Search Results

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Motorola Moto G34 Smartphone Review: The Affordable Motorola Moto G34 - Perfect for Everyday Communication SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199)  Entry Tier Ranking # 11 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Quick Summary The Motorola Moto G34 stands out as a budget-friendly smartphone tailored for communication-centric users. With efficient battery management for tasks like outgoing calls, MMS, and SMS, it ensures you stay connected throughout the day without frequent recharges. Offering up to 53 hours of battery life, the Moto G34 handles essential tasks such as browsing, emailing, and light multimedia consumption with ease. While it may not be the top choice for heavy multimedia and gaming enthusiasts, this smartphone's balanced performance and affordability make it a compelling option for students, retirees, and budget-conscious users. Its strong value proposition and dependable performance in the Entry Tier (€0-€199) invite users to explore more about this reliable and practical smartphone. Pros Cons Good design with a matte finish and a vegan leather back Slow charging Excellent battery life - 2 days of use Camera lacking in some features Affordable mobile phone IP52 rating     ViserMark Labels Specification Overview  - Released Date: December 2023 Body: 162.7 x 74.6 x 8 mm , weight 179g Display : LCD IPS 6.5 inch screen, 120Hz with 720 x 1600 pixels, IP52 rating water-repellent and Nano-SIM, eSIM or Dual SIM Operating System : Android 14 Chipset :   Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm), Memory : 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n. Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes Camera : Dual set-up - Main: 50 MP (wide) and 2 MP (macro) with LED flash, HDR. Video1080p@30fps Front Camera: 14 MP (wide). Video 1080p@30fps Battery : 5000 mAh, 18W wired Colour : Charcoal Black, Ice Blue, Ocean Green, Vanilla Cream Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Motorola Moto G34 Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer .   VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Motorola Moto G34 and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Motorola Moto G34 Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW We put the Motorola Moto G34 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Motorola Moto G34 performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance ViserMark can identify smartphones' strengths and weaknesses by comparing battery performance across similar mobile phones. This score reflects the battery's overall performance based on various metrics such as battery life, charging speed, power efficiency, and real-world usage. Here's the Battery Performance score for the Motorola Moto G34 The graph below illustrates the battery performance scores of the Motorola Moto G34  compared to other popular smartphones, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C and the Samsung Galaxy A15. These smartphones have been selected based on price (€0-€199) and have comparable battery performance, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C scored 52, and the Samsung Galaxy A15 scored 49. The Motorola Moto G34 scored 43 out of 100, almost on par with the Entry Tier average score of 44, collated from all tested smartphones within the Entry Tier. In summary, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C leads with superior battery performance, making it the best option for users prioritising battery reliability and longevity. The Samsung Galaxy A15 also offers strong battery performance, suitable for users seeking a balanced and dependable battery experience. The Motorola Moto G34, while adequate, may not provide the same level of efficiency and longevity, positioning it slightly below the average in the Entry Tier segment. This detailed comparison helps users make informed decisions based on their specific battery performance needs. 2. Battery Life Battery life remains one of the most important considerations for smartphone users. Often referred to as battery autonomy, it is trying to keep pace with smartphone improvements, such as higher-resolution displays and quality cameras. Let's see the Motorola Moto G34 test results. The charts visualise the battery life performance of the Motorola Moto G34, Samsung Galaxy A15, and Xiaomi Redmi 13C compared against the Entry Tier average. When examining the battery life in terms of days of use, both the Motorola Moto G34 and Samsung Galaxy A15 deliver a consistent performance of 2 days, aligning with the Entry Tier average. However, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C stands out significantly by offering 2.5 days of use, which is a notable increase and highlights its superior battery management and longevity. This extended battery life makes the Redmi 13C particularly appealing for users who need their phones to last longer between charges. In terms of hours of use, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C continues to lead with an impressive 57 hours of battery life. This is substantially higher than the Motorola Moto G34, which provides 53 hours, and the Samsung Galaxy A15, which offers 52 hours. Both are slightly above the entry tier average of 51 hours, indicating they still perform well within the Entry Tier. The additional hours provided by the Redmi 13C can be crucial for users engaged in prolonged activities like gaming, streaming, or extensive communication. The Motorola Moto G34 , while delivering solid performance, slightly lags behind the Xiaomi model but still offers respectable battery life, ensuring it remains competitive in the Entry Tier market. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C emerges as the top performer of battery autonomy, both in days and hours of use, setting a high standard for Entry Tier smartphones. The Samsung Galaxy A15 and Motorola Moto G34, while performing adequately and meeting the Entry Tier expectations, do not match the exceptional battery life of the Redmi 13C. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Motorola Moto G34  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. Below is a graph that provides a detailed analysis of the battery consumption for the Motorola Moto G34 (dark blue). It has been compared with the Xiaomi Redmi 13C (light blue), another popular Entry Tier smartphone as a comparison. Each activity's battery consumption is measured in mAh, with lower consumption indicating better efficiency. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C generally shows superior battery management across most activities, particularly in social media usage, gaming, and multimedia tasks. Its efficient power consumption in these areas aligns with its higher overall battery performance score and extended battery life. On the other hand, the Motorola Moto G34 , while consuming more battery in specific areas, performs efficiently in communication tasks like outgoing calls and MMS. This detailed consumption breakdown indicates that the Redmi 13C is better suited for heavy media and social media users, whereas the Motorola Moto G34 offers reliable performance for communication-centric users. The next graph compares the battery consumption of the Motorola Moto G34 (dark blue) and the Samsung Galaxy A15 (orange). Although classed as a Mid Tier (€200-€499) smartphone, the Samsung Galaxy A15 price has been reduced, making it a strong contender to the Motorola Moto G34 on battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy A15 generally exhibits better battery efficiency in social media, gaming, and multimedia tasks, which aligns with its higher overall battery performance score. This efficiency means that the Galaxy A15 can handle intensive usage without depleting the battery quickly, making it ideal for users with heavy multimedia and social media usage. Meanwhile, the Motorola Moto G34 shows strengths in communication-related tasks, consuming less battery for outgoing calls and MMS. This makes it a reliable option for users prioritising calling and messaging over other activities. In conclusion, while the Samsung Galaxy A15 offers better battery efficiency in several key areas, the Motorola Moto G34 performs efficiently in communication tasks. Users who engage more in social media, gaming, and multimedia would benefit from the Samsung Galaxy A15's optimised power management. People who primarily use their phones for communication might find the Motorola Moto G34 more aligned with their needs. Finally, the last graph compares the overall battery efficiency of the Motorola Moto G34, the Samsung Galaxy A15, and the Xiaomi Redmi 13C enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns.   Also, the Entry Tier average has been included as a set benchmark that most smartphones strive to meet. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C offers the best overall battery efficiency and low energy consumption, suitable for heavy and varied usage. The Samsung Galaxy A15 offers optimised performance for multimedia tasks, making it ideal for entertainment-focused users. The Motorola Moto G34 is well-suited for communication efficiency, catering well to users who prioritise calling and messaging, providing a balanced yet specific approach to battery management. 4.   Battery Efficiency Battery efficiency refers to a smartphone's ability to maximise its battery capacity, allowing the device to run longer on a single charge. A battery-efficient phone consumes minimal power during regular usage, maximising the time between charges. The chart provides an insightful comparison of battery efficiency among the Motorola Moto G34 , Samsung Galaxy A15, Xiaomi Redmi 13C, and the Entry Tier average. All three smartphones achieve a battery efficiency score of 1.5. This performance significantly surpasses the Entry Tier average of 1.36, indicating that these manage power consumption more effectively than their average devices in the Entry Tier. This efficiency translates into practical benefits, such as a reduced need for frequent charging and potentially longer battery lifespan, which are crucial for users seeking dependable performance from their smartphones. Also, the uniform high-efficiency score is a testament to the advanced power management capabilities of these Entry Tier smartphones. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The Xiaomi Redmi 13C stands out as the most energy-efficient phone with an annual energy consumption of 2.9 kWh. This figure is lower than both the Motorola Moto G34 and the Samsung Galaxy A15, each consuming 3.1 kWh annually, and significantly better than the Entry Tier average of 3.2 kWh. The lower energy consumption of the Redmi 13C translates into reduced electricity costs over the phone's lifespan, making it an economically attractive option for budget-conscious users. The Motorola Moto G34  and Samsung Galaxy A15 also demonstrate commendable efficiency, outperforming the Entry Tier average and providing users with reliable and economical options. VISERMARK VERDICT Motorola Moto G34 - what's it like to use? The Motorola Moto G34 offers a reliable performance with commendable strengths in communication tasks such as outgoing calls, MMS, and SMS. Its efficient battery management in these areas makes it a strong contender for users who want to stay connected through voice and text. However, the Moto G34 falls short in multimedia and gaming activities, where it demonstrates higher battery consumption compared to the Xiaomi Redmi 13C and Samsung Galaxy A15. Despite this, it provides a decent battery life of up to 53 hours, which is slightly above the Entry Tier average, ensuring that users can rely on it for two days of use for regular daily activities. In terms of overall battery performance, the Motorola Moto G34 scores slightly below the Entry Tier average, indicating room for improvement in power management, especially during high-demand tasks like gaming and video streaming. Nevertheless, its consistent performance in communication-related tasks and a manageable charging time of 2 hours 58 minutes make it a practical choice for users whose primary needs involve frequent calling and messaging. While it may not be the top performer in multimedia efficiency, the Moto G34's strengths in other areas provide a balanced and functional smartphone experience suitable for everyday use. Pros Cons Efficient battery consumption for outgoing calls, MMS, and SMS Higher battery consumption for social media, gaming, and multimedia tasks Above-average battery life with up to 53 hours of use Lower overall battery performance score compared to competitors Reliable performance for communication-centric users Not the best choice for heavy multimedia and gaming users Manageable charging time of approximately 2 hours 58 minutes. Who should buy the Motorola Moto G34? 1. Communication-Centric Users The Motorola Moto G34 excels in battery efficiency for communication tasks such as outgoing calls, MMS, and SMS. This makes it ideal for professionals, business users, or anyone who relies heavily on voice calls and text messaging. Its optimised power consumption ensures users can stay connected throughout the day without frequent recharges, crucial for those often on the go or in situations where charging facilities are not readily available. 2. Moderate Usage Individuals For users with moderate usage patterns, covering essential tasks like browsing, emailing, and light multimedia consumption, the Motorola Moto G34 provides balanced performance and a battery life of up to 53 hours, slightly above the Entry Tier average. 3. Budget-Conscious Consumers The Motorola Moto G34 is an affordable Entry Tier smartphone that delivers reliable performance. Budget-conscious users will find it compelling for its essential features and battery efficiency without a premium price tag, making it practical for students, retirees, or anyone looking to maximise value for money. CONCLUSION This smartphone is perfect for users who need to communicate and are looking for a reliable, budget-friendly smartphone for everyday use. Its efficient battery management, overall performance, and affordability make it a strong contender in the entry-tier segment. Though not ideal for heavy multimedia and gaming, the Motorola Moto G34 delivers solid value and dependable performance for its target users. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Motorola  is a well-established and innovative technology company known for its contributions to the telecommunications industry. Founded in 1928, Motorola has a rich history of pioneering achievements, including the development of the first handheld mobile phone. Today, the company continues to produce a wide range of consumer electronics, with a focus on smartphones that offer reliable performance, innovative features, and value for money. Motorola's smartphones are known for their durability, user-friendly interfaces, and strong battery life, making them a popular choice for consumers worldwide. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life and performance reviews and all the latest test results.

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4500 Honor 200 Lite Smartphone Review: Honor 200 Lite: Power-Efficient Performance in a Sleek Package SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid (€200-€499)  Entry Tier Ranking # 4 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Quick Summary Earlier this year, Honor introduced the Honor 200 series, featuring the premium Honor 200 Pro , the standard Honor 200 , and the budget-friendly Honor 200 Lite . ViserMark has conducted an in-depth analysis of the Honor 200 Lite , revealing intriguing battery test results and comparisons with other Mid Tier smartphones. The Honor 200 Lite combines sleek design with power-efficient performance, making it an excellent choice for budget-conscious users. With a vibrant 6.7-inch AMOLED display, advanced Mediatek Dimensity 6080 chipset, and an impressive camera setup featuring a 108MP main sensor, this smartphone delivers exceptional value. Its standout feature is its 2 days of use battery life, with an annual energy consumption of just 2.9 kWh, ensuring long-lasting usage across various tasks. Despite slightly higher power consumption for social media and calls, the Honor 200 Lite excels in overall functionality, making it a compelling Mid Tier option. Pros Cons Light-weight and has a thin, drop-resistant design 90Hz refresh rate Excellent battery life - 2 days of use No micro-slot or 3.5mm Jack Affordable mobile phone No charger in the box Good camera set-up Bright AMOLED display     ViserMark Labels for the Honor 200 Lite Based on the ViserMark test results provided for the Honor 200 Lite , here’s a detailed breakdown of the battery performance translated into ViserMark Labels. The Honor 200 Lite  showcases an impressive battery life, lasting over two days on a single charge, making it an excellent choice for users seeking long-lasting performance. It balances convenience and battery longevity with a reasonable charging time of just over two hours. However, its overall battery performance score is average, indicating potential areas for improvement in power management and efficiency. Despite this, this smartphone maintains a good annual energy consumption, making it energy-efficient. The Honor 200 Lite is a strong contender for those prioritising battery life, offering durability and reliability for everyday use. Specification Overview  - Released Date: April 2024 Body: 161.5 x 74.5 x 6.7 mm, weight 166g Display : AMOLED 6.7 inch screen, 90Hz with 1080 x 2412 pixels, IP52 rating water-repellent and Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) Operating System : Android 14 and MagicOS 8 Chipset :   Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm), Octa-core processor Memory : 256GB 8GB RAM Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n / ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct . Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: No Camera : Triple set-up - Main: 108MP (wide) 5 MP (ultra-wide) and 2 MP (macro) with LED flash, HDR. Video1080p@30fps Front Camera:  50 MP (wide). LED Flash and Video 1080p@30fps Battery : 4500 mAh, 35W wired Colour : Starry Blue, Cyan Lake, Black   Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Honor 200 Lite Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Test Results Learn more about the Honor 200 Lite Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing!   Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Honor 200 Lite  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Honor 200 Lite  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance Here's the Battery Performance score for the Honor 200 Lite. The Honor 200 Lite is a strong performer in the Mid Tier smartphone category, especially regarding battery performance. This places it on par with the Realme Narzo 50 , which scored 46 and was released in March 2022. Despite being an older model, the Realme Narzo 50 remains competitive, showing that it still holds up well in terms of battery efficiency. The Samsung Galaxy A55 slightly outperforms both with a score of 47. Compared to the average battery performance score of 45 for Mid Tier smartphones, the Honor 200 Lite  and its competitors slightly surpass this benchmark, indicating that these devices are optimised better than the average smartphone in their category. 2. Battery Life Let's see the Honor 200 Lite test results. As shown in the battery life comparison charts, the Honor 200 Lite provides an impressive 51 hours of usage, translating into 2 Days of Usage. This performance is superior to the Samsung Galaxy A55 , which offers 49 hours (approximately 2 days), and the Realme Narzo 50 , which delivers 45 hours (approximately 2 days). This extended battery life makes the Honor 200 Lite an ideal choice for users who need a dependable device for long periods without frequent recharging. Remarkably, the Honor 200 Lite achieves this with a 4500mAh battery, while its competitors, the Samsung Galaxy A55 and Realme Narzo 50 , feature larger 5000mAh batteries. This efficiency highlights the superior optimisation and power management of the Honor 200 Lite , enabling it to outperform other smartphones with greater battery capacities. Compared to the average battery consumption for Mid Tier smartphones, which stands at 47 hours or about 1.84 days, the Honor 200 Lite surpasses this benchmark. This robust battery performance ensures that users can comfortably rely on the Honor 200 Lite for extended daily use, making it a standout option in its price range for those who prioritise battery longevity. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Honor 200 Lite  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. The detailed battery consumption comparison between the Honor 200 Lite and the Realme Narzo 50, as depicted in the graph, reveals how each phone manages power across various daily tasks. Despite being released two years prior, the Realme Narzo 50 demonstrates competitive battery performance, but the Honor 200 Lite stands out in specific areas, showcasing superior efficiency. The Honor 200 Lite consumes significantly more power for social media and outgoing calls compared to the Realme Narzo 50. This indicates that these activities are more power-intensive on the Honor 200 Lite. In tasks such as MMS and email, the Honor 200 Lite uses less power than the Realme Narzo 50 . The combination of Android 14 and MagicOS 8 ensures optimised background task management, reducing unnecessary power drain during these activities. Also, the Honor 200 Lite handles power-intensive tasks like gaming and YouTube streaming with slightly better efficiency than the Narzo 50, despite only having a 90Hz refresh rate. Lastly, the Honor 200 Lite demonstrates lower power consumption during camera use and media playback. Its advanced camera setup, including a 108MP primary sensor, a 50MP front camera, and Smart AI image processing, supports this efficiency. Overall, the Realme Narzo 50 was ahead when it was released, offering a solid battery, a 120Hz display, and decent gaming performance. However, it lacks 5G support and stereo speakers, features that are becoming increasingly standard in newer models like the Honor 200 Lite. The advancements in the Honor 200 Lite , such as a more efficient chipset, improved display technology, and enhanced power management, illustrate the rapid pace of innovation in the smartphone industry. These improvements ensure that users get better performance, longer battery life, and a more seamless experience, making the Honor 200 Lite a notable example of the progress made in smartphone technology. Despite the Samsung Galaxy A55 ’s larger 5000mAh battery, the Honor 200 Lite , with its smaller 4500mAh battery, demonstrates competitive battery consumption across various tasks. Let's look into the specifics of each device and the findings from the ViserMark battery consumption test results. The Honor 200 Lite demonstrates superior power efficiency across various daily tasks compared to the Samsung Galaxy A55 . In social media and web browsing activities, the Honor 200 Lite shows lower current consumption, highlighting its better power management. Its 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate and the Mediatek Dimensity 6080 chipset support this efficiency, ensuring prolonged battery life and smooth performance. For more power-intensive tasks like gaming and streaming YouTube videos, the Galaxy A55's power consumption is higher. This is due to its 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and HDR10+ support, which, while delivering superior visuals, also demands more power. The Honor 200 Lite , with its efficient hardware and software integration, maintains superior power management during these high-demand tasks, making it a more power-efficient choice. Outperforming the Samsung Galaxy A55 in camera use and media playback, the Honor 200 Lite consumes less power during these activities. Its advanced camera setup, including a 108MP primary sensor, a 50MP front camera, and Smart AI image processing, contributes to this efficiency. Overall, the Honor 200 Lite boasts advanced power management and efficient specifications. These technological advancements reflect the rapid pace of innovation in smartphone technology, promising users better performance, longer battery life, and a seamless experience. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy A55   offers robust hardware and a superior display, making it a compelling choice for users seeking high performance. However, it does come with higher power consumption in specific tasks. The ViserMark battery consumption comparison provides an in-depth look at how the Honor 200 Lite performs relative to the Realme Narzo 50, the Samsung Galaxy A55, and the average Mid Tier smartphone. The Honor 200 Lite demonstrates a balanced power efficiency across various tasks compared to the Realme Narzo 50 and Samsung Galaxy A55 . Despite having a smaller 4500mAh battery, the Honor 200 Lite consumes less power for MMS, gaming, file transfer, media playback, SMS, email, and web browsing. This efficiency is attributed to its optimised hardware and software integration. In contrast, the Realme Narzo 50 , with its larger 5000mAh battery, consumes more power in most tasks except for social media and outgoing calls, which is more efficient than the Honor 200 Lite . The Samsung Galaxy A55, while showcasing advanced features like a 120Hz Super AMOLED display and a high-performance Exynos 1480 chipset, has the highest power consumption in several areas, especially in social media and outgoing calls. However, it performs better in camera use than the Honor 200 Lite. Finally, in most daily tasks, the Honor 200 Lite stands out for its superior power efficiency. When compared to the Realme Narzo 50 and Samsung Galaxy A55 , both of which exhibit higher power consumption in several tasks, it is evident that the Honor 200 Lite offers a better balance of performance and efficiency for everyday use. 4.   Battery Efficiency When comparing battery performance among Mid Tier smartphones, the Honor 200 Lite , Realme Narzo 50, and Samsung Galaxy A55 reveal significant differences in efficiency and power management. Here are the test results for the Honor 200 Lite. The Honor 200 Lite stands out with an efficiency rating of 1.50 leaves, surpassing both the Realme Narzo 50 and the Samsung Galaxy A55 , each with a rating of 1.00 leaves. The average Mid Tier smartphone has an efficiency rating of 1.11 leaves, indicating that the Honor 200 Lite is well above the average in terms of battery performance. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The Honor 200 Lite stands out with the lowest annual energy consumption at 2.9 kWh, making it the most energy-efficient device among the compared smartphones. This lower energy consumption is a testament to the Honor 200 Lite 's enhanced power management and efficient hardware and software integration. In contrast, both the Realme Narzo 50 and the Samsung Galaxy A55 have an annual energy consumption of 3.3 kWh. While they are slightly better than the average Mid Tier smartphone consumption of 3.5 kWh, they still consume more energy annually compared to the Honor 200 Lite . This indicates that while both devices offer competitive features and performance, they do so at the cost of higher energy usage. The Samsung Galaxy A55 , with its advanced features, demands more power, contributing to its higher annual consumption. Similarly, the Realme Narzo 50 , despite its larger 5000mAh battery, does not manage energy as efficiently as the Honor 200 Lite. The Honor 200 Lite excels in annual energy consumption, making it the most energy-efficient choice among the Mid Tier smartphones. Its power management ensures that users benefit from lower energy usage, translating to potentially lower costs and a more environmentally friendly device. ViserMark VERDICT Honor 200 Lite - what's it like to use? This smartphone delivers a well-rounded user experience, balancing performance, efficiency, and functionality. Despite its smaller 4500mAh battery, the Honor 200 Lite excels in power management, providing impressive 2-day battery life across various tasks. Whether browsing social media, streaming videos on YouTube, or engaging in multimedia activities, the Honor 200 Lite handles these tasks quickly and reliably. The Honor 200 Lite demonstrates lower power consumption for tasks like MMS, gaming, file transfers, and media playback than its competitors. For instance, gaming and video playback consume less power, ensuring users enjoy prolonged sessions without worrying about battery drain. Its camera setup, featuring a 108MP primary sensor and a 50MP front camera, also provides high-quality photos and videos. The phone's sleek design and lightweight build make it comfortable to hold and use for extended periods. Furthermore, its impressive annual energy consumption of just 2.9 kWh highlights its efficiency and sustainability, appealing to eco-conscious users. Pros Cons Lower power consumption for MMS, gaming, file transfers, and media playback. Consumes more power for social media and outgoing calls Excellent battery life - 2 days or 51 hours 90Hz refresh rate is lower than some competitors High-quality display Slower than average charging time Good camera performance Who should buy the Honor 200 Lite? The Honor 200 Lite is an excellent choice for a variety of users, especially those who want battery efficiency, display quality, and camera performance. Eco-Conscious Users: With the lowest annual energy consumption at just 2.9 kWh among its competitors, the Honor 200 Lite appeals to users who are mindful of their environmental impact and prefer energy-efficient devices. Photography Enthusiasts: The high-quality 108MP primary camera and 50MP front camera make the Honor 200 Lite an excellent option for those who love taking photos and videos. Advanced image processing and camera software ensure crisp, vibrant images are produced every time. Heavy Multimedia Users: Suppose you frequently watch videos, play games, or listen to music on your phone. In that case, the Honor 200 Lite’s efficient power management for media playback and gaming will ensure you can enjoy these activities longer without worrying about battery drain. Budget-Conscious Buyers: For budget-conscious buyers, the Honor 200 Lite is a smart investment in the €200-€499 price range. It offers a compelling combination of performance, battery life, and advanced features, delivering excellent value for money. CONCLUSION As a well-rounded Mid Tier smartphone, the Honor 200 Lite excels in battery efficiency, camera performance, and overall functionality. It offers efficient performance making it a compelling choice for anyone seeking a reliable, feature-rich smartphone with exceptional value. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background Established in 2013, HONOR is a leading global provider of smart devices, committed to becoming an iconic tech brand that enables a smart life for all people, across all scenarios and channels. With over 13,000 employees, more than 60% of whom are dedicated to research and development, HONOR focuses on innovation, quality, and service. The brand's extensive R&D capabilities and forward-looking technology empower people worldwide to achieve more. HONOR's impressive portfolio of innovative products and a vast retail presence with over 45,000 stores support more than 200 million active devices, creating a new intelligent world for everyone. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and the latest test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

"When every millisecond counts, having the right device can mean the difference between victory and defeat." The gaming landscape is evolving, and so are the devices we use to play. Whether engaging in high-stakes games like Fortnite or PUBG or exploring expansive open-world games like Genshin Impact , your smartphone's performance, battery life, and display quality are essential for an immersive experience. In this article, ViserMark explores the best gaming smartphones of 2024 that have been tested to date, breaking down their key features and helping you find the perfect match for your gaming needs. ViserMark's Top Picks for Best Smartphones for Gaming SAMSUNG GALAXY S24 ULTRA - (Flagship/Pro €700 +) The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and is supported by a high-end GPU known for excellent gaming performance. It supports advanced graphics rendering techniques, higher frame rates, and better power efficiency. Also, it can handle demanding games with high graphics settings smoothly and hardware-accelerated ray tracing, enhancing realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games. Its 6.8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display ensures vibrant colours, deep blacks, and excellent contrast, offering an immersive visual experience. Also, it has incredibly sharp and detailed visuals.are delivered by the QHD+ (1440 x 3200 pixels) resolution. QHD+ resolution and a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate ensure stunning visuals and smooth gameplay. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra also benefits from advanced gaming features, such as Samsung’s Game Booster , which optimises performance by managing system resources, HDR10+ support and an enhanced cooling system to maintain performance during extended gaming sessions. Read the Full Review >> GOOGLE PIXEL 8 PRO - (Flagship/Pro €700 +) The Google Pixel 8 Pro features a powerful Google Tensor G3 chipset that delivers seamless gaming performance. It also has a powerful GPU and offers robust gaming performance, supporting high graphics settings and smooth gameplay. It is capable of running most modern mobile games efficiently but may not match the highest performance tiers of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. The QHD+ (1344 x 2992 pixels) resolution further enhances the gaming experience with sharp and detailed visuals. The 6.7-inch OLED Super Actua display provides rich colours, deep blacks, and high contrast, making games look vibrant and lifelike. The 120Hz refresh rate enhances smooth animations and gameplay making it ideal for gamers. It's worth noting that Google's AI optimisations, including the advanced thermal management system, prevent overheating and maintain optimal performance enhancing gaming performance and graphics. Read the Full Review >> Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Google Pixel 8 Pro provide exceptional gaming experiences with their high-end specifications, efficient battery consumption, and fast charging capabilities. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a slight advantage in battery efficiency, gaming time, charging speed, and GPU performance, making it the better choice for gamers who prioritise these aspects. However, the Google Pixel 8 Pro still excels with its high-quality display and solid gaming performance, Still, its higher battery drain rate and slower charging speed make it slightly less optimal for extended gaming sessions than the S24 Ultra. For gamers prioritising the absolute best in graphics performance and efficient power management, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the better choice. The Google Pixel 8 Pro remains a strong contender with its excellent display and gaming capabilities but falls slightly behind in battery efficiency and charging speed. GOOGLE PIXEL 8a - (High Tier €500-€699) The Google Pixel 8a offers a good balance of performance and price. It features a Google Tensor G3 chipset and GPU designed for Mid to High Tier phones. It supports advanced graphics rendering and should handle most modern mobile games well. Its 6.1-inch OLED HDR display, with a 1080 x 2440 pixels resolution, provides vibrant colours, deep blacks, and good contrast. A 90Hz refresh rate provides a smooth display, ideal for gaming. Also, it may need more advanced gaming optimisations found in flagship devices and can't match the high-end graphics performance and display quality of the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE. Read the Full Review >> SAMSUNG GALAXY S23 FE - (High Tier €500-€699) The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is a solid option for gamers on a budget. It offers reliable performance with a balanced chipset found in Flagship Tier smartphones, superior graphics performance, higher frame rates, and better support for advanced graphics features. The 6.4-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X, display offers excellent colour accuracy, high brightness, and deep contrast. A 120Hz refresh rate provides an even smoother gaming experience but at the cost of higher power consumption. The S23 FE benefits from Samsung's Game Booster and other gaming features, which optimise performance and graphics rendering during gameplay. Read the Full Review >> Google Pixel 8a offers better battery performance and efficiency for gaming, providing longer gaming sessions on a single charge. Its efficient power management makes it a more reliable option for extended gaming without frequent recharging. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE offers a higher refresh rate and a more powerful processor, which can enhance the gaming experience with smoother graphics and faster performance. However, this comes at the cost of higher power consumption and shorter gaming duration per charge. For gamers prioritising longer battery life and efficient power usage, the Google Pixel 8a is the better choice. For those who value higher refresh rates and more powerful performance, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE might be more appealing despite its shorter battery life. HONOR 200 LITE - (Mid Tier €200-€499) The Honor 200 Lite provides good performance for gaming and everyday use. It features the MediaTek Dimensity 6080 processor, which provides a decent gaming experience for Mid Tier phones. The 90Hz display ensures smooth visuals, enhancing the gaming experience and the 6.7-inch AMOLED display with 1080 x 2412 resolution offers a respectable visual experience. It shows a slightly higher battery drain during gaming than the OPPO A78 5G, but it is still within acceptable limits for Mid Tier smartphones. Read the Full Review >> OPPO A78 5G - (Mid Tier €200-€499) The OPPO A78 5G is a great option for budget-conscious gamers. Like the Honor 200 Lite, it features the lower-end Mediatek Dimensity 700 processor. Even with a slightly lower resolution display of 720 x 1612 pixels, the OPPO A78 performs surprising ly well in gaming and is below the Mid Tier smartphone average for battery consumption during gaming. The 6.5-inch HD+ display provides a satisfactory visual experience. The battery consumption during gaming shows a marginally better battery efficiency, likely due to the lower resolution display. Also, faster charging capabilities provide a more seamless and less interrupted gaming experience. Read the Full Revie w >> The Honor 200 Lite and OPPO A78 5G offer competitive gaming performance in the Mid Tier market, powered by MediaTek Dimensity processors. The Honor 200 Lite has a larger 5000mAh battery, ensuring extended gaming sessions and has a slight edge in battery efficiency. Still, the OPPO A78 5G despite the smaller 4500mAh battery has faster charging times. Honor 200 Lite  has an advantage when it comes to gaming graphics due to its higher resolution display (FHD+). This will result in more precise and detailed visuals during gaming, enhancing the overall gaming experience. The OPPO A78 5G, with its lower resolution (HD+), will not provide the same level of detail. However, due to the lower pixel load on the GPU, it may benefit from reduced power consumption and potentially smoother performance. For users prioritising battery life and quick recharging, the OPPO A78 5G may be the better choice. However, the Honor 200 Lite also provides a robust gaming experience with its high-resolution display, making it a strong contender in this category. However, both smartphones are well-suited for gaming and the differences are not drastic enough to severely impact casual gaming. MOTOROLA MOTO G24 - (Entry Tier €0-€199) The Motorola Moto G24 is a solid entry-level gaming phone with a Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 chipset for casual gaming and everyday tasks. Its 6.5-inch LCD display offers a decent visual experience with a 720 x 1612 pixels resolution. The battery performance is rated the highest at 55/100, with efficient battery consumption during gaming. It offers a longer battery life of 61 hours, slightly higher than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C's 57 hours. The Motorola Moto G24 has a higher battery consumption rate during gaming. Users may need to manage their gaming sessions or have a charger handy for longer playtimes. However, the extended battery life provides more flexibility for daily use. Read the Full Review >> XIAOMI REDMI 13C - (Entry Tier €0-€199) The Xiaomi Redmi 13C provides excellent value for entry-level gamers. It also features a MediaTek Helio G85 chipset that handles casual gaming and daily tasks efficiently. The larger 6.7-inch LCD display offers a satisfactory visual experience. It demonstrates better battery consumption efficiency during gaming compared to the Motorola Moto G24. This suggests that the Xiaomi device may last longer during gaming sessions, which benefits gamers who prefer extended play without interruptions. The lower battery consumption during gaming makes the Xiaomi Redmi 13C more suitable for extended gaming sessions. Its higher battery efficiency also ensures that users get more gaming time from each charge, making it a more attractive option for gamers. Read the Full Review >> Both the Motorola Moto G24 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C are excellent choices for Entry Tier gaming smartphones, with strong battery performance. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C holds a slight advantage in battery efficiency and overall gaming time, making it a marginally better choice for extended gaming sessions. However, the Motorola Moto G24 provides a robust battery life and fast charging capabilities, ensuring a reliable gaming experience. For users looking for the best gaming performance within this budget, there may be better choices than the 90Hz refresh rate for high-end gaming. However, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C might be the preferable option due to its slight edge in battery efficiency. However, both phones will serve gamers well with their competitive specs and gaming features. Key Highlights and Insights This analysis evaluates the smartphone gaming performance and battery consumption across different price tiers: Entry, Mid, High, and Flagship. High-End Graphics Performance: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra  offers superior graphics performance with its Adreno 740 GPU, which supports advanced features like hardware-accelerated ray tracing. This makes it the best choice for gamers prioritising high-end graphics and smooth gameplay. Balanced Performance and Efficiency: The Google Pixel 8a  in the High Tier category perfectly balances performance and battery efficiency. Its Google Tensor G3 processor provides a robust gaming experience, making it an excellent option for extended gaming sessions. Entry-Tier Efficiency: The Xiaomi Redmi 13C  demonstrates that Entry Tier smartphones can offer good gaming performance with efficient power consumption. Its longer gaming sessions make it a compelling choice for budget gamers, highlighting the advancements in Entry Tier smartphone technology. Impact of Display Quality on Gaming Experience: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra  and Google Pixel 8 Pro  both feature QHD+ displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, enhancing the gaming experience with smooth and vibrant visuals. This underscores the importance of display quality in delivering an immersive gaming experience. Summary Our analysis uncovers some fascinating insights across different smartphone tiers. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra takes the lead in the Flagship Tier with its unparalleled graphics performance and efficient battery usage. In the high-tier segment, the Google Pixel 8a strikes a perfect balance between performance and battery life. The OPPO A78 5G shines in the Mid Tier category with its outstanding battery efficiency, while the Xiaomi Redmi 13C is a standout in the Entry Tier for its efficient power consumption and decent gaming performance. These findings highlight the advancements in smartphone technology across various price ranges, offering gamers multiple options based on their specific needs and budget. Ready to elevate your gaming experience? Choose from one of these top gaming smartphones to find the perfect fit for your gaming needs. Remember to subscribe to our mailing list for more insights and reviews on the latest smartphone battery reviews! Written By: Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at Smart V iser . She plays a crucial role in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn .  At Viser Mark , we pride ourselves on our rigorous and meticulous testing protocols. Our tests are conducted in real-time conditions to provide accurate and reliable results. Simulating everyday usage scenarios and intensive gaming sessions ensures that our battery performance and consumption data reflect actual user experiences. This thorough approach lets you make well-informed decisions when choosing a smartphone, knowing that our evaluations are grounded in practical, real-world applications - Trust ViserMark for unbiased and comprehensive assessments of the latest smartphones.

In today's digital age, ensuring the well-being of children amidst the omnipresence of screens has become a paramount concern. The ubiquity of digital devices like smartphones, tablets, and computers has raised significant concerns about their impact on children's mental and physical health. France has embarked on a comprehensive initiative to safeguard young minds from the potential harms of excessive screen time. Current Government Actions to Avoid Excessive Screen Time for Children France has taken significant steps to protect children online by enacting Law No. 2022-300 in March 2022 . This law mandated installing parental control systems on all internet-enabled devices sold in France, to block access to harmful content. While awaiting new laws, France has already implemented several measures to curb screen time: Parental Control Defaults : From July 2024 onwards, every internet-enabled device sold in France must come with pre-installed parental controls. These controls, available at device activation, are a critical component of the 2022 legislation aimed at protecting children from inappropriate online content. School Regulations : Existing laws prohibit mobile phone use in nurseries, primary, and lower secondary schools during teaching activities, though enforcement varies. Social Media Age Verification : France requires social media platforms to verify users' ages and obtain parental consent for those under 15. This is part of a broader effort to establish a 'digital majority' age of 15 across Europe. Tech Industry Response The tech industry, particularly Google, has responded proactively to these regulatory changes. Google intends to leverage its Family Link parental controls and enhance its Digital Wellbeing app to comply with French regulations. These updates will allow parents to set PIN-protected time limits and control app usage, reinforcing the protective measures mandated by French law. Apple is enhancing its Screen Time feature, providing parents with more granular controls over app usage and downtime. Samsung has also committed to integrating comprehensive parental control systems in their devices sold in France, ensuring compliance with the new laws. Notably, the Chinese government's stricter regulations on screen time for minors have influenced global manufacturers to adopt more robust parental controls. In China, minors are restricted to a maximum of two hours per day online, with even stricter limits for younger children. These measures have prompted manufacturers to develop more advanced tools to help parents manage screen time effectively. Google Family Link Google's Family Link app is a cornerstone of the tech giant's approach to helping parents manage their children's digital use. The app allows parents to create Google accounts for their children under 13, which are monitored by the parents' accounts. Parents can manage apps, monitor screen time, and set device bedtime hours. This app is particularly crucial in France's new regulatory environment, offering a straightforward way for parents to comply with the law's requirements. Recommendations and Proposed Measures Recognising the pervasive influence of digital devices on young children, President Macron announced in January 2024 the formation of a task force comprising experts in addiction, education, neurology, psychology, and digital technology. Their mission was to assess the impact of screen time on children and recommend robust policy changes. By April, the task force had compiled a comprehensive report, which was leaked to various media outlets. This report underscored the "very clear consensus on the negative effects" of screen time on children. Key findings highlighted the correlation between excessive screen use and mental health issues such as anxiety and depression, especially in children with pre-existing vulnerabilities. The report also expressed concerns over children's exposure to inappropriate content. The task force's recommendations were wide-ranging and aimed at various aspects of children's digital interactions: Screen Access : No screen time for children under three years old and highly limited access between three to six years, focusing on educational content with adult supervision. Mobile Phones and Social Media : Restrict mobile phone use to devices without internet access until age 13, with a gradual introduction to ethical social media platforms like Mastodon or Bluesky at age 15, while avoiding apps like Instagram and TikTok until 18. Schools and Nurseries : Establish 'mobile-free' zones in secondary schools and experiment with 'smartphone-free' environments to assess impacts on school life and bullying. Predatory Practices : Combat addictive design features like infinite scrolling and automatic video launches that tech companies employ to capture children's attention. The Road Ahead President Macron's advocacy for a 'digital majority' age of 15 across Europe underscores the potential for these measures to influence broader European policy. By aligning national regulations with European standards, France hopes to create a safer digital environment for children continent-wide. As France implements these new regulations, the emphasis remains on continuous parental education and vigilance. Despite the robust legislative framework, the responsibility of guiding children through the digital landscape ultimately rests with parents and guardians. The government's online resources, such as the site jeprotegemonenfant.gouv.fr , provide valuable tools and information to assist parents in managing their children's screen time effectively. In conclusion, France's multi-faceted approach to protecting children from excessive screen time reflects a deep commitment to fostering a healthy digital upbringing. Through a combination of expert recommendations, legislative action, and industry collaboration, France is setting a precedent for safeguarding young minds in the digital age. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact: Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

As the world prepares for the upcoming Olympics, Samsung took centre stage on July 10th with its latest Galaxy Unpacked event, unveiling a suite of groundbreaking technological advancements. From the sleek Galaxy Ring to cutting-edge foldable phones and AI-powered wearables, this year's event highlighted Samsung's unwavering commitment to technological innovation. Here’s an in-depth look at all the announcements from this landmark event. Galaxy Ring: A Revolution in Wearable Tech The Galaxy Ring stole the spotlight, marking Samsung's bold entry into the smart ring market. The Galaxy Ring is a marvel of miniaturization and design. Crafted from lightweight titanium and available in gold, silver, and black, it combines durability with elegance, boasting water resistance up to 10ATM and an IP68 rating. Key Features: Health Monitoring:  Tracks sleep patterns, heart rate, respiratory rate, and menstrual cycles. Energy Score:  Uses AI to assess your readiness for the day based on sleep quality and activity levels. Seamless Integration:  Syncs with the Samsung Health app and other Galaxy devices for a cohesive user experience. Battery Life:  Lasts up to seven days on a single charge, with a quick charging case included. Price:  from 449,00€ Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Z Flip 6: The Pinnacle of Foldable Innovation Samsung's latest foldable phones, the Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Z Flip 6 have received thoughtful enhancements that refine their already impressive capabilities. Galaxy Z Fold 6: Design:  Flatter profile with squared corners, offering a more modern and durable look. Display:  Brighter screens with up to 2,600 nits, making it the brightest Galaxy Fold to date. Performance:  Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset with improved cooling through a larger vapour chamber. Battery:  Maintains a 4,400mAh battery with 25W fast charging. Durability:  Now with an IP48 rating for better protection against dust and water. AI Integration:  Features like Sketch to Image and enhanced Circle to Search capabilities for a smarter user experience. Price:  from 1.999,00€ Galaxy Z Flip 6: Camera:  Equipped with a 50MP wide sensor and a 12MP ultra-wide sensor, enhanced with AI for up to 10x zoom. Display: Interactive cover screen with more widgets and AI-generated smart replies. Performance:  Also powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, ensuring smooth performance. Durability:  The first Z Flip to feature a vapour chamber, enhancing thermal performance and longevity. Battery:  Powered by a 4,000mAh battery Price:  1.199,00€ Galaxy Watch Series: Precision Meets Durability Samsung introduced two new smartwatches designed to cater to different user needs, from everyday health monitoring to extreme outdoor activities. Galaxy Watch 7: Health Features:  Includes sleep apnea detection, heart rate monitoring, and an AGEs Index for metabolic health insights. Performance:  A new 3nm processor for faster performance and improved power efficiency. Price:  319,00 € Galaxy Watch Ultra: Design:  Rugged titanium frame with a 47mm case, built for extreme conditions. Features: Dual-frequency GPS, advanced heart rate monitoring, and an emergency siren. Battery Life:  Up to 100 hours in power-saving mode. Price:  699,00 € Galaxy Buds 3 and Buds 3 Pro: Sound Meets Intelligence The new Galaxy Buds 3 and Buds 3 Pro bring significant upgrades in both design and functionality. Design:  Stemmed design for better comfort and stability, echoing the design of Apple's AirPods. Audio Quality:  Features adaptive noise cancellation, dual amplifiers, and planar tweeters for superior sound. AI Features:  Real-time translation via the Interpreter app, facilitating communication in multiple languages. Price:  Galaxy Buds 3 from 179,00€ and Buds 3 Pro from 249,00€   Galaxy AI-Powered Enhancements: A New Era of Intelligence  Samsung’s Galaxy AI capabilities were a highlight, with features designed to make devices more intelligent and user-friendly. These AI enhancements are available on over 200 million devices, offering a seamless and intuitive user experience. Circle to Search:  This feature allows users to draw a circle around any object or text on the screen to initiate a search. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 takes this further by offering instant full-screen translation, making it incredibly useful for professionals and travellers. Circle to Learn:  Users can circle a problem or a question, such as a math problem, and receive step-by-step instructions on how to solve it. This feature promotes independent learning and problem-solving. Google Gemini Integration:  Deep integration with Google’s Gemini AI brings powerful new capabilities. Users can interact with videos in real-time, asking questions and getting answers directly from the content. Gemini can also appear as a side panel for multitasking, making it ideal for the large screens of foldable devices. Composer and Note Assist:  With Galaxy AI, composing emails or notes becomes effortless. Users can type in a simple prompt, and the AI will draft a complete, contextually relevant message. Note Assist also integrates with Voice Recorder to transcribe and summarise meetings, distinguishing between different speakers. Sketch to Image:  This feature allows users to transform rough sketches into detailed images. It’s perfect for creative professionals who want to visualize ideas quickly. The AI can also enhance photos with suggestions for improvements and artistic styles. AI in Photography:  The ProVisual engine in the Galaxy Z Flip 6 uses AI to optimise images, adjust lighting and enhance details like skin tones and facial features. The FlexCam’s Auto Zoom feature ensures the best framing for hands-free shots. Live Translate and Interpreter:  These features support real-time translation in multiple languages, making communication easier across language barriers. The Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Z Fold 6 can display translations on both main and cover screens for a more natural conversation flow. Personal Knowledge Graph:  Samsung is leveraging AI to create a personal knowledge graph for each user, learning from usage patterns to provide personalised recommendations and insights. This is integrated into the Galaxy AI dashboard, allowing users to control and customise their AI experience. Preorders and Availability  All the latest devices are now available for preorder and will start shipping on July 24th in the US and between July 17th and July 19th in Europe , depending on the country. Conclusion  The Galaxy Unpacked Summer 2024 event in Paris was a vibrant display of Samsung's unwavering dedication to technological innovation. The launch of the Galaxy Ring, Z Fold 6, Z Flip 6, and a suite of AI-enhanced devices underscored Samsung's strategic focus on blending intelligent features with sleek, robust hardware. Innovations such as the AI-driven Energy Score, real-time translation, and advanced health tracking are setting new industry benchmarks and transforming everyday user experiences. As Samsung continues to expand and refine its ecosystem, users can look forward to more seamless, intuitive, and personalised technology that significantly enhances daily life. This event solidified Samsung’s leadership in the foldable smartphone market and the wearable tech sector, heralding a future where technology is more interconnected and smarter than ever. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact: Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com Subscribe for the Latest Reviews     Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox. Subscribe for the Latest Reviews

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Logicom Luma Smartphone Review: A Compact and Efficient Smartphone Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199)  Ranking # 19 Video Review What do you need to know about the Logicome Luma? Quick Summary The Logicom Luma smartphone is an Entry Tier smartphone (€0-€199), designed to meet basic smartphone needs at an affordable price. Its compact and lightweight design makes it easy to handle and fits comfortably in pockets or small bags. The phone features a modest display and a plastic build, prioritising cost-effectiveness over premium materials and high-definition visuals. Equipped with a 1.6 GHz Octa-Core processor and minimal 4GB RAM, the Logicom Luma is best suited for light usage, such as texting, browsing, and social media. Its battery life typically lasts 1.5 days on a single charge with regular use. The camera setup is simple, making it suitable for casual photography but not for those seeking high-quality photos. The phone runs on a simplified version of Android 13, ensuring a user-friendly experience optimised for its hardware capabilities. The Logicom Luma is appealing due to its affordability, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious users or as a secondary mobile phone. Although it may lack advanced features and robust performance and charges slowly, it still provides essential smartphone functionality at a fraction of the cost of Flagship/Pro smartphones. Specification Overview  - Released Date: August 2023 Body: 160.5 x 70 x 9.4 mm, weight 229g Display : LCD IPS Colour 6.82 inch screen with 720 x 1640 pixels resolution Operating System : Android 13 Chipset : 1.6 GHz Octa-Core. Nano Sim, Nano Sim Memory : 128GB 4GB RAM Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n. Bluetooth: Yes. Micro-USB: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes Cameras : Main: 16 MP with LED flash, digital zoom, and autofocus. Also, includes a 5 MP wide-angle camera and a 2 MP camera. Video : 720 x 1080 px Battery : 5000 mAh Colour : Black Good Points Not-so-Good Points Compact and practical design Slow charging Good battery life - 1.5 days of use Limited on storage Affordable mobile phone Android 13 and 4G connectivity Guaranteed for 2 years No IP ratings Basic 3-camera set-up    Pricing and Availability These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here . Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer .   VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Logicom Luma  and comparative smartphones.   Logicom Luma ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review   is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Logicom Luma  battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumption Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels 1. Battery Performance What is the Logicom Luma Performance Score? The Logicom Luma achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of  31 out of 100. The graph below illustrates the battery performance scores of the Logicom Luma compared to other Entry Tier smartphones. The Logicom Luma scored 31 out of 100, significantly lower than the Entry Tier average score of 44. In a competitive landscape, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C leads with a score of 52, while the Xiaomi Redmi A3 scores 39. This indicates that the Logicom Luma's battery life is below average, suggesting it may require more frequent charging. This battery performance test result highlights where the Logicom Luma may need to improve for users prioritising overall battery performance when choosing their smartphone.   2. Battery Life How long will the Logicom Luma battery last? The  Logicom Luma test results indicate an awe-inspiring battery life of 1.5 days, or 39 hours , on a single charge. The two graphs compare the Logicom Luma 's battery life against the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Redmi 13C and the average test result of previously tested Entry Tier smartphones this year. They reveal interesting trends and insights. The Logicom Luma , with its 1.5 days of use, provides sufficient battery life for basic tasks. While it may not exceed the Entry Tier average of 2 days, it still holds its ground against competitors like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C , which outperforms with an impressive 2.5 days, and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 , which matches the Logicom Luma at 1.5 days. This indicates that this smartphone is a reliable choice with a balance between battery life and affordability. Translating days into hours, the Logicom Luma  lasts 39 hours, compared to the Entry Tier average of 51 hours. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C leads with 57 hours, followed by the Xiaomi Redmi A3  at 44 hours. This further highlights the Logicom Luma's lower battery performance than its competitors, suggesting it may require more frequent charging for heavy users. One notable highlight is the consistent performance of the Xiaomi Redmi 13C , which outperforms the Entry Tier average and comparative smartphones. This battery optimisation and efficiency could be a game-changer for users prioritising battery life in their purchase decisions. The Entry Tier average of 2 days or 51 hours sets a benchmark that most smartphones strive to meet. However, it's important to note that the Logicom Luma , with its 1.5 days of use, still provides a reliable battery life for basic tasks, making it a viable option for many potential buyers. 3.  NEW  Battery Consumption Logicom Luma battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The  Logicom Luma  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the  Logicom Luma  manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. Below is a graph that provides a detailed analysis of Logicom Luma's battery consumption across various daily tasks, comparing it to the average Entry Tier smartphone. The tasks include social media, outgoing calls, MMS, gaming, file transfer, camera usage, YouTube, email, media player, SMS, and web browsing. The current (mA) used by the Logicom Luma and the entry-tier average are displayed, highlighting how efficiently the Logicom Luma manages power in different scenarios. Social Media and Communication The Logicom Luma consumes more power for social media and outgoing calls than the average for Entry Tier phones. People who use social media frequently or make many calls may find that the battery drains faster. Younger users, especially teenagers and adults active on social media, may have issues with this higher power consumption. Media and Gaming In tasks such as gaming and media playback (YouTube and media player), the Logicom Luma again shows higher power consumption than the Entry Tier average. This is particularly relevant for avid gamers, as gaming is a power-intensive activity, and the higher consumption of Logicom Luma here suggests there may be better choices for them. Similarly, for media consumption, the higher power draw implies shorter usage times for watching videos or listening to music before recharging. This trend might influence users who rely heavily on their phones for entertainment to consider alternative mobile phones with better battery efficiency. Messaging and File Transfer This smartphone performs close to the average for Entry Tier phones in tasks such as MMS, file transfer, and SMS. However, it still shows a slightly higher current draw. This suggests that while the Logicom Luma is relatively efficient in handling these tasks, there is still room for improvement. Users who heavily engage in messaging and file transfers, such as business professionals or those who frequently communicate for work, may find the battery life adequate. Camera and Web Browsing The Logicom Luma consumes significantly more power when using the camera and browsing the web. This issue is particularly noticeable when using the camera, as it uses more energy. Users who frequently use the camera or browse the web may need to restrict their usage to prevent the battery from draining quickly. This trend could impact users who enjoy photography or rely heavily on their phones for web browsing, which may lead them to consider other more suitable mobile phones with better battery performance. Overall, the Logicom Luma generally consumes more power than the average Entry Tier phone across various tasks. This suggests that although it can handle everyday activities, other more power-efficient options are available. Users who value more extended battery life should consider this when considering the Logicom Luma. Also, the higher power consumption during tasks such as social media, gaming, and camera use highlights areas where the device could benefit from further optimisation to meet the needs of more demanding users.   Analysing Battery Efficiency: Logicom Luma vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 Smartphone Comparison A graph comparing the Logicom Luma (blue) and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 (orange) battery consumption across various daily tasks. The current (mA) used by both smartphones is displayed, highlighting the efficiency of each device in managing power during typical usage scenarios. A lower current draw indicates better battery efficiency. Social Media and Communication For social media and outgoing calls, the Logicom Luma  uses less battery to demonstrate higher power efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 . This suggests that users who frequently engage in social media or make calls might experience longer battery life with the Logicom Luma. This trend highlights Logicom Luma's advantage in handling communication tasks, making it appealing to younger users who are more active on social media. Media and Gaming In gaming and media playback (YouTube and media player) tasks, the Logicom Luma shows better power efficiency, consuming less current than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 . Gaming, a power-intensive activity, shows a significant difference in battery consumption, indicating that the Logicom Luma might be a better choice for avid gamers. Similarly, for media consumption, the lower power draw implies longer usage times for watching videos or listening to music before recharging, enhancing the Logicom Luma's appeal to entertainment-focused users. Messaging and File Transfer The Logicom Luma has been found to perform tasks like MMS, file transfer, and SMS more efficiently, showing a lower current draw compared to the Xiaomi Redmi A3 . This suggests that the Logicom Luma is well-optimised for these activities. Individuals who heavily rely on messaging and file transfers, such as business professionals or those who frequently communicate for work, may find the Logicom Luma's battery life more satisfactory. Camera and Web Browsing The Logicom Luma's power consumption for camera use and web browsing is lower than that of the Xiaomi Redmi A3 . Users who frequently use the camera or browse the web may enjoy a longer battery life, and this efficiency also makes the Logicom Luma a more appealing option for photography enthusiasts and heavy web users. In summary, while the Logicom Luma offers reasonable performance, its higher power efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 suggests that users might experience less frequent charging. This comparison underscores Logicom Luma's strength in battery efficiency, making it a strong competitor in the Entry Tier market. However, it is essential to note that the Logicom Luma has much longer charging times. According to the test results, the Logicom Luma requires 9.14 hours to charge fully, significantly longer than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at 2.38 hours and the Xiaomi Redmi 13C at 1.55 hours, highlighting a crucial area for improvement. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Logicom Luma vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C Smartphone Comparison The graph compares the battery consumption of the Logicom Luma (dark blue) and the Xiaomi Redmi 13C (light blue) during various daily tasks, showcasing their power efficiency. A lower current draw indicates better battery efficiency. Social Media and Communication The Logicom Luma demonstrates higher power efficiency for social media and outgoing calls than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This suggests that users who frequently engage in social media or make calls might experience longer battery life with the Logicom Luma . Media and Gaming In tasks such as gaming and media playback (YouTube and media player), the Logicom Luma shows mixed results. While it demonstrates better power efficiency for media playback, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C shows a lower battery consumption during gaming. This indicates that the Logicom Luma might be a better choice for users who consume a lot of video content. At the same time, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C could be preferable for gamers due to its lower power consumption during gaming sessions. Messaging and File Transfer Regarding messaging and file transfer, Logicom Luma is the clear winner regarding power efficiency. The Logicom Luma's battery life could be more satisfactory if you rely heavily on these activities. Camera and Web Browsing The Logicom Luma consumes less power when using the camera or browsing the web than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This suggests that people who often use the camera or browse the web may enjoy a longer battery life with the Logicom Luma . This efficiency makes it a more appealing choice for photography enthusiasts and heavy web users, showcasing its strength in managing power for these activities. The comparison shows that the Logicom Luma uses less power than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C for most tasks. This means the Logicom Luma is more power-efficient and will have a longer battery life. If you value battery longevity and efficiency, you might prefer the Logicom Luma , mainly if you frequently use social media, watch videos, or take photos. In summary, while the Logicom Luma provides reasonable performance, its higher power efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C suggests that users may need to charge it less often. This underscores the Logicom Luma's strength in battery efficiency, making it a strong contender in the Entry Tier market. However, it's important to note that the Logicom Luma takes much longer to charge, which could be a drawback for users who need quick recharges.   Analysing Battery Efficiency: Logicom Luma Smartphone Comparison The graph compares the power efficiency of the Logicom Luma with three other smartphones during various daily tasks. It shows each smartphone's current (mA), with a lower current draw indicating better battery efficiency. Social Media and Communication The Logicom Luma stands out with its superior power efficiency regarding social media usage. It uses less current than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C . While it's slightly higher than the Entry Tier average, it still offers a balance of efficiency comparable to the overall market standard. While the Logicom Luma demonstrates better efficiency for outgoing calls than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C, it's still less efficient than the entry-tier average. Media and Gaming The Logicom Luma consumes more power in gaming than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C , which is the most efficient in this category. However, it performs better than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the Entry Tier average. This suggests that while the Logicom Luma is a decent choice for casual gaming, heavy gamers might prefer the Xiaomi Redmi 13C for its superior efficiency. It's worth noting that a more power-efficient smartphone can provide longer gaming sessions without frequent charging, enhancing the overall gaming experience. Regarding media tasks like YouTube and media playback, the Logicom Luma is highly efficient. It consumes less power than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the Entry Tier average. While it's slightly more than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C, it is still a strong candidate for users who frequently watch videos or listen to music on their smartphones. Messaging and File Transfer The Logicom Luma shows better power efficiency in MMS and file transfer tasks than the Xiaomi smartphones and the Entry Tier average, making it suitable for users who rely heavily on messaging and file transfers, such as business professionals or those who frequently communicate for work . Camera and Web Browsing The Logicom Luma is more efficient than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and has an Entry Tier average for camera use, but it consumes slightly more power than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C . So, it is a good option for users who frequently use their phone's camera, though the Xiaomi Redmi 13C may offer slightly better efficiency. In web browsing, the Logicom Luma again shows higher efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Entry Tier average but less efficient than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This indicates that the Logicom Luma provides a balanced performance for web browsing, making it a viable choice for internet users. In summary, the Logicom Luma offers solid performance with good battery efficiency in most tasks, making it a strong competitor in the Entry Tier market. Its efficiency in critical areas like social media, messaging, and media playback highlights its strengths. However, the significantly longer charging time is a crucial factor that potential buyers should consider. Users prioritising quick recharges may find this aspect a consideration despite the Logicom Luma’s overall power efficiency.  4. Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Logicom Luma? The battery efficiency for the Logicom Luma was 1 leaf out of 5 . The graph illustrates the battery efficiency ratings of the Logicom Luma  compared to other Entry Tier smartphones. The efficiency is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 leaves, with 5 being the highest efficiency. The Logicom Luma received a rating of 1 leaf, indicating the lowest efficiency among the compared devices. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C achieved the highest efficiency with a rating of 1.5 leaves, followed by the Entry Tier average at 1.33 leaves and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at one leaf. This rating highlights the Logicom Luma 's comparatively lower power efficiency, suggesting that it consumes more battery power for the same tasks than its peers. Users of energy-efficient devices may find the Logicom Luma less appealing than its more efficient counterparts like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. 5. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Logicom Luma use? Annual energy consumption refers to the total energy a smartphone uses over a year. This measure helps understand the smartphone's long-term efficiency and environmental impact, indicating how much power it draws during typical usage scenarios. The  Logicom Luma has an annual energy consumption of  4.2 kWh. The graph attached illustrates the annual energy consumption of the Logicom Luma compared to similar Entry Tier smartphones, Energy consumption is measured in kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. With the highest annual energy consumption at 4.2 kWh, the Logicom Luma is significantly higher than the Entry Tier average of 3.2 kWh. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C demonstrates the lowest energy consumption at 2.9 kWh, followed by the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at 3.7 kWh. This indicates that the Logicom Luma is less energy-efficient and consumes more power annually than the others. This higher energy consumption reflects lower power efficiency, suggesting that users may incur higher electricity costs over the smartphone's lifespan. VERDICT: What is it like to Use? Based on various performance metrics and comparisons with other Entry Tier smartphones, the Logicom Luma presents a mixed bag of user experiences, balancing decent performance with notable drawbacks. It shows commendable power efficiency in daily tasks such as social media, messaging, and media playback. For users who frequently engage in social media, make outgoing calls, or watch videos, the Logicom Luma is efficient, consuming less current than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and performing on par with or better than the Entry Tier average. This makes it a good choice for younger users or those whose daily routines heavily involve these activities. However, the Logicom Luma falls short in areas requiring intensive power usage, such as gaming, where it consumes more power than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C , which is the most efficient. Therefore, heavy gamers might prefer the Xiaomi Redmi 13C for its superior efficiency. Additionally, the Logicom Luma demonstrates good efficiency in camera usage and web browsing, using less power than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the entry-tier average. However, it lags slightly behind the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This balance makes it a viable choice for users who frequently use their phone's camera or browse the web One of the significant drawbacks of the Logicom Luma is its overall battery efficiency and charging time. Scoring only 1 out of 5 in battery efficiency indicates lower power efficiency. Also, the Logicom Luma has a substantially longer charging time of 9.14 hours, much higher than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 (2.38 hours), Xiaomi Redmi 13C (1.55 hours), and the Entry Tier average (3.27 hours). This prolonged charging time can be a major inconvenience for users who need quick recharges and frequent device usage throughout the day. Although, it is suitable for everyday use, its drawbacks in battery efficiency and long charging times may deter potential buyers who prioritise quick recharges and lower energy costs. What's in the box? Logicom Luma Smartphone USB-C cable Charger User Manual 2-year guarantee Should I buy the Logicom Luma? When deciding whether to purchase the Logicom Luma , you must consider your priorities and how you use your mobile phone. Suppose you use your phone for everyday tasks such as social media, messaging, and media playback. In that case, it performs reasonably well regarding power efficiency and is suitable for younger users or those who engage in these activities regularly. However, if you are a heavy gamer or need quick recharges and lower energy consumption, the Logicom Luma's longer charging times and lower battery efficiency are significant drawbacks. Additionally, its higher annual energy consumption suggests higher long-term costs. Overall, while the Logicom Luma offers some strengths in efficiency for everyday tasks, its shortcomings in charging time and energy use make more efficient alternatives like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C more appealing for users with demanding needs. Extra Insights Q: Does the Logicom Luma support 5G? No, it does not Q: Does the Logicom Luma have dual-SIM capabilities? Yes it does Q: What storage and RAM variants support the Logicom Luma? 128 GB of internal storage and 4 GB RAM Q: Does the Logicom Luma have stereo speakers? No, it does not Q: Does the Logicom Luma have a microSD card slot? Yes it does Q: Is the Logicom Luma VoLTE enabled? Yes, it is. Even if the device supports VoLTE users need to have this enabled in their SIMs to work and some networks may not have VoLTE services enabled Pricing and Availability These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here . VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Logicom is a well-established French company that has been at the forefront of consumer electronics since its inception in 1993. Over the years, the company has diversified its product offerings, expanding from its origins in residential telephony to include a wide range of innovative technology products. This focuses on smartphones, tablets, connected devices, and more. With a commitment to making cutting-edge technology accessible to everyone, Logicom has built a reputation for providing high-quality, stylish, and affordable electronic devices. With a quarter-century of experience and a dedication to innovation, Logicom remains a trusted name in the consumer electronics industry.  Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Behind the Battery Life: A Deep Dive into the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Mid Tier Ranking # 15 Video Review This review will explain the   ViserMark Labels  in under 5 minutes What you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G smartphone. Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a feature-packed smartphone emphasising performance and multimedia capabilities. It is well-rounded, with aesthetic appeal and functional features, making it an attractive choice in the Mid Tier (€200-€499). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a sleek and modern smartphone with flat panels and a flat frame, giving it a distinctive appearance. The glossy plastic back highlights two small camera rings, and the matte finish on the flat plastic frame contributes to the device's look and grip. The 6.67-inch AMOLED screen is protected by Gorilla Glass 3, which offers good scratch resistance. The thin bezels on the display enhance the visual appeal, making it an ideal smartphone for multimedia use. This smartphone has an energy-efficient chipset and a 5000mAh battery to deliver over 2 days of battery life and impressive performance in daily user activities like calling, web browsing, and video streaming. More details will be shared later in the review. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G supports 33W fast charging, which can recharge 29% of the battery in just 15 minutes and achieve a full charge in 72 minutes (as stated by Xiaomi). The Redmi Note 13 4G features a hybrid stereo speaker system, with the earpiece also functioning as a second speaker. This design enhances sound balance and overall audio quality. It runs MIUI 14 on top of Android 13, delivering a positive and customisable user experience. An update to HyperOS is also expected in the future. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G also supports dual-band Wi-Fi AC, Bluetooth 5.1 with LE, NFC, and an IR blaster. It has a USB Type-C port with USB 2.0 connectivity, offering a maximum data transfer rate of 480 Mbps. When it comes to the camera, the main 108MP camera is complemented by an 8MP ultrawide and a 2MP macro camera. The front features a 16MP selfie camera. The primary camera delivers decent quality, with natural colours and adequate dynamic range. While the Snapdragon 685 chipset limits the device's video capabilities, it can still capture 1080p video at 30fps. The video quality is generally satisfactory, focusing on preserving natural colours. This smartphone is available in Midnight Black, Mint Green, Ice Blue, and Ocean Sunset. Also, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G has an IP54 rating, which provides dust and splash protection and offers improved resilience over the previous Redmi Note 12 series. In summary, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a well-constructed smartphone that balances style and substance. Its design is visually appealing and practical, with a comfortable grip and various colour options to suit different tastes. The display and audio quality are notable highlights, enhancing the multimedia experience. The battery life is robust, with fast charging a nd convenience added . While the camera setup may not be groundbreaking, it performs satisfactorily for most users. The software experience is smooth and customisable, and the range of connectivity options ensures versatility. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a strong contender in the Mid Tier (€200-€499). It offers comprehensive features and appeals to a wide range of users. Specification Overview - Released Date: January 2024 Body : 162.3 x 75.6 x 8 mm or 6.39 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches. Weight 188.5g. Display : 6.67" AMOLED, 120Hz, 1800 nits (peak), 1080 x 2400 px resolution, 20:9 ratio, 395ppi. Protection : Corning Gorilla 3. IP54 dust/water rated. Operating System : Android 13, MIUI 14 Chipset : Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)   Memory : 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM ; UFS 2.2 Connectivity : microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) Wi-Fi 802.11 . Bluetooth: 5.1, A2DP, LE Front Camera : 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF, 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) Video:   Front camera: 1080p@30fps , 1080p@30fps. Back camera : 1080p@30fps Battery : 5000 mAh, 33W wired Colours : Midnight Black, Mint Green, Ice Blue, Ocean Sunset Others: N FC: Yes. Infrared Port: YES. Loudspeaker: Yes. Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass. Good Points ​Not So Good Points Full retail package, including a charger and case Lack of HDR video playback support, a feature commonly found in Xiaomi smartphones IP68-rated with Gorilla Glass 3 for protection and enhanced durability Noticeable performance issues with UI slowdowns, particularly in graphically intensive tasks Stereo speakers enhance the audio experience Fast and efficient charging solution Strong performance from the main and selfie cameras ​ Best Prices: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G   (We may earn a small commission when you purchase through links in our articles) French Visitors take a look: Site officiel de Xiaomi France Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark   offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer.    VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse smartphone test results and view them. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  and comparative smartphones. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G ViserMark Labels Battery Performance review by  ViserMark  is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. With its advanced features, including a robust camera system and long battery life, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a comprehensive package for users. It represents a significant step up from its predecessor, marking it a valuable option for those seeking an exceptional smartphone experience. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G's  battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumption   Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels Battery Performance Here's the Battery Performance score for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  has undergone testing to evaluate its battery performance, with the results presented using ViserMark labels. At the same time, it offers extremely good battery performance and ranks in #2 place i n the 2024 smartphone ranking table . The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra remains the overall leader in battery performance; so far this year, Battery performance is a crucial factor influencing user choices. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and one of its predecessors, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ , share the same score of 48/100, indicating similar overall battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy A54 , while featuring a lower score, is not far behind, suggesting only a slight underperformance in comparison. The chart below displays three smartphones' ViserMark battery performance scores for a clearer comparison. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ score 48/100 in battery performance. This similarity indicates comparable overall efficiency and longevity, although they might differ in other hardware specifications. The Samsung Galaxy A54 , with a slightly lower score of 42/100, indicates a marginal deficit in battery performance, possibly due to differences in software optimisation or hardware power consumption. For users reading the review, these insights imply that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G offers a reliable battery life, which is on par with other high-performing smartphones in the Mid-Tier. The balance between battery capacity, hardware efficiency, and software optimisation is crucial in determining a smartphone's overall battery performance. While the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G does not significantly outshine its competitors in this area, it maintains a good standard that meets general user expectations for Mid Tier smartphones. Battery Life Let's see the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G test results One of the most vital aspects to consider when choosing a smartphone is battery life. This feature becomes even more critical for users who depend on their smartphones for extended periods without access to charging. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G demonstrates exceptional battery performance with 51 hours of usage. This surpasses the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ , 45 hours, and the Samsung Galaxy A54 , 39 hours. Despite all three devices possessing the same 5000mAh battery capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G efficiently utilises its battery resources, offering extended usage. The chart below shows all three comparable smartphones. Thanks to its extended battery life, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G offers several benefits to users. Firstly, there are less frequent charging requirements, making the phone more suitable for extended use. Long-lasting performance is reliable throughout the day, and the lower energy consumption of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G translates to savings in power costs over time, making it a cost-effective choice in the long run. This smartphone is an appealing choice for users who prioritise battery life. Be the first to know about new reviews, updates, news and events.   Battery Consumption The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the device's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. This chart directly compares the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  against the average battery consumption values for Mid Tier smartphones tested in 2023. It will determine how the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G performs regarding  battery consumption for daily activities. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . Reviewing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 's battery consumption reveals several key insights. As you can see, the smartphone's battery usage during social media activities is notably higher than the Mid Tier average, indicating that busy social media users may need to recharge more frequently. Similarly, activities like outgoing calls and sending MMS also draw more power from the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G than typical for Mid Tier smartphones, which might affect users who rely heavily on voice calls and messaging services throughout the day. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shows that battery consumption during gaming sessions is quite efficient, suggesting that it could be a favourable option for mobile gamers looking for sustained play without the frequent need to recharge. Also, when it comes to camera use, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G exhibits higher battery usage than the average, likely reflecting the energy demand of processing high-resolution images or videos. Regarding web browsing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G demonstrates efficient power management, suggesting prolonged browsing sessions without substantial battery drain, a plus for users who surf the web extensively. For activities related to media consumption, such as watching YouTube videos or using a media player, the smartphone's battery consumption aligns closely with the Mid Tier average, implying a standard experience for users engaging in these activities. Lastly, the slightly above-average battery consumption for productivity tasks like email and SMS is unlikely to pose a significant issue for typical users. In summary, while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shows increased battery consumption for certain tasks such as social media, calling, and camera usage, it balances this with more efficient energy usage in gaming and web browsing. These insights into the smartphone's battery performance can help users align their expectations with their usage patterns. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ Smartphone Comparison This comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+  examines how these two smartphones consume battery power during typical daily activities. The chart below visually represents the strengths and weaknesses of each smartphone. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . In assessing the battery consumption of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ , the analysis reveals various aspects of their performance that will interest potential buyers. The test results indicate that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G tends to consume more power when engaging with social media platforms. This suggests that users who frequently browse feeds, post, or engage in social networking may find the need for more frequent charging sessions. Additionally, this smartphone draws more battery during voice calls and sending multimedia messages, a point to consider for busy communicators. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shines in the gaming department, demonstrating greater energy efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ . Gamers looking for extended playtime without the hassle of recharging would appreciate this advantage. Also, it's camera usage and data transfers use more battery. For video and music enthusiasts, the battery performance of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G sits close to the middle ground when consuming media content. With productivity tasks such as managing emails and text messaging, both smartphones exhibit similar battery usage, with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G edging slightly higher in consumption. Lastly, with web browsing, there is a marginally higher battery use in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G . This is something for heavy web users to remember, as they may notice a faster decline in battery levels. While the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G uses more power in several areas, it also offers notable advantages, particularly for gaming. Users must balance these findings with their needs and usage patterns to determine which device best suits their lifestyle. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A54 Smartphone Comparison Users often look beyond basic specifications to understand how smartphones perform in everyday scenarios—this comparison is with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G ViserMark Labels Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A54  focuses on battery consumption. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . Their battery consumption is in focus in a head-to-head battery performance comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A54 . The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G draws more power during social media activities than the Samsung Galaxy A54 . This higher consumption suggests frequent social media users may reach for the charger more often with the Xiaomi smartphone. Also, the Samsung Galaxy A54 exhibits greater battery drain during outgoing calls. Gaming presents a contrasting picture, with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G showing better energy management and drawing less power than the Samsung Galaxy A54 . This makes the Xiaomi smartphone more suitable for gamers looking for longer uninterrupted playtime. Both smartphones use considerable power for camera use, which is battery-intensive. However, the Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the others slightly in terms of efficiency. Both smartphones are on par regarding media consumption, such as streaming YouTube videos or using a media player. This implies that users could expect similar battery longevity from either device for entertainment. Interestingly, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G consumes more battery for email tasks. Lastly, the web browsing experience sees the Redmi Note 13 4G using slightly more power than the Galaxy A54. For those who spend considerable time surfing the web, this difference, although small, could be a deciding factor in favour of the Samsung Galaxy A54 . The choice between the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A54 may come down to individual usage patterns. The Xiaomi smartphone seems well-suited for gamers and those who engage in fewer but longer calls. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy A54 could be the one for those who are more active in photography and seek more efficient email and web browsing sessions. Each smartphone has its strengths, and understanding these can help consumers make an informed decision that aligns with their personal smartphone use. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Overall Smartphone Comparison We compare the battery consumption of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G , Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ , and   Samsung Galaxy A54  during various common activities, contrasting their battery consumption with the average for Flagship/Pro-tier smartphones. This comparison chart below aims to offer a clear understanding of which smartphone would be the best fit for your lifestyle and usage habits.   Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . Starting with social media, a known battery-intensive activity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shows considerable consumption, a factor social network enthusiasts should consider. However, it redeems itself in gaming performance, where it excels by managing power more effectively than its counterparts, offering an advantage to gamers. The chart shows the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G as average in managing battery life for typical communication tasks like calls and multimedia messaging. It neither underperforms nor stands out, suggesting balanced energy usage for such essential functions. The camera is not the most power-efficient but maintains a reasonable middle ground, suggesting that photography sessions won't be too demanding on the battery. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G aligns with the competition by streaming YouTube videos and using media players. Interestingly, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shows slightly higher battery consumption for productivity-oriented activities like managing emails and browsing the web. This is crucial for those using their phone as a professional tool, as it may require more frequent charging. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G, while exhibiting higher energy consumption in specific areas, maintains a satisfactory performance that can cater to different user needs. Gamers, in particular, might find the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G appealing, whereas heavy social media users and professional users might need to evaluate their options based on their specific requirements. The ViserMark analysis of these detailed battery performance test results helps users make an informed decision that aligns with their usage patterns and expectations from their smartphone's battery life. Power Efficiency Here are the test results for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G This ViserMark label is especially vital for users who prioritise a smartphone that can efficiently manage its power consumption while performing various tasks. This relatively low-efficiency score shows that while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  has a long battery life, it may not utilise its battery capacity as effectively as possible. This could impact users looking for the most energy-efficient smartphones. All three smartphones have relatively low battery efficiency. This rating reflects potential areas for improvement, such as optimising software for better energy consumption or using more efficient components. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 's test results in terms of battery efficiency present just one out of a potential five leaves. This rating aligns with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ and Samsung Galaxy A54 , indicating a low trend of battery efficiency within the Mid Tier. With concerns about energy consumption and its environmental impact, smartphone users may pause. This low-efficiency rating also suggests that while smartphones may offer satisfactory battery life in terms of hours of usage, they do so at a greater energy cost over time, which could translate to more frequent charges and higher electricity usage. These insights underscore an opportunity for future smartphones to improve in this area, providing the same or extended battery life with lower energy consumption. For the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G , the decision will likely hinge on whether the phone's other features and price point outweigh the modest battery efficiency. The phone may still appeal to those who prioritise performance and display quality over outright efficiency, particularly if the energy consumption aligns with their usage patterns and charging habits. Annual Energy Consumption The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 's annual energy consumpti on benefits energy-conscious users . Our ViserMark testing has determined that this smartphone consumes 3.2 kWh per annum. This reflects the energy consumption throughout a year of typical usage, providing an estimate of the overall energy impact for the user. Today, people are more environmentally conscious, and the energy of smartphones is important for many users. Knowing the annual energy consumption of a smartphone offers insights into its long-term efficiency and environmental impact. The chart below shows the annual energy consumption of three comparable smartphones. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G , which has been noted to have an annual energy consumption of 3.2, indicates that it offers a favourable energy profile among its contemporaries. This efficiency in energy consumption could translate to not only potential cost savings for users but also a reduced environmental impact over the lifespan of the device. Compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ and the Samsung Galaxy A54 , which have higher annual energy consumptions of 3.6 and 4.16, respectively, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G presents a more energy-conscious choice. This is particularly appealing in today's eco-aware markets, where energy efficiency is increasingly valued alongside performance. In summary, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a solid choice for smartphone users who prioritize energy efficiency. Also of Interest:   Smartphone Ranking Table.     ViserMark VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G delivers a reliable user experience, particularly in battery life, which is robust enough to handle various tasks without frequent charges. Its gaming performance is commendable, making it a suitable choice for mobile gaming users. However, heavy social media users might find the battery life somewhat limiting. The smartphone's camera and data transfer capabilities balance power consumption and functionality. For video streaming and music playback, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G performs on par with expectations, ensuring enjoyable media consumption. It's a capable smartphone that balances performance and battery longevity, except for more intensive tasks that could lead to quicker battery drain. Should I buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G? The decision to purchase the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G hinges on individual usage patterns and priorities. If battery life, especially during gaming, and a moderate consumption rate for web browsing and media consumption are important to you, this phone is certainly worth considering. It is well-suited for those who value long play sessions or extensive web surfing. However, the device may not be the most optimal choice for users who are highly active on social media, make frequent calls, or are involved in heavy photography due to its higher battery consumption in these areas. Potential buyers should weigh these considerations carefully to determine whether the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G aligns with their lifestyle and usage needs. Best Prices: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G   (We may earn a small commission when you purchase through links in our articles) French Visitors take a look: Site officiel de Xiaomi France VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Xiaomi   was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes in high quality. Technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. It is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint worldwide to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China, and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil. Be the first to know about new reviews, updates, news and events.   Written By: Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at Smart V iser . She plays a crucial role in developing communication and marketing strategies for the company. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn .   Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. We link to relevant and other trusted affiliate partners like Xiaomi FR.  If a ViserMark user clicks an affiliate link and purchases a smartphone from any of these affiliate sites within a set amount of time, ViserMark receives a small commission.  You   can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: HIGH TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4492 Google Pixel 8a Smartphone Review: Efficiency and Excellence Combined Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: High Tier (€500-€699) Ranking #2 Video Review What do you need to know about the Google Pixel 8a? Quick Summary The Google Pixel 8a is a standout High Tier (€500-€699) smartphone, offering exceptional value with its robust features and impressive performance. It boasts a vibrant 6.1-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and vivid visuals. Powered by Google's custom Tensor G3 chip and 8GB of RAM, the Pixel 8a delivers reliable performance for everyday tasks and multitasking. With 128GB/256GB of internal storage, users have ample space for their apps and media, though there's no option for expandable storage. One of the Pixel 8a's highlights is its camera system, featuring a 64MP primary wide camera and a 13MP ultra-wide camera coupled with Google's renowned AI image processing capabilities. Thanks to Night Sight mode, this setup produces stunning photos with excellent dynamic range and detail, even in low-light conditions. The front-facing 13MP camera also delivers high-quality selfies, making it a solid choice for photography enthusiasts. Battery life is a strong suit of the Pixel 8a, with its 4,492mAh battery comfortably lasting 2 full days of use or 48 hours. The Google Pixel 8a supports 18-watt wired charging and 7.5W Qi wireless charging ensuring quick top-ups when needed, a feature that enhances its convenience. Running on the latest version of Android, the Pixel 8a provides a clean, bloatware-free experience with timely updates and security patches, guaranteed for 7 years. With its high-quality display, excellent camera performance, and long-lasting battery, the Google Pixel 8a is an attractive option for those seeking a reliable, feature-rich smartphone at an affordable price. Specification Overview - Released Date: May 2024 Body: 152.1 x 72.7 x 8.49mm. Weight 188g. Display: 6.1 inches OLED, HDR, with 1080 x 2440 pixels resolution, 120Hz rate Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 3 and P67 dust/water resistant Operating System: Android 14 Chipset: Google Tensor G3 (4 nm). Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) Memory: 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM - no card slot. Nano-SIM and eSIM Connectivity: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent). NFC: Yes. Radio No. Loudspeaker: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: No. Rear Camera: Main: 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide). 13 MP, f/2.2 (ultrawide).Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, panorama, Best Take Front Camera: 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Video: Front camera: 1080p@30fps, Rear camera: 1080p@30/60/120/240fps Battery: 4492 mAh, 18-watt wired charging and 7.5W Qi wireless charging Colour: Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Aloe Pricing Google Pixel 8a These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here. Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer. VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Google Pixel 8a and comparative smartphones. Google Pixel 8a ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Google Pixel 8a battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption Battery Efficiency Annual Energy Consumption Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels 1. Battery Performance What is the Google Pixel 8a Performance Score? Battery performance is the key to a smartphone's endurance and efficiency. A good battery performance, like 45/100 for the Google Pixel 8a, ensures that it can handle extensive usage without frequent recharges, providing you with the reliability and convenience you need. The Google Pixel 8a achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 45 out of 100. How does the Google Pixel 8a compare to High Tier smartphones? The Google Pixel 8a's Battery Performance Score of 45 is a testament to its superior power management and efficiency. Its balanced consumption across various activities, such as social media, gaming, and web browsing, showcases its optimised performance, ensuring users can rely on their phones throughout the day without frequent recharges. When directly compared to the Google Pixel 7 and the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, the Google Pixel 8a's battery life and efficiency becomes evident. The Google Pixel 7, with its 4,355mAh battery, had a lower Battery Performance Score of 34. In contrast, the Pixel 8a, with its 4,492mAh battery, provides a noticeable improvement in Battery Performance Score. Similarly, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, despite having a slightly larger 4,500mAh battery, delivers a Battery Performance Score of 36, making the Google Pixel 8a a superior choice for those prioritising battery longevity and efficiency. Also of Interest: Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Review: Battery Life Stamina Meets Sophistication 2. Battery Life How long will the Google Pixel 8a battery last? Battery life refers to a smartphone's duration on a single charge, measured in days and hours. It indicates how long the smartphone can sustain various activities, such as calling, browsing, gaming, and streaming, before recharging The Google Pixel 8a test results indicate an awe-inspiring battery life of 2 days, or 48 hours, on a single charge. How does the Google Pixel 8a compare to High Tier smartphones? The Google Pixel 8a excels in battery life among High Tier smartphones, offering an impressive 48 hours of use on a single charge. This superior performance is significantly better than the Google Pixel 7, which provides only 35 hours of use. The Pixel 8a's efficient power management and robust 4,492mAh battery enable users to enjoy extended usage periods, making it an excellent choice for those who need a reliable smartphone for long days or travel without frequent recharging. Compared to the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, the Google Pixel 8a showcases significant advantages. Despite the Galaxy S23 FE's slightly larger 4,500mAh battery, it only manages 32 hours of battery life. This contrast underscores the Pixel 8a's superior power efficiency. While the Galaxy S23 FE boasts a faster charging time, its shorter overall battery life may require more frequent recharging. The Google Pixel 8a's longer battery life and balanced charging time make it a more reliable option. 3. NEW Battery Consumption Google Pixel 8a battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The Google Pixel 8a battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio, provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Google Pixel 8a manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. The test results comparing the Google Pixel 8a with the average High Tier (€500-€699) smartphone provide a detailed look at the most compelling aspects of its battery capabilities across various everyday activities. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Google Pixel 8a vs the Average High Tier Smartphone Comparison The chart illustrates the Google Pixel 8a's battery performance compared to the average high-tier smartphone across various common activities, measured in current (mA). It sets itself apart with its superior battery efficiency, a feature that is highlighted against the average High Tier smartphone. One example is its performance during social media usage, where it consumes a lower figure than the High Tier average, ensuring longer usage in social media applications, a clear advantage for potential buyers. In everyday activities such as outgoing calls and MMS the Google Pixel 8a outperforms the High Tier average, ensuring extended battery life. This is particularly beneficial for users who rely heavily on these types of communications and need their smartphones to last throughout the day. Gaming, a typically power-intensive activity, also sees the Pixel 8a performing efficiently with consumption lower than the High Tier average, so gamers can enjoy longer sessions without recharging as often. The Google Pixel 8a continues to showcase lower power consumption than the High Tier average for tasks like file transfers, camera use, YouTube streaming, and email. Specifically, its power usage for file transfers and camera operations is notably less, suggesting optimised hardware and software integration that conserves battery life. The battery performance of the Google Pixel 8a stands out due to its consistent power efficiency across various activities. It is reliable for smartphone users and has robust battery life and minimal power drain. The test results show the Pixel 8a's capability to handle daily tasks with less frequent charging, enhancing the user experience and providing substantial value in the High Tier smartphone market. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Google Pixel 8a vs Google Pixel 7 Smartphone Comparison The chart visually compares the battery performance between the Google Pixel 8a and its predecessor series, the Google Pixel 7 across various activities, measured in current (mA). In social media usage, the Google Pixel 7 outshines the Google Pixel 8a, indicating that the Pixel 7 is notably more power-efficient, allowing for extended use. Also, it shows better efficiency for outgoing calls and is more efficient in MMS usage. These differences highlight that the Google Pixel 7 conserves battery better during standard communication tasks. In gaming, a high power-consuming activity, the Google Pixel 8a demonstrates its strength, indicating a slightly better efficiency in gaming activities. Also, in media-related activities such as YouTube and media playback, the Google Pixel 8a is more efficient in media playback but less efficient in YouTube streaming. Summing up, the Google Pixel 8a does show some areas of improved efficiency, particularly in gaming, camera use, and web browsing. However, the Google Pixel 7 consistently demonstrates better battery efficiency across user activities. This suggests the Pixel 7 could offer a more balanced and power-efficient experience for users who value longer battery life across various tasks, although not as feature-rich as the latest Google Pixel 8a. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Google Pixel 8a vs Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Smartphone Comparison When comparing the battery efficiency of the Google Pixel 8a to the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, the Pixel 8a generally demonstrates better performance. The Google Pixel 8a is more efficient for social media usage than the Samsung Galaxy S23FE. This trend continues across most activities, indicating that the Google Pixel 8a manages power consumption more effectively, resulting in extended usage times and fewer recharges. For outgoing calls and MMS, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE again demonstrates lacking efficiency compared to the Pixel 8a which highlights the superior power management during communication tasks. In gaming, a typically high power-consuming activity, the Google Pixel 8a has a lower consumption so gamers can enjoy longer sessions without recharging as often. For tasks such as file transfers, YouTube streaming, SMS and web browsing, the Pixel 8a shows better efficiency. In email and media playback activities, the Google Pixel 8a also maintains an advantage compared to the Galaxy S23 FE. This further emphasises the Pixel 8a's ability to conserve battery life during routine tasks, communications and internet use. Notably, the camera usage shows the Google Pixel 8a consumes more battery energy, indicating that while it is generally more efficient, there are specific tasks where the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE might perform better. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Google Pixel 8a Smartphone Comparison The chart provides a comprehensive comparison of the battery performance of the Google Pixel 8a, Google Pixel 7, and Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and the High Tier average across various activities, measured in current (mA). The Google Pixel 8a's battery performance is a standout, demonstrating strong efficiency compared to the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and, in many cases, even outperforming the Google Pixel 7 and the High Tier average. It shows higher power consumption than the Pixel 7 and the High Tier average in specific tasks but remains more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE in certain activities. However, in other activities, the Google Pixel 8a's battery life is notably extended, making it a top choice for gaming, media playback, SMS, web browsing, email usage, and YouTube streaming. Overall, the Google Pixel 8a is a solid choice for a smartphone with balanced power management and efficient battery performance across various tasks. 4. Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Google Pixel 8a? Leading the comparison with a battery efficiency score of 1.5 is the Google Pixel 8a. This score indicates that the Pixel 8a manages its power consumption exceptionally well, providing more usage time. The battery efficiency for the Google Pixel 8a was 1.5 leaf out of 5. How does the Google Pixel 8a compare to HighTier smartphones? Overall, the Google Pixel 8a is the most power-efficient among the compared smartphones. Its power efficiency score of 1.5 highlights its ability to manage power consumption effectively, offering extended battery life and reducing the need for frequent recharges. Also of Interest: Motorola Moto G24 Smartphone Review: Ultimate Power and Efficiency for Everyday Use 5. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Google Pixel 8a use? Annual energy consumption refers to the total energy a smartphone uses over a year. This measure helps understand the smartphone's long-term efficiency and environmental impact, indicating how much power it draws during typical usage scenarios. The Google Pixel 8a has an annual energy consumption of 3 kWh. How does the Google Pixel 8a compare to High Tier smartphones? The Google Pixel 8a demonstrates a balanced annual energy consumption compared to other High Tier smartphones. With an annual energy consumption of 3 kWh, the Pixel 8a is more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, which has a higher yearly energy consumption of 4.5 kWh. This significant difference makes the Google Pixel 8a a more environmentally friendly and cost-effective option in the long run. Overall, this smartphone sets a high standard for energy efficiency, with lower annual energy consumption than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and Google Pixel 7, and the High Tier average. This makes the Google Pixel 8a an excellent choice for users seeking a smartphone that combines performance with sustainability. VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Google Pixel 8a delivers an impressive user experience through efficient power management and robust performance. Its 6.1-inch OLED display offers a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring vibrant visuals and smooth scrolling for browsing, video streaming, and gaming activities. The smartphone is powered by Google's custom Tensor G3 chip paired with 8GB of RAM, guaranteeing seamless multitasking and responsiveness for everyday tasks. While the 128GB of internal storage provides ample space for apps, photos, and media, it does not support expandable storage options. One standout feature of the Google Pixel 8a is its remarkable battery efficiency. With a 4,492mAh battery, it offers up to 2 days of usage or 48 hours on a single charge, surpassing many competitors. Additionally, the Google Pixel 8a excels in every day user activities demonstrating optimised power consumption during social media, gaming, and media playback. The Google Pixel 8a provides a well-rounded, efficient, and enjoyable user experience. Its high-quality display, powerful performance, and exceptional battery life make it an ideal choice for those seeking a reliable and high-performing smartphone. Additionally, the smartphone benefits from Google's latest software updates and security patches, further enhancing its appeal and ensuring users can access the latest Google AI features and protections. What's in the box? Google Pixel 8a Smartphone USB-C-to-C cable Quick Switch Adapter SIM Tool User Manual Should I buy the Google Pixel 8a? If you prioritise long battery life, excellent camera quality, and a clean, bloatware-free Android experience, the Google Pixel 8a is a strong contender in the High Tier smartphone market. Its balance of features and performance makes it a worthwhile investment for those seeking a dependable and powerful smartphone. Extra Insights Pricing Google Pixel 8a These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Google is a multinational American technology company specialising in Internet-related services and products. It was founded in September 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin while they were PhD students at Stanford University in California. The company has its headquarters in Mountain View, California. Google’s mission statement is "to organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful". The company offers various products and services, including search engines, online advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware. Google is one of the most widely known and used search engines on the internet today. Google has a range of smartphones called Pixel phones. The company has released several models of Pixel phones over the years, including the Pixel 6A, Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro, Pixel Fold and the Google Pixel 7a. The latest models are the Google Pixel 8, Pixel 8 Pro and Google Pixel 8a. The phones run on the Android operating system and are known for their high-quality cameras. Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser. She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn. Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.

Samsung Galaxy A51 - Highly Recommended! Smartphone Battery Performance: Ranking #64 Placed No. 15 Smartphone for Battery Performance within the Mid Tier Ranking Table Battery Performance Testing Report and Review – March 2021 Product The Galaxy A51 comes as the evolution of the A50 model, and it is a Samsung update for a mid-range price smartphone that already succeeded in 2019 with the A50. Most changes in the A51 are related to updated hardware and a modern design, and the A51 model has 4/6 GB RAM memory and 64/128 ROM memory and the possibility to extend it up to 500 GB. Release Date: January 2021 Product Features and Specification Design: Plastic, refined and stylish design. Camera: 32 MP Front camera, f/2.2 26mm (wide),1/2.8”, 0,8µm Quad 48 MP rear camera, f/2.0, 26 mm(wide) ½.0", 0.8µm, PDAF; 12 MP rear camera, f/2.2, 123" (Ultrawide); 5 MP rear camera, f/2.4 (macro); 5 MP rear camera, f/2.2 depth. Video capture: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps Battery: 4000 mAh (Fast charging 15W) Display: 6.5" Size: 158.5 x 73.6 x 7.9 mm Weight: 172g Memory: 64/128GB. RAM: 4/6GB Chipset: Exynos 9611 (10nm). Android: Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.0 Software Version: QP1A.190711.020.A515FXXU4CUA1 Battery Performance Introduction The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a Mid-tier smartphone in the ViserMark ranking (smartphones priced between 200 and 500 euros). It is equipped with the Exynos 9611 Chipset and has a battery capacity of 4000 mAh battery with a 15W Fast Charge option. The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. From the Samsung Galaxy A51 test results, we have given this Smartphone a ViserMark score of 39. The Battery Performance Label, being lower than 50, indicates that it is one of the lower-performing smartphones and has been ranked in 64th place of the Battery Performance Smartphones as tested by SmartViser. Testing Results BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use The Samsung Galaxy A51 reached 37 hours of autonomy through the ViserMark test protocol with a 60 Hz refreshing rate, obtaining a Battery Life score of 1.5 Days of Use. A Mid Tier smartphone's average Day of Use ViserMark score is “2” Days. This score places the Samsung Galaxy A51 Smartphone lower than the ViserMark Mid Tier ranking. CHARGING TIME - Hours and Minutes The charging time to 100% was 2 hours and 14 minutes. This smartphone has a built-in fast charging feature included. The average Charging Time is 1:36 for a Smartphone within the ViserMark Mid Tier. The Samsung Galaxy A51 ranks 47th in the Battery Charging Times for Smartphones. Test Graphics Our testing is based on smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to Power Off. When testing Smartphones, the testing protocol includes everyday life activities, for instance, Calls, Web, Video and Music streaming, Gaming, Social networks, Picture and Video capture and standby. All testing is performed under strictly controlled test conditions, expected in a defined order and timeline. Figure 1. ViserMark Battery Life Test at 60 Hz refresh rate Samsung Galaxy A51 Test Graphics Several power-efficient processors within today's smartphones can cope with the growing number of new smartphone applications and support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves" and reflects a rating between 1 being the least and 5 being the most power-efficient. Samsung Galaxy A51 achieved an overall Power Efficiency Score of 1 Best Smartphone for Power Efficiency: Ranking #71 Conclusion The battery autonomy of the Samsung Galaxy A51 is offering 1.5 days based on the ViserMark Test Protocol. The Samsung Galaxy A51's performance is far from expectations. Other devices in the same price range with a similar battery capacity performed better. An example is the Reno 4Z 5G with a performance score of 44 and the Sony L4 with a score of 45 (with a 3580 mAh battery capacity). ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency. They are powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer. The automation test includes a variety of user actions, from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. Samsung Galaxy A15 Camera Rating Details See More Reviews Background The Samsung Group is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the vital decisive aspects. Please review the comprehensive ViserMark database of test results. ​ Not only is ViserMark the first label that measures battery performance, translating mAh into direct battery life scores, but it is also a precious marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users. ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone. Our test results and reviews are to you first! Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer looking to improve your Smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you.

Smartphones have become essential to modern life due to their versatility and usefulness. Smartphones have transformed how we live and work, making our lives more connected, productive, and convenient. Some of the main reasons are: Communication: Smartphones enable us to stay connected with others through phone calls, text messages, and social media apps. They have made communication more accessible and convenient than ever before. Information: Smartphones provide instant access to vast amounts of information through the internet. They allow us to search for answers quickly, look up news and current events, and access educational resources. Productivity: Smartphones are powerful tools for productivity, allowing us to manage our schedules, send emails, and work on documents on the go. They can also provide access to productivity apps like to-do lists, calendars, and project management tools. Entertainment: Smartphones offer a range of entertainment options, from streaming video and music to playing games and reading books. They have become a primary source of entertainment for many people. Navigation: Smartphones have made getting around easier with built-in GPS and map apps. They can provide turn-by-turn directions and real-time traffic updates, making navigating unfamiliar areas easier. It is no surprise that we want the best battery performance on our smartphone devices to allow us to continue using them without interruptions for everything important to us. Smartphone Battery Technology There are several different smartphone battery technologies in use today. The most common types of batteries used in smartphones are lithium-ion and lithium-polymer batteries. Lithium-ion batteries are popular due to their high energy density, relatively low self-discharge rate, and long lifespan. These batteries use a liquid electrolyte to transfer ions between the anode and cathode and are generally safe when properly manufactured and used. Overall, the trend in smartphone battery technology has been towards higher energy density, longer lifespan, and faster charging times. Manufacturers are continually researching and developing new materials and techniques to improve battery performance and address concerns around safety and environmental impact. How ViserMark Test Battery Life At ViserMark, we perform a variety of testing to ensure that the battery is functioning properly and to determine how long it can last under different usage scenarios. Thanks to the test automation capabilities of viSer, we can test battery life using the smartphone under normal usage conditions, monitoring how long the battery lasts. This is done by setting up the phone to simulate typical usages (Day of Use), such as web browsing, video playback, voice calls, and other activities. Battery Life Testing Process 1) Device Calibration Each device that arrives in our lab is strictly calibrated to ensure that all devices are tested with the same conditions, ensuring repeatability and consistency. The calibration includes fixing parameters like brightness levels, audio volume, and connectivity setups like Bluetooth, NFC, GPS etc). All devices are fully charged before starting the testing. 2) Environment Strict Conditions As with the device calibrations at ViserMark lab, we follow a very strict protocol on external environmental conditions. All testing takes place on live network conditions to ensure we test closer to end users. Performing testing in the lab will never give a true picture of a device's battery life. We test on good network conditions. The network can greatly impact the smartphone battery life, and weak network conditions normally use more power from the device, impacting the battery life. We also ensure the room ventilation in the lab is at a certain level, as this can impact the battery life performance. 3) Testing Once the device and the environment are calibrated and checked, it's time to perform the testing. We use the test automation viSer to ensure all the testing is performed the same without any human error. viSer runs the Day Of Use scenario. The Day Of Use scenario includes several usages as the end user performs. Our team of experts created the scenario with input from several surveys on how people use their devices regularly and feedback from media and Mobile Network operators. During the testing viSer monitors all activities and any battery abnormal behaviour. If the battery percentage drops rapidly or the device shuts down unexpectedly, this could indicate a problem with the battery. We also monitor the temperature to ensure there are no overheating issues. All results from the testing are available in the SmartViser Analytics Studio, which allows in-depth analysis of the results and behaviours. Once the results review is completed and the scores are finalised, we can prepare the ViserMark labels and in-depth reviews. You can check the latest reviews here If you are a smartphone manufacturer or media reviewer testing phones, you can join the SmartViser viSer Free Trial Programme. Susie Siouti is the Chief Commercial Officer for SmartViser, helping organisations in the Telecommunications industry offer the superior end-user quality of experience and service by introducing innovative test automation products. Susie has 20 years of experience in the Telecoms industry and has led teams worldwide, mainly in Testing and Compliance. Holding an MBA from Henley Business School brings diverse skills and expertise, including business acumen, strategic thinking, financial management, sales and marketing expertise, leadership, and innovation. Susie joined SmartViser in 2016 and is part of the internal steering committee responsible for developing and implementing the company's commercial strategy and encouraging a customer-centric culture. The main mission is to help organizations to create value by offering better quality products and services by improving operational efficiency and innovation. Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Simply add your email below to sign-up for our monthly newsletter providing you with all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark have tried and tested. No pressure, you can unsubscribe at any time, and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Xiaomi Redmi A2 - A Smartphone Balancing Power and Affordability Smartphone Battery Performance: Score: 44/100 Overall Battery Performance: Ranking #80 Based on Price Entry Tier: Ranking: #8 All you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi A2 smartphone. Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi A2 is affordable. This price point does come with some compromises, particularly regarding performance and camera quality. However, its compact design, satisfactory display quality, and robust battery make it a worthy consideration for those seeking a basic, low-cost smartphone. While it doesn't boast the latest features or peak performance, it offers value for its price segment. Xiaomi Redmi A2 Overview What is it like to Use? Dimensioned at 164.9 x 76.75 x 9.09 mm and weighing 192 grams, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 is ergonomically designed for everyday use. Its compactness ensures it easily slides into pockets or purses. Constructed with a plastic chassis, a textured finish ensures an enhanced grip. Protection-wise, the matte surface is a relief against fingerprints, but without rugged features, one might consider an external protective case. How does it Perform? The Xiaomi Redmi A2 is equipped with a MediaTek Helio G36 octa-core processor, which, while suitable for basic tasks and navigation, may not be considered exceptional in terms of performance compared to higher-end smartphones. The MediaTek Helio G36 processor, combined with 2GB or 3GB of RAM, may lead to occasional stutters and slow loading times when running more complex apps. If you're looking for a device that can smoothly handle demanding tasks, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 might not be the best choice. What's in the box? Mobile Phone USB-C charging cable SIM eject tool Warranty Card User Guide Smartphone Battery Performance Score and Battery Performance Results ViserMark brings you a Smartphone Performance Score based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer. You can view our results shown as ViserMark Labels for every smartphone in our comprehensive database, as verified by SmartViser. For additional information, please refer to the detailed smartphone rankings available here. The Xiaomi Redmi A2 Battery Performance review by ViserMark is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. ViserMark Labels for the Xiaomi Redmi A2 are detailed here. Learn more about the ViserMark Labels. Smartphone Battery Performance Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Efficiency Annual Energy Consumption Watch the Video Review Battery Performance What is the Xiaomi Redmi A2 Battery Performance Score? The results of our testing showed the Xiaomi A2 scored 44 out of 100 as a smartphone Battery Performance score for a ViserMark Entry Tier (€0-€199) smartphone. How does the Xiaomi Redmi A2 compare to other Entry Tier smartphones? Battery performance is pivotal when choosing a smartphone, particularly in the Entry Tier (€0-€199) segment. Through the ViserMark Battery Performance scores, we gain an objective measure to compare these devices. Let’s see how these smartphones, the OPPO A57, Honor X7 and the Xiaomi Redmi A2, stack up against each other to help potential buyers make informed decisions. Learn more about the ViserMark Labels. From the chart above, this makes for an exciting and closely matched smartphone review. Let's take an in-depth view of our battery performance results for these smartphones. With a 44 out of 100 battery performance score, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 confidently positions itself in the higher part of the Entry Tier. Its MediaTek Helio G36 octa-core processor, coupled with 2GB or 3GB of RAM, is suitable for everyday tasks. Its 6.52-inch IPS LCD display and 720 x 1600 pixels resolution ensure that users get a decent visual experience, whether browsing or catching up on their favourite shows. With a focus on longevity, Xiaomi uses a plastic chassis for the Xiaomi Redmi A2, ensuring it can withstand the occasional bump. The textured back is not just a design choice but a functional one, ensuring the phone remains securely in hand and reduces the risk of accidental drops. Although not the most powerful smartphone, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 does ensure efficient power management. This makes it a viable choice for users who want a balance between performance and power longevity. All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser. Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels. TOP TEN SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Find out more Battery Life How long will the Xiaomi Redmi A2 battery last? A smartphone's performance and battery life determine its reliability and user satisfaction. An average battery performance lasting 2 days with 54 hours between charges for the Xiaomi Redmi A2. Learn more about the ViserMark Labels. How does the Xiaomi Redmi A2 compare to other Entry Tier smartphones? Battery life is one of the paramount considerations for many smartphone users. While the capacity of a battery (measured in mAh) indicates how long a smartphone might last, real-world usage and performance can vary due to factors like software optimisation, hardware efficiency, and user behaviour. With the battery capacity all equal at 5000mAh for Honor X7, the OPPO A57 and Xiaomi Redmi A2 smartphones, it's intriguing to see how real-world performance pans out. Very closely trailing the OPPO A57, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 impresses with a battery life extending up to 2 days, equivalent to 54 hours. This smartphone, though only an hour short of the OPPO A57, offers robust battery performance. Its MediaTek Helio G36 processor plays a role in power management, ensuring users get the most out of every charge. All smartphones undergo rigorous testing and verification by SmartViser. ViserMark provides a review for each smartphone, translating battery performance test results into ViserMark Labels. TOP TEN SMARTPHONE BATTERY LIFE Find out more Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Xiaomi Redmi A2? How does the XImaoi Redmi A2 compare to other Entry Tier smartphones? Understanding a smartphone's annual energy consumption is as crucial as knowing its features. With sustainability being a driving factor, discerning consumers look beyond mere battery life and delve into how efficiently their smartphones consume energy annually. Here, we've compared the annual battery consumption of three trending entry-tier smartphones: the OPPO A57, Honor X7, and Xiaomi Redmi A2. This smartphone has a 6.52-inch IPS LCD display and brings a vision of performance without compromise. Its efficiency score of 1.5 out of 5 leaves suggests a balance between providing vibrant visuals and conserving battery power. Also, the Xiaomi Redmi A2's architecture is built around optimising energy use. This ensures that even during demanding tasks, the smartphone manages its battery resources efficiently, providing users with a lasting experience. All three smartphones offer varying battery efficiency. The Xiaomi Redmi A2 and OPPO A57 lead the pack with scores of 1.5, while the Honor X7 trails slightly despite its visual prowess. For consumers, this provides a clear picture of what to expect from their smartphones regarding efficient battery utilisation, aiding them in making an informed choice. This page provides a comprehensive comparison of battery efficiency tests we've conducted. More smartphone Battery Efficiency ratings in the Smartphone Ranking Table. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Xiaomi Redmi A2 use? How does the Xiaomi Redmi A2 compare to other Entry Tier smartphones? Understanding a device's annual energy consumption is as crucial as knowing its features. With sustainability being a driving factor, discerning consumers look beyond mere battery life and delve into how efficiently their smartphones consume energy annually. Here, we've compared the annual battery consumption of three trending entry-tier smartphones: OPPO A57, Honor X7, and Xiaomi Redmi A2. This smartphone, boasting its impressive 6.52-inch IPS LCD display, doesn't just offer bright visuals but also does so in an energy-conscious manner. A consumption rate of 3kWh annually means that users can enjoy top-tier performance without excessively draining energy resources. Behind the scenes, the Xiaomi Redmi A2's internal mechanics and software optimisations reduce unnecessary power drain, ensuring the smartphone balances utility and energy conservation. More smartphone Annual Energy Consumption ratings in the Smartphone Ranking Table. VERDICT: Should I buy the Xiaomi Redmi A2? The Xiaomi Redmi A2 is an extremely affordable smartphone. However, this affordability has some trade-offs, especially in performance and camera capabilities. While it's suitable for basic daily tasks, it may not meet the expectations of users looking for a more powerful or feature-rich smartphone. It has a compact, lightweight design, decent display quality, and a long-lasting battery. If you're looking for a no-frills, low-cost smartphone for basic tasks, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 could be worth considering, but it's not a device that will impress with cutting-edge features or high-end performance. The OPPO A57 is known for its excellent battery performance, scoring 53 out of 100 and offering longevity and 33W super-fast charging. The IPS LCD display produces vibrant colours, even at lower resolutions, and comes with OPPO AI Eye Comfort and blue light reduction technology, making it ideal for extended screen time. The design is a perfect blend of glass and polycarbonate, offering both functionality and aesthetics. Its lightweight and ergonomic design ensures a comfortable grip for extended use, making it an excellent choice for budget-conscious consumers. Compared to the Xiaomi Redmi A2, the OPPO A57 has a slightly longer battery life, lasting up to 55 hours or 2 days on a single charge. Users can use the phone all day without needing to charge it. This slight advantage could be due to its power consumption management and demonstrates OPPO's commitment to producing efficient yet powerful devices. The Honor X7 is an impressive smartphone in the Entry Tier, boasting an elongated 18:9 bezel-less display. It scored 41 out of 100 for battery performance. With 5000 mAh, the Honor X7 falls within the standard battery capacity for smartphones in the Entry Tier range. A fully charged battery provides 1.5 days of use. However, it scored 1 out of 5 for power efficiency. However, it has some limitations due to its Entry Tier classification, such as occasional slowness and heating issues during extended use. It is not dustproof or water-resistant, lacks NFC functionality, and is not 5G compatible. Nevertheless, the Honor X7 is a good choice for those on a tight budget looking to replace their smartphone. Watch the Video Review Check out our video review of the Xiaomi Redmi A2 smartphone. Our battery performance overview will explain the ViserMark Labels in under 10 minutes so you can decide about your next smartphone purchase. Product Features and Specification Release Date March 2023 Extra Insights VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. See More Reviews Background Xiaomi was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes in high quality. Technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. It is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint worldwide to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China, and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil. Latest Reviews ViserMark wants to help you find and compare the right smartphone, ensuring it fits your requirements and budget. Our smartphone battery performance reviews and helpful ratings have all the necessary battery information. Smartphone Performance Scores can also provide a reference point for performance benchmarks and smartphone comparisons. Our test results and reviews are to you first! Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer looking to improve your Smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you.

Mobile Networks have evolved significantly over the past few decades, with each new generation offering faster speeds, lower latency, and new capabilities. An overview of the evolution of Mobile Networks from 1G to 5G: 1G (First Generation): 1G, or the first generation of Mobile Networks, was introduced in the 1980s. It primarily supported analogue voice communication and was quite basic compared to modern standards. Users could make voice calls, but no data services or internet connectivity were available on these networks. 2G (Second Generation): 2G was introduced in the early 1990s and significantly improved over 1G. It introduced digital voice communication, which improved call quality and allowed for some basic data services like text messaging (SMS). However, internet access was still limited. 3G (Third Generation): 3G emerged in the early 2000s and brought substantial improvements in mobile communications. It enabled faster data transfer rates, making accessing the internet on mobile devices possible. With 3G, users could browse the web, send emails, and use more advanced data-based applications. 4G (Fourth Generation): 4G, rolled out in the late 2000s, represented a major leap in mobile technology. It provided even faster data speeds and lower latency, making streaming high-definition videos, online gaming, and video conferencing smoother and more reliable. 5G (Fifth Generation): 5G is the latest and most advanced mobile network technology, first introduced in the 2010s. It offers significantly faster data transfer rates, reduced latency, and increased network capacity. 5G enables revolutionary technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and ultra-high-definition video streaming. It is designed to handle many connected devices and support advanced applications that require near-instantaneous data transmission. In summary, the evolution of Mobile Networks from 1G to 5G has seen vast improvements in data speed, call quality, and the ability to support a wide range of data-intensive applications and services, transforming how we communicate and use mobile devices. Many countries are accelerating their 5G infrastructure investment, and we have recently heard President Biden talk about the infrastructure plan and his goals to invest heavily in the expansion of 5G. How have speeds changed from 2G to 5G, and how does that affect how you use your smartphones? Regarding data transfer speeds, 5G is faster than 4G, which is faster than 3G, and so on. Each generation of Mobile Networks has seen significant improvements in data speeds, leading to faster and more efficient communication. Here's a general comparison of the data transfer speeds for each generation: 2G: Data speeds were typically in the range of kilobits per second (Kbps). It provided basic data services like text messaging (SMS) and limited internet access. 3G: Data speeds improved to the range of megabits per second (Mbps). It allowed for better internet browsing, email access, and basic video streaming. 4G: Data speeds increased further to the range of tens of megabits per second (Mbps) to hundreds of megabits per second (Mbps). This enabled seamless HD video streaming, online gaming, and faster downloads/uploads. 5G: Data speeds in 5G Networks can range from hundreds of megabits per second (Mbps) to multiple gigabits per second (Gbps). 5G's ultra-fast speeds enable applications like 8K video streaming, real-time virtual and augmented reality experiences, and super-fast downloads of large files. Learn more on 5G: https://www.qualcomm.com/5g/what-is-5g It's important to note that while 5G is much faster than its predecessors, its performance can vary based on factors like network infrastructure, location, and the number of connected devices. Nonetheless, 5G represents a significant advancement in mobile network technology, promising to revolutionise various industries and enhance user experiences. The above diagram shows examples of the difference in downloading the same film on different technologies. We have selected for this example downloading ET the movie, which is a 1-hour and 45 minutes film. Using 3G will take an astonishing 12 hours, like a flight from London, UK, to Singapore. On 4G, it will be long enough to make a cup of tea and prepare the snacks, but 5G will take as long as a blink of an eye. The download speeds are based on optimum network conditions, and results may vary depending on the areas and networks. What is next in Mobile Networks evolution? 6G (Sixth Generation) The sixth generation of Mobile Networks, also known as 6G, is still in development but is expected to be introduced in the early 2030s. 6G Networks are expected to offer data rates of up to 1 terabit per second (Tbps), which is 100 times faster than 5G networks. 6G Networks are also expected to be more reliable and secure than 5G Networks. They are expected to be used for many applications, including ultra-high-definition video streaming, virtual reality, augmented reality, and self-driving cars. The evolution of Mobile Networks has been driven by the demand for faster data speeds and more reliable connectivity. As new applications and technologies emerge, the demand for even faster and more reliable networks will continue to grow. Conclusion Here are some of the key conclusions from the evolution of Mobile Networks from 1G to 5G: Mobile Networks have become increasingly faster, more reliable, and more capable. The demand for mobile data has grown exponentially, driving the need for faster and more reliable networks. New technologies, such as 5G and 6G, are on their way to revolutionise how we use Mobile Networks. The future of Mobile Networks is bright, with the potential to enable a wide range of new applications and services. Susie Siouti is the Chief Commercial Officer for SmartViser, helping organisations in the Telecommunications industry offer superior end-user quality of experience and service by introducing innovative test automation products. Susie has 20 years of experience in the Telecoms industry and, in that time, has led teams across the world, mainly in Testing and Compliance. Holding an MBA from Henley Business School brings diverse skills and expertise, including business acumen, strategic thinking, financial management, sales and marketing expertise, leadership, and innovation. Susie joined SmartViser in 2016 and is part of the internal steering committee responsible for developing and implementing the company's commercial strategy and encouraging a customer-centric culture. The main mission is to help organizations to create value by offering better quality products and services by improving operational efficiency and innovation. Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Simply add your email below to sign-up for our monthly newsletter providing you with all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark have tried and tested. No pressure, you can unsubscribe at any time, and we promise not to fill up your inbox.