Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Quick Summary The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL stands out with its sleek, premium design, continuing Google's tradition of minimalist aesthetics and excellent build quality. It features a 6.80" LTPO OLED, promising vibrant colours and a smooth 120Hz adaptive refresh rate for a top-tier viewing experience. Additionally, its durable build, complete with IP68 water and dust resistance, ensures that it's both stylish and practical for everyday use. Despite its size, the phone should feel comfortable in hand, making it an excellent choice for those who prefer larger smartphones. Performance-wise, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is powered by the latest version of Google's Tensor G4, ensuring fast, efficient multitasking and AI-driven enhancements. This chipset will provide high-speed processing for daily tasks and enable advanced features like real-time language translation, on-device voice commands, and computational photography. Paired with up to 12GB of RAM and 5G support, the phone will be future-proofed for years of fast and reliable performance. Being known for its camera capabilities, this smartphone has three cameras on the back: a 50MP OIS primary (1x-2x), a 48MP ultrawide, and a 48MP 5x telephoto. Multi-zone LDAF assists all three cameras. The primary camera can capture 8K video, a feature not available on the Pixel 9. The selfie camera has also been upgraded to a 42MP camera with autofocus capabilities. Google's AI enhancements like Night Sight and Super Res Zoom will push mobile photography to new heights. Coupled with solid battery life, fast charging, and seamless integration with the latest Android version, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL will appeal to users looking for a premium, AI-driven smartphone experience. Pros Cons Great battery life of 2 days of use with fast charging Storage only starts from 128GB Launched with Android 14 Adequate camera performance still could be improved Upgraded Selfie Camera Seven years of OS, security and Pixel Drop updates   ViserMark Labels for the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL : Battery Life: The phone's total usage time is 49 hours, which equals two days and 1 hour. The phone has a good battery life, especially for users who use their phone moderately or heavily throughout the day. Battery Charging: The Pixel 9 Pro XL charges in 1 hour and 44 minutes, which means it offers a fast charging experience and allows users to recharge the phone quickly. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The phone scored 44/100 for battery performance and achieved a high battery efficiency rating. This indicates that the phone manages power well, optimising energy use to extend battery life. Additionally, the 3.3 kWh/annum energy consumption is energy-efficient for day-to-day operations. Specification Overview  - Released Date: August 2024 Body: 162.8 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm , weight 221g. Corning® Gorilla® Glass Victus® 2 cover Display : 6.8 inches, LTPO OLED, 120Hz with HDR10+ and 1344 x 2992 resolution. IP68 Dust and Water-resistant with fingerprint-resistant coating. Operating System : Android 14. Chipset :   Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) , Octa-core processor Memory : 128GB 16GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM Connectivity :  5G, Wi-Fi 6, eSIM, Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Stereo Speakers: Yes. Camera : Set-up - Main: 50MP (wide), Telephoto: 48 MP, Ultra wide angle: 48 MP with dual pixel PDAF, Multi-zone LDAF, OIS . Video 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps Front Camera:  42 MP and Video 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps. Battery : 5060mAh, 45W wired. Also, with 23W wireless (w/ Pixel Stand), 12W wireless (w/Qi-compatible charger), as well as reverse wireless. Colour : Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL achieved a battery performance score of 44/100 in ViserMark testing, indicating decent but not exceptional battery life compared to other flagship smartphones. This score reflects real-world battery efficiency, where the smartphone balances power consumption with performance throughout various tasks. Compared to similar Flagship smartphones, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL outperforms its predecessor, the Google Pixel 8 Pro , which scored 41/100, demonstrating improved battery management and longevity. However, it still falls behind the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , which achieved a higher 49/100 score. This suggests that while the Pixel 9 Pro XL is competitive with enhanced battery features, rival phones like Samsung's flagships may offer slightly better battery optimisation, especially for heavy smartphone users. Overall, the Pixel 9 Pro XL is a solid option for users seeking good performance and battery efficiency but may not offer quite the battery life compared to other high-end smartphones. 2. Battery Life In the ViserMark's battery life testing, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL performed exceptionally well providing continuous use for 2 days or 49 hours. This places it as a top performer in the flagship smartphone tier, ensuring users can depend on the phone for extended periods without frequent recharging. When compared to other flagship smartphones, the Pixel 9 Pro XL matches the battery life of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , both delivering two days of use. This represents a significant improvement over the Google Pixel 8 Pro, which only offers 1.5 days of battery life. The average battery life in the Flagship/Pro Tier category is approximately 1.58 days, making the Pixel 9 Pro XL stand out. Regarding battery life translated to hours, the Pixel 9 Pro XL exceeds 49 hours, closely matched by the Galaxy S24 Ultra at 52 hours. The Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly surpasses the Google Pixel 8 Pro, which provides only 38 hours of usage. Overall, the  Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  offers excellent endurance, making it one of the best choices for users who prioritise long-lasting battery life in a premium smartphone. 3.   Battery Consumption The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Google Pixel 8 Pro were compared in terms of battery performance, examining their power usage during various daily activities. The analysis, conducted using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , highlighted power consumption during social media usage, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing tasks. Social Media & Communication: The power efficiency for social media use is significantly improved in the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL compared to the Pixel 8 Pro . This indicates better optimisation for apps that involve continuous background activity, scrolling, and media consumption, making the newer device more suitable for users who spend extended periods on social media. Additionally, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes less battery for outgoing calls and multimedia messaging (MMS), showing its enhanced power management for communication-based tasks. Media & Entertainment: One area of significant improvement is in media playback, especially for YouTube and general media player usage. The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes notably less power than the Pixel 8 Pro, providing better battery performance for users who often stream videos or listen to music. This enhancement is important for users who want entertainment, as the newer smartphone allows for longer playback times without needing a recharge. Productivity: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL performs more efficiently during web browsing and email tasks than its predecessor. This improvement in power management means that users relying heavily on their smartphones for work-related tasks, such as checking emails or conducting research online, will experience longer battery life between charges. Additionally, it offers marginally better battery efficiency for tasks like file transfers, reducing the power drain when moving large amounts of data. Camera & Messaging: When using the camera, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 's power consumption is notably lower than the Pixel 8 Pro, demonstrating significant improvements in photography-related power management. This is a key advantage for users who frequently use their smartphones for photography. In SMS messaging, both devices show similar power consumption, but the Pixel 9 Pro XL's slight efficiency gain means longer battery life for everyday tasks. In conclusion, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has significantly improved battery management for various daily tasks compared to the Pixel 8 Pro . Users will especially appreciate the improved efficiency in social media usage, media playback, and productivity tasks, resulting in longer battery life and fewer interruptions for charging. These enhancements in the newer smartphone showcase Google's commitment to providing better power management for both leisure and work-related activities, making the Pixel 9 Pro XL a more dependable choice for all-day use. The detailed battery performance comparison between the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra highlights how leading brands' flagship devices manage power during a range of everyday tasks. Social Media & Communication: Both smartphones show comparable performance in terms of battery consumption for social media, with the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra consuming similar amounts of power. For outgoing calls, however, the Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes less energy than the S24 Ultra, making it a slightly more efficient choice for voice communication. Multimedia & Entertainment: The   Google Pixel 9 Pro XL shows superior efficiency in media playback, including watching YouTube videos and listening to music on the media player. It consumes less battery for gaming, suggesting better efficiency and optimisation for resource-intensive activities. Gamers will benefit from the Pixel 9 Pro XL's ability to conserve power during long gaming sessions. Productivity Tasks: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra performs better in email and consumes less power than the Pixel 9 Pro XL, which may make it a more efficient choice for productivity-focused users. It also exhibits slightly lower energy consumption for web browsing, offering better battery performance for users who spend more time browsing the internet on their phones. Camera & Messaging: In camera usage, the   Google Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes significantly more power than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, which suggests that the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is more efficient in photography and video capture. For tasks like SMS, both devices perform similarly, with minor differences in power consumption. For users, the choice between these two smartphones ultimately comes down to personal usage patterns. The key takeaway is that both brands offer competitive phones, and understanding these battery performance differences can significantly impact a user’s daily experience with their smartphone. The detailed battery performance comparison between the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , Google Pixel 8 Pro, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the average battery consumption for flagship smartphones (indicated by various colours) reveals how each device manages power during daily tasks. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: When it comes to social media usage, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (blue) is the most efficient in terms of battery consumption compared to the Google Pixel 8 Pro (light blue), the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (orange), and the average flagship consumption (green). This makes the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL the best option for users who spend significant time on social media. Additionally, the Pixel 9 Pro XL continues to outperform the other phones for outgoing calls, showcasing Google's improvement in optimising battery life for communication tasks. Gaming & Multimedia: Regarding gaming, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL stands out for its efficiency, using less power compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Pixel 8 Pro. This indicates that it is well-optimised for intense gaming, making it a solid choice for gamers. Also, for multimedia consumption, especially for tasks like watching YouTube and using media players, the Pixel 9 Pro XL uses significantly less power, making it the top choice for users who frequently stream videos or consume media on their devices. The Pixel 8 Pr o is less efficient in these tasks, using more battery power than the Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Galaxy S24 Ultra. Productivity & Web Usage: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, with its superior efficiency in email usage, stands out against the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , which is still competitive but uses slightly more power. However, both the Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Galaxy S24 Ultra perform similarly in web browsing, a crucial aspect for users heavily reliant on internet usage. This similarity in performance reassures users about the capabilities of both devices. The Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Galaxy S24 Ultra are competitive leaders in battery efficiency for productivity-related tasks, with the average flagship performance falling between the two. Camera Usage & Messaging: In terms of camera usage, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has the best battery efficiency. It uses less power than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Pixel 8 Pro, making it the ideal choice for users who frequently use their smartphones for photography or videography. As for SMS messaging, all smartphones are relatively similar, with minor differences in power consumption. This means that basic messaging tasks are efficiently handled across all flagship devices. The average flagship consumption (green) serves as a key benchmark to evaluate the overall efficiency of these leading smartphones. Both the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra perform above the average in many tasks, showcasing their competitiveness in the flagship category. Overall, the Pixel 8 Pro shows room for improvement compared to its successor but remains competitive in key areas. Users should choose based on their daily usage needs, with the Pixel 9 Pro XL excelling in entertainment and browsing, and the Galaxy S24 Ultra performing best in gaming and productivity. 4.   Battery Efficiency ViserMark tested the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and awarded it a 1-leaf rating for battery efficiency, indicating relatively low efficiency compared to a potential maximum of 5 leaves. This rating reflects the device's energy conservation during regular use. In the efficiency comparison chart, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  performed similarly to the Flagship/Pro Tier category average, providing 1 hour of efficient usage. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra topped the comparison with higher efficiency, lasting 1.5 hours, while the Google Pixel 8 Pro lagged, managing only 0.5 hours of efficient use. These results suggest that while the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL offers decent battery efficiency for most tasks, it could improve its energy conservation, especially compared to competitors like the Galaxy S24 Ultra. For users, this means that although the Pixel 9 Pro XL offers good battery life, it may consume energy faster during heavy or continuous usage, affecting overall efficiency. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The ViserMark label indicates that the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL uses 3.3 kWh of energy annually. This number represents the amount of energy the device uses over a year. A lower value means better energy efficiency, potentially resulting in lower electricity costs for the user. Compared to other flagship smartphones, the Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes more energy than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , which has an annual consumption of 3.1 kWh, making it more energy-efficient. However, it outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro , which has an annual consumption of 4.3 kWh, indicating that the Pixel 9 Pro XL is a more energy-efficient upgrade. The average for the general Flagship/Pro Tier category is around 3.8 kWh, showing that this smartphone is more efficient than most of its competitors in the Flagship smartphone range. For users interested in saving on energy costs or concerned about their environmental impact, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL offers a good balance between performance and energy efficiency. ViserMark VERDICT The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - what's it like to use? The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL offers a well-rounded experience that excels in daily efficiency, particularly in social media, playback, and web browsing. For users who spend hours scrolling through apps, streaming videos, or browsing the internet, the Pixel 9 Pro XL stands out with impressive battery optimization. Thanks to its balanced power consumption, it easily lasts a full day of mixed usage, allowing users to seamlessly transition from entertainment to productivity without worrying about constant recharging. When compared to its competitors such as the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , the Pixel 9 Pro XL stands out for its superior media performance while also being competitive in other important areas. While the Galaxy S24 Ultra is more efficient for tasks like photography and professional use such as email, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL excels in handling social apps, video playback, and gaming performance, making it a great choice for users who prioritize these features. The Pixel 9 Pro XL is not just a smartphone; it is a reliable, everyday companion that provides a seamless, long-lasting experience, making it an appealing option for users seeking a phone that balances productivity and entertainment. Pros Cons Extended battery life without frequent charging. Gaming Efficiency: compared to competitors, it is less efficient for extended gaming sessions. Outstanding Media Performance: Excels in media playback, offering superior battery efficiency for activities like streaming videos and listening to music. Productivity Tasks: Tasks like file transfers and professional use (e.g., email) consume more power. Features a 6.8-inch bright display with 120Hz refresh rate, with fast charging Not the Best for Heavy Professional Use: Although competitive, it falls slightly behind. Efficient Social Media Usage: For users who spend a lot of time scrolling through apps Balanced Power Consumption: Offers a seamless experience for both entertainment and productivity, Who should buy the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL? Introducing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, perfect for various user profiles: Media Enthusiasts & Social Media Users : This phone is great for people who enjoy streaming videos, listening to music, and using social media platforms. Its impressive battery optimisation ensures long-lasting performance for content consumption and social interaction. Researching & Web Browsing Fans : Ideal for users who spend a lot of time browsing the web. The Pixel 9 Pro XL offers efficient battery management for internet surfing, ensuring longer use without frequent recharging. Balanced Everyday Users: Best suited for those looking for a well-rounded smartphone experience. The Pixel 9 Pro XL balances entertainment, social media, and casual productivity, making it a reliable, all-purpose smartphone. CONCLUSION While the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL may not be the most efficient choice for heavy gaming or professional productivity tasks, it is a great everyday companion for users who prioritise entertainment, social interaction, and casual work. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. Google Pixel 9 Pro Camera review   Background Google  is a multinational American technology company specialising in Internet-related services and products. It was founded in September 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin while they were PhD students at Stanford University in California . The company has its headquarters in Mountain View, California . Google’s mission statement is "to organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful" . The company offers various  products and services ,  including search engines, online advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware . Google is one of the most widely known and used search engines on the internet today . Google has a range of smartphones called Pixel phones. The company has released several models of Pixel phones over the years ,  including the Pixel 6A, Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro, Pixel Fold and the Google Pixel 7a . The latest models  are the Google Pixel 8, Pixel 8 Pro and Google Pixel 8a. The phones run on the Android operating system and are known for their high-quality cameras . Written by Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4610 Xiaomi 14 Smartphone Review: Xiaomi 14: Powerhouse Performance in a Compact Design SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro (€700+)  Flagship/Pro Ranking # 2 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available Quick Summary The Xiaomi 14 is a compact flagship that offers high-end features in a sleek, durable design. It features a 6.36-inch LTPO OLED display, which provides vivid colours, a smooth 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, and a peak brightness of 3,000 nits, making it easily legible even in direct sunlight. The screen is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus, and the phone has an IP68 rating, ensuring it is both water and dust resistant. While its glossy back looks premium, it may attract fingerprints and smudges. Performance is driven by the powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor, paired with 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and up to 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage, ensuring fast and efficient multitasking, gaming, and AI-powered tasks. With 5G support, the Xiaomi 14 is future-proofed for fast and reliable connectivity. The phone runs Xiaomi’s new HyperOS, based on Android 14, delivering a smooth and user-friendly experience with improved multitasking features, although there is some pre-installed bloatware. In terms of photography, the Xiaomi 14 is equipped with a triple 50MP rear camera system, developed in collaboration with Leica. This includes a 50MP main camera with OIS (Optical Image Stabilisation), a 50MP ultra-wide lens, and a 50MP telephoto lens offering 3.2x optical zoom. The cameras deliver impressive performance across various lighting conditions, making the Xiaomi 14 a great choice for mobile photography enthusiasts. The front-facing camera is a 32MP sensor capable of capturing sharp selfies and supporting high-quality video calls. Video recording goes up to 8K resolution at 24 frames per second, ensuring top-tier quality. Pros Cons Great battery life of 1.5 days with 90W fast wired and 50W wireless charging No microSD card slot for expandable storage Compact and comfortable to use with a 6.36-inch display Slippery design due to the glossy back, prone to fingerprints Powerful performance with the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor Camera's Leica processing presets can't be turned off Triple 50MP Leica-powered camera system delivers excellent photography Selfie camera quality could be improved compared to rear cameras Up to 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage and 12GB RAM Performance throttling under sustained heavy load IP68-rated for water and dust resistance Launched with Android 14 and HyperOS   ViserMark Labels for the Xiaomi 14 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Xiaomi 14 : Battery Life : The Xiaomi 14 provides 43 hours of total usage, which equates to 1.5 days of battery life. This makes it a solid option for users who engage in moderate or heavy phone use throughout the day, ensuring that the device can last well into the next day before requiring a recharge. Battery Charging : The phone supports extremely fast charging, fully charging in just 44 minutes. This means users can quickly top up the battery, allowing for minimal downtime between charges. Battery Performance & Efficiency : The Xiaomi 14 achieved a 48/100 score for battery performance, highlighting its strong power management capabilities. It also has a high battery efficiency rating, indicating that it optimises energy usage to extend battery life effectively. Furthermore, the phone consumes 3.5 kWh per year, making it an energy-efficient choice for everyday use. Specification Overview  - Released Date: February 2024 Body: 152.8 x 71.5 x 8.2 mm, with a weight of 188g. Corning® Gorilla® Glass Victus® 2 for enhanced durability. Display : 6.36-inch LTPO OLED display with 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, HDR10+, Dolby Vision support, and a resolution of 1200 x 2670 pixels. It has a peak brightness of 3,000 nits. IP68 rated for dust and water resistance. It features a glass front, glass back, and an aluminium frame. Operating System : Android 14 layered with Xiaomi's HyperOS. Chipset : Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) processor, featuring Octa-core CPU and Adreno 750 GPU. Memory : 256GB storage with 8GB/12GB RAM, 512GB or 1TB storage with 16GB RAM. It uses UFS 4.0 storage but lacks a microSD card slot. Connectivity :   Supports 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, and USB-C (USB 3.2). It features stereo speakers but no headphone jack. Camera : Main camera:  Triple setup with 50MP wide (f/1.6), 50MP ultrawide (115˚ FOV), and 50MP telephoto (3.2x optical zoom). All lenses are enhanced by Leica optics. Video:  Records up to 8K@24fps, with HDR and Dolby Vision support. Front camera:  32MP selfie shooter capable of 4K@30/60fps video recording. Battery : 4610mAh with 90W wired charging, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless charging support. Colour : Black, Silver, Pink, and Green. Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Xiaomi 14 Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Xiaomi 14 Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Xiaomi 14 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Xiaomi 14  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Xiaomi 14 achieved a battery performance score of 48/100 in ViserMark testing, which indicates above-average battery life compared to other flagship smartphones. This score reflects its strong real-world battery efficiency, where the phone effectively manages power consumption while delivering solid performance across various tasks. Compared to similar flagship smartphones, the Xiaomi 14 stands out with a 48/100 battery performance score, outperforming both the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 , which each scored 44/100 in ViserMark's testing. This indicates that the Xiaomi 14 offers superior battery management and optimisation compared to its competitors in the same tier. Overall, the Xiaomi 14  is a great choice for users prioritising both solid performance and enhanced battery efficiency. Its battery life stands out among flagship smartphones, making it a competitive option for users who require long-lasting usage throughout the day. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark's battery life testing, the Xiaomi 14 provided continuous use for 1.5 days or 43 hours. This places it in the top tier of flagship smartphones, offering a reliable option for users who need solid endurance without the need for frequent recharging. With its combination of a 4,610mAh battery and efficient power management, the Xiaomi 14 ensures users can comfortably get through a full day and more with moderate to heavy usage. Despite its strong showing, the Xiaomi 14 delivers 1.5 days of battery life, which is on par with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6  but falls short of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , which offers a longer 2 days of use. For users with more demanding needs, the Pixel 9 Pro XL may provide a marginal advantage in battery longevity, although the Xiaomi 14 holds up well against average flagship battery life, which is 1.58 days. Regarding battery life translated to hours, the Xiaomi 14 delivers a solid performance, providing up to 43 hours of continuous use, which translates to 1.5 days of real-world usage. This places it on par with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 , which also offers 43 hours of battery life. However, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL outperforms both, offering a longer battery life of 49 hours, demonstrating its ability to last 2 full days without recharging. Overall, the Xiaomi 14 offers solid endurance, providing 43 hours of continuous use, making it suitable for users who need reliable, long-lasting battery life. While it doesn't surpass the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , it remains a strong contender in the flagship category with fast charging capabilities. 3.   Battery Consumption The Xiaomi 14  and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  were compared in terms of battery performance, analysing their power consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , highlighted power consumption during social media usage, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing tasks. Social Media & Communication : In terms of social media activity, the Xiaomi 14 consumes more power than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , indicating that the latter is better optimised for tasks that involve continuous background activity. Similarly, for outgoing calls and multimedia messaging (MMS), the Pixel 9 Pro XL performs more efficiently, making it a better choice for users frequently engaging in communication-based tasks. Media & Entertainment : The Pixel 9 Pro XL outshines the Xiaomi 14 when it comes to media consumption, such as YouTube and general media playback. The Pixel consumes less power, allowing users to enjoy longer viewing sessions without the need to recharge. This makes the Pixel a more suitable option for users who rely on their smartphones for entertainment, offering better battery management during video streaming and music playback. Productivity : When looking at productivity tasks like web browsing and emails, the Pixel 9 Pro XL again performs more efficiently than the Xiaomi 14 . This improvement in power management ensures that users can work longer on their devices without draining the battery too quickly, making the Pixel a preferable option for professionals who frequently use their devices for work-related activities. Camera & Messaging : In terms of camera performance, the Xiaomi 14 is more power-efficient than the Pixel 9 Pro XL , making it a better option for users who rely heavily on their cameras throughout the day. This highlights the Xiaomi 14's ability to conserve battery during photography tasks. When it comes to SMS messaging, both smartphones demonstrate similar power usage, though the Pixel 9 Pro XL offers slightly better efficiency in everyday communication tasks. In conclusion, while the Xiaomi 14 offers robust performance, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL consistently demonstrates better power efficiency across most tasks, making it a more reliable choice for users who prioritise long-lasting battery life for both work and leisure activities. The battery performance comparison between the Xiaomi 14 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 showcases how these flagship devices handle power across various daily activities, offering insights into their battery efficiency. Social Media & Communication: The Xiaomi 14 is more efficient in tasks like social media browsing and outgoing calls, consuming less power than the Galaxy Z Fold 6 . This difference suggests better optimisation on the Xiaomi 14 for background activity, media loading, and consistent usage, which benefits users who spend considerable time on social media apps. Additionally, for outgoing calls, the Xiaomi 14 consumes noticeably less power, making it more suitable for users who rely heavily on voice communication. Multimedia & Entertainment: When it comes to gaming and multimedia tasks like video streaming on YouTube or listening to music, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 showcases superior battery efficiency. Its lower power consumption during gaming indicates better resource management, which makes it ideal for users who indulge in graphic-intensive games or extended video-watching sessions. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 manages to conserve more battery in high-demand tasks, giving users longer entertainment periods without frequent recharging. Productivity Tasks: For web browsing, the Xiaomi 14 demonstrates slightly lower power consumption than the Galaxy Z Fold 6 , which could appeal to users who spend more time browsing the internet. The Xiaomi 14, on the other hand, shows better performance in email tasks, where it consumes slightly less battery than the Galaxy Z Fold 6. Camera & Messaging: When it comes to camera usage, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6  is more efficient, consuming less power during photography and video tasks. This makes the Galaxy Z Fold 6 a stronger option for users who frequently use their phone for capturing photos and recording videos. For SMS and media player, the Galaxy Z Fold 6 also has the upper hand, as it uses slightly less power compared to the Xiaomi 14 . In summary, the Xiaomi 14 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 both exhibit solid battery efficiency across various tasks, but their strengths differ depending on the usage scenario. The Xiaomi 14 outshines the Z Fold 6 in social media, voice calls, and web browsing, making it a great option for users focused on communication and internet-based tasks. Meanwhile, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 proves more efficient in gaming, multimedia streaming, and camera use, catering to users who prioritise high-performance entertainment and photography. Ultimately, the choice between these devices depends on personal usage patterns, with each excelling in distinct areas. The detailed battery performance comparison between the Xiaomi 14 , Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and the average battery consumption for flagship smartphones (indicated by various colours) reveals how each device manages power during daily tasks. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: In terms of social media and communication, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL proves to be the most efficient device, consuming noticeably less power than the Xiaomi 14 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 . This suggests that the Pixel 9 Pro XL is better optimised for tasks involving background activity and media consumption, making it an excellent choice for users who spend a lot of time on social apps. Additionally, the average flagship consumption is also slightly more efficient than the Xiaomi 14, placing the Xiaomi 14 just behind its competitors for battery management in social media and outgoing calls. Gaming & Multimedia: When it comes to gaming and multimedia, such as video streaming on YouTube or playing music through media players, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 leads in battery efficiency, consuming less power than the Xiaomi 14 and the Pixel 9 Pro XL . This makes the Galaxy Z Fold 6 a better choice for users who frequently engage in graphics-intensive activities or prolonged video-watching sessions. However, both the Xiaomi 14 and the Pixel 9 Pro XL remain competitive in these areas, showing only slight differences in power consumption. Productivity & Web Usage: In terms of web browsing and email tasks, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL  shows better battery efficiency compared to both the Xiaomi 14 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 . The Pixel 9 Pro XL consumes noticeably less power, making it the best option for users who spend a lot of time on the internet or managing emails. Camera Usage & Messaging: In terms of camera usage, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 is the most efficient, consuming less power during photography and video recording tasks than the Xiaomi 14 and the Pixel 9 Pro XL . This makes it a stronger contender for users who frequently use their smartphones for capturing photos or recording videos. For SMS tasks, both the Xiaomi 14 and the Galaxy Z Fold 6 are on par, with minor differences in battery consumption, ensuring efficient power use during basic messaging functions. In conclusion, each of the three devices— Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , Xiaomi 14 , and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 —excel in different areas of battery efficiency depending on the user's needs. The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL stands out for social media, communication, productivity, and web usage, making it ideal for users who prioritize these activities. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 leads in gaming, multimedia, and camera usage, making it a better option for those focused on entertainment and photography. While the Xiaomi 14 may not dominate in any particular category, it shows more equity in power consumption across all tasks, maintaining a well-balanced performance. 4.   Battery Efficiency ViserMark tested the Xiaomi 14 and awarded it a 1-leaf rating for battery efficiency, indicating relatively low efficiency compared to a potential maximum of 5 leaves. This rating reflects the device's energy conservation during regular use. In the efficiency comparison chart, the Xiaomi 14  performed similarly to the Flagship/Pro Tier category average, providing 1 hour of efficient usage. The Xiaomi 14 showcases strong battery efficiency, matching key competitors like the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL in this comparison. Each device, including models from the flagship/pro tier, reaches a similar battery efficiency level of 1 leaf in the viSerMark system. This indicates that these devices deliver comparable performance in energy management under typical conditions. For users, this means that the Xiaomi 14 offers solid battery efficiency, similar to competitors like the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL . Despite its overall good battery life, users engaging in power-intensive tasks such as gaming or prolonged multitasking may notice faster battery drain, which could affect the phone’s overall efficiency during demanding scenarios. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The ViserMark label indicates that the Xiaomi 14 uses 3.5 kWh of energy annually. This number represents the amount of energy the device uses over a year. A lower value means better energy efficiency, potentially resulting in lower electricity costs for the user. Compared to other flagship smartphones, the Xiaomi 14 consumes slightly more energy than both the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL , which have an annual consumption of 3.3 kWh, making them marginally more energy-efficient. However, the Xiaomi 14's annual consumption of 3.5 kWh is still lower than the general flagship/pro tier average of 3.79 kWh, showing that it remains more efficient than many competitors in this category. For users interested in balancing performance with energy conservation, the Xiaomi 14 offers a reasonable level of energy efficiency, making it a competitive option in its class. ViserMark VERDICT The Xiaomi 14 - what's it like to use? The Xiaomi 14 offers an exceptional flagship experience, delivering high-end performance in a sleek, compact design. Its standout feature is its powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, which, when combined with 12GB of RAM, ensures smooth multitasking and excellent performance in gaming and productivity. Users will enjoy a fast, fluid experience across various apps, with the added benefit of future-proof 5G connectivity. In terms of battery life, the Xiaomi 14 delivers 1.5 days of usage, or around 43 hours, making it a solid choice for those who need a reliable device for day-to-day tasks. Paired with 90W wired and 50W wireless charging, it allows for minimal downtime, fully charging in just 44 minutes. This is ideal for busy users who need to quickly recharge without interrupting their day. However, for users who prioritise extended battery life, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL may offer a slight advantage with its longer battery endurance of up to 49 hours. Compared to its competitors, the Xiaomi 14 holds its own. The triple 50MP Leica-powered camera system is a key highlight, offering excellent photography in a variety of lighting conditions, although the Leica presets may limit customization for advanced users. While the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 may outperform in certain media and gaming scenarios, the Xiaomi 14 excels in compact usability, photography, and fast, efficient power management. Overall, the Xiaomi 14 is a well-balanced, high-performance device that appeals to users who want flagship-level power, great cameras, and solid battery life in a more compact form factor. Its combination of features makes it a strong contender in the premium smartphone market. Pros Cons Delivers up to 1.5 days of usage, minimising the need for frequent recharging. While powerful, it experiences performance throttling and consumes more battery during extended gaming sessions compared to competitors. With 90W wired and 50W wireless charging, the phone fully charges in just 44 minutes, ensuring minimal downtime. Lacks expandable storage, limiting options for users who need more than 512GB. Features a 6.36-inch LTPO OLED display with a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate and 3,000 nits of peak brightness, making it highly responsive and legible in any lighting. For intensive tasks like file transfers or prolonged productivity, it consumes slightly more power than some rivals. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and 12GB RAM provide smooth performance for everyday tasks and intensive use. The triple 50MP camera system excels in mobile photography, offering versatility in various lighting conditions. Who should buy the Xiaomi 14? Introducing the Xiaomi 14, perfect for various user profiles: Power Users & Gamers With the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor and 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM, the Xiaomi 14 delivers strong performance for multitasking, gaming, and AI-powered applications. It handles most tasks with ease, making it a solid choice for users who need reliable power throughout the day. However, it is worth noting that under sustained heavy workloads, some performance throttling may occur, making it less ideal for extreme, prolonged gaming or intensive tasks. Photography Enthusiasts The Xiaomi 14’s triple 50MP camera system, developed in partnership with Leica, excels in mobile photography. With a 50MP main camera with OIS, 50MP ultra-wide lens, and 50MP telephoto lens with 3.2x optical zoom, the phone delivers exceptional images in various lighting conditions. Users Needing Long Battery Life For users who are frequently on the go, the Xiaomi 14’s 4,610mAh battery offers 43 hours (1.5 days) of usage, making it suitable for those who need a reliable phone for heavy use throughout the day. With its fast 90W wired and 50W wireless charging, you can recharge quickly and minimize downtime, making it ideal for busy individuals who need to stay connected. Everyday Users The Xiaomi 14 is also ideal for users seeking a well-rounded, reliable smartphone for daily tasks. Its 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, vibrant OLED display, and stereo speakers make it great for browsing, streaming, and social media. CONCLUSION The Xiaomi 14 is a well-rounded flagship that excels in performance, display quality, and fast charging, making it a strong contender in its category. Its compact design, combined with the powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip and versatile Leica-powered camera system, delivers a premium user experience. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. Xiaomi 14 camera review.   Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, with a vision to deliver high-quality technology at accessible prices. Committed to a user-centric approach, Xiaomi quickly gained traction in the mobile internet space. By 2014, the company had sold over 61 million smartphones and expanded into key markets including Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil. Headquartered in Beijing, China, Xiaomi continues its global expansion with offices across the Asia-Pacific region, India, and Brazil, positioning itself as a rising global tech brand. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4700 Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Smartphone Review: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: Affordable Flagship with Strong Performance SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro (€700+)  Flagship/Pro Ranking # 8 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a flagship smartphone that combines style, performance, and affordability. It features a 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a Full HD+ resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, delivering vibrant colours, deep blacks, and smooth animations with its 120Hz refresh rate. With a peak brightness of 1,900 nits, the display remains clearly visible even under direct sunlight. Additionally, HDR10+ support enhances video content with vivid colours and contrast. The device is built to last, with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front, Gorilla Glass 5 on the back, and an aluminium frame, alongside an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance (up to 1.5 metres for 30 minutes). The Galaxy S24 FE is powered by the Exynos 2400e chipset, built on a 4nm process, offering exceptional performance with its 10-core processor configuration (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) and Xclipse 940 GPU. Paired with 8GB of RAM and storage options of 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB, the phone delivers smooth multitasking, gaming, and app usage. It runs on Android 14 with Samsung’s One UI 6.1, which provides a refined, intuitive, and highly customisable user experience. Battery life is another highlight of the Galaxy S24 FE, featuring a 4,700mAh battery that supports 25W wired charging (50% charge in 30 minutes), 15W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging for added convenience. The robust battery ensures dependable performance throughout the day, making it ideal for those with busy lifestyles. The camera system is a standout feature, offering versatility and precision. The 50MP main sensor (f/1.8) includes dual-pixel autofocus and Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS), ensuring sharp, detailed photos even in low-light or shaky conditions. The 8MP telephoto lens (f/2.4) also features OIS and provides 3x optical zoom, enabling crisp and stable close-ups. Completing the setup is a 12MP ultra-wide camera (f/2.2) with a 123-degree field of view for capturing expansive landscapes. The 10MP front camera (f/2.4) is perfect for high-quality selfies and supports 4K video recording at 30/60fps. Video enthusiasts will appreciate the rear camera’s capability to record in 8K at 30fps, along with various frame rate options in 4K, 1080p, and slow motion (up to 960fps). Connectivity is top-notch, with 5G support, eSIM compatibility, Wi-Fi 6e, and Bluetooth 5.3, ensuring fast and reliable connections. Other notable features include an in-display optical fingerprint reader, stereo speakers, Samsung DeX, and modern functionalities like Virtual Proximity Sensing. Pros Cons Offers up to 1.5 days of usage with a 4,700mAh battery. Supports 25W fast wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging for added convenience Lacks a microSD card slot, making storage selection at purchase critical. Features a 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X screen with HDR10+, 120Hz refresh rate, and 1,900 nits peak brightness for a vivid and responsive viewing experience. Slightly more prominent screen bezels than other flagship devices may impact aesthetics. Powered by the Exynos 2400e chipset, paired with 8GB RAM and up to 512GB of UFS 3.1 storage, suitable for multitasking and gaming. Replaces a physical sensor, which might not be as precise in some situations. Equipped with Gorilla Glass Victus+ (front), Gorilla Glass 5 (back), and an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance. Weighing 213 grams, the device feels bulkier compared to some competitors. The 50MP primary sensor with OIS, 8MP telephoto (3x zoom with OIS), and 12MP ultra-wide camera excel in daylight and low-light scenarios. The 10MP front camera delivers decent results but lags behind the rear cameras in quality. Offers excellent audio quality with stereo speakers and a desktop-like experience via Samsung DeX.   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE : Battery Life : The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE provides 37 hours of total usage, equating to 1.5 days of battery life. This makes it an excellent choice for moderate to heavy users, ensuring the device lasts through an entire day and into the next before requiring a recharge. Battery Charging : The phone supports 25W fast wired charging, taking 1 hour and 18 minutes for a full charge. It also includes 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, offering versatile power solutions for users who need flexibility in recharging options. Battery Performance & Efficiency : The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE scores 42/100 in battery performance, highlighting its capability to manage power effectively during demanding tasks. Its annual energy consumption of 4.1 kWh is average for a flagship smartphone. While it doesn't set a new benchmark for efficiency, it offers a balanced approach that aligns with standard expectations for this tier. Specification Overview  - Released Date: October 2024 Body:  162.0 x 77.3 x 8.0 mm, with a weight of 213g. Corning® Gorilla® Glass Victus+ on the front and Gorilla Glass 5 on the back, offering durability. Aluminium frame construction with IP68 dust and water resistance (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes). Display:  6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, HDR10+ support, and a resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels (385ppi). Peak brightness reaches 1,900 nits, ensuring clarity under direct sunlight. Operating System:  Android 14 layered with Samsung's One UI 6.1. Chipset:  Exynos 2400e (4nm) processor with a 10-core CPU (1x Cortex-X4 at 3.1GHz, 2x Cortex-A720 at 2.9GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 at 2.6GHz, and 4x Cortex-A520 at 1.95GHz) and an Xclipse 940 GPU. Memory:  128GB or 256GB of UFS 3.1 storage with 8GB RAM. No microSD card slot available. Connectivity:  Supports 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, and USB-C (USB 3.2). Equipped with stereo speakers but lacks a headphone jack. Camera: Main Camera:  Triple setup with 50MP wide (f/1.8, OIS), 8MP telephoto (f/2.4, 3x optical zoom, OIS), and 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 123˚ FOV). Video Recording:  Rear camera supports up to 8K@30fps with HDR10+ and gyro-EIS. Front Camera:  10MP sensor (f/2.4) capable of 4K@30/60fps video recording. Battery:  4,700mAh with 25W wired fast charging (50% in 30 minutes), 15W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging support. Colours Available:  Graphite, Mint, Yellow, Blue. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE achieved a battery performance score of 42/100 in ViserMark testing, placing it within the average range for flagship smartphones. This score reflects its balanced approach to power management, providing reliable battery performance while delivering solid results across various use cases. Compared to similar flagship smartphones, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE achieved a battery performance score that matches the Samsung Galaxy S24 and is slightly behind the Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus , which scored 44/100. This indicates that while the Galaxy S24 Plus has a slight advantage in battery management, the Galaxy S24 FE still provides reliable and efficient power performance within the flagship tier. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is an excellent choice for users seeking balanced performance and battery life. Its ability to deliver competitive efficiency on par with the Galaxy S24 makes it an appealing option for those who value flagship features at a more accessible price point. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark's battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE provided continuous use for 37 hours, equivalent to approximately 1.5 days of real-world usage. This positions it as a reliable option for users seeking a smartphone that can comfortably last a full day and into the next, without the need for frequent recharging. With its 4,700mAh battery and efficient power management, the Galaxy S24 FE ensures reliable performance for moderate to heavy usage. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE provided continuous use for 1.5 days, aligning with the performance of the standard Galaxy S24 and slightly trailing the Flagship/Pro tier average of 1.58 days. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus also delivers 1.5 days of real-world usage, maintaining parity with the Galaxy S24 FE in terms of daily endurance. This consistency across models ensures that the Galaxy S24 FE remains a dependable choice for users seeking reliable battery performance for moderate to heavy usage. Despite its commendable endurance, the Galaxy S24 FE’s battery life in hours reveals its slightly shorter runtime compared to the Flagship/Pro tier average of 40.7 hours and the Galaxy S24 Plus's 41 hours of continuous use. However, it outpaces the Samsung Galaxy S24 , which provides only 34 hours of usage. This positions the Galaxy S24 FE as a well-balanced option in the flagship tier, offering a practical blend of performance and efficiency without sacrificing usability. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE delivers competitive battery life within its tier, making it an excellent choice for those prioritising a balance of endurance, flagship features, and value. While it may not lead the pack in longevity, its strong battery performance ensures it remains a versatile option for busy lifestyles. 3.   Battery Consumption The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Samsung Galaxy S24 were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. Social Media & Communication : The Galaxy S24 is more efficient for social media and communication tasks compared to the Galaxy S24 FE. It demonstrates better optimisation for activities that involve continuous background processes, making it a more suitable choice for users who frequently engage in these activities, including outgoing calls and messaging. Media & Entertainment : The Galaxy S24 excels in media consumption, consuming less battery during video streaming and general media playback than the Galaxy S24 FE. This makes it the better option for users who rely heavily on their smartphones for entertainment, allowing for longer uninterrupted usage. Productivity : For productivity tasks such as email and web browsing, the Galaxy S24 showcases superior battery management, ensuring users can work longer without needing to recharge. This gives it an edge for professionals or anyone who frequently uses their device for work-related activities. Camera & Messaging : When it comes to camera usage, the Galaxy S24 FE performs more efficiently, making it a better choice for photography enthusiasts who rely heavily on their smartphone for taking pictures. However, for messaging, the Galaxy S24 provides slightly better battery optimisation, making it more efficient for everyday communication. In conclusion, the Galaxy S24 stands out in overall battery efficiency, particularly for media, productivity, and communication tasks, making it the preferred option for users prioritising these activities. On the other hand, the Galaxy S24 FE shines in camera performance, offering a compelling alternative for users who value photography while still delivering solid battery life across other tasks. The battery performance comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and the Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus highlights the differences in power consumption across various daily activities, providing insights into their efficiency for diverse usage scenarios. Social Media & Communication: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus is more efficient for social media browsing and outgoing calls compared to the Galaxy S24 FE. This suggests better optimisation on the S24 Plus for background activities and communication-related tasks, making it a suitable choice for users who spend significant time on social apps or rely on their phones for voice calls. Multimedia & Entertainment: When it comes to gaming and multimedia tasks like video streaming or listening to music, the Galaxy S24 Plus showcases superior battery efficiency. Its lower power consumption during these high-demand tasks makes it ideal for users who prioritise gaming or extended media playback sessions, allowing for longer entertainment without frequent recharging. Productivity Tasks: For productivity activities such as web browsing and email, the Galaxy S24 Plus again outshines the Galaxy S24 FE. It consumes less power, enabling users to perform work-related tasks for extended periods, which can be particularly appealing for professionals who use their devices extensively throughout the day. Camera & Messaging: In terms of camera usage, the Galaxy S24 Plus offers better battery efficiency, consuming less power during photography and video recording. This makes it a more practical option for users who frequently capture photos or videos. Additionally, for SMS and media playback, the Galaxy S24 Plus has a noticeable edge, further cementing its efficiency for everyday tasks. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus demonstrates better battery efficiency across a wide range of tasks, from communication and multimedia to productivity and camera usage. This makes it a compelling choice for users seeking a device that excels in power management for high-demand activities. On the other hand, while the Galaxy S24 FE may consume slightly more power in these scenarios, it still provides reliable battery performance and serves as a solid option for those who prioritise affordability while maintaining flagship-level features. The detailed battery performance comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE , Samsung Galaxy S24 , Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus , and the average battery consumption for flagship smartphones (indicated by various colours) reveals how each device manages power during daily tasks. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: When it comes to social media usage and communication tasks like outgoing calls and multimedia messaging (MMS), the Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus demonstrates superior efficiency, consuming less power than both the Galaxy S24 FE and the Galaxy S24. The Galaxy S24 FE, while slightly more demanding in these tasks, still performs admirably, providing reliable power management for extended usage. The Samsung Galaxy S24 , however, exhibits higher power consumption, making it less ideal for users who frequently engage in communication-heavy activities. The average flagship smartphone maintains a balanced performance, slightly outperforming the Galaxy S24 FE in this category. Gaming & Multimedia: For gaming and multimedia tasks like video streaming on YouTube or media playback, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus again leads in battery efficiency, conserving more power during high-demand activities. The Galaxy S24 FE follows closely, providing a solid balance between performance and consumption, while the Galaxy S24 lags behind due to higher power usage. Compared to the flagship tier average, the S24 FE holds its ground, offering comparable battery efficiency during intensive gaming and media sessions. Productivity & Web Usage: In productivity tasks such as web browsing and email management, the Galaxy S24 Plus excels, delivering the best battery efficiency among the three devices. The Galaxy S24 FE also performs well, providing consistent power management for users who spend considerable time online. The Samsung Galaxy S24 , however, falls short, consuming significantly more power during these activities. The average performance of the flagship tier slightly surpasses the Galaxy S24 FE, maintaining a small advantage in these scenarios. Camera Usage & Messaging: For photography and video recording, the Galaxy S24 Plus is the most power-efficient, making it a great choice for users who rely heavily on their smartphone cameras. The Galaxy S24 FE performs moderately well, offering balanced power consumption during camera tasks. The Galaxy S24 consumes the most power in this category, which might deter frequent photographers. For basic messaging tasks like SMS, the Galaxy S24 Plus again leads, followed closely by the Galaxy S24 FE, with the Samsung Galaxy S24 showing higher power draw. The flagship tier average remains consistent, slightly outperforming the Galaxy S24 FE. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE , Samsung Galaxy S24 , and Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus each offer unique strengths in battery efficiency. The Galaxy S24 Plus excels across most tasks, making it ideal for high-performance users. The Galaxy S24 FE provides a balanced, efficient experience, offering great value for those seeking flagship features at a lower price. The Galaxy S24 consumes more power in most areas, suiting users with moderate battery needs. Compared to the average flagship, the S24 Plus outperforms, while the S24 FE matches its performance in most scenarios. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual usage, with the S24 Plus offering the best efficiency. 4.   Battery Efficiency ViserMark tested the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and awarded it a 1-leaf rating for battery efficiency, indicating relatively low efficiency compared to a potential maximum of 5 leaves. This rating reflects the device's energy conservation during regular use. In comparison to other flagship devices like the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S24 Plus , which also received a 1-leaf rating, the Galaxy S24 FE performs similarly in terms of battery efficiency. This suggests that while the S24 FE delivers solid battery life, its efficiency in power management is on par with its direct competitors within the same tier, showing no significant advantage in conserving energy during standard usage. For users, this means the Galaxy S24 FE offers a good balance of performance and battery efficiency, though it’s not exceptional when compared to the best devices in terms of energy conservation. It is a solid option for everyday use, but demanding tasks such as prolonged gaming or heavy multitasking may reduce battery life more quickly. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The ViserMark label indicates that the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE uses 4.1 kWh of energy annually. This figure represents the device’s total energy consumption over the course of a year. A lower value signifies better energy efficiency, which could lead to reduced electricity costs for the user. When compared to other flagship smartphones, the Galaxy S24 FE consumes more energy than the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S24 Plus , both of which use slightly less energy. However, the Galaxy S24 FE’s annual energy consumption of 4.1 kWh is still within a reasonable range for flagship devices, staying within the general flagship/pro tier average of 3.8 kWh. For users who are looking for a balance between performance and energy efficiency, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE offers a solid choice. While it uses a bit more energy than some of its competitors, it still remains a competitive option in terms of overall energy management, making it a good option for users seeking reliable performance while maintaining a reasonable level of energy efficiency. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - what's it like to use? The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE offers a robust flagship experience, combining high-end performance with a design that's built for everyday practicality. Powered by the Exynos 2400 chipset and paired with 8GB of RAM, it delivers solid multitasking, smooth app navigation, and excellent performance for most tasks, including gaming and productivity. Users can expect a fast, responsive experience, with the added advantage of future-proof 5G connectivity for optimal data speeds. In terms of battery life, the Galaxy S24 FE offers up to 1.5 days of usage, or approximately 37 hours, making it an excellent option for users who need dependable performance throughout the day. It supports 25W fast wired charging, allowing users to get 50% charge in just 30 minutes, while 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging offer further flexibility for recharging. Although its battery life may not outlast the Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus , which provides a bit more endurance, the S24 FE still holds its own with efficient power management. When compared to other devices in its class, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE delivers strong performance in key areas, including a versatile triple-camera setup featuring a 50MP main sensor, 8MP telephoto lens, and 12MP ultra-wide lens. This camera system delivers excellent results across various lighting conditions, making it a great option for mobile photographers. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE strikes a good balance between performance and value, providing flagship capabilities at a more accessible price. It's an ideal choice for users looking for a reliable, well-rounded device that doesn't compromise on key features. Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE? Introducing the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, perfect for various user profiles: Power Users & Gamers With the Exynos 2400e chipset and 8GB of RAM, the Galaxy S24 FE delivers solid performance for multitasking, gaming, and general use. While it can handle most tasks well, heavy gaming or sustained high-performance tasks may lead to performance throttling, which could affect its efficiency during extended use. Photography Enthusiasts The Galaxy S24 FE’s triple-camera system, featuring a 50MP main sensor with OIS, 8MP telephoto (3x optical zoom), and 12MP ultra-wide lens, offers a well-rounded setup for mobile photography. It delivers good results in a variety of lighting conditions, making it a solid option for photography lovers, although it may not have the advanced capabilities of more premium devices. Users Needing Long Battery Life With its 4,700mAh battery offering up to 1.5 days of usage, the Galaxy S24 FE provides a dependable solution for those who need solid performance throughout the day. While the battery life might not be as long as the Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus , its 25W fast charging and 15W wireless charging options make it a convenient choice for quick recharges. Everyday Users The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is ideal for users looking for a well-rounded smartphone that delivers flagship-level features without the premium price tag. Its 120Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, solid performance, and versatile camera system make it a good choice for everyday tasks like browsing, streaming, and social media. CONCLUSION The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE offers a solid flagship experience with its impressive performance, vibrant display, and versatile camera system. Powered by the Exynos 2400e chipset and offering reliable battery life with fast charging, it strikes a balance between high-end features and affordability. A great option for users seeking flagship capabilities without the premium price tag. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: HIGH TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Xiaomi 14T: Fast Charging Meets Power-Packed Performance SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: High Tier ( €500 - €699 )  High Tier Ranking # 2 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available Quick Summary The Xiaomi 14T is a high-tier smartphone that balances cutting-edge features with excellent value. It boasts a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 2712 x 1220 pixels and a pixel density of 446ppi, offering vibrant colors, sharp contrasts, and lifelike clarity. The 144Hz refresh rate ensures seamless scrolling and responsive animations, while HDR10+ and Dolby Vision® support enhance video playback with stunning color depth and contrast. With a peak brightness of 4,000 nits, the screen excels in all lighting conditions, including direct sunlight. Protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, the display is designed to withstand scratches and minor impacts. Powering the Xiaomi 14T is the MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra chipset, a high-performance 4nm processor built for efficiency and speed. The CPU combines 1 Cortex-A715 core at 3.35GHz, 3 Cortex-A715 cores at 3.2GHz, and 4 Cortex-A510 cores at 2.2GHz, while the Arm Mali-G615 MC6 GPU ensures smooth gaming and multitasking performance. Paired with 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and storage options of 256GB or 512GB (UFS 4.0), the device guarantees fast, reliable performance. Running on Xiaomi HyperOS, the software offers a streamlined, user-friendly experience with enhanced AI-powered features. The 5,000mAh battery is engineered for long-lasting performance, providing enough power to last through a full day of heavy use. With 67W HyperCharge technology, the brand claims the phone can fully charge in just 42 minutes when using a compatible charger. While wireless charging is not available, the robust wired charging capabilities ensure you’ll never be far from a full battery. The Leica-powered camera system elevates mobile photography to new heights. The setup includes a 50MP main sensor (IMX906) with OIS for sharp, stable images in any lighting condition; a 50MP telephoto lens with a 50mm equivalent focal length for high-quality zoomed-in shots; a 12MP ultra-wide camera with a 120-degree field of view, perfect for capturing expansive landscapes or group photos. Advanced features like Leica Vibrant and Authentic photographic styles, Master-lens modes, and Xiaomi ProFocus ensure professional-quality results. For video enthusiasts, the rear camera supports 4K recording at 60fps, 1080p slow-motion recording up to 960fps, and advanced video features like HDR10+ recording and Director Mode. The 32MP front-facing camera offers excellent selfie quality, with 4K video recording capabilities for content creators. Connectivity is another strong suit, with Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, and 5G support for fast, reliable connections. The phone also supports dual SIM configurations, including eSIM compatibility for added flexibility. Other notable features include dual stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, an in-screen fingerprint sensor, and a cooling system powered by Xiaomi’s IceLoop technology to keep the device running smoothly during intensive use. The Xiaomi 14T is IP68-rated for water and dust resistance, capable of withstanding submersion in up to 2 meters of water for 30 minutes under controlled conditions, adding durability for everyday use. With its stunning display, powerful processor, versatile Leica camera system, and long-lasting battery, the Xiaomi 14T offers a premium experience for those seeking high-tier performance without the flagship price tag. Whether for gaming, photography, or productivity, it’s a solid choice for users looking for a feature-packed smartphone at a competitive price. Pros Cons Equipped with a 5,000mAh battery and 67W HyperCharge technology for a full charge in under an hour.  Lack of a microSD card slot limits flexibility in storage expansion. Features a next-generation 144Hz AMOLED display with 4,000 nits peak brightness, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision for vibrant visuals, even in bright sunlight. TÜV certifications ensure eye comfort. The 32MP selfie camera, while good, doesn't match the rear camera's level of performance. Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra chipset with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, ensuring smooth multitasking and gaming. Requires purchasing the 67W power adaptor separately. Leica-tuned triple-camera setup with a 50MP main sensor, 50MP telephoto, and 12MP ultra-wide delivers exceptional photography and 4K video capabilities. eSIM functionality depends on regional carrier support. Sleek, lightweight design with Gorilla Glass Victus and IP68 water and dust resistance. The Xiaomi HyperOS interface, though functional, might not appeal to users who prefer stock Android experiences. Runs on Xiaomi HyperOS, offering a clean, AI-driven, and customisable user experience.   ViserMark Labels for the Xiaomi 14T Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Xiaomi 14T : Battery Life : The Xiaomi 14T offers 39 hours of total usage, translating to approximately 1.5 days of battery life. This makes it a reliable choice for users who need their phone to last throughout a busy day and into the next, catering to moderate to heavy usage scenarios without frequent recharging. Battery Charging : With 67W HyperCharge technology, the Xiaomi 14T can reach a full charge in just 45 minutes. This rapid charging capability ensures minimal downtime, while the device’s support for Power Delivery 3.0 provides compatibility with a range of charging solutions. Battery Performance & Efficiency : The Xiaomi 14T achieves a battery performance score of 45/100, showcasing its ability to handle power-hungry applications effectively. Its annual energy consumption stands at 4.2 kWh, reflecting a balance between powerful performance and energy efficiency, which is commendable for its high-tier segment. Specification Overview  - Released Date: September 2024 Body: 160.5 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm (glass) / 7.95 mm (PU) with a weight of 195g (glass) / 193g (PU). Features Corning® Gorilla® Glass Victus 2 on the front for added durability. Aluminium frame construction, and an IP68 dust and water resistance rating (up to 2m for 30 minutes). Display: 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 2712 x 1220 pixels (446ppi). Supports a 144Hz adaptive refresh rate, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, and peak brightness of up to 4000 nits, offering outstanding clarity even in bright sunlight. Certified for TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light, Flicker-Free, and Circadian Friendly for eye comfort. Operating System: Xiaomi HyperOS, offering a refined and user-friendly experience. Chipset: MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (4nm) with a 10-core CPU configuration (1x Cortex-A715 at 3.35GHz, 3x Cortex-A715 at 3.2GHz, 4x Cortex-A510 at 2.2GHz) and Arm Mali-G615 MC6 GPU. AI powered by MediaTek NPU 780. Memory: Available configurations include 256GB storage with 12GB RAM, or 512GB storage with 16GB RAM, using UFS 4.0 and LPDDR5X technology for fast and efficient performance. Connectivity: Supports dual SIM (nano/eSIM), 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, and USB-C. In cludes stereo speakers with Hi-Res Audio and Dolby Atmos but lacks a headphone jack. Camera : Rear Camera:  Triple setup featuring Leica professional lenses: 50MP wide main sensor (f/1.7, OIS) with Sony IMX906 sensor. 50MP telephoto (f/1.9) with 2x optical zoom. 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2) with 120˚ FOV. Photography features include Leica Authentic Look, Leica Vibrant Look, Master-Lens system, Night Mode, and advanced focus options (motion tracking, eye tracking). Video Recording:  Up to 4K@60fps, with HDR10+ and slow-motion options at 1080p (240fps). Front Camera:  32MP sensor (f/2.0) supporting 4K@30fps video recording. Battery: 5,000mAh capacity with 67W wired HyperCharge (fully charges in 45 minutes). Supports Power Delivery 3.0 and reverse charging. Colours Available:  Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Gray, and Titan Blue. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Xiaomi 14T through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Xiaomi 14T  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Xiaomi 14T achieved a battery performance score of 45/100 in ViserMark testing, matching the Google Pixel 8a and surpassing the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE , which scored 42/100. The Xiaomi 14T 's impressive performance is supported by its industry-leading 45-minute full charge time for its 5000mAh battery, setting it apart from competitors. This rapid charging time ensures minimal downtime and positions the Xiaomi 14T as a leader in charging efficiency within its tier. Combined with its strong battery performance score, the Xiaomi 14T is an excellent choice for users seeking dependable energy management and the convenience of ultra-fast charging. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark's battery life testing, the Xiaomi 14T provided continuous use for 39 hours, equivalent to approximately 1.5 days of real-world usage. With its 5,000mAh battery and efficient power management, the Xiaomi 14T ensures reliable performance for moderate to heavy usage scenarios. The Xiaomi 14T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE , which offers only 32 hours, or about 1 day, of continuous usage. However, it falls behind the Google Pixel 8a , which boasts an impressive 48-hour runtime, surpassing the Xiaomi 14T by 9 additional hours. Despite this, the Xiaomi 14T compensates with its exceptional 45-minute charging time, thanks to its 67W HyperCharge capability, allowing the device to regain full power quickly, which is a key advantage for users needing fast recharging. Overall, the Xiaomi 14T delivers solid battery performance and exceptional charging efficiency, making it an appealing choice for users seeking a balanced smartphone with dependable endurance and ultra-fast charging capabilities. 3.   Battery Consumption The Xiaomi 14T and Google Pixel 8a were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. The Google Pixel 8a outperforms the Xiaomi 14T in battery efficiency across all tasks, making it a better choice for users who prioritise extended usage. It excels in social media, communication, media consumption, and productivity tasks like email and web browsing, offering longer uninterrupted use. The Xiaomi 14T may consume more battery due to its higher performance hardware and advanced features, which can be more power-intensive. For instance, its 144Hz AMOLED display, while delivering smoother visuals and a superior viewing experience, requires more energy compared to the Google Pixel 8a ’s standard refresh rate. Additionally, the Xiaomi 14T's MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra chipset, might prioritise power over efficiency during demanding tasks like gaming or heavy multitasking The battery performance comparison between the Xiaomi 14T and the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE highlights the differences in power consumption across various daily activities, providing insights into their efficiency for diverse usage scenarios. Social Media & Communication:  The Xiaomi 14T demonstrates slightly better efficiency for social media browsing and outgoing calls compared to the Galaxy S23 FE . This suggests that the Xiaomi 14T is better optimised for these background-intensive communication tasks, making it a suitable choice for users who engage heavily in social media or rely on voice calls. Multimedia & Entertainment: For multimedia tasks, including gaming and video streaming, the Xiaomi 14T demonstrates better efficiency compared to the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE . The Xiaomi 14T consumes less power during gaming, download/uploads, and general media usage. Productivity Tasks: The Xiaomi 14T has an edge in power efficiency for emailing tasks, consuming less battery than the Galaxy S23 FE , which makes it a more energy-conscious choice for users who often send or check emails. However, for web browsing, the Galaxy S23 FE consumes slightly less, making it suitable for users prioritising extensive online productivity. Camera & Messaging:  When it comes to photography, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE  demonstrates better efficiency during camera use, making it a more energy-conscious choice for users who frequently capture photos or videos. For SMS and general media playback, the Xiaomi 14T consumes slightly more power, which might impact users who prioritise these everyday tasks. The Xiaomi 14T demonstrates superior battery efficiency in various tasks, including social media, outgoing calls, gaming, and multimedia usage, making it a compelling choice for users who prioritize energy optimisation in these areas. However, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE excels in camera efficiency and web browsing, catering to users who frequently engage in photography or online productivity. While both devices showcase reliable battery performance, the Xiaomi 14T is better suited for heavy multitasking and entertainment, whereas the Galaxy S23 FE appeals to those who prioritize specific activities like photography and web use. The comparison between the Xiaomi 14T , Google Pixel 8a , and Samsung Galaxy S23 FE reveals significant differences in power consumption across various tasks, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each device. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: The Google Pixel 8a stands out as the most power-efficient option for social media browsing, outgoing calls, and multimedia messaging (MMS). Its lower power consumption makes it ideal for users who rely heavily on communication tasks. The Xiaomi 14T follows with moderate efficiency, offering balanced performance for social media and calls. However, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE consumes the most power in this category, indicating less optimisation for these activities. Gaming & Multimedia: In gaming and multimedia tasks such as video streaming and download/uploads, the Pixel 8a again leads with superior efficiency, conserving battery during high-demand activities. The Xiaomi 14T performs reasonably well, maintaining solid efficiency, especially in gaming. The Galaxy S23 FE , however, consumes significantly more power in these tasks, making it less suitable for intensive multimedia usage. Productivity & Web Usage: In productivity tasks such as email management, the Pixel 8a continues to dominate with the least power consumption. The Xiaomi 14T follows with respectable efficiency, while the Galaxy S23 FE is the least efficient, making it less ideal for productivity-focused users. In web browsing, the Pixel 8a maintains its lead, with the Galaxy S23 FE slightly outperforming the Xiaomi 14T. Camera Usage & Messaging: When it comes to photography, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE demonstrates better power efficiency compared to the Xiaomi 14T , making it a more energy-conscious choice for users who frequently capture photos or videos. The Pixel 8a is slightly less efficient than the S23 FE in this category but remains reliable. For messaging tasks like SMS, the Pixel 8a once again outshines its competitors, followed by the Galaxy S23 FE. The Xiaomi 14T consumes the most power for messaging, making it less ideal for users relying heavily on these activities. The Google Pixel 8a stands out as the most efficient device overall, ideal for users who prioritise extended battery life across communication, productivity, and multimedia tasks. The Xiaomi 14T delivers balanced performance, excelling in gaming while maintaining reasonable efficiency in other areas. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is the most efficient for camera usage but consumes more power in other categories, making it better suited for users with moderate battery needs and a focus on photography. 4.   Battery Efficiency ViserMark tested the Xioami14T and awarded it a 1-leaf rating for battery efficiency, indicating relatively low efficiency compared to a potential maximum of 5 leaves. This rating reflects the device's energy conservation during regular use. In comparison to devices like the Google Pixel 8a , which achieved a superior 1.5-leaf rating, and the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE , which received a lower 0.5-leaf rating, the Xiaomi 14T occupies the middle ground. It demonstrates better efficiency than the Galaxy S23 FE but falls short of the Pixel 8a in terms of optimised power management during everyday tasks. For users, the 1-leaf rating indicates that the Xiaomi 14T delivers a consistent blend of energy conservation and robust performance, particularly in areas like gaming and social media. However, the advanced features might contribute to slightly higher energy consumption compared to its most efficient competitors. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The ViserMark label indicates that the Xiaomi 14T uses 4.2 kWh of energy annually. This figure represents the device’s total energy consumption over the course of a year. A lower value signifies better energy efficiency, which could lead to reduced electricity costs for the user. The Xiaomi 14T demonstrates an annual energy consumption of 4.2 kWh, reflecting higher power usage compared to the high-tier average of 3.94 kWh. It is more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE , which consumes 4.6 kWh annually, but it falls behind the Google Pixel 8a , which leads with an impressive 3 kWh consumption. This variance highlights the trade-off between the Xiaomi 14T ’s advanced performance features and energy efficiency, as its 144Hz AMOLED display and MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra chipset contribute to its increased power demands. Who Should Buy the Xiaomi 14T? Introducing the Xiaomi 14T , perfect for various user profiles: Power Users & Gamers: The Xiaomi 14T is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra chipset and paired with a 144Hz AMOLED display, delivering a smooth and immersive experience for gaming and multitasking. Despite its robust hardware, the device maintains commendable battery efficiency during gaming and high-demand tasks, consuming less power than many competitors in its class. With a 5,000mAh battery, it provides reliable performance for moderate gaming sessions, while its ultra-fast charging ensures minimal downtime. Photography Enthusiasts: For users who frequently rely on their smartphones for photography, the Xiaomi 14T balances advanced camera features with dependable battery performance. While the Leica-tuned triple-camera system excels in capturing high-quality images, its power consumption during photography is moderate compared to competitors. However, the 67W HyperCharge ensures quick recovery after extended camera use, making it suitable for photography enthusiasts who need to recharge on the go. Multimedia & Entertainment Enthusiasts: The Xiaomi 14T ’s 144Hz AMOLED display with HDR10+ and Dolby Vision support offers exceptional visuals for streaming and gaming. Despite its vibrant and high-resolution display, the device manages power consumption effectively during multimedia usage, outperforming many in its tier. This balance makes it an excellent option for users who spend long hours consuming media while still requiring dependable battery life. Everyday Users Focused on Battery Efficiency: The Xiaomi 14T is a practical choice for everyday users who want a balance between battery performance and features. It excels in social media browsing, outgoing calls, and general productivity tasks like emailing, offering better efficiency than many competitors. Its quick recharge capabilities further enhance its suitability for users who need a reliable and consistent daily performer. ViserMark VERDICT The Xiaomi 14T - what's it like to use? The Xiaomi 14T delivers a high-tier smartphone experience, combining cutting-edge features with excellent value. Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra chipset and equipped with up to 12GB of RAM, the device ensures smooth multitasking, seamless app performance, and reliable gaming capabilities. Its advanced hardware makes it ideal for users seeking a fast, responsive smartphone with the added benefit of 5G connectivity for lightning-fast data speeds. In terms of battery life, the Xiaomi 14T offers approximately 1.5 days, or 39 hours, of real-world usage, making it a dependable choice for moderate to heavy users. Its standout feature is the 67W HyperCharge technology, which allows for a full charge in just 45 minutes, minimising downtime. Although the Google Pixel 8a outlasts it in battery longevity, the Xiaomi 14T compensates with its exceptional charging speed, making it a leader in charging efficiency within its price range. The Xiaomi 14T 's Leica-tuned triple-camera setup stands out, featuring a 50MP main sensor, a 50MP telephoto lens, and a 12MP ultra-wide camera. This versatile system delivers sharp, vibrant images and 4K video recording, making it a strong choice for photography enthusiasts. While its front-facing 32MP camera is ideal for selfies and content creation, it doesn't quite match the rear camera's performance. Overall, the Xiaomi 14T is an excellent choice for users seeking a well-rounded device that excels in performance, display quality, and charging efficiency. While it may not lead in battery endurance compared to some competitors, it strikes a balance between power, features, and value, making it a compelling option in the high-tier market. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, with a vision to deliver high-quality technology at accessible prices. Committed to a user-centric approach, Xiaomi quickly gained traction in the mobile internet space. By 2014, the company had sold over 61 million smartphones and expanded into key markets including Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil. Headquartered in Beijing, China, Xiaomi continues its global expansion with offices across the Asia-Pacific region, India, and Brazil, positioning itself as a rising global tech brand. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Xiaomi 14T Pro: Power, Performance, and Ultra-Fast Charging in a Flagship Experience. SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro Tier (€700+)  Flagship/Pro  Tier Ranking # 1 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available Quick Summary The Xiaomi 14T Pro is a top-tier smartphone that merges cutting-edge technology with a sleek, premium design. Featuring a 6.67-inch CrystalRes AMOLED display with a 1220 x 2712 resolution and a 446ppi pixel density, it delivers stunning clarity, vibrant colours, and sharp contrasts. With 144Hz refresh rate support, interactions feel seamless, whether you're gaming, scrolling, or watching content. Dolby Vision® and HDR10+ ensure an immersive viewing experience, while an impressive peak brightness of 4,000 nits means exceptional visibility even in direct sunlight. The Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection enhances durability against scratches and minor impacts. At the core of the Xiaomi 14T Pro is the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ chipset, a flagship-level 4nm processor built for extreme speed and efficiency. The octa-core CPU comprises one Cortex-X4 core at 3.4GHz, three Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85GHz, and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.0GHz, ensuring smooth multitasking and high-performance gaming. The Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU takes care of intensive graphics tasks, making it perfect for mobile gamers and power users. Paired with 12GB LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage (ranging from 256GB to 1TB), the phone ensures ultra-fast loading times and reliable performance. Running Xiaomi HyperOS, based on Android 14, the software is optimised for fluidity, efficiency, and AI-driven enhancements. The Xiaomi 14T Pro continues Xiaomi’s legacy of high-end mobile photography, featuring a Leica-powered triple-camera setup: 50MP main sensor (f/1.6, 1/1.31”, OIS) – captures highly detailed and stabilised images in all lighting conditions; 50MP telephoto lens (f/2.0, 2.6x optical zoom) – excellent for portrait shots and high-quality zoomed-in photography; 12MP ultra-wide camera (f/2.2, 120° FOV) – perfect for landscapes and group photos. The camera system supports Ultra HDR, Leica Authentic & Vibrant colour profiles, and Xiaomi ProFocus for professional-quality results. Video recording goes up to 8K at 30fps, with options for 4K at 60fps, slow-motion up to 960fps, and HDR10+ video capture. The 32MP front camera (f/2.0) enables stunning selfies and 4K video recording, making it ideal for vloggers and content creators. The 5000mAh battery is optimised for all-day endurance, excelling in both active use and standby time. With 120W wired HyperCharge, the phone reaches 100% in just 25 minutes in real-world testing. Meanwhile, 50W wireless charging achieves a full charge in around 45 minutes when using compatible accessories. This makes the Xiaomi 14T Pro one of the fastest-charging smartphones in its class, ensuring minimal downtime. Designed for the modern user, the Xiaomi 14T Pro  supports: 5G connectivity for ultra-fast network speeds; Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, and NFC (availability varies by region); Dual SIM options, including eSIM compatibility for flexible network switching; Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos®, delivering an immersive audio experience; In-display fingerprint sensor, ensuring secure and convenient unlocking. Encased in a glass and aluminium design, the Xiaomi 14T Pro exudes a refined aesthetic, available in Titan Grey, Titan Blue, and Titan Black. With an IP68 water and dust resistance rating, it withstands submersion in up to 2 metres of water for 30 minutes, making it more durable for everyday life. Pros Cons Blazing-Fast Charging & Long Battery Life – Equipped with a 5,000mAh battery and 120W HyperCharge technology, reaching 100% in just 25 minutes in real-world tests. No MicroSD Card Slot – Lack of expandable storage might be a drawback for users needing extra flexibility. Next-Generation Display – 6.67-inch CrystalRes AMOLED panel with 144Hz refresh rate, 4,000 nits peak brightness, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision® for stunning visuals, even in direct sunlight. TÜV-certified for eye comfort. Selfie Camera Falls Short – The 32MP front camera captures decent selfies but lacks autofocus and isn't on par with the rear camera system. Flagship-Grade Performance – Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ chipset with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, ensuring seamless multitasking and high-end gaming. Charger Not Included – Despite 120W fast charging support, the phone does not include a charger in the box, requiring an additional purchase. Leica-tuned triple-camera setup with a 50MP main sensor, 50MP telephoto, and 12MP ultra-wide delivers exceptional photography and 4K video capabilities. Limited eSIM Support – eSIM functionality is region-dependent, which may affect some users’ ability to take full advantage of dual SIM features. Leica-Tuned Triple Camera System – A 50MP main sensor (OIS), 50MP 2.6x telephoto, and 12MP ultra-wide deliver exceptional photography with Leica Authentic & Vibrant styles, 8K video recording, and advanced AI enhancements. Xiaomi HyperOS Isn't for Everyone – While feature-rich and AI-driven, some users may prefer a stock Android experience over Xiaomi’s custom skin. Immersive Audio & Smart Connectivity – Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, and an infrared blaster for enhanced versatility. No LTPO Technology – The 144Hz refresh rate is not adaptive, meaning it doesn’t dynamically adjust to lower refresh rates to save battery life. AI-Driven Software & Long-Term Support – Runs Android 14 with Xiaomi HyperOS, featuring AI-powered enhancements like Circle to Search, AI Notes, AI Image Editing, and Google Gemini. Xiaomi promises 4 major OS updates and 5 years of security patches. Device Can Get Hot Under Load – During extended gaming or benchmarking, the phone heats up noticeably, which may impact long-term performance.   ViserMark Labels for the Xiaomi 14T Pro Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Xiaomi 14T Pro : Battery Life: The Xiaomi 14T Pro delivers an impressive 51 hours of total usage, translating to approximately 2 full days of battery life under regular use. This makes it one of the better-performing flagship-tier smartphones in terms of endurance, catering to users who demand a device that can handle moderate to heavy workloads without the need for frequent recharges. Battery Charging: With 120W HyperCharge technology, the Xiaomi 14T Pro achieves a full charge in just 25 minutes in real-world tests, significantly reducing downtime. 50W wireless charging is also included, enabling a full charge in approximately 45 minutes, making it one of the fastest wirelessly charging phones in its category. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The Xiaomi 14T Pro achieves a battery performance score of 52/100, demonstrating its ability to efficiently manage power-intensive tasks such as gaming, video streaming, and multitasking. Its annual energy consumption stands at 3.2 kWh, making it more power-efficient than many flagship competitors while still delivering top-tier performance. Specification Overview  - Released Date: September 2024 Body & Build: Dimensions: 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm Weight: 209g Materials: Glass front (Corning® Gorilla® Glass 5), aluminium frame, and Panda X glass back Durability: IP68-rated, ensuring dust and water resistance (up to 2m depth for 30 minutes) Design: Available in Titan Gray, Titan Blue, and Titan Black, featuring a sleek, metallic aesthetic Display: Size: 6.67-inch CrystalRes AMOLED Resolution: 2712 x 1220 pixels (~446ppi) Refresh Rate: 144Hz adaptive Brightness: 4,000 nits peak brightness for outstanding visibility, even in direct sunlight HDR Support: Dolby Vision, HDR10+ for enhanced contrast and colour accuracy Eye Comfort Certifications: TÜV Rheinland (Low Blue Light, Flicker-Free, Circadian Friendly) Operating System: Xiaomi HyperOS (based on Android 14) – offering a refined, AI-driven, and user-friendly experience Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) CPU: Octa-core (1x 3.25GHz Cortex-X4, 3x 2.85GHz Cortex-X4, 4x 2.0GHz Cortex-A720) GPU: Immortalis-G720 MC12 – top-tier gaming and graphical performance AI: MediaTek NPU, boosting AI-powered imaging and system efficiency Memory & Storage: Configurations: 256GB storage + 12GB RAM 512GB storage + 12GB RAM 512GB storage + 16GB RAM 1TB storage + 12GB RAM Technology: UFS 4.0 storage and LPDDR5X RAM for ultra-fast speeds Expandable Storage: No microSD slot Connectivity: 5G Dual SIM support (Nano-SIM + eSIM / Dual eSIM support) Wi-Fi 7 for ultra-fast wireless connections Bluetooth 5.4 with LHDC support NFC (availability depends on region) Infrared Port for remote control functionality USB Type-C 2.0 (OTG support) Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res Audio Camera System: Rear Camera – Triple Leica Setup: 50MP Main Camera (f/1.6, 23mm, OIS, PDAF) – featuring a large 1/1.31" sensor for enhanced light capture and detail 50MP Telephoto (f/2.0, 60mm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom) – ideal for portraits and distant shots 12MP Ultrawide (f/2.2, 15mm, 120° FOV) – for expansive landscapes and group photos Camera Features: Leica Authentic & Vibrant Looks, Master-Lens modes Xiaomi ProFocus AI (motion tracking, eye tracking) Advanced Night Mode for low-light photography Video Recording: 8K@24/30fps, 4K@60fps, HDR10+ support Super slow-motion up to 1080p@960fps Gyro-EIS stabilisation for smooth footage Front Camera: 32MP (f/2.0, 25mm, fixed focus) Video recording: 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps Colours Available: Titan Gray, Titan Blue and Titan Black. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Xiaomi 14T Pro through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Xiaomi 14T Pro  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Xiaomi 14T Pro  achieved an impressive battery performance score of 52/100 in ViserMark testing, surpassing both the Xiaomi 14 (48/100) and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (42/100). This positions it as one of the top contenders in battery longevity within its category. Beyond endurance, the Xiaomi 14T Pro  also excels in charging efficiency. With its industry-leading 120W wired charging, the 5,000mAh battery reaches 100% in just 25 minutes—significantly faster than most flagship competitors. Additionally, 50W wireless charging offers a convenient alternative, fully replenishing the battery in approximately 45 minutes. This combination of exceptional battery life, ultra-fast charging, and energy efficiency makes the Xiaomi 14T Pro  an excellent choice for users who demand long-lasting power without interruptions. Whether for intensive gaming, content creation, or daily productivity, the Xiaomi 14T Pro delivers a balanced and reliable power experience. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark's battery life testing, the Xiaomi 14T Pro  demonstrated continuous use for 51 hours, equating to approximately 2 full days of real-world usage. Its 5,000mAh battery, combined with intelligent power management, ensures excellent endurance for users who engage in moderate to heavy usage throughout the day. Compared to competing models, the Xiaomi 14T Pro outperforms both the Xiaomi 14 (43 hours) and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (37 hours), offering a notable advantage in longevity. It also surpasses the flagship/pro-tier category average (41.24 hours), reinforcing its efficiency and battery stamina. With its combination of extended battery life and industry-leading fast charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro  is an outstanding choice for users who prioritise power efficiency, rapid recharging, and all-day reliability. 3.   Battery Consumption The Xiaomi 14T Pro and Xiaomi 14 were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. The Xiaomi 14T Pro demonstrated slightly higher power consumption across most tasks compared to the Xiaomi 14, reflecting its more powerful chipset and advanced display technology. While both devices use a 5,000mAh battery, the Xiaomi 14T Pro's MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ processor and 144Hz AMOLED display contribute to higher energy demand, particularly in web browsing, camera use, and video streaming. The Xiaomi 14T Pro  is built for high-performance tasks, making it slightly less energy-efficient than the Xiaomi 14, which is optimised for better power management. The higher refresh rate (144Hz vs. 120Hz) and enhanced GPU performance make the 14T Pro a superior choice for gaming and multimedia, albeit at the cost of higher power draw. While the Xiaomi 14T Pro offers superior performance, it comes with a modest trade-off in battery efficiency. For users who prioritise raw power and high refresh rates, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is the better choice, whereas the Xiaomi 14 may be preferable for those who seek slightly longer battery endurance over maximum performance. The battery performance comparison between the Xiaomi 14T Pro  and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE highlights notable differences in power consumption across various daily activities, offering insights into their efficiency across different usage scenarios. Social Media & Communication: The Xiaomi 14T Pro exhibits higher power efficiency for social media browsing and outgoing calls compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. This suggests that the Xiaomi 14T Pro is better optimised for background-intensive communication tasks, making it a strong choice for users who heavily engage in social media or rely on voice calls. Multimedia & Entertainment: For gaming, video streaming, and downloading/uploading, the Xiaomi 14T Pro has lower power consumption than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. Productivity Tasks: In terms of email management, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is more energy-efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, making it better suited for professionals or users who frequently check and send emails. However, for web browsing, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE consumes slightly less power, making it the better choice for users who spend extended periods online. Camera & Media Playback: When it comes to photography, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is more efficient in camera usage, consuming less battery during photo and video capture compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro. This makes the Galaxy S24 FE a better choice for users who frequently take photos or record videos. Additionally, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is slightly more power-efficient for general media playback, whereas the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE consumes more energy in these tasks. The comparison between the Xiaomi 14T Pro , Xiaomi 14 , and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE  reveals key differences in power consumption across various daily tasks. This analysis provides valuable insights into which device offers the best efficiency for different usage scenarios. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE demonstrates higher power consumption when used for social media browsing and outgoing calls, making it less efficient for users who frequently engage in these activities. The Xiaomi 14T Pro and Xiaomi 14 are more power-conscious in this category, ensuring better energy efficiency for those who rely heavily on messaging and social media interactions. Gaming & Multimedia: Gaming performance is where the Xiaomi 14T Pro surprises with better battery efficiency, consuming less power than the Xiaomi 14 and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE in this category. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE consumes the most battery during gaming, which could be due to differences in system optimisation or chipset power draw. The  Xiaomi 14 is the most efficient for multimedia consumption, making it a strong option for users who watch a lot of videos or stream content frequently. Productivity & Web Browsing: In email management, the Xiaomi 14 performs slightly better than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, consuming less power. Web browsing is more power-intensive on the Xiaomi 14T Pro and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, likely due to their higher refresh rate screens, while the Xiaomi 14 is better optimised for extended browsing sessions. Camera & Media Playback: Camera usage is more energy-efficient on the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, making it the best choice for users who frequently capture photos or videos. The Xiaomi 14T Pro and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE consume more power during media playback, meaning users who frequently watch videos or listen to music might notice faster battery drain. 4.   Battery Efficiency ViserMark tested the Xiaomi 14T Pro  and awarded it a 1-leaf rating for battery efficiency, indicating moderate efficiency in power consumption but not reaching the highest levels of energy conservation. The Xiaomi 14T Pro  achieved the same 1-leaf rating as the Xiaomi 14 and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, meaning they offer similar battery efficiency despite its more powerful chipset. While the Xiaomi 14T Pro 's efficiency rating suggests that it doesn't lead in battery conservation, it still balances strong performance and usability. This means users can expect smooth multitasking, excellent gaming performance, and high-quality media consumption, but may need to recharge more frequently compared to more power-efficient competitors. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The ViserMark label indicates that the Xiaomi 14T Pro  consumes 3.2 kWh of energy annually. This metric represents the device’s estimated total power consumption over a year, reflecting its efficiency in real-world usage. The Xiaomi 14T Pro is more energy efficient than the Xiaomi 14, which consumes 3.5 kWh annually . It a lso outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, which has a significantly higher 4.1 kWh annual consumption and the flagship/pro-tier average, which stands at 3.77 kWh. For users prioritising performance-driven experiences, the Xiaomi 14T Pro  provides an optimal balance between energy efficiency and power output. Who Should Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro? Introducing the Xiaomi 14T Pro , perfect for various user profiles: Power Users & Gamers: Equipped with the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ chipset and a 144Hz AMOLED display, the Xiaomi 14T Pro provides an ultra-smooth and immersive experience for gaming and multitasking. The high refresh rate ensures fluid animations, while the powerful processor handles demanding applications with ease. Despite its robust performance, the 5,000mAh battery ensures reliable power for extended gaming sessions, and its 120W fast charging (full charge in just 25 minutes in real-world tests) ensures minimal downtime—ideal for those who need consistent high-speed performance. Photography Enthusiasts: For users who rely on their smartphones for photography, the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Leica-tuned triple-camera system offers exceptional imaging capabilities. The 50MP wide sensor with OIS, 50MP telephoto lens with 2.6x optical zoom, and 12MP ultra-wide camera ensure detailed and vibrant photos in various lighting conditions. However, battery consumption during photography is slightly higher than some competitors, especially when using advanced camera modes. Thankfully, fast charging and efficient battery management help keep users shooting longer without worrying about running out of power. Multimedia & Entertainment Enthusiasts: The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 6.67-inch AMOLED display with HDR10+ and Dolby Vision delivers rich colours, deep contrast, and an immersive viewing experience for streaming and gaming. With a peak brightness of 4,000 nits, it remains visible even in bright outdoor conditions. While its high-resolution and 144Hz refresh rate contribute to a slightly higher power draw, the device optimises battery usage effectively, ensuring long media playback sessions without excessive drain. Everyday Users Focused on Battery Efficiency: For users who prioritise battery life without sacrificing performance, the Xiaomi 14T Pro offers a well-rounded experience. It excels in social media browsing, calls, and web productivity tasks while maintaining better efficiency than some flagship competitors. With a battery life of up to 2 days in moderate use, it caters to those who need a dependable phone for daily tasks. The ultra-fast wired and 50W wireless charging further enhance its convenience, making it ideal for users who want a fast-charging, all-day smartphone. ViserMark VERDICT The Xiaomi 14T Pro - what's it like to use? The Xiaomi 14T Pro offers a premium smartphone experience, combining top-tier performance, display quality, and ultra-fast charging at a competitive price point. With the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ chipset and up to 16GB of RAM, the device ensures seamless multitasking, high-speed gaming, and efficient app management. Its 5G connectivity guarantees fast data speeds, making it ideal for users who demand power and speed. With a 5,000mAh battery, the Xiaomi 14T Pro provides an impressive 2-day battery life under moderate use, outperforming many competitors. The standout feature is its 120W HyperCharge technology, which fully charges the device in just 25 minutes in real-world testing—one of the fastest charging times available. It also supports 50W wireless charging, completing a full charge in around 45 minutes, ensuring minimal downtime for users on the go. The 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision delivers stunning colours, sharp contrasts, and smooth motion for gaming, media consumption, and everyday use. With a peak brightness of 4,000 nits, the screen remains highly visible even in direct sunlight. TÜV Rheinland certifications ensure reduced eye strain, making extended use more comfortable. The Leica-tuned triple-camera system is a highlight of the Xiaomi 14T Pro . It features: 50MP wide main sensor with OIS for sharp, clear images in all lighting conditions. 50MP telephoto lens with 2.6x optical zoom, providing excellent portrait and zoom capabilities. 12MP ultra-wide camera with a 120˚ field of view, perfect for landscape shots and group photos. For video enthusiasts, the Xiaomi 14T Pro offers 8K recording at 24/30fps, 4K at 60fps, and advanced stabilisation features. The 32MP front-facing camera provides great selfie quality and 4K video recording, catering to content creators and vloggers. The Xiaomi 14T Pro is an exceptional choice for users who prioritise performance, display quality, fast charging, and versatile camera capabilities. While it excels in charging speed and overall power, its battery life is slightly shorter than ultra-efficient rivals like the Pixel 8a. However, its combination of top-tier features at a competitive price makes it one of the best value high-tier smartphones available today. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, with a vision to deliver high-quality technology at accessible prices. Committed to a user-centric approach, Xiaomi quickly gained traction in the mobile internet space. By 2014, the company had sold over 61 million smartphones and expanded into key markets including Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil. Headquartered in Beijing, China, Xiaomi continues its global expansion with offices across the Asia-Pacific region, India, and Brazil, positioning itself as a rising global tech brand. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4000 Samsung Galaxy S25: A Compact Flagship That Maximises Efficiency SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro Tier (€700+)  Flagship/Pro  Tier Ranking # 12 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a premium flagship that refines the Galaxy experience, offering cutting-edge performance, AI-driven software enhancements, and a compact, durable design. Combining powerful hardware with an intelligent software ecosystem, it sets a new standard for small yet capable smartphones. The 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display brings stunning colors, deep contrasts, and exceptional brightness, making it one of the best screens in its category. With a 1080x2340 resolution and 416 pixels per inch, it delivers crisp detail, while the 120Hz adaptive refresh rate ensures ultra-smooth scrolling and interactions. HDR10+ support enhances contrast and color accuracy, creating an immersive experience for streaming and gaming. The peak brightness of 2600 nits guarantees excellent outdoor visibility even under direct sunlight. The Always-On Display feature adds convenience by showing essential information at a glance. Powering the Galaxy S25 is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, built on a cutting-edge 3nm architecture for superior performance and efficiency. The octa-core CPU, featuring two high-performance Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores clocked at 4.47 GHz and six Oryon V2 Phoenix M cores at 3.53 GHz, ensures blazing-fast multitasking and seamless gaming. The Adreno 830 GPU enhances graphics performance, delivering smooth gameplay and efficient power consumption. The device is equipped with 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage options ranging from 128GB to 512GB, providing ample space and lightning-fast data speeds. Samsung continues to refine its triple-camera system, delivering sharp, detailed, and stabilized shots in all conditions. The 50-megapixel main sensor, with an f/1.8 aperture and optical image stabilization, captures stunning images with great dynamic range and low-light performance. The 10-megapixel telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom ensures high-quality close-ups and portraits, while the 12-megapixel ultra-wide lens with a 120-degree field of view is perfect for capturing expansive landscapes and group shots. The Galaxy S25 supports 8K video recording at 24 and 30 frames per second, as well as 4K at 60 frames per second, ensuring cinema-quality footage. Video stabilization is enhanced with gyro-EIS and HDR10+ for smooth, detailed recordings. The 12-megapixel front camera with dual-pixel autofocus captures high-quality selfies and supports 4K video recording at 60 frames per second, making it an excellent choice for content creators and video calls. Despite its compact size, the Galaxy S25 houses a 4000mAh battery, optimized for all-day endurance. The device supports 25W wired charging via USB Power Delivery 3.0, reaching 50 percent in just 30 minutes. It also offers 15W Qi2.1 wireless charging, allowing for convenient cable-free power-ups, along with 4.5W reverse wireless charging, perfect for topping up accessories like Galaxy Buds or a smartwatch. The Galaxy S25 features a premium and durable design, with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both the front and back, ensuring resistance against scratches and minor impacts. Its Armor Aluminum 2 frame adds robustness while keeping the device lightweight at just 162 grams. It is IP68-certified for water and dust resistance, capable of withstanding immersion in water up to 1.5 meters deep for 30 minutes. The device is available in Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, and Silver Shadow, offering a sleek and modern aesthetic. Running One UI 7 on Android 15, the Galaxy S25 is designed for efficiency, AI-powered interactions, and seamless user experience. Samsung guarantees seven years of OS and security updates, ensuring longevity and sustained performance over time. The device also features Samsung DeX and Wireless DeX, transforming the smartphone into a desktop-like workstation when connected to a monitor or TV. The Galaxy S25 offers top-tier connectivity options, including 5G with eSIM support, Wi-Fi 7 for next-generation speeds, Bluetooth 5.4 for stable wireless connections, and NFC for seamless mobile payments and device pairing. The in-display ultrasonic fingerprint sensor provides fast and secure authentication, enhancing privacy and accessibility. Pros Cons The 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel offers a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, 2600 nits peak brightness, HDR10+ support, and an Always-On Display, ensuring vibrant visuals, fluid interactions, and excellent outdoor visibility. Same Design as Previous Models – While sleek and premium, the Galaxy S25’s design remains nearly identical to its predecessor, with only minor refinements. And price Remains High with Modest Upgrades Flagship-Grade Performance – Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) chipset with an octa-core CPU and Adreno 830 GPU, delivering top-tier performance, AI-driven enhancements, and seamless gaming. No MicroSD Card Slot – Storage is non-expandable, requiring users to choose between 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB UFS 4.0 options from the start. Long-Term Software Support – Runs on Android 15 with One UI 7, featuring Samsung's Galaxy AI tools and promising 7 years of major OS upgrades and security updates, making it one of the most future-proof devices on the market. AI Features Still in Development – While Samsung’s Galaxy AI shows promise, some of its most anticipated features are still rolling out and may not be fully optimised at launch. Premium & Durable Build – Features Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front and back with an Armor Aluminum 2 frame for added durability. The IP68 water and dust resistance rating protects against accidental splashes and submersion. Small Battery Capacity for a Flagship – The 4000mAh battery is smaller than many competitors. Battery Degradation Concerns Over Time – With a smaller battery capacity and slow charging speeds, users may experience noticeable battery wear over time, reducing long-term endurance. Cutting-Edge Connectivity – Equipped with 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, eSIM, and Samsung DeX (both wired and wireless) for a seamless multitasking and high-speed connectivity experience. Samsung’s Software Can Be Overwhelming – While One UI 7 offers great customisation, it has many deep settings and menus that may feel complex or cluttered, especially for new users. Immersive Audio & AI-Enhanced Features – Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, AI-powered Circle to Search, Live Translate, and AI-driven editing tools make it a smartphone optimised for both work and entertainment. Limited Camera Upgrades – The 50MP+10MP+12MP camera system is solid but remains unchanged from last year’s model, while competitors offer higher megapixel counts and periscope zoom options.   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy S25 : Battery Life: The Samsung Galaxy S25 delivers 35 hours of total usage, which translates to approximately 1.5 days of battery life under normal use. While respectable, this is slightly lower than some competitors in the flagship tier, making mid-day charging necessary for power users. Battery Charging: While Samsung claims the Galaxy S25 can reach 50% in 30 minutes with its 25W wired charging, real-world tests showed slightly slower charging times. In testing, a full charge took 1 hour and 19 minutes, meaning the device doesn't reach 100% in just one hour as expected. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The Galaxy S25 scores 41/100 in battery performance, reflecting balanced efficiency but room for improvement in endurance under heavy workloads. The annual energy consumption is 3.7 kWh, meaning the device consumes more power than some of its rivals, but remains within the expected range for flagship devices. Specification Overview  - Released Date: February 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mm Weight: 162g Materials: Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame. Durability: IP68-rated (dust and water resistance up to 1.5m for 30 minutes). Design: Armor Aluminum 2 for enhanced durability Display: Size: 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X Resolution: 2340 x 1080 pixels (FHD+) 416 ppi Refresh Rate: 120Hz adaptive for smooth scrolling and power efficiency Brightness: Peak brightness of 2600 nits for excellent outdoor visibility HDR Support: HDR10+ compatibility for vivid contrast and enhanced color accuracy Always-on Display: Yes Operating System: Android 15 with One UI 7 Software Support:  Up to 7 major Android updates, making it one of the longest-supported smartphones on the market Chipset & Performance: Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (US/China) / Exynos 2400 (International) CPU: Octa-core (2x 4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x 3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) GPU: Adreno 830 for high-performance gaming and graphics Memory & Storage: Configurations: 128GB UFS 4.0 + 12GB RAM 256GB UFS 4.0 + 12GB RAM 512GB UFS 4.0 + 12GB RAM UFS 4.0 for faster read/write speeds Expandable Storage: No microSD card slot Connectivity & Features: Network: 5G-ready (Sub6 FDD & TDD, SDL support) with Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM / Dual eSIM support) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 7 (EHT320, MIMO, 4096-QAM) for ultra-fast speeds Bluetooth: 5.4 with improved energy efficiency NFC: Yes (availability varies by region) USB Port: USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 Samsung DeX: Supports both wired and wireless desktop experience Fingerprint Sensor: Ultrasonic under-display for fast and secure unlocking Audio: Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos Location Services: GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS Camera System: Rear Cameras (Triple-lens Setup) 50MP Main (f/1.8, 24mm, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF) – Delivers excellent detail, dynamic range, and low-light performance 10MP Telephoto (f/2.4, 67mm, 3x optical zoom, OIS, PDAF) – Sharp zoomed-in shots without loss of detail 12MP Ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FOV, Super Steady video, 1.4µm) – Ideal for landscapes and group photos Video Capabilities Rear Video Recording: 8K @ 24/30fps, 4K @ 30/60fps, 1080p @ 30/60/240fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS Front Video Recording: 4K @ 30/60fps, 1080p @ 30fps Front Camera 12MP (f/2.2, Dual Pixel PDAF, 1/3.2”) – Delivers high-quality selfies and sharp video calls Colours Available: Navy, Icy Blue, Silver Shadow, Mint. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy S25 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy S25  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Samsung Galaxy S25  achieved a battery performance score of 41/100 in ViserMark testing, positioning it slightly behind the Samsung Galaxy S24 (42/100) and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (42/100) but close to the Flagship/Pro Tier average (41.64/100). While it does not lead the category in battery efficiency, it delivers a balanced experience for everyday use. Beyond endurance, the Galaxy S25 ’s charging efficiency presents a mixed experience. While Samsung advertises 25W wired charging, real-world tests show that the device reaches 50% in 30 minutes but takes approximately 1 hour and 19 minutes to reach full charge—slower than many of its high-end competitors. Additionally, it supports 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, offering flexibility but falling short of the ultra-fast charging speeds seen in rival flagship devices. This combination of moderate battery life, average charging speeds, and flexible charging options makes the Samsung Galaxy S25 a solid choice for users within the Samsung ecosystem. However, those prioritising faster charging and extended battery endurance may find other flagship alternatives more appealing. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark's battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 delivered 35 hours of continuous usage, translating to approximately 1.5 days of real-world use. While this ensures a full day of moderate to heavy activity without frequent recharges, it falls slightly behind some competing flagship devices with larger battery capacities. Despite having the same battery size as the Samsung Galaxy S24 (4,000mAh) and a smaller capacity compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (4,700mAh), the Galaxy S25 still manages to hold its own, thanks to Samsung's optimised power management and efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset. The Samsung Galaxy S25 still delivers a balanced power experience, offering reliable all-day battery life with intelligent power management, while benefiting from a compact and lightweight form factor. For users who prioritise efficiency over raw battery capacity, the Galaxy S25 remains a compelling choice within the premium smartphone segment. 3.   Battery Consumption The Samsung Galaxy S25 and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. Notably, the Galaxy S25 consumes less power in social media, calls, gaming, camera usage, media player, and web browsing, making it a more efficient choice for users who engage in multimedia creation and high-performance tasks. However, the Galaxy S24 FE shows lower power consumption in download/uploads, YouTube, and email, which may make it slightly better for users who spend more time streaming videos and handling cloud-based tasks. Despite having a smaller 4,000mAh battery compared to the S24 FE ’s 4,700mAh, the Galaxy S25 maintains strong battery performance thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and improved power efficiency optimisations. This allows it to compete closely with the S24 FE in endurance while offering superior efficiency in high-performance activities. Ultimately, users who prioritise gaming, photography, and media playback may prefer the Galaxy S25, while those who focus more on video streaming and cloud-based productivity might find the S24 FE a slightly better fit. The battery performance comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S25 and Samsung Galaxy S24  highlights notable differences in power consumption across various everyday activities, offering insights into which device is more efficient depending on the user’s habits. The Samsung Galaxy S24 consumes less power in social media browsing and outgoing calls compared to the Galaxy S25 . This suggests that the S24 is better optimised for background-intensive communication tasks, making it a stronger choice for users who frequently engage in social media and voice calls. For video streaming (YouTube) and downloading/uploading, the Samsung Galaxy S25 has higher power consumption than the Galaxy S24 . This could be attributed to its more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and display enhancements, which demand more energy during high-resolution content processing. For gaming, while the S25 has lower power consumption compared to the S24 , the impact of its display features—such as refresh rate and brightness—should also be considered. The S25’s LTPO Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with 120Hz refresh rate ensures smoother visuals, but depending on brightness settings and gaming graphics intensity, power consumption can fluctuate. The S25 remains a more efficient gaming option overall, but prolonged gameplay sessions at higher brightness and refresh rates could lead to increased battery drain compared to standard settings. When it comes to email management, the Galaxy S25 consumes more battery compared to the S24 , meaning the S24 is more efficient for professionals or users who frequently check and send emails. For web browsing, both devices have nearly equal power consumption, with the S25 consuming slightly more energy. The difference is marginal, meaning users won’t notice a major impact in daily usage. For photography and camera usage, the Galaxy S24 is more battery-efficient than the S24, meaning it consumes less power when capturing photos and recording videos. This makes the S25 a better option for users who frequently use their cameras. However, for media playback (watching videos and listening to music), the Galaxy S24 is more power-efficient, consuming less battery than the S25. This suggests that users who prioritise long hours of video streaming or music playback might find the S24 a better fit in terms of battery life. The battery performance comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S25 , Samsung Galaxy S24 FE , Samsung Galaxy S24 , and Flagship/Pro Tier devices highlights significant differences in power efficiency across various everyday tasks. This analysis provides valuable insights into which smartphone delivers the best power management for different usage scenarios. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE  exhibits the highest power consumption in social media usage and outgoing calls, making it the least efficient for users who frequently browse social media or make voice calls. The Samsung Galaxy S25  consumes significantly less power in these tasks, making it a more power-conscious choice for communication-heavy users. The Samsung Galaxy S24  is the most efficient in this category, with the lowest power draw. Gaming & Multimedia: For gaming, the Galaxy S25  is more efficient than the S24 FE , and the S24  performs slightly better than the FE variant. When it comes to media consumption, the Galaxy S25  and S24  show better power efficiency in video and music playback, while the S24 FE consumes more power. Productivity & Web Browsing: Email usage is more power-intensive on the S25  compared to the S24 FE , but the S24 remains the most efficient in this category. Web browsing shows minimal differences, with the S25 and S24 being slightly more efficient than the S24 FE . Camera & Media Playback: The Samsung Galaxy S25 is the most efficient for photography and video recording, consuming less power during camera use compared to the S24 FE and S24 . However, for media playback, the Galaxy S24 is the best choice, consuming the least power, followed by the S25 , with the   S24 FE consuming the most battery. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark's battery efficiency testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25  was awarded a 1-leaf rating, indicating moderate power efficiency. This rating suggests that while the S25 delivers solid performance, it does not lead in energy conservation compared to some competitors. The S25 shares the same 1-leaf rating with the Samsung Galaxy S24  and  S24 FE , meaning all three devices offer a similar balance between performance and power consumption. Despite its more advanced Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, the S25 does not achieve a higher efficiency score, suggesting that its improvements in power management are balanced out by increased performance demands. While the battery efficiency rating is not the highest, the Galaxy S25  still ensures a strong overall experience, with smooth multitasking, efficient gaming, and high-quality media playback. However, users who prioritise battery longevity over high performance may need to recharge more frequently compared to other energy-efficient alternatives. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The ViserMark label indicates that the Samsung Galaxy S25  has an estimated annual energy consumption of 3.7 kWh, making it one of the more efficient flagship devices in terms of power usage. Compared to its competitors, the Galaxy S25  is more energy-efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, which has a higher annual consumption of 4.1 kWh, indicating that the   S24 FE may require more frequent recharges over a year. Meanwhile, the Samsung Galaxy S24 consumes slightly more energy than the S25 at 3.8 kWh, while the flagship/pro-tier category average sits at 3.77 kWh, placing the S25 just below the segment average in efficiency. This data highlights that the Galaxy S25 offers an optimal balance between high performance and power efficiency, ensuring a competitive energy footprint while still delivering flagship-grade features. Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25? Introducing the Samsung Galaxy S25 , perfect for various user profiles: Social Media & Communication-Heavy Users: For users who spend a significant amount of time on social media and making calls, the Samsung Galaxy S25 is a more efficient choice than the Galaxy S24 FE. It consumes less power when browsing, posting, and messaging across platforms, allowing longer usage without excessive battery drain. The compact and lightweight design also makes it easy to use one-handed, and the super-bright 2600-nit AMOLED display ensures great visibility even in direct sunlight. If you rely on your phone for constant connectivity and high-quality video calls, the 12MP front camera with 4K video support makes the experience even better. Power Users Who Prioritize Performance: If you want a powerful and fast phone for multitasking, productivity, and gaming, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset inside the Galaxy S25 offers cutting-edge performance. Apps launch quickly, gaming is smooth, and Samsung’s AI-powered One UI 7 optimisations ensure efficiency. Despite having a smaller 4,000mAh battery compared to competitors, the device remains highly optimised for performance-heavy tasks like gaming and high-resolution content processing. Photography Enthusiasts Who Want Efficiency: The Samsung Galaxy S25 outperforms the Galaxy S24 in battery efficiency for photography, making it a great option for users who frequently take photos and videos. Its triple-camera system with a 50MP main sensor, 10MP telephoto (3x zoom), and 12MP ultrawide lens ensures high-quality, stabilised shots. The phone also consumes less battery during camera use compared to the S24 FE, making it a stronger choice for mobile photographers who want to shoot without worrying about rapid battery drain. Future-Proof Buyers Looking for Long-Term Support: If you want a smartphone that will last for years, the Galaxy S25 is one of the best choices. Samsung offers 7 years of OS and security updates, meaning this device will remain supported until 2032—outlasting many competitors. This makes it an excellent investment for users who don’t upgrade frequently but still want the latest features and security. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy S25 - what's it like to use? The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a premium flagship smartphone that offers top-tier performance, advanced AI features, and a compact, durable design. It's powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, paired with 12GB of RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, ensuring fast multitasking, high-speed gaming, and smooth everyday performance. The device supports 5G connectivity and Wi-Fi 7, providing ultra-fast data speeds for users who demand seamless connectivity. The 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display is among the best in its category, offering stunning colors, deep contrasts, and ultra-smooth motion. With a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, HDR10+ support, and an impressive 2600-nit peak brightness, it delivers exceptional outdoor visibility and vibrant visuals. The Always-On Display ensures quick access to important information without unlocking the phone, adding extra convenience for daily use. The Galaxy S25 maintains Samsung’s premium build quality, featuring Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both the front and back for scratch resistance and durability. The Armor Aluminum 2 frame keeps the phone lightweight at just 162 grams, while the IP68 rating ensures dust and water resistance. Available in Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, and Silver Shadow, the sleek and modern design remains one of the most polished in the industry. With a 4,000mAh battery, the Galaxy S25 delivers up to 1.5 days of battery life, and while charging speeds (25W wired, 15W wireless) aren't the fastest, the phone remains efficient for daily use thanks to Samsung’s software optimizations. Samsung has refined its triple-camera setup, ensuring sharp, detailed, and stabilized shots in all conditions. The 50MP main sensor with OIS captures high-quality images, the 10MP telephoto lens provides 3x optical zoom for clear close-ups, and the 12MP ultra-wide camera is perfect for landscape and group shots. For video, the Galaxy S25 supports 8K recording at 24/30fps and 4K at 60fps, delivering cinema-grade footage. The 12MP front camera with dual-pixel autofocus ensures sharp selfies and 4K video recording, making it a great choice for content creators and video calls. Its premium build (Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Armor Aluminum 2, IP68-rated design) makes it durable yet lightweight, while One UI 7 on Android 15 delivers AI-powered features and long-term support (7 years of updates). Samsung DeX and Wireless DeX remain standout features for those who want a desktop-like experience from their phone. Pairing the device with a monitor or TV worked flawlessly in our tests, making multitasking seamless. The Samsung Galaxy S25 doesn’t break new ground, but it perfects what already worked well. It offers flagship-tier performance, a stunning display, and a reliable camera system in a compact form factor. However, battery life, charging speeds, and the lack of design innovation might leave some users wanting more. If you value compact design, premium build, and long-term software support, the Galaxy S25 is an excellent choice. But if battery endurance or groundbreaking camera features are your priority, some competitors might be more appealing. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra - Maximising Performance and Durability Smartphone Battery Performance Score: 49/100 Based on Price: Flagship/Pro Ranking #1 Video Review It will be available shortly. What you need to know about the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra smartphone. Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is a Flagship/Pro (€700+)  smartphone that offers an impressive blend of advanced technology and user-centric design. It has a powerful camera system that includes a new 5x telephoto lens and a 200MP primary camera, making it highly versatile for photography. The phone's AI-driven features, such as Circle to Search and ProVisual Engine , enhance the user experience by providing creative and convenient options. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset powers the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra's battery life, providing long-lasting efficiency that can easily last over a day with moderate usage. The S Pen remains a standout feature, adding an extra layer of productivity and creativity. However, this smartphone has a slow 45W charging speed, and some minor display imperfections might fall short of some users' expectations. Despite these minor drawbacks, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra promises to provide extended software support and innovative AI features, making it a top contender in the Flagship/Pro smartphone market. Specification Overview - Released Date: January 2024 Body : 162.3 x 79.0 x 8.6mm or 6.39 x 3.11 x 0.3 inches. Weight 232g . Display : 6.70" Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak), 1440x3120px resolution, 19.5:9 aspect ratio, 513ppi; Always-on display. Protection : Gorilla Armor front and back with Armor aluminium 2 frames for drop and scratch resistance. IP68 dust/water rated (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes) Operating System : Android 14, One UI 6.1 Chipset : Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Memory : 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM; UFS 4.0 Connectivity : 5G; eSIM; Dual SIM; Wi-Fi 6e; BT 5.3; NFC . Front Camera : 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDA Video: Front camera: 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps. Back camera : 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS Battery : 5000 mAh, 45W wired, 15W Wireless, 4.5W Reserve Charging Colours : Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange Others: It has stereo speakers, fingerprint sensor, Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX, Ultra Wideband (UWB) support, and S Pen stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro). Good Points ​Not So Good Points The new 5x telephoto lens and the 200MP main camera offer versatile and high-quality photography capabilities. The 5000mAh battery ensures 2 days of use for lasting performance, even with heavy usage . Lacks significant advancements in camera hardware compared to its predecessors. The matte glass back may feel slippery and prone to dropping without a case. IP68-rated with Gorilla Armor and titanium frame for enhanced durability. It supports 45W wired charging, but the shipped USB cable does not. AI-driven features that enhance functionality and user experience Some of the Bluetooth features in the S Pen, such as air actions, may not be widely used or found useful​  ​​ Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, the device delivers robust performance. While offering a range of features, the price point may concern some users, especially considering the mentioned cons. The S Pen adds a unique dimension of productivity and creativity, enhancing the overall user experience. Security  and Software updates for seven years ​ Visit the Amazon Store Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, AI Android Smartphone, 12GB RAM, 512GB Storage, 200MP Camera, S Pen These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here . Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW Viser Mark   offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer.    VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse smartphone test results and view them. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra  and comparative smartphones. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra ViserMark Labels Battery Performance review by  Viser Mark   is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. With its advanced features, including a robust camera system, long battery life, and the S Pen, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra makes it a comprehensive package for users. It represents a significant step up from its predecessor, marking it a valuable option for those seeking an exceptional smartphone experience. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra's battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results. Battery Performance Score Battery Life   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumptio n   Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels Battery Performance What is the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Battery Performance Score? In our comprehensive testing, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 49 out of 100. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has undergone testing to evaluate its battery performance, with the results presented using ViserMark labels. While it offers above-average battery performance and ranks highest in the 2023/2024 ranking table, it still falls slightly behind Apple smartphones regarding overall battery performance. In terms of battery efficiency, this smartphone only demonstrates moderate effectiveness in utilising its battery capacity. However, it still provides a reliable battery life of up to two days, thanks to its 5000mAh battery, making it suitable for most users and heavy usage. The annual energy consumption of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is relatively low at 3.1 kWh/Annum, indicating decent battery management and overall power consumption. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 's battery performance. How does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra compare to Flagship/Pro smartphones? Battery performance is a crucial factor influencing user choices. With the release of Samsung’s latest Samsung Galaxy series - the S24 Ultra , S24+ and S24 - understanding how these smartphones compare in terms of battery performance is key for potential buyers. The chart below displays three smartphones' ViserMark battery performance scores for a clearer comparison. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , with a 5000mAh battery, scores 49/100 in battery performance. Although it has the largest battery in the series, this smartphone has high-end, power-intensive features that might slightly drain the advantage of its larger battery. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ and the Samsung Galaxy S24 , with scores of 44/100 and 42/100, respectively, demonstrate a decent balance between battery size and efficiency. These scores are credible, considering their smaller battery capacity than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra . It indicates that Samsung has optimised these smartphones to deliver efficient battery performance despite the constraints of a smaller battery. In summary, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra leads with a larger battery, and its intensive features impact its overall score. In contrast, the   Samsung Galaxy S24+  and the Samsung Galaxy S24 manage to deliver efficient performance with smaller batteries. These insights are crucial for users as they choose between battery size, device performance, and efficiency while selecting their preferred smartphone from the Samsung Galaxy S24 series. Also of Interest : Have you missed this smartphone review? Samsung Galaxy S24+ - Beyond the Basics, Providing Exceptional User Experience All smartphones are thoroughly  tested and verified by SmartViser . Every smartphone  has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels.   Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Performing Smartphone   Battery Life How long will the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra battery last? The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra test results indicate a battery life of 2 days, or 52 hours , on a single charge. One of the most vital aspects to consider when choosing a smartphone is battery life. This feature becomes even more critical for users who depend on their smartphones for extended periods without access to charging. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra  offers an excellent battery life, suitable for heavy usage and likely to satisfy most users who need a reliable smartphone for extended periods. How does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra compare to Flagship/Pro smartphones? The battery life of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , Samsung Galaxy S24+, and Samsung Galaxy S24 varies significantly. The chart below demonstrates how these smartphones compare. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra stands out with a larger 5000mAh battery that can last up to 2 days or 52 hours due to its energy-efficient management. The Samsung Galaxy S24+  and the Samsung Galaxy S24 also perform well in terms of battery life despite having lower battery capacities. The Samsung Galaxy S24+ can last up to 1.5 days or 41 hours, while the Samsung Galaxy S24 provides around 1.5 days or 34 hours. In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy S24 series offers a range of battery life options to cater to different user needs. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is ideal for heavy users or those needing smartphones to last longer between charges. The Samsung Galaxy S24+  and the Samsung Galaxy S24 , while not matching the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra's endurance, still offer battery life that meets the needs of average users. It's important to consider personal usage patterns when selecting a smartphone to ensure optimal battery life. NEW - Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the device's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Flagship/Pro Tier Smartphone Benchmark The average battery consumption values for the Flagship/Pro Tier smartphones tested during 2023 serve as a benchmark to compare smartphones released in 2024. We can help analyse how the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra stands against this average to determine its battery efficiency for daily user activities. This section will directly compare the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra against the average battery consumption values for Flagship/Pro Tier smartphones tested in 2023. This will determine how the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra stands regarding battery consumption for daily activities. Based on the battery consumption test results, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra compares against the average battery consumption for Flagship/Pro smartphones. The chart below clearly indicates the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra's performance across daily user activities. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . From the test results, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra consumes varying amounts of battery depending on the activity. For instance, during social media use and outgoing calls, it utilises significantly more power than the average Flagship smartphone. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra uses less power than the average for MMS, and uses only slightly more than the average Flagship smartphone for gaming, which might appeal to gamers looking for a smartphone that can handle longer gaming sessions without quickly draining the battery. Regarding downloading/uploading tasks, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra uses less battery than the average Flagship smartphone. Similarly, the camera operations are optimised for power usage, as indicated by the lower battery consumption than the average, which is essential for users who take numerous photographs or videos. There is a slightly higher than average for YouTube streaming, which could be due to the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra having advanced screen quality that enhances the viewing experience at the expense of additional power. Also, this smartphone is slightly less efficient than the average for email, but this is unlikely to be a significant issue unless email is used extensively. Regarding media playback and texting, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is on par with the average, indicating its efficient handling of these tasks. Finally, being more efficient than the average during web browsing, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra could benefit those who use their smartphones for internet browsing extensively throughout the day. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 's battery performance is generally good compared to the average Flagship smartphone, particularly with gaming, camera usage, web browsing, and frequently high-drain activities. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra uses more power than the average for social media and YouTube streaming, which might be attributable to its higher-resolution display or other premium features. This trade-off between functionality and power consumption is an important consideration for smartphone users, especially those prioritising battery life in their daily usage. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S24+ Smartphone Comparison This comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S24+ takes a closer look at how these two smartphones consume battery power during various typical daily activities, giving valuable insights into which phone might best suit usage patterns. The chart below visually represents the strengths and weaknesses of each smartphone. This comparison of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S24+ looks into how these smartphones consume battery power during various common tasks, providing valuable insights for users. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra exhibits more energy efficiency than the Samsung Galaxy S24+ for social media activities. However, this smartphone is not as efficient as the Samsung Galaxy S24+ for outgoing calls, which makes it the preferred choice for users who frequently engage in extended conversations. Surprisingly, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ is significantly more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra for multimedia messaging service tasks. However, it consumes more battery power for gaming than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , possibly due to different processing efficiencies or display technologies that impact power usage. The Samsung Galaxy S24+ shows higher consumption rates for data transfer tasks but drains more battery when using the camera. Users who enjoy photography may prefer the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra for its high-quality camera and video functionality. Once again, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ is slightly more efficient for YouTube streaming, which could make it the preferred option for users who watch a significant amount of video content. However, both devices exhibit similar battery usage for email, media player, SMS, and web browsing tasks, with no significant differences to sway user preference based solely on battery consumption. The comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S24+ indicates that each device has its strengths and weaknesses across different activities. While the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra generally leads in efficiency for more power-intensive tasks, such as social media and camera use, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ shows its strengths in areas like MMS and YouTube streaming. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Smartphone Comparison Users often look beyond basic specifications to understand how smartphones perform in everyday scenarios. This comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S24 focuses on battery consumption across various common activities. It provides valuable insights for users considering which model to choose based on their daily usage patterns. The chart visually represents how these two smartphones compare, providing valuable insight for users based on their daily usage patterns. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . According to the analysis, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S24 when using social media, making it a good option for users who frequently engage in this activity. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S24 consumes less battery during outgoing calls, which might make it a better choice for users who use their phone primarily for voice calls. For multimedia messaging, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is more battery-efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S24 , which could benefit users who send MMS frequently. Similarly, for gaming and data-intensive activities such as downloading and uploading, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is more efficient, making it a more attractive option for users who enjoy gaming frequently. Regarding camera usage, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is more efficient, an important consideration for users who frequently use their phone camera. However, the S24 consumes slightly less battery for YouTube streaming, which could make it a better option for users who stream videos frequently. Both smartphones generally show similar or slightly better battery efficiency for less demanding tasks such as email, media player, SMS, and web browsing. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra generally exhibits better battery efficiency across various activities than the Samsung Galaxy S24 , thanks to its larger battery. However, users should consider their usage habits when choosing between the two phones, as each offers distinct advantages regarding battery consumption and efficiency. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Overall Smartphone Comparison Battery performance is a crucial aspect of the smartphone experience, affecting everything from daily usage to long-term satisfaction. In this final analysis, we compare the battery life of Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , Samsung Galaxy S24+ , and Samsung Galaxy S24 during various common activities, contrasting their battery consumption with the average for Flagship/Pro-tier smartphones. This comparison chart below aims to offer a clear understanding of which smartphone would be the best fit for your lifestyle and usage habits. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer by Smart V iser . Regarding social media usage, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S24+ demonstrate higher battery consumption compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 , which suggests that the latter may be relatively more efficient for frequent social media users. Nonetheless, all three models surpass the average flagship's battery consumption, indicating the need for improvement in this category. In terms of outgoing calls, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S24+ smartphones continue to display higher battery consumption than the Samsung Galaxy S24 , implying that they may employ more power-intensive features during calls. Notably, their battery consumption surpasses the average Flagship/Pro smartphone, highlighting a potential area for optimisation. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra demonstrates gaming prowess, offering better efficiency than its siblings and aligning closely with the flagship average. This suggests this smartphone is well-suited for gamers who desire extended gameplay without frequent charging. Concerning camera usage, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the most efficient smartphone, followed by the Samsung Galaxy S24+ and Samsung Galaxy S24 . All smartphones consume less battery than the flagship average, indicating that Samsung's camera optimisation effectively manages battery consumption. Regarding YouTube streaming and web browsing, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ exhibits the best efficiency in these categories, with the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra slightly behind and the Samsung Galaxy S24 trailing. The battery consumption for these activities is generally in line with the flagship average. In summary, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is notable for its efficient battery usage in gaming and camera activities, while the Samsung Galaxy S24+ offers a good balance across various daily tasks. The Samsung Galaxy S24 , despite being less powerful, excels in social media and calling efficiency. Compared to the average Flagship/Pro smartphone, the S24 series demonstrates competitive performance, with specific camera and gaming efficiency strengths. These insights are critical for potential buyers to understand the strength of each smartphone and how they align with individual usage patterns and preferences . All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser. Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels. Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Smartphones for Battery Life Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra? The battery efficiency for the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra was 1.5 leaves out of 5 . This ViserMark label is especially vital for users who prioritise a smartphone that can efficiently manage its power consumption while performing various tasks. This relatively low-efficiency score shows that while the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a long battery life, it may not utilise its battery capacity as effectively as possible. This could impact users looking for the most energy-efficient smartphones. How does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra compare to Flagship/Pro smartphones? Smartphone users highly demand powerful features and long-lasting battery life. Therefore, it is crucial to understand battery efficiency, an important consideration for purchasing the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , Samsung Galaxy S24+, and the Samsung Galaxy S24 . The chart below reflects how these comparable smartphones effectively use their battery power relative to their hardware capabilities. Regarding battery efficiency, the Samsung Galaxy S24 series has room for improvement. All three smartphones show varying levels of efficiency. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra leads with a rating of 1.5 leaves out of 5, indicating a moderate balance between its high-performance hardware and power consumption. This suggests that its large battery and advanced features require significant power. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S24+  and the Samsung Galaxy S24 each have an efficiency rating of 1 leaf out of 5. This lower efficiency suggests that power management may not be optimised about their hardware capabilities. It indicates that even smaller batteries could consume power at a higher rate. To sum up, if you prioritise energy consumption and long-term sustainability, you should consider battery efficiency as a crucial factor when evaluating the Samsung Galaxy S24 series . While the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has slightly more battery efficiency, all smartphones indicate potential areas for enhancement in power management. This insight can guide you in making a more informed decision, balancing your need for powerful features with efficient battery usage. Also of Interest : Apple iPhone 14 Plus - Bigger and Even Better on Battery Performance We follow an independent, repeatable, and rigorous battery testing protocol . Based on comprehensive test results, we categorise smartphones into Flagship/Pro, High, Mid, and Entry tiers based on price. Also of Interest: Smartphone Reviews By Tier Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra use? The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a moderate energy consumption of 3.1 kWh annually . The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 's annual energy consumpti on benefits energy-conscious users . Our ViserMark testing has determined that this smartphone consumes 3.1 kWh per annum. This reflects the energy consumption throughout a year of typical usage, providing an estimate of the overall energy impact for the user. How does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra compare to Flagship/Pro smartphones? Today, people are more environmentally conscious, and the energy of smartphones is important for many users. Knowing the annual energy consumption of a smartphone offers insights into its long-term efficiency and environmental impact. The chart below shows the annual energy consumption of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , Samsung Galaxy S24+  and the Samsung Galaxy S24 .  This is valuable for users mindful of energy usage when considering the Samsung Galaxy S24 series. The Samsung Galaxy S24+  and the Samsung Galaxy S2 have an almost identical annual energy consumption rate of 3.8 and 3.9, respectively. This similarity is interesting, given the Samsung Galaxy S24+ 's larger battery size, suggesting that both models operate with comparable energy efficiency over a year. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a lower annual energy consumption 3.1. Having the largest battery, 5000 mAh, and more power-intensive features, it delivers more efficient energy usage. Therefore, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra could be the most eco-friendly option. It emphasises the significance of considering a smartphone's long-term energy footprint and immediate features. Also of Interest: Smartphone Ranking Table. VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is an advanced and user-friendly smartphone. Its AI features, such as Circle to Search, allow users to gain more information about what they see on the screen. Moreover, the ProVisual Engine enhances creativity with features like AI Zoom and object-aware Super HDR, improving photography and videography experiences. The Instant Slow-mo feature is impressive as it can convert any video into slow motion and generate filler frames using AI. What's in the box? Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Smartphone USB-C charging and data transfer cable rated as 3A or up to 25W SIM eject tool Should I buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra? If you're considering buying the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra , assessing your needs and preferences is important. This smartphone offers an impressive battery life lasting up to 2 days, which is ideal for busy users. Its camera system is versatile and performs well in low-light conditions, though it's similar to the previous model. The inclusion of the S Pen adds a unique productivity aspect. However, this smartphone's charging speed is slower than that of some competitors, capped at 45W. The AI features are innovative but require internet connectivity for optimal performance. In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, a Flagship/Pro smartphone, delivers powerful performance, innovative AI features, and a versatile camera system. It's an excellent choice for users looking for an exceptional smartphone experience, particularly those who value long battery life and creative features. However, if fast charging speeds or significant improvements over its predecessor, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, are vital for you. In that case, it may be worth considering other options or waiting for future updates. Now available to buy!: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, AI Android Smartphone, 12GB RAM, 512GB Storage, 200MP Camera, S Pen Extra Insights Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra support 5G? Yes, it does Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra have a headphone jack? No, it doesn't Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra have wireless charging? Yes, it does Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra have dual-SIM capabilities? Yes, it does Q: What storage and RAM variants are the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra available? Storage: 256GB , 512GB, 1TB. RAM: 12GB of memory Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra have stereo speakers? Yes, it does Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra have a microSD card slot? The S24 series does not support external memory via micro SD cards Q: Is the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra VoLTE enabled? Yes, it is. Even if the device supports VoLTE users need to have this enabled in their SIMs to work and some networks may not have VoLTE services enabled. Visit the Amazon Store Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, AI Android Smartphone, 12GB RAM, 512GB Storage, 200MP Camera, S Pen These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here . VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra camera review. Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer looking to improve your smartphone's battery Performance , don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you. Written By: Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at Smart V iser . She plays a crucial role in developing communication and marketing strategies for the company. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position at SmartViser. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn . Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO Battery Capacity mAh: 4575 Google Pixel 8 - Compact Elegance with Impressive Display! Smartphone Battery Performance Score: 41/100 Overall Battery Performance Ranking: #44 Based on Price Flagship/Pro Tier Ranking : #8 All you need to know about the Google Pixel 8 smartphone is Quick Summary The Google Pixel 8 emerges as a compact yet powerful smartphone with its smaller 6.2-inch form factor and upgraded hardware. It features the advanced 4nm Google Tensor G3 chipset and a stunning OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. The battery performance is limited to 1.5 days, and no charger. The camera system remains unchanged. The battery performance is limited to 1.5 days, and no charger. The camera system remains unchanged, and a new ultrawide lens with autofocus enhances photography capabilities. Google's commitment to 7 years of software support sets a new benchmark in the industry. However, while improved, the Google Pixel 8 's battery performance doesn't break new ground compared to competitors. Good Points ​Not So Good Points Impressive AI-driven features Limited battery performance of 1.5 days and no charger included in the box. Bright, stunning OLED display Some software features are limited 1h23m fast charging Slight enhancement in battery performance relative to the prior version Tensor G3 chipset for improved efficiency Audio quality could be improved 27W wired and 18W wireless charging ​ Visit the Amazon Store Google Pixel 8 – Unlocked Android smartphone with advanced Pixel Camera, 24-hour battery and powerful security – Hazel, 128GB These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. A s an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy  here . Google Pixel 8 Overview What is it like to Use? The Google Pixel 8 offers a pleasant user experience with its ergonomic design. The handset feels comfortable and secure, benefiting from its rounded corners and matte-finished aluminium side frame. The Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy glass back, and aluminium frame give it a robust yet stylish appearance. Face Unlock via the selfie camera is also more secure, allowing for online and contactless payments through Google Wallet. It offers clear and loud audio, suitable for speech-related content, but lacks depth and is not ideal as a speaker substitute. Its haptics show improvements, with more robust, non-mushy vibrations compared to previous models. The Google Pixel 8 features Google’s Tensor G3 SoC, 8GB LPDDR5X RAM, and 128GB or 256GB storage options. It supports USB-C and runs on Android 14. The device features a 10.5MP front camera and a rear camera setup with a 50MP primary and a 13MP ultrawide lens. It also boasts an IP68 rating, an OLED display with 60-120Hz refresh rate, and various connectivity options, including 5G, Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3, though it lacks the Ultra-Wideband chip found in the Pixel 8 Pro. How does it Perform? The Google Pixel 8 boasts a 6.2-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+ support, and a peak brightness of 2,000 nits for HDR content. The display quality is a standout feature, with exceptional brightness, colour accuracy, and sharpness. It's considered a significant improvement over previous Pixel models, bringing it in line with top competitors in terms of display technology. Its software capabilities are limited, and there are no bezels surrounding the display. The camera system of Google Pixel 8 impresses with significant strides in AI-powered photography enhancement.The camera system of Google Pixel 8 impresses with significant strides in AI-powered photography enhancement. The main camera, equipped with a 50MP sensor, has been upgraded for 25% more light sensitivity, while the 12MP ultra-wide camera remains the same as the previous model. The selfie camera features a 10.5MP sensor. The Google Pixel 8 's AI-driven camera capabilities are notable, such as the Best Take feature, which selects optimal facial expressions from multiple shots, and the Audio Eraser in videos, which can mute unwanted background sounds. Supporting a 27W wired charging, the Google Pixel 8 is a slight increase from the previous model, leading to marginally faster charging times. While not placing the Google Pixel 8 in the league of the fastest-charging smartphones on the market, this enhancement still represents a step forward in its charging efficiency. The phone also supports 18W wireless charging, which allows for a convenient and cable-free method of recharging the device. However, it's important to note that the charging speed can vary based on factors like the charger and battery health. What's in the box? Google Pixel 8 smartphone 1 m USB-C® to USB-C® cable (USB 2.0) SIM eject tool Quick Switch adaptor Buy a Google Pixel 8 Google Pixel 8 Smartphone Price Available from Amazon £699.00 These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy  here . Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW Viser Mark brings you a Smartphone Performance Score based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer. You can view our results , shown as ViserMark Labels for every smartphone in our comprehensive database, as verified by SmartViser . Also of Interest: Smartphone Battery Performance Rankings . Google Pixel 8 Visermark Labels Battery Performance review by Viser Mark is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Efficiency Annual Energy Consumption Watch the Video Review Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels . Battery Performance What is the Google Pixel 8 Battery Performance Score? ViserMark Label showing Smartphone Battery Performance for the Google Pixel 8 The results of our testing showed the Google Pixel 8 scored 41 out of 100 as a smartphone Battery Performance score for a ViserMark Flagship/Pro ( €700 + ) smartphone. How does the Google Pixel 8 compare to other Flagship/Pro smartphones? The quest for reliable battery performance is of utmost importance. Come along with us as we assess the battery capabilities of three vital smartphones - Google Pixel 8, Xiaomi 13 , and Samsung Galaxy S23 . A chart showing the ViserMark Labels for Battery Performance comparing the Google Pixel 8 Smartphone From the chart above, this makes for an exciting and closely matched smartphone review. Let's look at our battery performance results for these smartphones. The Google Pixel 8 marks a significant shift in Google's approach, particularly regarding battery performance. It scores 41 out of 100 on the battery performance scale. With a modest increase in battery capacity to 4,575 mAh, Google promises enhanced endurance, supported by the efficiency of the new 4nm Google Tensor G3 chipset. After closely examining the Google Pixel 8 , Xiaomi 13 , and Samsung Galaxy S23 in terms of battery performance, it is evident that the Xiaomi 13 is currently ahead with a two-point lead over the Google Pixel 8 and the Samsung Galaxy S23, which share identical scores. These closely matched scores highlight a striking similarity in battery performance across these smartphones. This analysis aims to provide consumers with helpful information to help them make informed decisions when purchasing a phone. Also of Interest : Xiaomi 13 Review - So Smart and Stylish All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser. Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels. Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Performing Smartphone Battery Life How long will the Google Pixel 8 battery last? ViserMark Label showing Smartphone Battery Life for the Google Pixel 8 A smartphone's performance and battery life determine its reliability and user satisfaction. The battery performance lasts 1.5 days, or 36 hours , for the Google Pixel 8 . How does the Google Pixel 8 compare to other Flagship/Pro smartphones? The Google Pixel 8 boasts an impressive 4,575mAh battery capacity, surpassing the Samsung Galaxy S23 with 3,900mAh and the Xiaomi 13 with 4,500mAh. A chart showing the ViserMark Labels for Battery Life comparing the Google Pixel 8 Smartphone The Xiaomi 13 has a significantly longer battery life, providing a full day and 14 hours more than the other two smartphones. The Google Pixel 8 and Samsung Galaxy S23 have the same battery life rating, at 1.5 days and 36 hours each. The Google Pixel 8 , despite having a slightly higher capacity than the Xiaomi , seems not to convert that into a proportional increase in usage time. The Samsung Galaxy S23 , with the smallest battery capacity, shares the same battery life rating as the Google Pixel 8 , which might indicate more efficient power management or different testing conditions. Also of Interest : Samsung Galaxy S23 Review: - Ideal Power Pocket Smartphone All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser. Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels. Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Smartphones for Battery Life Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Google Pixel 8? ViserMark Label showing Smartphone Battery Efficiency for the Google Pixel 8 The battery efficiency for the Google Pixel 8 was 1.5 leaves out of 5 leaves. How does the Google Pixel 8 compare to other Flagship/Pro smartphones? Battery life is essential when selecting a smartphone, yet it isn't the sole consideration. Equally vital is battery efficiency, as it dictates how efficiently a phone utilises its power. To assess the efficiency performance of the Google Pixel 8 , Xiaomi 13 , and Samsung Galaxy S23 , we must determine how efficiently they use their battery capacity. A chart showing the ViserMark Labels for Battery Efficiency comparing the Google Pixel 8 Smartphone The Xiaomi 13 has a slightly better power efficiency rating of 1.5 out of 5 compared to the Google Pixel 8 and Samsung Galaxy S23 , which are rated 1 out of 5. While none of these smartphones excels in power efficiency, this slight advantage of the Xiaomi 13 could result in longer battery life and more usage time between charges. Smartphone chipsets are crafted for top performance and energy efficiency, with ongoing enhancements in resource allocation to reduce power usage. Power efficiency in mobile devices is crucial for user experience and environmental sustainability. Also of Interest: Latest Article - What to Expect from 6G We follow an independent, repeatable, and rigorous battery testing protocol . Based on comprehensive test results, we categorise smartphones into Flagship/Pro, High, Mid, and Entry tiers based on price. Also of Interest: Smartphone Reviews By Tier Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Google Pixel 8 use? ViserMark Label showing Smartphone Annual Energy Consumption for the Google Pixel 8 The Google Pixel 8 has an energy consumption of 4.1 kWh annually. How does the Google Pixel 8 compare to other Flagship/Pro smartphones? Comprehending a smartphone's yearly energy usage is as important as understanding its functionalities. In a world where sustainability plays a significant role, conscientious consumers go beyond merely considering battery life and instead examine how efficiently their smartphones consume energy over the course of a year. This analysis assessed the annual battery consumption of three popular Flagship/Pro smartphones: Google Pixel 8 , Xiaomi 13 , and Samsung Galaxy S23 . A chart showing the ViserMark Labels for Annual Energy Efficiency comparing the Google Pixel 8 Smartphone The Google Pixel 8 is expected to use 4.1kWh per annum . The Xiaomi 13 leads the pack with the most efficient energy use at 2.9 kWh per annum, followed by the Samsung Galaxy S23 with a 3.5 kWh per annum consumption. The annual energy consumption figures reveal the intricate balance between phone capabilities, user experience, and ecological responsibility. The Xiaomi 13 stands out for its minimal energy consumption, yet the industry must take action to reduce these numbers even further. Also of Interest: Latest Smartphone Reviews VERDICT: Should I buy the Google Pixel 8? The Google Pixel 8 is a formidable competitor in the smartphone market, striking a balance between premium features and a few trade-offs. Its key strengths lie in its cutting-edge AI-powered camera system, vibrant OLED display, and the assurance of robust software support spanning up to seven years. Notably, improvements in battery life and the inclusion of 18W wireless charging further enhance its appeal. Nevertheless, the absence of certain features, such as a dedicated telephoto lens, reliance on older UFS 3.1 storage, and the omission of a charger in the package, might deter some users. Additionally, while the enhanced capabilities justify the price hike, it could also be a consideration for potential buyers. The Google Pixel 8 is an excellent choice for those seeking a versatile device with powerful camera and software capabilities, as long as they are willing to overlook its minor imperfections. Also of Interest: The Google Pixel 8 is now available from Amazon. Watch the Video Review Our Google Pixel 8 smartphone battery performance video review is now a vailable. It explains the ViserMark Labels in under 5 minutes so you can decide about your next smartphone purchase. Product Features and Specification Release Date: October 2023 Display 5.93 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches Resolution: 1080 x 2400 pixels Processor Android 14 Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) Memory 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM; UFS 3.1 Protection IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Main Camera Dual Camera set up. 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS; 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF; Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take Video : 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR Front Camera 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm , Video: 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps Battery Li-Ion 4575 mAh, non-removable; 27W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min (advertised); 18W wireless Communications/Audio Loudspeaker: Yes, with stereo speakers 3.5mm jack : No Radio: No NFC: Yes Weight 187 g Colours Available Hazel, Obsidian (black), Rose Extra Insights Q: Does the Google Pixel 8 support 5G? A: Yes, it does. Q: Does the Google Pixel 8 have a headphone jack? A: No, it doesn't. Q: Does the Google Pixel 8 have wireless charging? A: Yes, it does. Q: Does the Google Pixel 8 have dual-SIM capabilities? A: Yes, it does. Single nano-SIM and eSIM. Q: What storage and RAM variants is the Google Pixel 8 available? A: 8 GB LPDDR5X RAM; 128 GB/256 GB UFS 3.1 storage Q: Does the Google Pixel 8 have stereo speakers? A: Yes, it does Q: Does the Google Pixel 8 have a microSD card slot? A: No, the Google Pixel 8 doesn't support microSD cards Q: Is the Google Pixel 8 VoLTE enabled? A: Yes, it is. Even if the device supports VoLTE, users need to have this enabled in their SIMs to work, and some networks may not have VoLTE services enabled. Visit the Amazon Store Google Pixel 8 – Unlocked Android smartphone with advanced Pixel Camera, 24-hour battery and powerful security – Hazel, 128GB These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. A s an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here . VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. Google Pixel 8 camera review. See More Reviews Background Google is a multinational American technology company specialising in Internet-related services and products. It was founded in September 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin while they were PhD students at Stanford University in California . The company has its headquarters in Mountain View, California . Google’s mission statement is "to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful" . The company offers various products and services , including search engines, online advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware . Google is one of the most widely known and used search engines on the internet today . Google has a range of smartphones called Pixel phones. The company has released several models of Pixel phones over the years , including the Pixel 6A, Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro, Pixel Fold and the Google Pixel 7a . The latest models are the Google Pixel 8 and the Pixel 8 Pro. The phones run on the Android operating system and are known for their high-quality cameras . Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Written By: Debbie Bouffler holds the Marketing and Communications Manager role at SmartViser , which is pivotal in crafting communication and marketing plans for the company. Debbie gained expertise in strategic business development and marketing across multiple enterprises before joining SmartViser. Recognised for her boundless creativity, unparalleled drive, and inspiring leadership, Debbie is fueled by challenges—especially those that amplify SmartViser's footprint in the Telecommunications sector. With a passion for continuous evolution, she relentlessly pursues avenues for growth and excellence. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn . Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, ViserMark may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Samsung Galaxy Fold6 Smartphone Review: Unfolding Excellence: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 – Innovation Meets Versatility SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro (€700+)  Flagship/Pro Ranking #9 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Available Soon Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 marks a new chapter in foldable smartphone technology, blending cutting-edge innovation with refined usability. This smartphone is designed for users who demand versatility, offering a seamless transition between a compact smartphone and a tablet-like experience. With its durable hinge mechanism, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 provides confidence in its daily use. At the same time, the improved main and cover displays ensure a top-tier viewing experience, whether you're watching videos, gaming, or multitasking. This smartphone has a 6.3-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X with a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate. It provides smooth scrolling and vibrant visuals for gaming or streaming content and is just as functional when the device is folded. It is powered by the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor and delivers exceptional performance across all applications. In addition to its robust performance, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 includes a versatile triple-camera setup a 50MP main sensor, a 12MP ultra-wide lens, and a 10MP telephoto lens, ensuring high-quality photos and videos in various conditions. The device supports 5G connectivity, wireless charging, and IP48 water resistance, including protection against solids, adding to its appeal as a premium smartphone. With its cutting-edge features, the mobile phone continues to push the boundaries of what a foldable smartphone can offer, making it a compelling choice for users who want both innovation and practicality in their mobile experience. Pros Cons Great display and quality speakers No major improvements in camera functionality Powerful and feature-rich with S Pen support Reasonable 1.5 days of Use battery life Galaxy AI A larger and wider cover screen Reliable camera set-up Longer charging time IP48 rating dust and water resistance improved to include protection against solids   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy Fold6 When it comes to battery performance, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 has been extensively tested and has received a ViserMark Battery Life rating of 1.5 days of usage or translated into 43 hours. While the overall battery performance scored 44 out of 100, it charges efficiently with a ViserMark Battery Charging Time of 1 hour and 32 minutes. The device also demonstrates a reasonable annual energy consumption of 3.3 kWh/Annum and earns a Battery Efficiency rating with 1 out of 5 leaves. These ViserMark labels suggest that the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 balances performance and power efficiency. Specification Overview  - Released Date: July 2024 Body: Unfolded : 153.5 x 32.6 mm x5.6 mm. Folded: 153.5 x 68.1 mm x 12.1 mm Weight 239g. Folded Glass front with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Unfolded with plastic front. Display : Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ with 1856 x 2160 resolution. Cover Display: 6.3 inches Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz with 968 x 2376 resolution. IP48 water rating. Operating System : Android 14, One UI 6.1.1 Chipset :   Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 , Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) with GPU Adreno 750 (1 GHz) Memory : 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n / ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct. Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. Camera : Triple set-up - Main: 50MP (wide) 10 MP (telephoto) and 12 MP (ultrawide) with LED flash, HDR, and panorama. Video 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/120/240fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10+ Front Camera:  4 MP (wide). HDR and Video 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS Battery : 4400mAh, 25W wired, 15W wireless and 4. 5W reverse wireless Colour : Silver Shadow, Pink, Navy, Crafted Black, and White Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Samsung Galaxy Fold6 Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Test Results Learn more about the Samsung Galaxy Fold6   Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy Fold6  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance  The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 has a Battery Performance Score of 44 out of 100. This score reflects its efficiency in balancing battery life, charging speed, and power consumption. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6's battery performance can be evaluated by comparing it with other Flagship/Pro devices. Here's an overview of its battery performance score. Compared to the Xiaomi 13 which has a score of 43, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and Galaxy Z Flip5 have the same scores of 44 and slightly outperform the Xiaomi 13, indicating that it offers better battery performance in everyday usage scenarios. The Flagship/Pro Tier average with a score of 40, ranks lower, suggesting that the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is more optimised for battery performance despite its complex foldable design. 2. Battery Life The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 offers a battery life of 1.5 days of use, which is consistent with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6, indicating a well-balanced power management strategy across Samsung's foldable devices. However, compared to the Xiaomi 13 , which delivers an impressive two days of battery life, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 falls slightly behind. The Flagship/Pro Tier average slightly outperforms both Samsung smartphones by a small margin, achieving 1.56 days of use. It suggests that while the Z Fold6 is efficient, it might not be the top performer in battery life compared to other smartphones in this category. In terms of hours, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 provides 43 hours of usage, surpassing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6's 38 hours. This slight edge highlights the Z Fold 6's superior battery optimisation, possibly due to its larger battery capacity and more efficient power distribution. Nevertheless, the Xiaomi 13 again takes the lead with 50 hours of use, making it the most enduring mobile phone in this comparison. The Flagship/Pro Tier average, while offering more hours than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 , still lags behind the Galaxy Z Fold6 with 40 hours of battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 demonstrates solid battery life performance, balancing longevity and practical usability. It outperforms the Galaxy Z Flip6 in this Samsung series, in terms of hours of use, but it still needs to reach the levels of the Xiaomi 13 , which is the clear leader in both days and hours of battery life. Its consistent battery life showcases its reliability for users who need a durable, foldable smartphone. However, those prioritising maximum endurance might consider alternatives like the Xiaomi 13 as an alternative. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Samsung Galaxy Fold6  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. The battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 shows interesting differences in various usage scenarios. Analysing the test results reveals how each device manages power during different activities, providing valuable insights for users who prioritise battery efficiency for specific everyday activities. Across most activities, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 exhibits higher current consumption (mA) compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 . This trend is expected due to the Galaxy Z Fold6's more extensive display system, which demands more power, especially when the device is fully unfolded. This is particularly evident in tasks like gaming and file transfers, where the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 consumes significantly more power, reflecting its demand for greater processing power and display. Camera usage also follows this trend, with the Galaxy Z Fold6 consuming slightly more power, likely due to the need to render images on a larger display. These findings suggest that the Galaxy Z Flip6 is more optimised for everyday communication, making it a more power-efficient choice for users who frequently engage in these activities. When it comes to media consumption, both smartphones exhibit similar battery consumption patterns, although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 still consumes slightly more power. This suggests that while it offers a more immersive media experience due to its larger display, it does so at the expense of higher battery usage. Overall, the Galaxy Z Flip6 is more efficient for users who prioritise battery life in everyday tasks and communication, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6  caters to those who value a larger screen and are willing to accept higher power consumption for a more versatile and expansive display experience. The comparison between the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and the Xiaomi 13 reveals notable differences in how each phone manages battery consumption across various activities. Overall, the Galaxy Z Fold6 exhibits higher power consumption in some activities due to its larger display and more demanding hardware. The performance differences are particularly evident in file transfers and camera usage. The Galaxy Z Fold6's larger screen and multitasking capabilities demand more power, leading to higher battery consumption. On the other hand, the Xiaomi 13 demonstrates better power efficiency, especially in communication and social media tasks. It consistently consumes less power during outgoing calls, MMS and media, optimising it for everyday use. The Xiaomi 13 outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 regarding battery conservation during YouTube and media player usage, likely due to its smaller, less power-hungry display. Users who value a large, versatile screen and don’t mind a higher battery drain might prefer the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 . In contrast, those who prioritise battery efficiency for daily tasks might find the Xiaomi 13 a better fit. The battery consumption analysis of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6  in comparison with the Xiaomi 13  and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 - using the Flagship/Pro Tier average as a benchmark- reveals critical insights into each smartphone's power management capabilities. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 does not consistently consume the most battery energy in all activities. While it does show higher power consumption in some tasks, such as file transfers and social media, it is not the most power-hungry in gaming and camera usage. In fact, the Xiaomi 13 shows higher battery consumption during these particular tasks, indicating that the GalaxyZ Fold6 is more efficient in these areas. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 continues to strike a balance between the Galaxy Z Fold6 and Xiaomi 13 but with a closer performance to the Flagship/Pro Tier benchmark. Its power consumption is more moderate, particularly in gaming and camera usage, where it consumes less power than the Xiaomi 13 but more than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 . This balance makes the Galaxy Z Flip6 a practical choice for users who want foldable features with relatively efficient battery usage. 4.   Battery Efficiency The 1 leaf rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 means that while it offers solid battery life and performance, it may not be the most energy-efficient option. This could be a trade-off for users who prioritise the foldable design and more significant screen display, which naturally demand more power. With a Battery Efficiency rating of 1 leaf, which places it on par with the Xiaomi 13 and the Flagship/Pro Tier average, indicates that while the Galaxy Z Fold6 is efficient, it does not stand out in energy efficiency compared to high-end smartphones. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 achieves a higher efficiency rating of 1.5 leaves, suggesting that despite its smaller battery, it is more efficient in managing power consumption. This could be due to optimised software, a smaller display, and lower power demands. While the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 offers a competitive battery efficiency in line with other flagship smartphones, it does not exceed expectations in this area. Its efficiency rating reflects the challenges of powering a large, foldable display, making it a suitable choice for users who prioritise screen size and versatility over maximum energy efficiency. However, for those looking for the most efficient mobile phone in Samsung's foldable lineup, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 may be a better option. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The annual energy consumption of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 , measured in kilowatt-hours (kWh), provides an important insight into its overall energy efficiency. Lower energy consumption indicates a more efficient device, which can be crucial for users mindful of both environmental impact and long-term energy costs. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 uses 3.3 kWh of energy annually, making it slightly more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6, which uses 3.4 kWh annually. Despite the Galaxy Z Fold6's larger and more complex dual-display setup, it remains competitive in energy efficiency. The Xiaomi 13 is the most energy-efficient mobile phone in this comparison, with an annual energy consumption of 2.9 kWh. This lower consumption rate reflects Xiaomi's effective optimisation strategies, allowing it to lead in energy efficiency among the devices compared. With its impressive energy efficiency, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 strikes a good balance in energy consumption. Despite its demanding hardware features, it maintains a lower annual rate. However, for those who prioritise the lowest possible energy consumption, the Xiaomi 13 shines. It's not just a suitable choice, it's a confident choice for users who value sustainability in their tech. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy Fold6 - what's it like to use? The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 offers a unique and versatile user experience that differentiates it from traditional smartphones. Its foldable design transforms the device from a compact phone into a tablet-sized screen, giving users an expansive display for multitasking, media consumption, and productivity. This flexibility makes it particularly appealing for users who need a phone that can adapt to different scenarios, from browsing the web and watching videos to managing multiple apps simultaneously. However, the large, foldable screen and advanced hardware have trade-offs, particularly in battery consumption. While the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 performs efficiently in gaming and camera usage tasks, it tends to consume more power during activities like file transfers and social media. This means that users who frequently engage in these tasks may notice faster battery depletion than other devices. Despite the challenges, this smartphone delivers a premium, high-tech experience. The device's seamless transition between a standard smartphone and a larger display mode is a standout feature, offering a level of versatility that is unparalleled in the market. For users who value the latest technology and a flexible, large display, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is a compelling option that enhances productivity and entertainment in a way that few other smartphones can match. Pros Cons Versatile foldable design between a compact phone and a tablet-sized display. Higher battery consumption in file transfers and social media Demonstrates better battery efficiency during gaming and camera usage making it a strong performer. Heavy and bulky design Premium user experience with a large, high-quality display and seamless transitions. The premium features and innovative design come at a high cost, Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6? The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is ideal for users who want innovation, versatility, and a premium smartphone experience. Tech Enthusiasts and Early Adopters: This smartphone is perfect for those who crave the latest in smartphone innovation. Its foldable design and advanced features offer a unique experience beyond traditional smartphones, appealing to users who enjoy exploring cutting-edge technology. Productivity-Focused Professionals and Multitaskers: Ideal for users who need a versatile phone for managing multiple tasks, the Z Fold6’s large, tablet-like display supports efficient multitasking, making it a strong choice for professionals and creatives who require a portable yet powerful tool for work and creative projects. Media Enthusiasts and Flexibility Seekers: If you consume a lot of media or value a mobile phone that can adapt to various situations, the Z Fold6 offers an immersive experience with its expansive screen. It is perfect for gaming, watching videos, or reading. Its ability to switch between a compact phone and a larger display provides unparalleled flexibility. CONCLUSION Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is best suited for users who want to stay at the forefront of smartphone innovation and need a smartphone that can serve multiple purposes in one sleek, foldable package. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and the latest test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000   Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Review: Power Meets Performance in Your Pocket Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Mid Tier Ranking #4 Video Review Watch Now! What you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G   smartphone. Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is a smartphone that offers excellent value for money and has several improvements over its predecessor, the R edmi Note 12 . It has a minimalist design and a flat, lightweight build. A MediaTek Dimensity 6080 SoC powers the phone and comes in variants with 6GB, 8GB, and 12GB of RAM, coupled with 128GB or 256GB of storage. It has a 6.67-inch Super AMOLED display with Full HD+ resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate, providing a great viewing experience even in bright sunlight. For photography, it has a 108MP primary camera, an 8MP ultra-wide camera, and a 2MP macro camera. The 108MP camera performs well in daylight, offering balanced contrast and saturation, while the 8MP ultra-wide camera maintains similar quality. The phone's 16MP front camera captures sharp images in daylight but has issues with accurate skin detection. In terms of performance, this smartphone can handle most apps smoothly, even moderately graphically intense games. It has 5G support and offers decent network speeds. The   Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has a 5,000mAh battery, providing over 1.5 days of usage on a single charge. It also supports 33W fast charging, which enables it to reach nearly full charge in just over an hour. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is a well-balanced smartphone with a good display, reliable performance, and long battery life, making it a solid choice for anyone looking for these features.  Specification Overview - Released Date: January 2024 Body : 161.1 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm or 6.39 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches. Weight 174.5g. Display : 6.67" FHD+ AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak), 1080 x 2400 resolution, 20:9 ratio, 395ppi. Protection : Corning® Gorilla® Glass 5 . IP54 dust/water rated. Operating System : Android 13, MIUI 14 Chipset : MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) Memory : 8GB RAM, 256GB RAM Connectivity : 5G; Hybrid Dual SIM; Wi-Fi 5; BT 5.3; NFC; Infrared port; 3.5mm jack Rear Camera : 108MP+8MP+2MP triple camera. 1080p@30fps Front Camera : 16MP Video:  Front camera: 1080p@30fps, Rear camera : 1080p@30fps Battery : 5000 mAh, 33W wired Colours : Graphite Black, Artic White, Ocean Teal Others: NFC: Yes. AI Face Lock: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes.   3.5 mm headphone jack. Side Fingerprint Sensor, GPS: L1, A-GPS supplementary positioning, electronic compass. Good Points ​Not So Good Points Full retail package, including a charger and case No stereo speakers IP54-rated with Gorilla® Glass 5 for protection and enhanced durability Battery life of 1.5 days of use could be improved Good overall functionality and performance Video capture only to 1080p Fast and efficient charging solution Strong performance from the main and selfie cameras ​ Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G and comparative smartphones. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review   is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G's  battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumption   Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels Battery Performance What is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Performance Score? In our comprehensive testing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 43 out of 100 . The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G scored 43 out of 100 on the ViserMark battery performance test. This score incorporates the efficiency and endurance of the smartphone's battery in a real-world context. Understanding how this score positions the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G in the Mid Tier (€200-€499) is essential. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G competes closely with smartphones like the Nothing Phone 1 and the OPPO A78 , which scored 42/100. The overall score is calculated based on battery size, day of use, and charging. This similarity in score indicates that all three phones have comparable battery performance levels, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G benefits from fast charging, giving a marginal edge. When we look in closer detail into the battery performance, the efficiency and management are slightly disappointing, but they are still well-suited for users with average smartphone usage patterns. The chart below displays three smartphones' ViserMark battery performance scores for a clearer comparison. Also of Interest : Have you missed this smartphone review? Behind the Battery Life: A Deep Dive into the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser . Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels.   Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Performing Smartphone   Battery Life How long will the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G battery last? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  test results indicate a battery life of 1.5 days, or 39 hours , on a single charge. In assessing the battery life of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , which boasts a 5000mAh battery, the smartphone delivers 1.5 days of use or approximately 39 hours on a full charge. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? Compared to similar smartphones like the Nothing Phone 1 (2 days/53 hours) and the OPPO A78 (2 days/49 hours), the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G falls slightly short. This difference can be decisive for users whose primary concern is the longest between charges. The chart below shows all three comparable smartphones. NEW BATTERY CONSUMPTION  Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the device's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. In this analysis, we compare the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G' s energy consumption with the industry's average mid-tier level across a range of everyday activities to see how it performs in terms of milliampere hours (mAh). Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by SmartViser . Reviewing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's battery consumption reveals several key insights. For those who use social media frequently, this smartphone is quite power-hungry, consuming approximately 969 mAh, which is higher than the average mid-tier smartphone's consumption of 515.40 mAh. If you tweet, like, and scroll a lot, you may need to charge your phone more often than usual. For gamers, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has excellent gaming performance but consumes more battery power than the average mid-tier phone, using 758 mAh compared to 542.37 mAh. If you are a gamer, you might want to carry a charger when you're playing to ensure your phone doesn't run out of battery. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has an average battery life of 39 hours, shorter than the Mid Tier average of 48 hours. While it is a robust device, it may not be the most efficient regarding battery life. Users who value the Xiaomi experience may find that this trade-off is worth it and embrace the phone's features, but they may need to keep an eye on their battery levels and be prepared to recharge more frequently. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G vs Nothing Phone 1 Smartphone Comparison This comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and Nothing Phone 1 examines how these two smartphones consume battery power during typical daily activities. The chart below visually represents the strengths and weaknesses of each smartphone. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by  SmartViser . When using social media, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G consumes almost twice the battery of Nothing Phone 1 . It uses 969 mAh, while Nothing Phone 1 only uses 452.33 mAh. Choosing between these two phones can make a difference for social media enthusiasts. Also, when making phone calls, this smartphone uses 785 mAh, whereas Nothing Phone 1 consumes only 464.22 mAh. The Nothing Phone 1 might be the better option. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G consumes 758 mAh for gaming, while Nothing Phone 1 only uses 376.97 mAh. If you're a gamer, you might find Xiaomi's low battery notifications interrupting your play sessions more often than the Nothing Phone 1 . Nothing Phone 1 's battery life lasts longer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G. It lasts 49 hours, while the Xiaomi smartphone only lasts 39 hours. This suggests that Nothing Phone 1 manages its resources more efficiently. In summary, Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is more power-hungry than Nothing Phone 1 . The choice between these two phones may depend on how much battery life you need to get through your day. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G vs OPPO A78 Smartphone Comparison Users often look beyond basic specifications to understand how smartphones perform in everyday scenarios. This comparison is with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G . The OPPO A78  focuses on battery consumption. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by  SmartViser . Social media enthusiasts will be pleased to know that the OPPO A78 is the clear winner here, with a much more conservative consumption of 442.95 mAh than Xiaomi's 969 mAh. Also, if you're a frequent caller, the OPPO A78 is the better choice here . However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G does ensure clear and stable connectivity, reflecting Xiaomi's commitment to maintaining communication quality. Regarding battery life, the OPPO A78 performs better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , lasting an average of 53 hours compared to Xiaomi's 39 hours. This makes the OPPO A78 a great choice for gaming enthusiasts due to its low power consumption of 528.79 mAh. However, high-quality images and videos may require more power, and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G delivers excellent performance where it matters. In conclusion, the OPPO A78 does show lower consumption when it comes to battery life. Its more conservative battery consumption across various daily activities makes it a clear winner compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G . Yet, Xiaomi offers a powerfully engaging user experience that justifies its energetic approach to battery usage. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Overall Smartphone Comparison We compare the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G battery consumption, the Nothing Phone 1 , and the OPPO A78  during various common activities, contrasting their battery consumption with the average for Flagship/Pro-tier smartphones. This comparison chart below aims to offer a clear understanding of which smartphone would be the best fit for your lifestyle and usage habits.   Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by  SmartViser . Bringing an enthusiastic approach to battery consumption, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has a robust feature set and performance capabilities. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G uses a significant 969 mAh, much higher than the Nothing Phone 1 's 452.33 mAh, OPPO A78 's 442.95 mAh, and the mid-tier average of 515.40 mAh when using social media. Yet gamers will appreciate Xiaomi's 758 mAh consumption, showcasing the ability to handle more graphically intensive games smoothly, making it a solid choice for mobile gaming enthusiasts. With an average battery life of 39 hours, the Xiaomi supports a full day of extensive use, demonstrating its capacity to handle a heavy-duty lifestyle. While the Nothing Phone 1 and OPPO A78 show lower consumption and the mid-tier average stands at 48 hours, the Xiaomi offers a powerfully engaging user experience catering to the active smartphone user who values performance even if it means a bit more fast charging. In summary, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has capabilities and delivers a user experience due to its higher battery consumption. All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser . Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels.   Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Smartphones for Battery Life Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G? The battery efficiency for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G was 1 leaf out of 5 . The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's battery efficiency is critical to its overall performance, especially when considering its 1 leaf out of 5 rating in this area. This rating offers insight into how well the device manages its 5000mAh battery in practical use. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The 1 leaf out of 5 rating indicates room for improvement in battery management. This score reflects how the smartphone utilises its battery capacity regarding hardware and software configurations. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's battery efficiency, as indicated by its 1 leaf out of 5 rating, suggests it's less efficient in power management compared to some of its close competitors. This aspect is significant for users prioritising energy efficiency and prolonged battery life. Potential buyers should weigh this factor alongside their usage habits and the phone's other features to determine if the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G meets their needs. Also of Interest : Apple iPhone 14 Plus - Bigger and Even Better on Battery Performance Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G use? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G has a moderate energy consumption of 4.2 kWh annually. The annual energy consumption of a smartphone, like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , is a metric for understanding its long-term energy efficiency and environmental impact. This smartphone records an annual energy consumption of 4.2, which is higher in the context of other similiar smartphones regarding usage and sustainability. How does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G compare to Mid Tier The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's 4.2 annual energy consumption rating is relatively high compared to the Nothing Phone 1 and the OPPO A78 , which showcased lower annual energy consumption ratings at 3.0. This difference highlights a more efficient use of power in these smartphones, possibly due to better optimisation between hardware and software or more energy-efficient components being used. The chart below shows the annual energy consumption of three comparable smartphones. Fo r users, especially those who are environmentally conscious or faced with high electricity costs, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 's higher annual energy consumption could be a concern. It indicates a need for more frequent charging, which could translate to higher electricity usage over time. Potential buyers must consider how this factor aligns with long-term usage and sustainability goals. Also of Interest:   Smartphone Ranking Table.     VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G offers a solid experience for those prioritising performance and features over battery longevity. The phone provides a smooth and responsive experience, especially in social media browsing, gaming, and multimedia. It has decent camera performance and captures high-quality images and videos, although it consumes more battery. The smartphone handles everyday tasks easily, but this comes at the cost of higher power consumption, meaning you may charge it more often than other phones. What's in the box? Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Smartphone USB-C charging and data transfer cable rated as 3A or up to 25W 33W power adapter Dark grey protective case Should I buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G? As for whether you should buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G, it depends on your priorities. If you're looking for a smartphone that delivers strong performance and has a range of features for a comprehensive smartphone experience, and you don't mind charging it more frequently, then the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is a great choice. However, suppose battery life is a major concern for you, and you prefer a phone that can last longer between charges. In that case, you might explore other options like the Nothing Phone 1 or the OPPO A78 , which offer better battery efficiency. The decision ultimately hinges on what you value more in your daily smartphone use.   Extra Insights Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G support 5G? Yes, it does Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G have dual-SIM capabilities? Yes, it does Q: What storage and RAM variants are available for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G? 8GB RAM + 256GB Storage, 12GB RAM + 256GB Storage Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G have stereo speakers? No, it does not. It has a single, bottom-firing speaker, which is different from the other models in the Redmi Note 13 series. Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G have a microSD card slot? No, it does not Q: Is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G VoLTE enabled? Yes, it is. Even if the device supports VoLTE users need to have this enabled in their SIMs to work and some networks may not have VoLTE services enabled. Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G support wireless charging? No, it does not Q: Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G have a headphone jack? Yes, it does VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Xiaomi   was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes in high quality. Technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. It is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint worldwide to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China, and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil.   Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing!   If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer  looking to improve your smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn . Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .